S
Simeon_Hovey
Guest
Once again ekklhsian is the word used in Ephesians and it is a sectarian call to meeting, ekklhsian is a verb.
Simeon
Simeon
Even the devil recognizes Christ Jesus.Oh really. Fascinating.
Per her testimony, she made a personal decision for Jesus Christ per John 3:16.
And. that is demonic.
Interesting.
So, do you think her testimony is “demonic” too? Fascinating.Even the devil recognizes Christ Jesus.
How many times must a person make a “decision for Christ”? One, two, five, ten? That would have already occurred during a solemn rite in the Catholic Church. So, this is like being baptized numerous times until it “feels right” Would that not be an affront to God? Now, THAT is the interesting part.Oh really. Fascinating. Per her testimony, she made a personal decision for Jesus Christ per John 3:16.
The evil one is pleased by all such occurrences, as it further divides and weakens Christ’s Body. Yes.And. that is demonic.
Such a person either knowingly walked away from Christ, or failed to believe in His true presence in the Eucharist. It is quite possible that such a person was not properly instructed in the faith. That is the major problem in the Church today. It is tragic and needs immediate correction. No matter the reason, it is a weakening of Christ’s Sacred Body.You know, maybe you just don’t understand what happened to (believer). That is possible.
Demons are real. Demons exist. We all fight them. So, where do you think they are, and what are they doing? Their purpose is to gain souls for their master. Luring souls away from the fulness of Christ, to a lesser form of worship or to agnosticism or atheism is what they do. To a Catholic, or another who actually knows Catholicism, this is exactly what has occurred here.Now I don’t think that all Catholics have not made a personal decision for Jesus Christ, but just maybe you have not. Because if you had, I just don’t understand why you would be ascribing this to demons (read the gospels and see how Jesus reacted when other folks did it in his day).
Could you tie this in to the doctrine of sola scriptura, please?Once again ekklhsian is the word used in Ephesians and it is a sectarian call to meeting, ekklhsian is a verb.
Simeon
Hmm. I just read the testimony again.I will respond in a general manner regarding a person who is in this same situation, to comply with forum rules.How many times must a person make a “decision for Christ”? One, two, five, ten? That would have already occurred during a solemn rite in the Catholic Church. So, this is like being baptized numerous times until it “feels right” Would that not be an affront to God? Now, THAT is the interesting part.The evil one is pleased by all such occurrences, as it further divides and weakens Christ’s Body. Yes.Such a person either knowingly walked away from Christ, or failed to believe in His true presence in the Eucharist. It is quite possible that such a person was not properly instructed in the faith. That is the major problem in the Church today. It is tragic and needs immediate correction. No matter the reason, it is a weakening of Christ’s Sacred Body.Demons are real. Demons exist. We all fight them. So, where do you think they are, and what are they doing? Their purpose is to gain souls for their master. Luring souls away from the fulness of Christ, to a lesser form of worship or to agnosticism or atheism is what they do. To a Catholic, or another who actually knows Catholicism, this is exactly what has occurred here.
To one who has seen miracles occur in the presence of Christ in the Eucharist, walking away from Him is indeed a tragedy and is sorrowfully close to what happened in John 6:66. I do not expect you to understand any of this, but to those who have come to believe in Jesus Christ in the Holy Eucharist, rejection of Him is rejection of the true Gospel in favor of a lessor one which is acceptable in merely human terms.
Jesus established one Church in unity, not thousands of bickering, disagreeing communities. The work of demons is to weaken Christ’s Body on earth, His Church, so that evil may gain ground upon good. That is exactly what I see happening in such situations.
If you take satisfaction in dividing the Body of Christ, or if you believe that Christians should be divided, be careful in celebrating, as the demons celebrate right beside you.
But you do realize what you are telling me with these words?Even the devil recognizes Christ Jesus.
