Prove it!

  • Thread starter Thread starter dizzy_dave
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.

How’s this verse for a core belief for salvation?​

John 3:16 "For God so LOVED the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
So what about the fact that there’s only one God? Why didn’t you mention that?

You don’t think Christians need to believe that?

Do you see what I’m getting at in this little game? You simply cannot make a list of “core beliefs”–you’re going to end up excluding HUGE, IMPORTANT, BIG DEALS–like forgetting about LOVE!

Not to mention, [SIGN]this list of core beliefs is no where in Scripture[/SIGN]. It’s extra-biblical.
 
Oh! SOOOO, *another *extra-biblical belief you have. :tsktsk:
You’d be a hypocrate not to let me have my extra-Biblical belief seeing it’s going againt your extra-biblical belief. I’d say this is a draw unless you’re willing to give up.😃
 

I’m going to bait you here…​

It looks like you’re avoiding post #336.:):D:thumbsup:
 
You’d be a hypocrate not to let me have my extra-Biblical belief seeing it’s going againt your extra-biblical belief. I’d say this is a draw unless you’re willing to give up.😃
I will never give up! I may go to bed, but I won’t give up! 😃

I think, however, this thread will give you much pause before you object to the CC having extra-biblical doctrines. Of course we do! And you do, too. Nothing wrong with that whatsoever!

That’s the bottom line: you have extra-biblical beliefs and [SIGN]there’s nothing inherently wrong with that[/SIGN], objectively speaking.

You get that now.

Now, our extra-biblical beliefs are part of Sacred Tradition, which comes from the Holy Spirit.

YOUR extra-biblical beliefs come from…a non-authoritative, fallible man’s interpretation. There IS something wrong with that, IMHO. :sad_yes:
 
I think, however, this thread will give you much pause before you object to the CC having extra-biblical doctrines. Of course we do! And you do, too. Nothing wrong with that whatsoever!

That’s the bottom line: you have extra-biblical beliefs and [SIGN]there’s nothing inherently wrong with that[/SIGN], objectively speaking.

You get that now.

:
You think incorrectly about me pausing. I’ve already made comment —
Doki in #336: Here’s where you’re wrong: I have no problem with the CC holding ‘extra-Biblical’ beliefs as long as they (the beliefs) don’t contradict the Bible and as long as the CC member know that the extra-Biblical beliefs could be incorrect. If you can’t admit this then it is you that may be hypocritical.

Too bad you missed it!!🍿

Maybe now you’ll have a bit of trouble sleeping. I’m sorry.😦
 
YOUR extra-biblical beliefs come from…a non-authoritative, fallible man’s interpretation. There IS something wrong with that, IMHO. :sad_yes:
IMO, your extra-biblical beliefs, while are authoritative, can be fallible man’s interpretation.
 
You think incorrectly about me pausing. I’ve already made comment —
You asked what extra-Biblical beliefs you held–which, I presume to mean you thought you had none.

You have been shown, multiple times, that you hold quite a few.

I think you were surprised to learn that you held even one extra-biblical belief. In fact, I bet if anyone had asked you even 2 days ago if you believed anything about God that was not in the Bible, you would have declared, “Absolutely not!”.

Now, thanks to this thread, you know that you do. And you’re ok with it. I’m ok with it. (Objectively speaking that is).

Next time someone asks you if you believe something about God that’s not in the Bible, you’re going to have to say, “Why, yes I do! One thing I learned just a few days ago is that I believe in the canon of Scripture, but that’s not in the Bible!”
 
IMO, your extra-biblical beliefs, while are authoritative, can be fallible man’s interpretation.
So do you think that the canon of Scripture is fallible? Do you think the Gospel of Thomas, or the Didache, should have been included?
 
You asked what extra-Biblical beliefs you held–which, I presume to mean you thought you had none.

You have been shown, multiple times, that you hold quite a few.

I think you were surprised to learn that you held even one extra-biblical belief. In fact, I bet if anyone had asked you even 2 days ago if you believed anything about God that was not in the Bible, you would have declared, “Absolutely not!”.

Now, thanks to this thread, you know that you do. And you’re ok with it. I’m ok with it. (Objectively speaking that is).

Next time someone asks you if you believe something about God that’s not in the Bible, you’re going to have to say, “Why, yes I do! One thing I learned just a few days ago is that I believe in the canon of Scripture, but that’s not in the Bible!”

