Protestants: Sinner's Prayer-What must it say and does it assure Salvation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anna_Scott
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The narrative does not mention Confirmation as conformation is done by a bishop. BUT as I mentioned before the Water is only the outward sign that you have been saved through the profession. The Water has no power in and of itself. “Sacramentum proprie dicitur quod ita signum est gratiae Dei, ei invisibilis gratiae forma, ut ipsius imaginem gerat et causa existat”
When a person joins the Catholic church they are asked a series of questions prior to Baptism. This is similar to formulas used in many other Protestant faiths as well.
Confirmation is the re-affirmation of vows taken if you were an infant by your parents on your behalf now that you are able to answer and make your own profession “confirming” that faith.

The one and ONLY reference in the Bible that says specifically that Baptism saves the person comes from 1 Peter 3 : 21 "There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ," HOWEVER, notice that it mentions that it is the “answer of a good conscience towards God” so it still boils down to the profession of faith first as claimed by the early church and handed down to us.

NOW, lets play a hypothetical game. Knowing that scripture and the early church fathers state it starts on the profession of faith. If person “X” has made the profession of faith (or sinner’s prayer) and is now on their way to the church to be baptized and a Mack truck slams into the car killing the person. Is this person saved because they never received the actual water but did everything else?
Water in and of it’s self, i.e. the water in Lake Jordon not far from where I am now has no power, this is true. The sacrament of baptism, which uses water (matter) does have the power to save. You are mis-identifying the moment at which the spirit is received and the person is “saved” (in quotes because salvation is not assured). It’s when the person is submersed in water, or when water is poured on the individual (typically 3 times) and the person administering the sacrament says “I baptise thee in the name of the Father, the Sone and the Holy Spirit”.

The profession, as mentioned earlier does not need to be made by the person being baptised.
 
The narrative does not mention Confirmation as conformation is done by a bishop. BUT as I mentioned before the Water is only the outward sign that you have been saved through the profession. The Water has no power in and of itself. “Sacramentum proprie dicitur quod ita signum est gratiae Dei, ei invisibilis gratiae forma, ut ipsius imaginem gerat et causa existat”
When a person joins the Catholic church they are asked a series of questions prior to Baptism. This is similar to formulas used in many other Protestant faiths as well.
Confirmation is the re-affirmation of vows taken if you were an infant by your parents on your behalf now that you are able to answer and make your own profession “confirming” that faith.
For the sacrament of Baptism to be valid there is no requirement for a profession of faith necessarily by the one being Baptized. In the CC the great majority of people receive infant Baptism (in the Eastern rite as well). There is a profession of faith made by the parents and Godparents on behalf of the infant as well promises made to raise the child in the faith.
Steve,

Haven’t talked to you in awhile. Glad you joined the discussion. 🙂

I understand the profession of faith being made by parents, on behalf of the infant.
You are correct in that water is the “outward” sign, but, as with all sacraments, it accomplishes what it signifies; your sins are washed away. It is an action of God, not the recipient. The recipient responds to the grace (a free gift) given by God as he lives the Christian life.
I can see how this grace would be applied to infants. However, for an adult entering the Catholic Church, wouldn’t they need to make a profession of faith, at some point, as well as repentance, prior to Baptism?
Confirmation is the re-affirmation of vows taken if you were an infant by your parents on your behalf now that you are able to answer and make your own profession “confirming” that faith.
As for Confirmation, it is not “the re-affirmation of vows taken… now that you are able to answer and make your own profession”. That is a common misunderstanding even among Catholics. It is related to Baptism in that it is a strengthening (thus the use of holy oil as the outward sign) of the grace received in Baptism through the reception of gifts of the Holy Spirit.
I’m not sure I understand the difference in what you and Padrej are saying. I understand the strengthening of the grace received in Baptism. But, doesn’t the person being confirmed acknowledge the Holy Trinity?

It seems that if confirmation does not include a personal profession of faith; a person could believe almost anything and still be confirmed. So, I don’t quite understand the role of a Confirmation, without a profession of faith in the Holy Trinity, and a personal acknowledgment/understanding of reconciliation to God, through the Sacrifice of Christ. Would you clarify?
In the Eastern right infants receive the sacrament of Confirmation along with Baptism and Hoy Eucharist (the sacraments of initiation).
Interesting.
NOW, lets play a hypothetical game. Knowing that scripture and the early church fathers state it starts on the profession of faith. If person “X” has made the profession of faith (or sinner’s prayer) and is now on their way to the church to be baptized and a Mack truck slams into the car killing the person. Is this person saved because they never received the actual water but did everything else?
They would be saved through “Baptism of desire”. God doesn’t get us on technicalities.
I agree with both of you on this one.

