S
Sailor_Kenshin
Guest
I’m more than a little tired of wishy-washy, overintellectual Catholics letting Evangelicals do all the heavy lifting.
I’m more than very tired of Catholics behaving like right-wing Evangelicals.I’m more than a little tired of wishy-washy, overintellectual Catholics letting Evangelicals do all the heavy lifting.
overintellectual? Their ideas come from those places that promote public nudity by giving it the appearance of something intellectual.I’m more than a little tired of wishy-washy, overintellectual Catholics letting Evangelicals do all the heavy lifting.
My positions are in line with JPII’s Theology of the Body.Sailor Kenshin;6653068:
overintellectual? Their ideas come from those places that promote public nudity by giving it the appearance of something intellectual.I’m more than a little tired of wishy-washy, overintellectual Catholics letting Evangelicals do all the heavy lifting.
And you’re pretty much doing to this what the pseudo-intellectuals did to Vat II.My positions are in line with JPII’s Theology of the Body.
Here’s a portion of what JPII wrote (originally posted by Papawbooks):
"Because God created it, the human body can remain nude and and uncovered and preserve intact its splendor and its beauty…Nakedness as such is not to be equated with physical shamelessness…Immodesty is present only when nakedness plays a negative role with regard to the value of the person…The human body is not in itself shameful …Shamelessness [just like shame and modesty] is a function of the interior of a person.’
—Karol Cardinal Woytyla [Pope John Paul ll ]
‘Love & responsibility’, 1981
Do you think JPII’s positions are intellectual or pseudo-intellectual?
Overall, modesty is about properly respecting the body, which is a temple of the Holy Spirit. One may potentially properly respect the body without covering it. However, if by not covering it, one is treating their body the like a harlot would treat her body, than the body is not being treated like a temple of the Holy Spirit.
Please back up your accusation.And you’re pretty much doing to this what the pseudo-intellectuals did to Vat II.
Naively???LOL!!!
My daughter went to France to study, and naively ended up at a public beach with a number of other people nude.
Must have been a shocking experience!LOL!!!
My daughter went to France to study, and naively ended up at a public beach with a number of other people nude. From her description:
An extremely overweight 60+ year old woman whose skin looks like old beat up leather: now that is sinful!
But certainly not in the sense of the sin of creating lust… more likey the sin of creating unmitigated horror and the immediate urge to toss one’s cookies. Or perhaps, in this case, one’s French pastries…![]()
Yes, she did not know such things existed. Long story. She was, however, hilarious in her recounting of the incident.Naively???![]()
Oh, I see. She went to a nudist place but kept herself dressed. Thanks for clarifying it. I actually posted above that “public nudity is a sin” only if you’re over 50. After 60 it must become a mortal sinYes, she did not know such things existed. Long story. She was, however, hilarious in her recounting of the incident.
As mentioned elsewhere, many (if not most) beaches in Europe are quite tolerant of either partial (topless) or occasionally complete nudity. It’s just the way things have always been… And this is the time that many people learn that those “Playboy-Playmate-perfect models” are an extreme rarity in the real world.Oh, I see. She went to a nudist place but kept herself dressed. Thanks for clarifying it. I actually posted above that “public nudity is a sin” only if you’re over 50. After 60 it must become a mortal sin![]()
No, actually she and a couple of the other students went to the beach; their destination was not to go to a nude beach but simply to go to th4 beach (as she had numerous times in Oregon), and they had no idea that it was permitted. She found out when got there; she was both embarrassed and grossed out.Oh, I see. She went to a nudist place but kept herself dressed. Thanks for clarifying it. I actually posted above that “public nudity is a sin” only if you’re over 50. After 60 it must become a mortal sin![]()
As mentioned elsewhere, many (if not most) beaches in Europe are quite tolerant of either partial (topless) or occasionally complete nudity. It’s just the way things have always been… And this is the time that many people learn that those “Playboy-Playmate-perfect models” are an extreme rarity in the real world.Those “Lane Bryant” size models are somewhat closer to reality…
I’ve read somewhere that in France, beaches are clothes-optional by default, and that nudity is legal in all beaches but two in that country. I’m guessing that one of those two was stormed on D-day, and thus has more historical rather than recreational significance.No, actually she and a couple of the other students went to the beach; their destination was not to go to a nude beach but simply to go to th4 beach (as she had numerous times in Oregon), and they had no idea that it was permitted. She found out when got there; she was both embarrassed and grossed out.
Her description, however, was hilarious; I did not do it justice.
This happened to me in Italy.LOL!!!
My daughter went to France to study, and naively ended up at a public beach with a number of other people nude. From her description:
An extremely overweight 60+ year old woman whose skin looks like old beat up leather: now that is sinful!
But certainly not in the sense of the sin of creating lust… more likey the sin of creating unmitigated horror and the immediate urge to toss one’s cookies. Or perhaps, in this case, one’s French pastries…![]()