Wrong. I was wondering what the specific ‘extra-Biblical’ belief the person was referring to so we could, together see what the Bible says on the issue.​

Best for you to ask rather than making statements about anyone (in this case me) off the top of your head. It’s not wise or is it fair.​

Now I see why you think you’ve won round #1 - because you think you understand me. I would say you don’t have a clue as your comments are in error so to this point you’ve lost round #1 by default (I’m sure I’m not good enough to have won on my own – thank you for giving me the victory)
 
So do you think that the canon of Scripture is fallible? Do you think the Gospel of Thomas, or the Didache, should have been included?

What does this have to do with my quote you’ve drawn from?
-.
Why do you care what I believe about the canon, GofT, or Did?​

BTW, for whatever it’s worth, I’m more than comfortable with the 27 books of the NT. But that’s my extra-Biblical belief. Oh, ye, and I could be wrong.
 
There are several Catholic books you can read, to show you that Jesus Christ started the Catholic Church, through Peter and the Apostles.
If you read from the Bible these verses: Matt. 16:18-19, Matt. 5:14-16, Matt. 18:15-17, Jn 17:21-23, Acts 15:1-29, Acts 20:28-31, Rom 13:13, Rom 16:17, 1 Cor 1:10-13, Acts 8:14-24, 1 Cor 12:12-27, 1 Tim 3:1-4, 2 Tim 4:1-5, 1 Pt 5:1.
Monica24
 
Wrong. I was wondering what the specific ‘extra-Biblical’ belief the person was referring to so we could, together see what the Bible says on the issue.
Really, in all honesty–and I have no reason to doubt your integrity, Dokimas. I am certain you are a righteous man–if someone asked you a month ago if you had any beliefs about God that are not in Scripture would you have answered, “Yes, I do!”

OR

Would you have answered, “Absolutely not! All my beliefs come from the Bible!” (or something to that effect.)
 
What does this have to do with my quote you’ve drawn from?
It has to do with your statement that the CC’s Sacred Tradition may be wrong in some of its teachings (i.e. fallible man’s interpretation)

Since it was through Sacred Tradition that the canon of Scripture was declared, you are asserting that this decision may be wrong, are you not?

You see the pickle you’ve put yourself into, Dokimas? Either ST is infallible, and the canon of Scripture is correct,

OR

ST is fallible and it may have erred in declaring Genesis inspired.
BTW, for whatever it’s worth, I’m more than comfortable with the 27 books of the NT. But that’s my extra-Biblical belief. Oh, ye, and I could be wrong.
Yikes! You cannot even rest in the assurance that the Bible is correct in what’s been included and what’s been excluded?
 
Time for bed. Good night, friend and God bless.
I wish you restful sleep, dear brother.

(I, for one, would take no pleasure in knowing you had a fitful night’s rest. But that’s just me. Maybe I’m just too kind-hearted. ;))
 

I don’t mean to be silly here, but it seems to me the only thing Jesus, the 8 day old, learned when He was circumcised was that it hurts.​

BTW, did circumcism do for Jesus what baptism does for your children?

In some aspects, yes. It seals them in the New Covenant, and permanently marks them as belonging to Christ. There are very many things baptism does that circumcision could not, since it is the circumcision made without hands (by the HS).​

  • Please show me a verse that tells you that the apostles taught baptism replaces circumcism as the entrance rite into the Kingdom. Someone already brough up one verse and I pointed out that the circumcism mentioned in context was the circumcism of the heart not of the flesh and only someone can chose to have their heart circumcised.
Yes, it is a circumcision of the heart, and it does not require one to choose it, any more than Jesus chose to be circumcised.

Rom 15:8 And I say, Jesus Christ has become a minister of circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises of the fathers,

Jesus performs our circumcision by the power of the HS through baptism.

Php 3:3 For we are the circumcision, the ones who worship by the Spirit of God, and who glory in Christ Jesus, and who do not trust in flesh.

No one can worship God by Spirit without regeneration.

Col 2:11 in whom also you were circumcised with a circumcision not made by hands, in the putting off of the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ,

This passage in Colossians is a reference to baptism.

1Pe 3:21 Which antitype now also saves us, baptism (not a putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God through the resurrection of Jesus Christ;

Baptism is not just a water bath, but unites us to Christ in His death and resurrection. This is the only way to have a clean conscience before God.
 
What is the quickest, easiest way to prove to a Baptist that the Catholic church is the true church Jesus Christ founded, and is still the true church?
You cannot prove that any church is the true church.

Baptists believe in Jesus. Lutherans believe in Jesus. Christians believe in Jesus. The church you attend with all its rites, rituals, and traditions are the way that particular denomination tries to honor Him and sadly we all fall short.