Our Savior Jesus Christ founded a Church that had four qualities. If a community lacks one or more of these qualities, can it be true? It can be close, but it will lack something of the truth. I don’t want some truth. I don’t want most of the truth. I seek it all, no matter how difficult its teaching is. The true Church is One (unified), Holy (set apart from this world), Catholic (universal - in all nations) and Apostolic (having the successors to the Twelve). To settle for less is, well, less.Hmm. I just read the testimony again. Although it is somewhat in the language of Christianese, the testimony was one of walking away from Jesus and encountering Jesus again. That sounds like something the Holy Spirit would do to me. The only problem to you is that God chose not to do it you way, and instead did decided to do it in an inferior Protestant church. And you are having a cow because of this and ascribing it to satan. Fascinating response though.
And apparantly this One True Church has given you such a superiority complex so that when Jesus decides to do something like take the role the Good Shepherd and search and seek for someone that is lost, you…just like the Pharisees…can not accept what Jesus is doing because Jesus is doing is outside of the box that you have created for Him by doing it within an obviously inferior Protestant church…Our Savior Jesus Christ founded a Church that had four qualities. If a community lacks one or more of these qualities, can it be true? It can be close, but it will lack something of the truth. I don’t want some truth. I don’t want most of the truth. I seek it all, no matter how difficult its teaching is. The true Church is One (unified), Holy (set apart from this world), Catholic (universal - in all nations) and Apostolic (having the successors to the Twelve). To settle for less is, well, less.
You came to a Catholic forum. You are going to get industrial strength Catholicism.
Same thing Jesus was accused of when He presented what the Father had revealed; so I’m in good company.Truth? What IS truth? How do you know that your interpretation of scripture is the truth, and not the leading of a demon? A demon could be leading you without your knowledge or awareness. I am certainly open to your opinion, if that’s what you mean.
All true Christians are of one mind, the mind of Christ, exactly as the Scripture says, and the bride of Christ is yet to be revealed.Amen! Jesus founded a Church for all of us, and desires that we be of one heart and mind.
You give the Catholic Church too much attention and glory IMO; it is God, not the Catholic Church or any other church, that gave man His word. Would you like to argue that point? God gets His word to His people regardless of any obstacle.Unified, not divided. Satan wants us divided. He is gaining ground, it appears. Before God allowed the bible to be compiled, He established a Church and gave it authority - even to write scripture. But, it seems obvious that if there were no Church, there would be no bible as we know it.
It is even tougher when you realize your religion teaches you things that are incorrect on almost every point. For example concerning feeding of the sheep, which is what? Preaching and teaching the Word; particularly the gospel…right?Please ponder why Christ only asked Peter to feed His Sheep (John 21:15-17). This is a tough one for those who reject the authority of the Church.Leading a soul to God’s revealed truth is never frivolous.
First; I appreciate your concern, but I am on the narrow path after finding and agonizing through that narrow gate. Second, you are my concern for I am certain of yours and others destiny if they do not change the road they have chosen, but that is theirs/yours responsibility; mine is to put the Word out. Thirdly, false teaching and teachers were around before Jesus died. Finally, you cannot show one new or false belief I support and rebuke it from Scripture; yet I can show you a half a dozen old and newer beliefs you have and either show you from Scripture; like I have today and in the past or have you fail to prove them based on Scripture; this is not a show of muscle; it is a matter of eternal destination, a very serious matter.If I was not concerned about your eternal destiny, I would not have replied. I must advise you that many of your beliefs are quite new to Christianity. This should be a major caution flag for any believer, since we live in the age of antichrists and false teachers.May the Lord bless you with the fullness of His revelation, and an obedient heart.
You just agreed that God is not a respecter of persons, He shows no partiality; then you go on to say He plays favorites; you said “valued Peter, James and John above the others”. You are seeing God from the human goggles; we would see that as playing favorites because it is our nature; He does not view men that way. It is not His nature to play favorites; it is contrary to His nature. This is another reason why Peter has no special preference with God, but God preferred to use Peter according to His purpose and His plan; just like He does with all true disciples.Tanner9188:![]()
God is not a respecter of persons and could have, and probably did, use both godly and ungodly men under the strict influence of the Holy Spirit.po18guy:![]()
Absolutely! But, please note that Christ valued Peter, James and John above the others, as He took them aside many times for special teaching and witness. Please ponder why Christ only asked Peter to feed His Sheep (John 21:15-17). This is a tough one for those who reject the authority of the Church.