Await further comments,
Anna

P.S.
Water in and of it’s self, i.e. the water in Lake Jordon not far from where I am now has no power, this is true. The sacrament of baptism, which uses water (matter) does have the power to save. You are mis-identifying the moment at which the spirit is received and the person is “saved” (in quotes because salvation is not assured). It’s when the person is submersed in water, or when water is poured on the individual (typically 3 times) and the person administering the sacrament says “I baptise thee in the name of the Father, the Sone and the Holy Spirit”.

The profession, as mentioned earlier does not need to be made by the person being baptised.
As I stated in responses to SteveVH, I don’t understand Baptism without a profession of faith. See my comments above. Need some clarification on this.

Thanks,
Anna
 
I agree with both of you on this one.

Await further comments,
Anna

P.S.

As I stated in responses to SteveVH, I don’t understand Baptism without a profession of faith. See my comments above. Need some clarification on this.

Thanks,
Anna
If one thinks of baptism as a free gift of the spirit, forgiveness of sins and salvation it becomes easier to understand. More specifically, if you think of it in terms of the crossing of the Red Sea, which prefigures baptism (along with the flood) it’s easier yet.

Baptism is essentially that free gift of salvation God offers, it is that literal first step one need take in order to walk the path to salvation. Thus, like the Isrealites them selves had no need to make an individual profession of faith in order to be saved from Pharo’s chariots, neither do you need to make an individual profession of faith at the moment of baptism. This profession rather, can (at this time) be made on your behalf, sort of like it was Moses’s profession of faith which saved the Israelites.

The sacrament of confirmation, servers to complete the sacrament of baptism through the laying on of hands (and now anointing with oil, as of the 2nd century AD). Interestingly, and you can see this in the bible, Baptism and Confirmation were in fact administered at exactly the same point in time, forming a “double sacrament”, for instance in Acts 8 (and it happens again and again)
12 But when they had believed Philip preaching of the kingdom of God, in the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. 13 Then Simon himself believed also; and being baptized, he adhered to Philip. And being astonished, wondered to see the signs and exceeding great miracles which were done. 14 Now when the apostles, who were in Jerusalem, had heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John. 15 Who, when they were come, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost.
16 For he was not as yet come upon any of them; but they were only baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 17 Then they laid their hands upon them, and they received the Holy Ghost. 18 And when Simon saw, that by the imposition of the hands of the apostles, the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money,
Edit
BTW, this addresses what might be called the “ordenary means of salvation”, that is how things are supposed to work or the way you really want to do things in order to obtain the beatific vision. As noted by several posters, there are several exrodenary means of salvation, included here are Baptisms of Blood (dieing for Christ, even if you weren’t afforded the oppertunity to be baptized under normal conditions) and baptizm of desire, which would apply very nicely to “the good theif”.

Also, when confirmation and baptizm are celebrated seperatly, as they are in the Western tradition there is a profession of faith on the part of the person being confirmed.
 
Steve,

Haven’t talked to you in awhile. Glad you joined the discussion. 🙂

I understand the profession of faith being made by parents, on behalf of the infant.

I can see how this grace would be applied to infants. However, for an adult entering the Catholic Church, wouldn’t they need to make a profession of faith, at some point, as well as repentance, prior to Baptism?
Hi Anna. Yes, those entering the Church who have reached the age of reason do make a profession of faith. Basically they must agree with the Apostles Creed. The desire for Baptism (a profession in itself) and the understanding of the effect of Baptism must preceed the sacrament. While the Catholic Church accepts Baptism from any denomination (as long as it is done in the name of the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit and water is used) the difference in understanding of the purpose and effect of the sacrament is very different. From what I have heard, most Protestant denominations treat the Baptism as a proclamation of their acceptance of Christ into their lives. In other words, it is a statment of faith by the recipient rather than an action of God’s grace with real effects. We believe that our sins are truly washed away (in the case of infants, original sin, rather than actual sin) and that supernatural life is infused into our soul.
I’m not sure I understand the difference in what you and Padrej are saying. I understand the strengthening of the grace received in Baptism. But, doesn’t the person being confirmed acknowledge the Holy Trinity?
Yes, they must profess all that the Catholic Church teaches. But the sacrament is much more than a simple profession of faith; again there are real effects through the reception of the gifts of the Holy Spirit. The primary action is on the part of God. The recipient only acknowledges and accepts these gifts which will strengthen them.
It seems that if confirmation does not include a personal profession of faith; a person could believe almost anything and still be confirmed. So, I don’t quite understand the role of a Confirmation, without a profession of faith in the Holy Trinity, and a personal acknowledgment/understanding of reconciliation to God, through the Sacrifice of Christ. Would you clarify?
Maybe I need to read through these posts more closely. Is someone saying that there isn’t a profession of faith required? Anyway, as I said above, yes a profession of faith is involved. Before any adult receives any of the sacraments of initiation they must complete at least two years of study (that may vary according to the particular diocese) so that they understand very well what they are doing in order to make their profession. Without going into the entire “rite” of Christian initiation, sufice it to say that there are several professions of faith before you ever receive the sacraments.

