E
elvisman
Guest
Joen wrote the Bread of Life discourse under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.Of course now you’re resorting to misrepresenting my position (unless this was an honest oversight on your part). I embrace, affirm, and defend real presence. We simply disagree on what real presence means. I do not view the Eucharist as a mere representation of Christ or solely a rememberance (though it is also a rememberance).
Moreover, John didn’t author the bread of life discourse, he simply recorded the words of Christ. You mention Ignatius, who wrote one sentence on the Eucharist (affirming real presence, or that it is the flesh of our Lord). However, he never elaborated beyond that (as I said before).
Anyway … tell me what does it mean to you to say that the bread retains the appearance of bread, but in substance it is the flesh of Christ? Is this a spiritual or physical reality? In other words if we did an MRI on a real die hard 100% faithful Catholic while he or she was ingesting the Eucharist … would we see the bread transform into flesh or would it continue to retain the “appearance” of bread (yet in substance be flesh)? If it’s the latter (which I suspect it is) then how can you say it’s an objective physical reality? Isn’t that a bizarre proposition.
Isn’t it more correct to say real presence means a pneumatic presence?
Reformed theology has also historically taught that when the Holy Communion is received, not only the spirit, but also the true body and blood of Jesus Christ (hence “real”) are received through the Spirit, but these are only received by those partakers who eat worthily (i.e., repentantly) with faith. (link here)
The above statement represents the doctrine of my denomination (Presbyterian), which I embrace whole heartedly.
It is said that John’s Gospel was written toward the end of the 1st century and is very different from the previous 3 “synoptic” gospels for a reason.
John’s Gospel is very heavy on the Sacraments because of the heretical views of Gnostics and other people of his day who were twisting the word of God to their own destruction (2 Pet. 3:16).
Jogn 6:60-66:
***Then many of his disciples who were listening said, “This saying is hard; who can accept it?” ******Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this, he said to them, "Does this shock you? ***
***What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? ***
**It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life. **
**But there are some of you who do not believe." Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe and the one who would betray him. **
***And he said, “For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by my Father.” ***
As a result of this, many of his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.
The belief in what Jesus was saying must be revealed to those who truly follow and obey him.
The belief in Transubstantiation and the Real Presence is why so many of the Early christians were put to death. they accused of being “cannibals” by the Jews and the Romans during those first few hundred years because of their ardent belief in these doctrines.
It has apparently not been reveraled to you yet. Pray that you might be less prideful and that God may reveal this truth to you.