I agree with what you’re saying here. I totally believe that the church should have a leader…
but the Pope in my opinion is a human, just like me, who needs to be forgiven for sins, just like me, who makes mistakes, just like me, who is a child of God, just like me. I mean no disrespect, I just have a hard time seeing where this authority is the Pope’s…
Ok, so you understand we must have a leader, but apparently you believe that the Church teaches that the Pope is
perfect and therefore that is how he can teach or lead us over morals and have authority over us?.
Well, I hope you will understand and take to heart my poor poor teaching here.
The Catholic Church does not teach that the Pope is perfect. It teaches that the Holy Spirit, acting on it’s perfect Will and the promise that nothing will prevail against the church, protects the church and it’s teachings on morals and salvation.
We have had bad popes in the past, but never has a bad pope been allowed by the Holy Spirit to teach bad salvation. Like Honorius, although he preached Monotheism, he never *defined *the doctrine.
In 265 Popes in 2000 years we have had 3 or 4
alleged failures. If you considered all the Kings of England for less time than that, you will find far more loss, malice and more contradiction… we can even just look at any one century of History for problems…
the Pope himself is not anything more than a godly Man. Look at Pope John Paul II. Most people these days will say he was a godly man. Infallible means in most eyes
perfect. In the Church’s eyes, he is perfect if God makes him perfect (called impeccability from peccare: to sin), but he can *ONLY *be infallible if he speaks when a particular doctrine has been called into question as the head of the Bishops of the Church and when all of them, even though dispersed, concur conclusively, even more so when gathered in a council. The Bishops (and the pope as the head of the bishops) speak as the teachers and judges of faith and morals for the universal Church. The Pope speaks in a special way because he is the head of the Church, and pronounces specially with the assistance of the Holy Spirit, assistance promised to him through Peter.
Infallibility is
similar to the President helping to enact some defining Amendment to the Constitution, like anti-slavery. He doesn’t do this alone. The big difference is that the Constitution is not protected by the Holy Spirit and therefore we have had amendments like prohibition.
The other point in your objection is his authority. Papal authority was understood by the Early Church Fathers from the beginning with Peter in Rome. His laying on of hands, that is, passing his authority to another, in his case, to Linus and then from Linus to Cletus, shows this idea. Those looking to Clement for authority from Rome even though John, disciple of Christ and Apostle, was still alive and on Patmos at the time, shows that even the Apostles knew there had to be someone on whom the Authority fell. Christ did not just leave his people without a leader, anymore than the God of Israel left them without leaders in the Old Testament.
I hope this helps clear up some of the things that you were mistake on and will allow you to come closer to entering the Church.