I know many Catholics who think that in Confirmation they are giving their final “yes” to God and are becoming “adults” in the Catholic Church. That is not what the sacrament is about. It is about receiving the gifts of the Holy Spirit which is a free gift of God. The gifts are given but it is up the the person receiving them to use them. There are a lot of Catholics with unopened gifts laying around. Professions of faith are made, but that is not the primary purpose. I’ve probably totally confused you at this point. I’ve taught Confirmation classes for about ten years now so I’m pretty familiar with the various understandings of most Catholics prior to the classes.

I wish I had my Catechism handy. It always explains things better than I. I may follow up on this if I find something I missed.

Hope all is well with you Anna. God bless.
 
I wish I had my Catechism handy. It always explains things better than I. I may follow up on this if I find something I missed.

Hope all is well with you Anna. God bless.
Anna, here is a better explanation of sacraments as a whole, why they are primarily an act of God, rather than an act of persons.

Cathechism of the Catholic Church:

“Celebrated worthily in faith, the sacraments confer the grace that they signify. They are efficacious because in them Christ himself is at work: it is he wo baptizes, he who acts in his sacraments in order to communicate the grace that each sacrament signifies. The Father always hears the prayers of his Son’s Church which, in the epiclesis of each sacrament, expresses her faith in the power of the Spirit. As fire transforms into itself everything it touches, so the Holy Spirit transforms into the divine life whatever is subjected to its power.” (CCC par.1127)

“This is the meaning of the Church’s affirmation that the sacraments act ex opere operato
(literally: ‘by the very fact of the action’s being performed’), i.e., by virtue of the saving work of Christ, accomplished once, for all. It follows that ‘the sacrament is not wrought by the righteousness of either the celebrant or the recipient, but by the power of God.’ From the moment that a sacrament is celebrated in accordance with the intention of the Church, the power of Christ and his Spirit acts in and through it, independently of the personal holiness of the minister. Nevertheless, the fruits of the sacraments also depend on the disposition of the one who receives them.” (CCC par. 1128)

That’s what I meant to say 🙂
 
Hi Anna. Yes, those entering the Church who have reached the age of reason do make a profession of faith. Basically they must agree with the Apostles Creed. The desire for Baptism (a profession in itself) and the understanding of the effect of Baptism must preceed the sacrament. While the Catholic Church accepts Baptism from any denomination (as long as it is done in the name of the Father and the Son and Holy Spirit and water is used) the difference in understanding of the purpose and effect of the sacrament is very different. From what I have heard, most Protestant denominations treat the Baptism as a proclamation of their acceptance of Christ into their lives. In other words, it is a statment of faith by the recipient rather than an action of God’s grace with real effects. We believe that our sins are truly washed away (in the case of infants, original sin, rather than actual sin) and that supernatural life is infused into our soul.
Most Protestant denominations do treat Baptism as purely symbolic; and it follows the “Sinner’s Prayer.” I was Baptized, at the age of 7, in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. However, the Baptist Church does not teach that Baptism carries any grace or real effects. For Baptists, Baptism does serve as a public profession of faith in Christ. Otherwise, it is purely symbolic.

I am realizing that Baptism does impart certain graces, including the forgiveness of sin. I met with the Episcopal Priest, yesterday (I’ve been visiting a conservative Episcopal Church.) His explanation of Baptism was very similar to yours, both for adults and for infants; and seems much in line with the quotes you gave from CCC.

The Episcopal Book of Common Prayer describes the “inward and spiritual grace in Baptism” as “the union with Christ in his death and resurrection, birth into God’s family the Church, forgiveness of sins, and new life in the Holy Spirit.”

The Priest explained that just as circumcision was performed when an infant was 8 days old, Baptisms were performed on the 8th day as well. Circumcision was done under the Old Covenant. Baptism is done to bring one into the New Covenant. Would you agree?

This is finally making sense to me, especially in light of Colossians 2, where the “circumcision made without hands” is connected to Baptism.

Colossians 2: 8 See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. 9 For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, 10 and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority.

11In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.

13 And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, 14 by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. 15 He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.

Padrej: you made a good point about the one verse that says Baptism saves a person. You pointed to the “good conscience toward God,” as being a profession of faith. However, in Colossians 2:13-14 (quoted above) could also be seen as a connection between Baptism and forgiveness. Maybe I am misinterpreting. Not sure.
. . . . .The one and ONLY reference in the Bible that says specifically that Baptism saves the person comes from 1 Peter 3 : 21. . . . .HOWEVER, notice that it mentions that it is the “answer of a good conscience towards God” so it still boils down to the profession of faith first as claimed by the early church and handed down to us. . . .
**1 Peter 3: **18 For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, 19 in which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison, 20 because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through water.

