L
LDNCatholic
Guest
If she is a Catholic she should not have had pre marital sex.No she does not. That’s right she should of used birth control, if she was going to subject herself to pre-marital sex.
If she is a Catholic she should not have had pre marital sex.No she does not. That’s right she should of used birth control, if she was going to subject herself to pre-marital sex.
A living fetus or embryo of what species?a living feturs or embryo
Everything is about the living. It is all about Life.The way they dictate sexuality between a husband and wife. How they consider birth control sinning. Everything is about the embryo and not the person who is living. :twocents:
Excuse me. Pushing them out.And they do. It is called abstaining from marital relations or marrieage until they are in a position to provide care for the children they give birth to. You’re very naive if you think babies just ‘‘pop out’’, either that or you’re just being vulgar, and highly disrespectful to women who have had children.
If you don’t know this answer, you should really look at a science book.A living fetus or embryo of what species?
Even if she doesn’t claim to be Catholic or if she isn’t Catholic, she ought not to be having that kind of relationship outside of Marriage, it is still wrong even if she isn’t Catholic.If she is a Catholic she should not have had pre marital sex.
Seems to me kalt does know, its you that doesn’t seem to understand this.If you don’t know this answer, you should really look at a science book.
If they want to be obedient to the Church, responsible for their spiritual welfare, they will abstain.Excuse me. Pushing them out.Why should they abstain? They are married and should express their love for each other through sexual intercourse. They are being responsible by using birth control so that no unwanted children get “pushed” out. No disrespect to women who want to have their precious “miracles”.
Well obviously she can’t change what she did. So she now has these children. Which if she would have been using something, she would not be crying about her hard life. IIf she is a Catholic she should not have had pre marital sex.
I’m a tad sensitive on these matters, so I’ll do my best not to fly off the handle here…The embryo has to be born to be a “person” who is alive. Not out of sight/out of mind. Out of logic/out of mind, eh?
You are right of course, apologies.Even if she doesn’t claim to be Catholic or if she isn’t Catholic, she ought not to be having that kind of relationship outside of Marriage, it is still wrong even if she isn’t Catholic.
Using artificial birth control isn’t being responsible, we’ve been all through this with you yesterday, do you have a problem with comprehension?Excuse me. Pushing them out.Why should they abstain? They are married and should express their love for each other through sexual intercourse. They are being responsible by using birth control so that no unwanted children get “pushed” out. No disrespect to women who want to have their precious “miracles”.
Which she must now take care of. Too late for coulda woulda shoulda.Well obviously she can’t change what she did. So she now has these children.
That is if they are Catholic. I doubt spiritual welfare would be in jeapordy. Just because they don’t to “push” out babies.If they want to be obedient to the Church, responsible for their spiritual welfare, they will abstain.
Children are miracles, thank you for noting that. Large families are families that have been especially blessed.
It seems that you’re implying that as a woman, my only choice is to conceive or not to conceive. I think my choice is to engage in sexual intercourse or not to engage in sexual intercourse [after all sex is what makes babies…]. I believe I have enough self-control to avoid having sex until I’m ready for the responsibility of children. I don’t feel oppressed - I feel liberated! How awesome is it that I can conceive, carry, bear, and nuture a child?!A woman doesn’t have to pop out babies to serve God. Women don’t have a choice about how their anatomy is made to urinate. They should have a choice of when babies pop out of them.
I live in one too, my mum is one of 19. They are blessings.That is if they are Catholic. I doubt spiritual welfare would be in jeapordy. Just because they don’t to “push” out babies.
Big families are overated. I live in one so i know.
I have answered this question already.I’m a tad sensitive on these matters, so I’ll do my best not to fly off the handle here…
I saw my “embryo’s” heart beating two weeks after learning I was pregnant.
How long must a heart beat before my child becomes a “person”?
Be quiet and get back in the kitchen until you’re ready to give birth again.It seems that you’re implying that as a woman, my only choice is to conceive or not to conceive. I think my choice is to engage in sexual intercourse or not to engage in sexual intercourse [after all sex is what makes babies…]. I believe I have enough self-control to avoid having sex until I’m ready for the responsibility of children. I don’t feel oppressed - I feel liberated! How awesome is it that I can conceive, carry, bear, and nuture a child?!