Your question can be answered by simple common sense. By its definition, Bible-believing churches are those which consider the Bible to be the authoritative, inerrant, and infallible Word of God. You can know that by just asking the believer.That’s completely beside the point.
There is no such thing as a self-interpreting text, so anyone who claims to be a member of a “Bible-Believing Church” are actually begging the question, WHO determines which churches are “Bible-Believing”?
In other words: It’s a logically useless term.
Remember what I said about the spirituality versus the physicality of flesh. To believe in a real presence of eating flesh; is to forgo the true sense of the message and quite frankly it is receiving the Lords Supper in an unworthy manner according to Scripture. This is but one of a few reasons why it is non-Biblical; another would be the administers of the Lords Supper; a non-existent priesthood from the Biblical perspective.DISCLAIMER: The following is merely my opinion, but all Eastern Orthodox and Catholics who believe in the real presence of Christ will know what I mean.
To me, this is testimony only to the power of demons, who lead the faithful stray. Janet either did not believe in the real presence of Christ in the Eucharist, or was caused by some supernatural power to doubt it. Who would lead away from Christ? God, or a demon? Lies are made acceptable by the evil one. It is the truth that is hard to accept.
**Hey; that’s okay because my Bible states that Jesus was told He has a demon for putting His trust in the Father; like Janet has done; so she is in great company; whereas those same people that made those false accusation follow the Pharisees and their subscribers and condemned them all.So, do you think her testimony is “demonic” too? Fascinating.
Maybe it is a bad translation but my Bible version says in 1 Cor. 12:3 that “nobody speaking by the Spirit of God says Jesus is accursed, and no one can say Jesus is Lord, except by the Holy Spirit.”
So when somebody here has a testimony that lifts up Jesus as Lord and relates how they came to Christ, I think I should believe him/her and not ascribe it to satan don’t you think. Specifically when Jesus has this little inconvenient verse about blaspheming the Holy Spirit in the context of ascribing the works of God to the works of satan.
No…I didn’t say that. The point I was making was that just to say you believe in Christ is not an adquate testimony to the nature of the person making the proclamation.So, do you think her testimony is “demonic” too? Fascinating.
But it isn’t “all about Him” and He isn’t the “center” of your life if you don’t listen to him.But you do realize what you are telling me with these words?
Yes believing in God is not a sign of being saved, because the devils also believe, and tremble… (See James 2:19)
The difference is that Jesus Christ is my Lord and my Saviour. He is the centre of my life. It’s all about Him.
Au Contraire! Please do not mistake confidence for arrogance. I remain the worst sinner here. I boast only in our Lord, Who resides in His fulness, in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church - the Church He founded so that we might find the narrow path that leads to eternity in paradise.And apparantly this One True Church has given you such a superiority complex so that when Jesus decides to do something like take the role the Good Shepherd and search and seek for someone that is lost, you…just like the Pharisees…can not accept what Jesus is doing because Jesus is doing is outside of the box that you have created for Him by doing it within an obviously inferior Protestant church…
So instead you ascribe it to satan.
Fascinating response. Learning a lot here.
Thank you!!! Blessings,If you are so disposed, here is a testimony of God’s revelation to an Evangelical and his wife: chnetwork.org/Conversionstories/Johngiles.pdf
May Christ’s peace be with you.
Don’t add to scripture and please don’t add to my post. I said that such a calling away of a follower of Christ from the fulness of Christ - dividing His Body in the process, is demonically sourced.So, do you think her testimony is “demonic” too? Fascinating.
Kcmekim,That’s funny, Ephesians 5:23 says that Jesus is the head of the church, not Peter and Ephesians 5:24 says that the church is subject to the authority of Christ, not Peter.