21 Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers having been subjected to him.

In Romans 6, we find more descriptions of the graces of Baptism. These are important passages that I have overlooked in the past. I am finally seeing them in “new light.”

Romans 6: 3 Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life. 5 For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his. 6 We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. 7 For one who has died has been set free from sin.
Yes, they must profess all that the Catholic Church teaches. But the sacrament is much more than a simple profession of faith; again there are real effects through the reception of the gifts of the Holy Spirit. The primary action is on the part of God. The recipient only acknowledges and accepts these gifts which will strengthen them.
Maybe I need to read through these posts more closely. Is someone saying that there isn’t a profession of faith required? Anyway, as I said above, yes a profession of faith is involved. Before any adult receives any of the sacraments of initiation they must complete at least two years of study (that may vary according to the particular diocese) so that they understand very well what they are doing in order to make their profession. Without going into the entire “rite” of Christian initiation, sufice it to say that there are several professions of faith before you ever receive the sacraments.
I know many Catholics who think that in Confirmation they are giving their final “yes” to God and are becoming “adults” in the Catholic Church. That is not what the sacrament is about. It is about receiving the gifts of the Holy Spirit which is a free gift of God. The gifts are given but it is up the the person receiving them to use them. There are a lot of Catholics with unopened gifts laying around. Professions of faith are made, but that is not the primary purpose. I’ve probably totally confused you at this point. I’ve taught Confirmation classes for about ten years now so I’m pretty familiar with the various understandings of most Catholics prior to the classes.

I wish I had my Catechism handy. It always explains things better than I. I may follow up on this if I find something I missed.

Hope all is well with you Anna. God bless.
The Episcopal Priest said pretty much the same thing, as you are saying about confirmation.
Anna, here is a better explanation of sacraments as a whole, why they are primarily an act of God, rather than an act of persons.

Cathechism of the Catholic Church
:

“Celebrated worthily in faith, the sacraments confer the grace that they signify. They are efficacious because in them Christ himself is at work: it is he wo baptizes, he who acts in his sacraments in order to communicate the grace that each sacrament signifies. The Father always hears the prayers of his Son’s Church which, in the epiclesis of each sacrament, expresses her faith in the power of the Spirit. As fire transforms into itself everything it touches, so the Holy Spirit transforms into the divine life whatever is subjected to its power.” (CCC par.1127)

“This is the meaning of the Church’s affirmation that the sacraments act ex opere operato
(literally: ‘by the very fact of the action’s being performed’), i.e., by virtue of the saving work of Christ, accomplished once, for all. It follows that ‘the sacrament is not wrought by the righteousness of either the celebrant or the recipient, but by the power of God.’ From the moment that a sacrament is celebrated in accordance with the intention of the Church, the power of Christ and his Spirit acts in and through it, independently of the personal holiness of the minister. Nevertheless, the fruits of the sacraments also depend on the disposition of the one who receives them.” (CCC par. 1128)

That’s what I meant to say 🙂

Great quotes from CCC. Thank you.
On Baptism
usccb.org/catechism/text/pt2sect2.shtml#art1

On Confirmation
usccb.org/catechism/text/pt2sect2chpt1art2.shtml

On the Eucharist
usccb.org/catechism/text/pt2sect2chpt1art3.shtml

Crazzeto,

Thanks for the links. 🙂

So, do we all agree that for an adult, some form of profession of faith is necessary prior to Baptism?

Anna
[/QUOTE]
 
The Priest explained that just as circumcision was performed when an infant was 8 days old, Baptisms were performed on the 8th day as well. Circumcision was done under the Old Covenant. Baptism is done to bring one into the New Covenant. Would you agree?
Absolutely!
This is finally making sense to me, especially in light of Colossians 2, where the “circumcision made without hands” is connected to Baptism.
I know. It really begins to make sense when we see the Old Testament fulfilled in the New through Jesus. It is all truly fascinating and incredibly exciting. I don’t know how much you have studied the Eucharist, but its ties with Passover, Christ as the Paschal Lamb, is another example of the sacraments being instruments of salvation foreshadowed in the Old Testament.
The Episcopal Priest said pretty much the same thing, as you are saying about confirmation.
Anna, I’m so happy that you are attending the Episcopal Church. I’m happy because you’re learning a lot of Catholic doctrine. 😃 (I’m a little jealous. We need people like you in our Church). Honestly, there is little doctrinal difference and it sounds like you have a very competent priest (obviously because he agrees with me).
So, do we all agree that for an adult, some form of profession of faith is necessary prior to Baptism?
We do!
 
