G
Gab123
Guest
They ordained the first actively openly homosexual married bishop (who is now divorced)The Episcopal Church (USA) has some kind of same sex union blessing or something like that.
They ordained the first actively openly homosexual married bishop (who is now divorced)The Episcopal Church (USA) has some kind of same sex union blessing or something like that.
There is the alternative of marrying and then becoming a priest in the western rite Orthodox church. The priests in the Orthodox Church are recognized by the Roman Catholic church as validly ordained and I think I read that Pope Paul VI had lifted the excommunications that existed between the RCC and the Eastern Orthodox Church when he met with Patriarch Athenogoras. However, there is as yet no complete union between the two churches. OTOH, the validity of the Anglican priesthood is questioned by the RCC.I have received my vocation through discernment to be a priest at the same time I also have received the same vocation in terms of marriage.
I personally knew an Eastern Catholic priest. He was born and baptized as a Roman Catholic (western rite). He did not like Vatican II or the aftermath of Vatican II. He then joined the Eastern Orthodox Church. He got married and was ordained a priest in the Orthodox Church. He had attended the Orthodox seminary. He had trouble being accepted by the Congregation in the Russian Orthodox church to which he was assigned, as the word was out that he was a former Catholic. After a time, because of the complaints about his having been Catholic, he then decided to rejoin the Catholic Church and was accepted (with his wife and family) as a priest in the Ruthenian Byzantine Eastern Catholic Church. He did not have to undergo any further studies, but was simply accepted as he was. He served as a priest at the local Eastern Catholic Church for a few years.A Catholic becoming an Orthodox and ordained a priest needs to be looked into as the Catholic Church sees Catholics as Catholics until we die. Especially if he wants to return to the Catholic Church later in life.
yes, BUT . . .You can always become Eastern Catholic. You get to be a preist and be married at the same time.
Not quite.Eastern Catholic Churches in the US (actually the entire diaspora) have only been allowed their married clergy for 5 years, since Pope Francis lifted the historical ban imposed on immigrants to the US in the 1800s by the US bishops petition to the Vatican at that time.
Wrong.Wrong. If there were no celibates then the Orthodox would not have any bishops.
We are NOT a “loophole”!Wouldn’t Eastern Catholicism be a better option along with being biritualistic?
You should have seen it a decade agoLack of respect for the East is quite common here.
In the same sense of the word that flat earthism is “questioned” by geologists . . .’OTOH, the validity of the Anglican priesthood is questioned by the RCC.
He still has valid ordination, but would not have faculties.An Orthodox priest, who has never been a Catholic does have valid ordination if that priest becomes Catholic.
No. Flat earthism is easily disprovable and more than 99% agree. Not so with the validity of the Anglican orders.In the same sense of the word that flat earthism is “questioned” by geologists . . .’
As the other way around. If a Catholic priest goes Orthodox they are re-vested but not re-ordained.An Orthodox priest, who has never been a Catholic does have valid ordination if that priest becomes Catholic.
I don’t see how you can disagree with the fact that there are some who claim that the Anglican orders are valid.The RCC disagrees with you on that distinction
I have not yet met a deacon’s wife who thinks married priests would be a good idea. I have met a lot who thought that being married to the pastor would be too tall of an order.Honestly, I am a married woman with only one child and even in this simple life setting I see how hard it is to have time, mind and heart available to serve the Church without struggling to keep up with your duties as a parent and as a spouse. I cannot even imagine how hard would be for a faithful man, married with several children (not uncommon in fertile religious couples) to keep up with parenthood, couple life AND guiding a parish life in the role of a priest. It can be done but it is much much more difficult.
Eddie Doherty was Western Catholic who was married to Catherine de Hueck Doherty. I believe he was allowed to become Eastern Catholic in order to become a priest, probably about 50 years ago. I believe there was a commitment to celibacy at that time, though still married - not sure about that part.If you change for the eastern church itself, and later happen to discern a vocation, that is now possible (a very recent change).
So, were you baptised Lutheran before age 14 or after? In canon law, if 14 or older then you take the ritual church you chose (Latin) else it is that of the Catholic parent (your father).I originally planned on becoming Ruthenian Catholic before going into RCIA however it was not an option because their were not any around me. I had studied Orthodoxy before becoming Catholic and loved the spirituality, the liturgy, the mysticism, I love the lestovka and komboskini. It also was a connection to my Slavic heritage that got taken away with my grandfather marrying my fanatical Danish Lutheran grandmother (God bless her soul, she was very faithful and religion did not matter very much to my grandfather, so she raised my mother and uncle according to her beliefs. Same with my father he was raised Catholic, as he got older his faith became less important so when he married my mother he did not go through the sacrament of holy matrimony and allowed my mom to raise us LCMS. Sorry for the rant it just is some clarification of my background.
If the priest or deacon’s wife dies, they may not remarry, although sometimes from what I gather an exception can be granted if the husband was left with young children who have no mother. It is this way with our deacons and the few Roman Catholic men who were ordained priests after their marriage, as well.I believe there was a commitment to celibacy at that time, though still married - not sure about that part.
I don’t think the Good King Henry saw seizing all the Church property in his realm as a downside to the plan, either, except maybe on his deathbed. Those nuns and monks were not just turned out of the convents and monasteries, but slandered on the way out.My personal opinion - the Anglican Church came into being because Henry wanted a divorce and the pope wouldn’t allow it - thats enough for me to never consider becoming Anglican. Unless you agree with divorce. It was a selfish act to find an heir to the throne - thats not the birth of a church I want to join.
I’m saying that these folks are disregarding, even rejecting, explicit papal teaching, and therefore can be discounted in terms of “catholic thinking”I don’t see how you can disagree with the fact that there are some who claim that the Anglican orders are valid.
I’ve met one who is waiting for her husband to be ordained.I have not yet met a deacon’s wife who thinks married priests would be a good idea. I have met a lot who thought that being married to the pastor would be too tall of an order.
And at the time, Bishop Raya noted the highly unusual circumstances and that it was by no means a precedent.Eddie Doherty was Western Catholic who was married to Catherine de Hueck Doherty. I believe he was allowed to become Eastern Catholic in order to become a priest, probably about 50 years ago.
Non monastic priests are actually tonsured and momentarily made monastics before episcopal ordination in the East.You also mentioned widowers can become bishops. But I thought bishops had to be chosen from among the ranks of monks(?) Or can they be chosen from any religious order?
keep in mind that, outside the US, the unmarried Eastern priest is the exception. So children being grown would be common by the time of becoming a widower.In any event, I would think there would be very very few men who had time to go through the process of a marriage, grieving the death of a wife, going through discernment of a possible religious vocation in a religious order, have no young children anymore, progress through the religious order and in ministry to the point of becoming prominent enough to attract attention for process of discernment as potential bishop material.