R
Ronald_E
Guest
Amen, Mickey
Amen to that 100 times and Our Lord Jesus the Christ once said, unless you became like little children you will not enter the kingdom of GOD.Excellent post! We do not need scholars to explain to us how the change takes place using fancy philosophical words and theories.
Faith and knowledge, is in simplicity.![]()
There are many Catholics and even non-Catholic Christians who believe in the real presence but don’t need that word to believe. We already explained that to you.I do not know how many times I have to say that if the philosophy behind “transubstantiation” assists you personally, then go for it.
Those who say certain things about someone else say those things most of the time because it is true of what they think or say. Do you get where I’m going with this? I really think that the first time you heard that word and what it meant you were confused so you didn’t want to deal with it. But at the same time perhaps you thought you didn’t need it because you already believed. And that is fine. If you already believed then you wouldn’t need that word. And so I say, that is just fine.I am simply stating that it is an unnecessary teaching and I have seen people become terribly confused by the whole concept.
One day your eyes will be open so that you can see that they did. I pray it be soon, if it’s God’s will. He has His own time.I truly believe that the Early Church Fathers taught no such philosophy when they dealt with the Real Presence in the Precious Gifts.
Wow, finally.But I will concede that there are people who may undoubtedly benefit from the Thomistic explanation.
Not necessary for you perhaps because it might have confused you when you first heard it. But good thing you believe anyway. I’m speaking for myself here but I’m sure Ron is also not threatened. I myself am not threatened by your belief that it is not necessary. But I do feel like I have to defend those who feel that word and explanation necessary for them to start to see and then possibly come to believe because of it. Of course we know it is ultimately because of God’s grace that they believe. But God works in many different ways and different people come about the grace they need in different ways.Please do not feel threatened because I happen to believe it is not necessary to embrace such a concept.
How about What is God’s word in creation, and what is voltage, watts,amp’s? Something to ponder anyway.hi all i haven’t read the entire thread,just the OP…the title got me to thinking so i’ll just throw this into the mix for some fun…can any one give me the precise phsyical dimension of an idea,or even an electrical current.![]()
Great.There are many Catholics and even non-Catholic Christians who believe in the real presence but don’t need that word to believe.
Amen. It surely confused me the first time I heard it…and the second…and the third…Those who say certain things about someone else say those things most of the time because it is true of what they think or say.
I’ve said that multiple times on this thread…amazing! Btw–have you ever heard that when people are always telling others to humble themselves that they may need…er…never mind.Why can’t you just humble yourself and say that you agree that there might be some people who might get some enlightening with that word and its explanation?
Usually, those who accuse others of not having their eyes opened are…er…never mind.One day your eyes will be open so that you can see that they did.
Yes. The strange philosophy behind this word tends to confuse people. Ask your average Catholic—you will see.Not necessary for you perhaps because it might have confused you when you first heard it.
Then by all means…do what you feel you have to do.But I do feel like I have to defend those who feel that word and explanation necessary for them to start to see and then possibly come to believe because of it.
Amen.Of course we know it is ultimately because of God’s grace that they believe.