I never said they actually filled in the gaps, I only asked if it was a possibility. Actually, the traditional belief in her immediate ascension into heaven without death is not entirely true. Many early Christians attest to her natural death. Some say she was buried in Jerusalem such as Epiphanius of Salamis, Gregory of Tours, Isidore of Seville, Saint Modest, Sophronius of Jerusalem, German of Constantinople, Andrew of Crete, John of Damascus. Others such as 3rd century Book of John about the Dormition of Mary and 4th century Treatise about the passing of the Blessed Virgin Mary claim her tomb was in Gethsemane, just outside of Jerusalem with a church built by Patriarch Juvenal. Others state it was in Ephesus. Case point: she died a natural death.
If she truly ascended in Heaven without death as Catholics believe, then why did she have a tomb?
The only reason why they believed she was resurrected was because her tomb was supposedly empty on the third day just like Christ. Of course, everything is exactly like Christ. In fact, they even have a widely celebrated feast called the Dormition of Mary celebrated by Eastern Christians to this day stating that she died first and then resurrected.
***
St. John of Damascus (P.G., I, 96) thus* formulates*** the tradition of the Church of Jerusalem:
Code:
*St. Juvenal, Bishop of Jerusalem, at the Council of Chalcedon (451), made known to the Emperor Marcian and Pulcheria, who wished to possess the body of the Mother of God, that Mary died in the presence of all the Apostles, but that her tomb, when opened, upon the request of St. Thomas, was found empty; wherefrom the Apostles **concluded ***that the body was taken up to heaven.
*** Catholic Encycolopedia
At the Council of Chalcedon in 451, when bishops from throughout the Mediterranean world gathered in Constantinople, Emperor Marcian asked the Patriarch of Jerusalem to bring the relics of Mary to Constantinople to be enshrined in the capitol. The patriarch explained to the emperor that there were no relics of Mary in Jerusalem, that
"Mary had died in the presence of the apostles; but her tomb, when opened later . . . was found empty and so the apostles
concluded that the body was taken up into heaven."
Like I mentioned earlier, there were no eyewitnesses of her assumption and it was based on speculation and not direct observation.
In other cases, both Jesus and Elijah who were taken into heaven certainly had numerous eyewitnesses.
With that in mind, how does one know all the details that upon Mary’s ascension she was glorious crowned and all the angels were rejoicing? Also, please site any official Catholic documents stating that her ascension (without death) was apostolic tradition. I would love to know your (name removed by moderator)ut with sources.