I notice that stevevh claims that confirmation is not the renewal of vows made for you as an infant. Please note the following from the link above: the below paragraph is from the council of Catholic Bishops
1298
When Confirmation is celebrated separately from Baptism, as is the case in the Roman Rite, the Liturgy of Confirmation begins with the renewal of baptismal promises and the profession of faith by the confirmands. This clearly shows that Confirmation follows Baptism.111 When adults are baptized, they immediately receive Confirmation and participate in the Eucharist.112


Also
1321
When Confirmation is celebrated separately from Baptism, its connection with Baptism is expressed, among other ways, by the renewal of baptismal promises. The celebration of Confirmation during the Eucharist helps underline the unity of the sacraments of Christian initiation.

I do agree that confirmation is a further sealing of the Holy Spirit as well.
 
@Anna,

I didn’t say no profession was required, just that it isn’t necessarly required to be said on the part of the person being baptised such as in the case of an infant. In that case, the parent would say the profession for the child, as moses professed his faith to God, on behalf of the doubtful Israelites on the shorts of the Red Sea.
 
@Anna,

I didn’t say no profession was required, just that it isn’t necessarly required to be said on the part of the person being baptised such as in the case of an infant. In that case, the parent would say the profession for the child, as moses professed his faith to God, on behalf of the doubtful Israelites on the shorts of the Red Sea.
As a Catholic priest I am certainly not going to Baptize an infant without the professing faith of Catholic parents. In my mind that IS a requirement, or else lets just drag every bum off the street and make them Catholics through baptism without ever having them make a vow to the church or profession that they are Christian. That is not how the Catholic church works.
 
As a Catholic priest I am certainly not going to Baptize an infant without the professing faith of Catholic parents. In my mind that IS a requirement, or else lets just drag every bum off the street and make them Catholics through baptism without ever having them make a vow to the church or profession that they are Christian. That is not how the Catholic church works.
Neither will I baptize an infant if the parent has no intention of raising said child in the faith. I have only had to refuse to baptize an infant once because the mother had no intention of ever darkening the door of the church, she thought it was just something you did for a child rather like buying fire insurance from Hell. The parents are asked “On behalf or this child do you…” and if they have no more desire to see that child raised in those vows made before God why make them?
 
As a Catholic priest I am certainly not going to Baptize an infant without the professing faith of Catholic parents. In my mind that IS a requirement, or else lets just drag every bum off the street and make them Catholics through baptism without ever having them make a vow to the church or profession that they are Christian. That is not how the Catholic church works.
Could you slow down, and reread what I wrote?

Edit
Sorry, but you seem to have this tendancy to respond to points I’m not making. Perhaps there’s some sort of communication error happening.

Although, we might as well bring up more exceptions. From the Code of Canon Law:

vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__P2X.HTM
§2. An infant of Catholic parents or even of non-Catholic parents is baptized licitly in danger of death even against the will of the parents.

Though even in this case, there should be someone there to make a profession of faith I would imagine. But based on what I read, I might even imagine a situation (with an infant) where one might in an emergancy baptise that child with out anyone else present. I assume that if the child survived, there would be some process by which the validity of the Baptism might be discerned.

Note, the above is of course an exceptional case whic in no way should be considered normal, usual or licit in any condition but the most extreme.
 
. . .I know. It really begins to make sense when we see the Old Testament fulfilled in the New through Jesus. It is all truly fascinating and incredibly exciting. I don’t know how much you have studied the Eucharist, but its ties with Passover, Christ as the Paschal Lamb, is another example of the sacraments being instruments of salvation foreshadowed in the Old Testament.
Steve,

The Baptist Church does connect the Sacrifice of Christ and Passover-Christ being the Paschal Lamb, as you said.

I’ve only begun to understand the connection between Circumcision of the Old Covenant and Baptism in the New Covenant; and the fact that there are Graces imparted during Baptism and the Eucharist.

In regards to the Sinner’s Prayer, I realized, quite some time ago, that salvation is more than an event in one moment in time–as a number of us have discussed on this Thread.

Many Protestants, most Baptists included, believe the moment of salvation occurs upon praying the Sinner’s Prayer. One is “born again” through praying the Sinner’s Prayer. Faith and repentance lead to salvation, though the work of salvation is entirely through the sacrifice of Christ. Grace is imparted at that one moment, which is entirely different from the Catholic view, and Episcopal view, that Grace is imparted through Baptism; and the Eucharist.

You posted some excellent comments on one of my previous Threads: **Baptists, Does Scripture point to the Catholic Lord’s Supper/Eucharist? **
Link: forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=418696

In that Thread, I invited Baptists to comment on John Chapter 6. Sadly, only one Baptist posted on the Thread, and he did not address Scripture that clearly says one must consume the Body and Blood of Christ.