It is only HIS love for us that we are saved. As Christians, we should be worrying more about those who don’t know the love of Jesus and his free gift of love and salvation for all who seek Him.

Seek Him and you will find Him.
 

PRmerger, justify your beliefs any way you want to. Use me to make yourself feel better is you want to; it bothers me not one bit.​

Believe Mary never had more children if you want; that’s truly extra-Biblical because the Bible say Jesus had sibblings no matter how you spin it.

Matthew 1:
24 Then Joseph, being aroused from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord commanded him and took to him his wife,
25 and did not know her** till ** she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS.
I REALLY dont want to wade into this but Gosh it makes me upset when people dont show the holy mother respect…

so… using your logic above that the word “until” means that the antithesis (mary had other children) inevitably came to pass, what is your take on this verse:

Psalm 110
Of David. A psalm.
1 The LORD says to my Lord:
“Sit at my right hand
until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet.”

2 The LORD will extend your mighty scepter from Zion;
you will rule in the midst of your enemies.

3 Your troops will be willing
on your day of battle.
Arrayed in holy majesty,
from the womb of the dawn
you will receive the dew of your youth.

The word until does NOT indicate an inevitable antithesis.

And for the sake of all that is sane and logical, PLEASE dont try to use the word brothers (adelphos) in this… Seriously. Its too pedantic and has already been explained too many times to be worth my while to discuss that word again.

If you really want, we can talk about the word kecharitoomene, (full of grace), but not adelphos.

And for the record, the Church that emanated through PETER, from CHRIST, has the solemn promise from Christ that the gates of hell shall not prevail… There is only one church from Christ on earth and it is Holy, Apostolic, and CATHOLIC. Do not fall into the standard protestant dilemma of trying to differentiate between Catholic and catholic. The supposed difference there is the ultimate non sequitur.

I dont have to HOPE that my faith is from God, I know it. My HOPE is in Heaven. My HOPE is as follows:

Hope

1817 Hope is the theological virtue by which we desire the kingdom of heaven and eternal life as our happiness, placing our trust in Christ’s promises and relying not on our own strength, but on the help of the grace of the Holy Spirit. "Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful."84 "The Holy Spirit . . . he poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that we might be justified by his grace and become heirs in hope of eternal life."85

1818 The virtue of hope responds to the aspiration to happiness which God has placed in the heart of every man; it takes up the hopes that inspire men’s activities and purifies them so as to order them to the Kingdom of heaven; it keeps man from discouragement; it sustains him during times of abandonment; it opens up his heart in expectation of eternal beatitude. Buoyed up by hope, he is preserved from selfishness and led to the happiness that flows from charity.

1819 Christian hope takes up and fulfills the hope of the chosen people which has its origin and model in the hope of Abraham, who was blessed abundantly by the promises of God fulfilled in Isaac, and who was purified by the test of the sacrifice.86 "Hoping against hope, he believed, and thus became the father of many nations."87

1820 Christian hope unfolds from the beginning of Jesus’ preaching in the proclamation of the beatitudes. The beatitudes raise our hope toward heaven as the new Promised Land; they trace the path that leads through the trials that await the disciples of Jesus. But through the merits of Jesus Christ and of his Passion, God keeps us in the "hope that does not disappoint."88 Hope is the "sure and steadfast anchor of the soul . . . that enters . . . where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf."89 Hope is also a weapon that protects us in the struggle of salvation: "Let us . . . put on the breastplate of faith and charity, and for a helmet the hope of salvation."90 It affords us joy even under trial: "Rejoice in your hope, be patient in tribulation."91 Hope is expressed and nourished in prayer, especially in the Our Father, the summary of everything that hope leads us to desire.

1821 We can therefore hope in the glory of heaven promised by God to those who love him and do his will.92 In every circumstance, each one of us should hope, with the grace of God, to persevere "to the end"93 and to obtain the joy of heaven, as God’s eternal reward for the good works accomplished with the grace of Christ. In hope, the Church prays for "all men to be saved."94 She longs to be united with Christ, her Bridegroom, in the glory of heaven:
Code:
Hope, O my soul, hope. You know neither the day nor the hour. Watch carefully, for everything passes quickly, even though your impatience makes doubtful what is certain, and turns a very short time into a long one. Dream that the more you struggle, the more you prove the love that you bear your God, and the more you will rejoice one day with your Beloved, in a happiness and rapture that can never end.95
sorry for the mini tirade, but I got frustrated with this.

Dominus vobiscum,

FSC
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top