Proven mathematically: Women = Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter rpp
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If I could download my most recent credit card statement, it would bolster your argument. 😊
 
Hmmm. Remembering my dating days and how much I spent on clothes, makeup, manicures, pedicures, perms, color, fragrances and all the associated nonsense to attract men, I’d say women spend a bundle, too. And that was back in the days when men paid for everything on a date! Not that way anymore. So what planet are you from, if I might ask? Takes time and money to find a guy, too.
 
No, um, kidding Sherlock!

Of course Adam bit the apple too. And every one of us on BOTH sides has been nonstop trouble ever since. 😃
 
Hmmm. Remembering my dating days and how much I spent on clothes, makeup, manicures, pedicures, perms, color, fragrances and all the associated nonsense to attract men, I’d say women spend a bundle, too. And that was back in the days when men paid for everything on a date! Not that way anymore. So what planet are you from, if I might ask? Takes time and money to find a guy, too.
It is right there in my profile. Oregon. It is not just that most of the women here do not do the things you mentioned, it is more along the lines of being lucky if you find one who showers regularly and realizes that tattoos are not a replacement for clothing! šŸ‘
 
I’ve seen this one before. There are several problems with it, the most obvious one is that money is not the root of all evil (or problems), but the LOVE of money is the root of all evil.

As a female engineer, I really do see this quite a lot.
 
Uh…that would be MS. Sherlock…:rotfl:

I lived in Portland for several years and didn’t know anybody who didn’t shower regularly. 'Course, I worked in Corporate America. That’s too bad about the gals up there. I’ve still got a close friend in Tualatin who’s a lawyer…maybe she could introduce you to some nice, showered Catholic girls?
 
WHEN you meet the right woman, rpp…you won’t mind spending money on her. šŸ˜‰
 
I’ve seen this one before. There are several problems with it, the most obvious one is that money is not the root of all evil (or problems), but the LOVE of money is the root of all evil.
Does it therfore follow that the love of women is evil? šŸ˜›
As a female engineer
:tiphat:

Female engineers are wonderful people.
I lived in Portland for several years and didn’t know anybody who didn’t shower regularly. 'Course, I worked in Corporate America. That’s too bad about the gals up there. I’ve still got a close friend in Tualatin who’s a lawyer…maybe she could introduce you to some nice, showered Catholic girls?
Lawyers have it really bad. These days law firms have shower rooms because you aren’t supposed to go home form work on every week day.
 
Well, right from the get go, the ā€œandā€ in time ā€œandā€ money would be addition, not multiplication, so that ruins your whole proof. Sorry.
 
The logical operator ā€œANDā€ is a conjunction and that means multiplication, actually. Addition would be alternative, ā€œORā€.
 
The logical operator ā€œANDā€ is a conjunction and that means multiplication, actually. Addition would be alternative, ā€œORā€.
I’m talking basic computation. ā€œAndā€ means addition, and ā€œofā€ means multiplication.

Of course I’m just a woman, causing problems.
 
I’m talking basic computation. ā€œAndā€ means addition, and ā€œofā€ means multiplication.

Of course I’m just a woman, causing problems.
It’s logical statements, we’re using logic here. Besides, even in basic maths it wouldn’t follow from ā€œneeding X and Yā€ that the relationship is addition. It’s like physics where to calculate force, you need mass and acceleration, which you multiply.
 
It’s logical statements, we’re using logic here. Besides, even in basic maths it wouldn’t follow from ā€œneeding X and Yā€ that the relationship is addition. It’s like physics where to calculate force, you need mass and acceleration, which you multiply.
I think we’re not using anything, since it’s a ridiculous, albeit funny, idea. I get it with the logic. You could look at it that way, or you could look at it as "for dinner, I need 2 apples and 3 oranges to make the salad. No, no multiplying the apples and oranges. Just cut and mix.
 
I’ve seen this one before. There are several problems with it, the most obvious one is that money is not the root of all evil (or problems), but the LOVE of money is the root of all evil.

As a female engineer, I really do see this quite a lot.
This statement cannot be factual as there is no such thing as female engineers.

I’ve heard stories about them, but they are a myth (like sasquach)
 
I think we’re not using anything, since it’s a ridiculous, albeit funny, idea. I get it with the logic. You could look at it that way, or you could look at it as "for dinner, I need 2 apples and 3 oranges to make the salad. No, no multiplying the apples and oranges. Just cut and mix.
But you can’t add apple and oranges either. only apples or oranges. 😃
 
This statement cannot be factual as there is no such thing as female engineers.

I’ve heard stories about them, but they are a myth (like sasquach)
Wow, I am a mythical creature? No wonder my husband doesn’t seem to hear me when I talk! šŸ˜›
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top