**The role of the Sinner’s Prayer seems to affect the understanding of Baptism and the Eucharist. **If one believes that salvation, and forgiveness of sins, occurs in one moment through a specific prayer; it is much more likely that Baptism and the Eucharist would be viewed symbolically. Baptists do continue to repent of sins (no confession to a minister & no Absolution,) and ask forgiveness. However, Baptism and the Eucharist play no role in the forgiveness of sin. I am realizing these are false doctrines.
Anna, I’m so happy that you are attending the Episcopal Church. I’m happy because you’re learning a lot of Catholic doctrine. 😃 (I’m a little jealous. We need people like you in our Church). Honestly, there is little doctrinal difference and it sounds like you have a very competent priest (obviously because he agrees with me). . .
Appreciate your words of encouragement. Nice to hear that you would want me to be a part of the Catholic Church. You do realize that I failed miserably as a Protestant. 😊 I submitted my formal resignation to the Baptist Church in the last part of January, this year. I haven’t heard a word from the Church. I think they were glad to see me go. I had too many questions about Baptist Doctrine.

The Episcopal Church I am attending is very conservative. The Priest/Rector seems to have some Eastern Orthodox leanings. I would say his beliefs seem to be far more Catholic than Protestant. The Liturgy is very similar to the Catholic Mass. Some prayers and confessions are the same word-for-word.

And yes, I would say the Episcopal Priest is very competent–obviously, because he agrees with you. 😃 I spend a lot of time talking to Catholics on these forums. I have asked before, can one become Catholic by “osmosis?” 😉

I checked out your new Thread: Non-Catholics - What does the word “Sacrament” mean to you? I do want to post on that Thread. I realize an understanding of the Sacraments is so very important.

For all who want to continue the discussion of the Sacraments in more detail, here is the link to Steve’s new Thread:
SteveVH said:
The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines “Sacrament” as follows:

“An efficacious sign of grace, instituted by Christ and entrusted to the Church, by which divine life is dispensed to us through the work of the Holy Spirit. The sacraments (called ‘mysteries’ in the Eastern Churches) are seven in number: Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance or Reconciliation, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony.”

I have heard of Baptism being described as an ordinance (not absolutely necessary) or a profession of faith. As Catholics we believe the sacraments are the means of acquiring God’s grace, that they have a real, necessary, salvific, supernatural effect upon our soul. What say you?
In Christ,
Anna
 
I notice that stevevh claims that confirmation is not the renewal of vows made for you as an infant. Please note the following from the link above: the below paragraph is from the council of Catholic Bishops.

1298
When Confirmation is celebrated separately from Baptism, as is the case in the Roman Rite, the Liturgy of Confirmation begins with the renewal of baptismal promises and the profession of faith by the confirmands. T
his clearly shows that Confirmation follows Baptism.111 When adults are baptized, they immediately receive Confirmation and participate in the Eucharist.112

Also
1321
When Confirmation is celebrated separately from Baptism, its connection with Baptism is expressed, among other ways, by the renewal of baptismal promises. The celebration of Confirmation during the Eucharist helps underline the unity of the sacraments of Christian initiation.
Padre, I didn’t do the best job of expressing myself. While there is a renewal of Baptismal vows involved, the primary purpose of the sacrament is not a statement of faith on behalf of the person being confirmed, but rather the reception of a free gift of God in the form of gifts of the Holy Spirit. That is the point I was trying to make. While witnessing the sacrament the entire congregation renews their respective Baptismal vows, not just those being confirmed. As Catholics, we renew our Baptismal vows at various times throughout the litirgical year (Easter season, Baptisms, Confirmation). We even remind ourselves of our Baptism every time we enter or leave a Church by blessing ourselves with holy water. Yes, the two sacraments are definately related, as are all the sacraments, especially the sacraments of initiation, but each has its unique effect upon our soul.
I do agree that confirmation is a further sealing of the Holy Spirit as well.
Yes, but not just “as well”. That is the effect of God’s action through the sacrament and its primary purpose. I think we are actually in agreement. Sorry for the lack of clear communication on my part.

God bless.
 
I agree with this.

By saying it “insures salvation” I would mean salvation at that point in time.

