
Let the glory of the Lord, rise among us!!! Whew, man prodigal, you write a lot! Where do I begin; wel, let’s see, I(speaking only for myself; 1beleevr), I do now, and have always confessed my sins to God, in the presence of, well, Jesus(imagine that!). I have never accused anyone, catholic or otherwise, of not confessing sin to God, or Jesus; just asking,"why do you need the priest! Once, a short time ago, I was confessing a long overdue sin to God! And because I am secure enough in my salvation, and my manhood, I can admit, that I cried like a baby

And there was no one else around; just me God, and Jesus! Whom one confesses to, is a matter of choice, not obligation! And please don’t lie to me, and say that this was one of Jesus’s commands! I don’t remember ever saying that I believed in sola scriptura, but when someone says something, that doesn’t sound quite right, you say,"Where does it say that?"And you said that confession is also called reconciliation

So when God, through Christ’s finished work on the Cross, reconciled us back to Himself, He was confessing? Let me see if I understand the crux of this discussion; if by some weird chance, I were to convert to catholicism, even though I didn’t believe that the pope was the vicar of Christ, and then I said,“I don’t feel like going to confession!” Then what? God made man in His own image, for R-E-L-A-T-I-O-N-S-H-I-P.
Good morning 1beleevr,
If there was no need for a priest, why did Christ choose and ordain the Apostles?
I haven’t lied to you. Christ’s instructions to the Apostles were commands. Those He gave authority too, teach us those commands. Christ told them, “whatsoever you bind upon earth will be bound in heaven, and whatsoever you loose on earth would be loosed in heaven.” Christ told them, " those sins you forgive will be forgiven, those sins you retain will be retained." These were Apostles, ordained by Him. Peter held the keys to the kingdom of heaven.
The Bible clearly shows there was an Apostolic succession and gives examples of a hierarchy. The Old Testament tells us to let another take his place and Peter stood up and called for a replacement for Judas Iscariot. Were all Apostles? Are all prophets? Are all doctors? And he gave some apostles, and some prophets, and other some evangelists, and other some pastors and doctors. With any hierarchy, there is one commanded to lead. Would Christ have built a Church, setup a hierarchy, and done any less than man would have done?
Show me where the hierarchy was non-existant or self authortive before the Protestant reformation. Show me any writings from self imposed Churches, that you would agree with, from our early history, before the 1500s. God did not let generation after generation follow a false Church and then all of a sudden say, we’ve got to put a correct Church on the earth. Christ promised to be with us until the consummation of the world. There were no gaps in that promise.
Just as men assigned the term “Trinity”, men assigned names for leaders within the Church, based on their knowledge of scriptures and the oral tradition. Christ taught with oral tradition. The Apostles taught with oral tradition. Just as God had the power to preserve His written word, He has the power to preserve the spoken word in His Church.
Mat 23:1 Then Jesus spoke to the multitudes and to his disciples,
Mat 23:2 Saying: The scribes and the Pharisees have sitten on the chair of Moses.
Mat 23:3 All things therefore whatsoever they shall say to you, observe and do: but according to their works do ye not. For they say, and do not.
The letters and epistles that make up the New Testament were written, to individual Churches scattered across Asia, 30 to 70 years after the death and resurrection of Christ. Then came a time those writings had to be brought together, along with forgeries and other writings, so the canon of the New Testament could be defined. The Council of Laodicea, c. 360, produced a list of books similar to today’s canon. This was one of the Church’s earliest decisions on a canon. Pope Damasus, 366-384, in his Decree, listed the books of today’s canon.
The faith and the Church grew without a New Testament, as you and I know it today. Many things were accepted through oral tradition before that, since they didn’t have the luxury to reference and cross reference. Instances in the New Testament that tell us of conversions, whether a single person, a household, or multitudes, came from the spoken word. When it speaks of “scriptures”, it speaks of the Old Testament, which had no doctrines of the new convenant specified. People accepted the truth based on faith. They didn’t legalize their faith by dissecting every doctrine they had received, whether by word or epistle. They fit their theology to the oral tradition and scriptures. I cannot see the same for the Protestant reformation.
The eternal Father did create man in His image. A Fatherly God, with a Fatherly relationship. When He walked the earth, He taught that relationship to His Apostles. Apostolic succession is the same as a family succession. Everything is passed on.
Reconcilation is confession. Below is a list of the seven sacraments of the Catholic Church.
Baptism
Eucharist
Reconciliation
Confirmation
Marriage
Holy Orders
Anointing of the Sick
I’m sorry if you find that confusing. This is based on scriptures and confirmed by Church writings throughout history. As I said, show me any writings, throughout history that you would agree with, showing doctrines closer to your Church.