My personal favorite is the Bayside apparition (alleged)…the Veronica Leuken thingie, the ladies with the blue berets…they distribute that stuff all over my neighborhood, because this area is heavily Catholic as well as heavily Orthodox Jewish.
I dunno why but reading that Bayside stuff gives me the same creepy feeling I get when I read about things like the eucharistic Lanciano thingie, and incorrupt saint bodies. :bigyikes:
You are aware that this apparition has been rejected by the Catholic Church, right? So, why are you mentioning an apparition that is not approved by the Church? It is my understanding that we are not allowed to discuss unapproved apparitions at CA.
Bishop Francis Mugavero
%between%, then Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn stated in 1986 that
“a thorough investigation revealed that the alleged visions of Bayside completely lacked authenticity” and that “the messages and other related propaganda contain statements which, among other things, are contrary to the teachings of the Catholic Church.”
Now for an approved apparition captured on film at Zeitun, Egypt:
youtube.com/watch?v=6W9T-XQpb6Q
And Assiut, Egypt, look on the right side of the dome:
youtube.com/watch?v=fBXBaH0mNUs
What is your explanation for that?
Secondly, you may feel creepy about the Eucharistic Miracle in Lanciano and the incorruptibles but can you or an actual scientist* explain it*?
In 1973, the Higher Council of the World Health Organization (WHO) appointed a scientific commission to verify the Italian doctor’s conclusions. The work was carried out over 15 months with a total of 500 examinations.
The conclusions of all the researches confirmed what had been stated and published in Italy.
The extract of the scientific research of WHO’s medical commission was published in New York and Geneva in 1976,
confirming science’s inability to explain the phenomenon.
zenit.org/article-12933?l=english
Perhaps you will say this is “magic”, too.
And what about the details not discovered in the Blessed Virgin’s eyes on Juan Diego’s tilma until the 20th century, when we had the technology to study it at a microscopic level? How do you explain this one:
The scientist began his study in 1979. He magnified the iris of the Virgin’s eyes 2,500 times and, through mathematical and optical procedures, was able to identify all the people imprinted in the eyes.
The eyes reflect the witnesses of the Guadalupan miracle, the moment Juan Diego unfurled his tilma before the bishop, according to Tonsmann. In other words, the Virgin’s eyes have the reflection that would have been imprinted in the eyes of any person in her position.
In the eyes, Tonsmann believes, it is possible to discern a seated Indian, who is looking up to the heavens; the profile of a balding, elderly man with a white beard, much like the portrait of Bishop Zumárraga, painted by Miguel Cabrera, to depict the miracle; and a younger man, in all probability interpreter Juan González.
zeitun-eg.org/zenit01011420.htm