Whether or not it is guaranteed salvation throughout the lifetime of the individual up to the point of death is a subject of your local Eternal Security thread.
AP,
I think we agree that the Sinner’s Prayer would not guarantee salvation, but serve as a profession of faith and a starting point on the path to salvation.
. . . . .No. I was trying to give a response to your original post which seemed to be asking why some Protestants would question the salvation of Catholics or Anglicans if prayers like the sinner’s prayer could be found in their liturgies. In my old days, and I’m going back almost 20 years now, I believed in Christian Unity. Only very serious errors could be a just reason for splitting away and starting new churches. I could never have justified the Reformation if Catholics were being saved by the prayers at Mass. We thought that we had to take into consideration the doctrines that the Catholic Church teaches. Catholics believed they are regenerated by baptism that must be maintained by works (we didn’t allow that these could be works of grace), and that salvation can be forfeited by sin. This was a false Gospel to me that would lead one to damnation. If the message of the Catholic Church would save, then I had a duty to join…and that is what I did…in 1995. . . .
RoryMcKenzie56,

I don’t think I responded to this post. I found the same in my experience with Baptist Churches. The Catholic liturgy would not be considered, even though the liturgy contains the same basic elements of the Sinner’s Prayer. Same reason: many Baptists believe Catholic doctrines are false. So any “profession of faith” found in liturgy would be dismissed. Of course, I no longer agree with this line of thinking.
I agree, consider who the evangelist is dealing with. A former nonbeliever who has moved past the natural and accepted the supernatural by having faith in Jesus. Before this point the stories he has seen of the supernatural have been the occult and the good/bad witches.

In fiction he sees all manner of mayhem occur because the witch mispronouces one word from a foriegn language. The new Christian brings that life story installed prejudice to his new found faith and asked to be walked through that “siner’s prayer” so that he does not say the wrong thing to God and have mayhem happen because of it.
4Squarebaby,

You’ve made an interesting point, here. Throughout Christian history, defenders of Christianity have dealt with the importation of paganism into the Church by new converts, hesitant to let go of their pagan roots. Paul fought this, and it is still an issue today. I believe Evangelist or Priest must make sure no paganism is integrated into a “profession of faith.” I think the Liturgy can act as a safeguard, as well. Though it does go back to the intentions of the heart. So, pagan converts to Christianity should be well catechized–something that is seriously lacking in many Protestant Churches.

Thanks for comments,
Anna
 
crazzeto, Padrej, FrJohnB, SteveVH:

I’ve gone back through all your posts. Took some time. :coffeeread: Great info.

Would it be safe to say all of you agree on the following?
  • We are justified/saved through faith.
  • Profession of faith is made by the parents/God Parents/guardians prior to infant Baptism.
  • A profession of faith is made by the adult convert prior to Baptism.
  • Baptism, the Eucharist, and other Sacraments, follow the profession of faith.
  • “Water has no power in and of itself.” “Form, matter, and intention” make a Sacrament valid. Through the Sacrament of Baptism, God washes away our sins, and saves us by making us a member of the Body of Christ. Water signifies the purification of the soul by grace.
  • Profession of faith, and the Sacraments must be accompanied by works of charity.
O.K. guys, do I have this right???

Anna
Again though, the destinction is this, the Protistant groups who typically make use of the prayer would have stoppled at

“Do you believe in the Trinity”

With that yes, they would have said “great, your saved”… Perhaps some might have baptised as a formality, sadly enough there certainly are others that consider baptism so unimportant that it never would have occured them.

This soldire is quite lucky, in that it would seem fairly certain though, thanks to the actions of this Priest that he indeed was saved. This preist when ahead and gave him the Sacraments of Baptism (perhaps Confirmation?) and then the Eucharist (as you post).

The Sacrament of Baptism is what washes away his sins, and saves the sinner by making him a member of the Body of Christ.
Crazzeto,

According to the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) (www.sbc.net):🙂 the Baptismal Candidate must be a “regenerate believer in Jesus Christ.” Baptism is “purely symbolic and distinct from salvation itself.” The means of Baptism is “immersion.” One is Baptized “unto faith in Christ.” One is Baptized “with a view toward eternal life that cannot be lost once graciously given by God.” Baptism is “symbolic unto the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.” Infant Baptism is absolutely forbidden.

If one has been baptized in another Church that views Baptism as “sacramental or regenerative,” or in a church that does not embrace the “doctrine of the security of the believer,” one must be Baptized again in accordance with SBC guidelines. More details at www.sbc.net.

SBC Sinner’s Prayer (sbc.net/knowjesus/default.asp) “How to Become a Christian”:
. . . . .Are you ready to accept the gift of eternal life that Jesus is offering you right now? Let’s review what this commitment involves:
Code:
I acknowledge I am a sinner in need of a Savior - this is to repent or turn away from sin
Code:
I believe in my heart that God raised Jesus from the dead - this is to trust that Jesus paid the full penalty for my sins
Code:
I confess Jesus as my Lord and my God - this is to surrender control of my life to Jesus
Code:
I receive Jesus as my Savior forever - this is to accept that God has done for me and in me what He promised
If it is your sincere desire to receive Jesus into your heart as your personal Lord and Savior, then talk to God from your heart:
Here’s a Suggested Prayer:
"Lord Jesus, I know that I am a sinner and I do not deserve eternal life. But, I believe You died and rose from the grave to make me a new creation and to prepare me to dwell in your presence forever. Jesus, come into my life, take control of my life, forgive my sins and save me. I am now placing my trust in You alone for my salvation and I accept your free gift of eternal life."
Reading those requirements, again, on the Southern Baptist Convention website, actually causes anxiety for me. It is so difficult to break free from this indoctrination. I’m working on it. I appreciate all your posts.

