M
Michael57
Guest
Yeah, well, I was in a hurry to get to Mass, and my fingers just went into autopilot…Good point. “I will pray for all three” was, in fact, a slightly odd statement.![]()
![]()
Yeah, well, I was in a hurry to get to Mass, and my fingers just went into autopilot…Good point. “I will pray for all three” was, in fact, a slightly odd statement.![]()
![]()
Not sure what you are citing as my “inaccurate” assertion. The position of Lutheran and Anglican churches with notable exceptions * view homosexuality as “moral” behavior.
There is, of-course, individual freedom to disagree yet the Church ordains and marries gay Christians.*
It is inaccurate to portray, as if in complete agreement, when the document cited shows nothing of the kind.
Did you even read it before you posted it? Or did you just read what agreed with your private opinions?
I’ve read it, and from what you post, I don’t think you have either read or understand the document that you cited.
The document itself said that there were a wide varieties of opinion about the subject of homosexuality within ELCA, let alone the decision at the corporate level to ordain those that many within ELCA have strong objection to as a policy.
Then there is the issue of ordination of women.
Your position does not seem to be supported by the things that you quote to support it or the document you cite.![]()
It’s monumental only if you try to deconstruct Scriptures enough to make it say whatever it is you want it to say.You know that what you ask requires a monumental answer. I can only provide limited information since both women and gay ordination are not main interests. The thread on Rt Krister Stendahl should help.
It’s monumental only if you try to deconstruct Scriptures enough to make it say whatever it is you want it to say.
It’s pretty simple:
*Leviticus 20:13
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
13 If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them.
Romans 1:18-32
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
The Guilt of Mankind
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of men who by their wickedness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse; 21 for although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man or birds or animals or reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error.
28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a base mind and to improper conduct. 29 They were filled with all manner of wickedness, evil, covetousness, malice. Full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God’s decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them but approve those who practice them.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral,[a] nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,**[c] 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
1 Timothy 1:8-10
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
8 Now we know that the law is good, if any one uses it lawfully, 9 understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 immoral persons, sodomites, kidnapers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,
Jude 1:7
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
7 just as Sodom and Gomor′rah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.***
![]()
Generally speaking from my own experience in the ELCA, when there is a wide variety of opinions about an issue, one can rest assured that the only opinion that really matters is the opinion that represents the modernist, liberal side of the topic.It is inaccurate to portray, as if in complete agreement, when the document cited shows nothing of the kind.
Did you even read it before you posted it? Or did you just read what agreed with your private opinions?
I’ve read it, and from what you post, I don’t think you have either read or understand the document that you cited.
The document itself said that there were a wide varieties of opinion about the subject of homosexuality within ELCA, let alone the decision at the corporate level to ordain those that many within ELCA have strong objection to as a policy.
Then there is the issue of ordination of women.
Your position does not seem to be supported by the things that you quote to support it or the document you cite.![]()
It’s monumental only if you try to deconstruct Scriptures enough to make it say whatever it is you want it to say.
It’s pretty simple:
*Leviticus 20:13
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
13 If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall be put to death, their blood is upon them.
Romans 1:18-32
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
The Guilt of Mankind
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of men who by their wickedness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse; 21 for although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man or birds or animals or reptiles.
24 Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25 because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever! Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. Their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error.
28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a base mind and to improper conduct. 29 They were filled with all manner of wickedness, evil, covetousness, malice. Full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are gossips, 30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31 foolish, faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32 Though they know God’s decree that those who do such things deserve to die, they not only do them but approve those who practice them.
1 Corinthians 6:9-11
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
9 Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral,[a] nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals,**[c] 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.
1 Timothy 1:8-10
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
8 Now we know that the law is good, if any one uses it lawfully, 9 understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, 10 immoral persons, sodomites, kidnapers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,
Jude 1:7
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition (RSVCE)
7 just as Sodom and Gomor′rah and the surrounding cities, which likewise acted immorally and indulged in unnatural lust, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.***
Yeah, but that’s the opinion of an ancient Hebrew culture. It isn’t really intended for our modern, enlightened culture. You see, we just know better.
Jon
Dustin,How can there be such communions when each faith can teach whatever they wish about Scripture?
![]()
What you know of me, would I be welcome at holy altar in your parish?Dustin,
Any questions why theLCMS is not in communion with the ELCA?
Jon
ummmm…Dustin,
Any questions why theLCMS is not in communion with the ELCA?
Jon
You certainly are welcome to attend mass at any catholic parish…just do not go up and receive the Eucharist until you are in full communion with the Holy See.What you know of me, would I be welcome at holy altar in your parish?
So, if I am invited by the parish pastor/ monsignor/ padre to take holy communion, I should decline?You certainly are welcome to attend mass at any catholic parish…just do not go up and receive the Eucharist until you are in full communion with the Holy See.
Well, I don’t doubt that sometimes happens, but it really shouldn’t since he would be going against Catholic policy.So, if I am invited by the parish pastor/ monsignor/ padre to take holy communion, I should decline?![]()
Why should they invite you if you are not Catholic?So, if I am invited by the parish pastor/ monsignor/ padre to take holy communion, I should decline?![]()
It is frequently asked whether non-Catholics can receive Communion at a Catholic Mass. Quite often this comes up in the context of family events - weddings, baptisms, funerals - situations which put a great deal of pressure on families and Eucharistic ministers, Ordinary and Extraordinary, to allow it. As a result it happens quite frequently that Communion ministers believe themselves authorized to extend Eucharistic hospitality, either for the sake of kindness or a genuine sense of unity among the members of the Congregation. While such motives are admirable, the result nonetheless falsifies the sacramental meaning of the Eucharist as both a sign of communion with Christ and communion with the Catholic Church.
In order to safeguard the sacrament, and to ensure that Christ is received with the proper dispositions (something very important for the authentic good of the person receiving Him), the Church has enacted certain norms for determining those occasions when intercommunion is legitimate. In the 1983 Code of Canon Law the following is prescribed:
Canon 844
Absolutely…for the priest or monsignor may not be aware there is a non-Catholic attending. Their invite is geared towards catholics…not non-Catholics.So, if I am invited by the parish pastor/ monsignor/ padre to take holy communion, I should decline?![]()
Here is another question EC:So, if I am invited by the parish pastor/ monsignor/ padre to take holy communion, I should decline?![]()
I visited the Catholic Church often before I became Catholic through RCIA, even though I referred to myself as “Catholic” and held the idea that the teachings and doctrine of the Church were True.So, if I am invited by the parish pastor/ monsignor/ padre to take holy communion, I should decline?![]()
You are being a bit obsessive compulsive about Catholic communion. Please don’t eat and drink judgement upon yourself.I don’t I think I live in a totally isolated universe where family weddings, baptisms, 1st Communion, requiem, etc cut across Catholic & Lutheran lines. The family often sit together in several pews or in a side chapel. We are greeted and encouraged to come forward in Mass. Cursillos, retreats in Catholic & Anglican religious communities always include taking holy communion.