Working out my salvation in fear and trembling,
Anna
 
Padre, I didn’t do the best job of expressing myself. While there is a renewal of Baptismal vows involved, the primary purpose of the sacrament is not a statement of faith on behalf of the person being confirmed, but rather the reception of a free gift of God in the form of gifts of the Holy Spirit. . . …
Could you slow down, and reread what I wrote?

Edit
Sorry, but you seem to have this tendancy to respond to points I’m not making. Perhaps there’s some sort of communication error happening. . . . .
Neither will I baptize an infant if the parent has no intention of raising said child in the faith. I have only had to refuse to baptize an infant once because the mother had no intention of ever darkening the door of the church, she thought it was just something you did for a child rather like buying fire insurance from Hell. The parents are asked “On behalf or this child do you…” and if they have no more desire to see that child raised in those vows made before God why make them?
As a Catholic priest I am certainly not going to Baptize an infant without the professing faith of Catholic parents. In my mind that IS a requirement, or else lets just drag every bum off the street and make them Catholics through baptism without ever having them make a vow to the church or profession that they are Christian. That is not how the Catholic church works.
SteveVH, Crazzeto, Padrej, and FrJohnB, please see my post #57.

Thanks,
Anna
 
crazzeto, Padrej, FrJohnB, SteveVH:

I’ve gone back through all your posts. Took some time. :coffeeread: Great info.

Would it be safe to say all of you agree on the following?
  • We are justified/saved through faith.
  • Profession of faith is made by the parents/God Parents/guardians prior to infant Baptism.
  • A profession of faith is made by the adult convert prior to Baptism.
  • Baptism, the Eucharist, and other Sacraments, follow the profession of faith.
  • “Water has no power in and of itself.” “Form, matter, and intention” make a Sacrament valid. Through the Sacrament of Baptism, God washes away our sins, and saves us by making us a member of the Body of Christ. Water signifies the purification of the soul by grace.
  • Profession of faith, and the Sacraments must be accompanied by works of charity.
O.K. guys, do I have this right???

Anna
I certainly subscribe to all of this, through faith alone which leads to the fruits of charity in Christ.
Crazzeto,

According to the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) (www.sbc.net):🙂 the Baptismal Candidate must be a “regenerate believer in Jesus Christ.” Baptism is “purely symbolic and distinct from salvation itself.” The means of Baptism is “immersion.” One is Baptized “unto faith in Christ.” One is Baptized “with a view toward eternal life that cannot be lost once graciously given by God.” Baptism is “symbolic unto the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.” Infant Baptism is absolutely forbidden.

If one has been baptized in another Church that views Baptism as “sacramental or regenerative,” or in a church that does not embrace the “doctrine of the security of the believer,” one must be Baptized again in accordance with SBC guidelines. More details at www.sbc.net.

SBC Sinner’s Prayer (sbc.net/knowjesus/default.asp) “How to Become a Christian”:

Reading those requirements, again, on the Southern Baptist Convention website, actually causes anxiety for me. It is so difficult to break free from this indoctrination. I’m working on it. I appreciate all your posts.

Working out my salvation in fear and trembling,
Anna
Huh, it’s almost a pretty good prayer, other than the finality which is attached to it. Very sad, particularly since even when I was just listening to Father read the Gosples I never got a sense of “finality” to your salvation, other than when you actually die in the Graces of our Lord.
 
I agree, consider who the evangelist is dealing with. A former nonbeliever who has moved past the natural and accepted the supernatural by having faith in Jesus. Before this point the stories he has seen of the supernatural have been the occult and the good/bad witches.

In fiction he sees all manner of mayhem occur because the witch mispronouces one word from a foriegn language. The new Christian brings that life story installed prejudice to his new found faith and asked to be walked through that “siner’s prayer” so that he does not say the wrong thing to God and have mayhem happen because of it.
I agree with Anna that this is an interesting point. I think the most important thing to stress with those coming from this background is that Christianity is not magic. It is God who reads our hearts and knows our intentions and that is the basis on which we are judged. It can work the other way too. One can say “the words” perfectly but have nothing in his heart. You only receive the graces that you are disposed to receive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top