Purgatory for Children

  • Thread starter Thread starter marietta
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This theory does not even come close to addressing the questions put forth in the opening of this thread.

yinekka writes:

“If you wish to see what the Baltimore Catechism taught this age child just enter Baltimore Catechism Vol 1 in Google and it should come up”. I guess you missed my post # 10 in which I described the Baltimore Catechism rendition of Purgatory for Children.

mattkubes writes:

*“The confusion is much more likely to have been caused by a lack of catechesis in recent decades, focusing solely on community and a feel-good Gospel. **Church teaching remains ***fairly clear on this doctrine.” Didn’t the whole formation of the vague and veiled references to purification come from Gregory the Great? Until he honed the images, the Church was not clear on this “doctrine” - it was not even “fairly clear on this doctrine”.

Consider the impact of “poor catechesis” - lives and souls lost and damaged, many never to return to Catholicism, never to trust “doctrine”, never to even have a remote desire for “redemption” because the terms, as laid out by laypersons with good intentions, were too harsh.

I have no intention of trying to dismantle faulty teachings that have both shaped me and impaired me for fifty years. I choose to keep whatever remnants of good remain and leave the rest. If Purgatory exists I suppose I will do my time. I’ll be sure to take my fire-retardant pajamas.

marietta
It will be the cool super hot blue flame of redemption and healing instead of the red-hot, slow burning fire of damnation and destruction. Jesus will look upon us with the innocent and pure souls of the children he said looks upon the eyes of his Angels and they in their purity and goodness will know who they want to join them in heaven.
 
It will be the cool super hot blue flame of redemption and healing instead of the red-hot, slow burning fire of damnation and destruction. Jesus will look upon us with the innocent and pure souls of the children he said looks upon the eyes of his Angels and they in their purity and goodness will know who they want to join them in heaven.
For you, perhaps.

And for me:

It will be existence without tinnitus so I might hear that otherworldly voice saying, “You had to bring the flannel when you had so many nice cotton nightgowns??”

marietta
 
What is a “feel-good” gospel? Is that like the one Joel Osteen preaches. He focuses on the positive. He wins many converts I guess because he says that God is a good God and wants us to be the same.
Actually, it’s exactly that. I’m all for teaching the feel-good parts, but not to the exclusion of other doctrines and realities.
It will be the cool super hot blue flame of redemption and healing instead of the red-hot, slow burning fire of damnation and destruction.
That’s it in a nutshell, yes. Like I said in an earlier post, I’ve always thought that the main suffering will be the fact that we know we’re so close to spending eternity with God, but we have to wait for purification to occur. When we die and the veil is lifted, those of us in a state of grace will want nothing more than to flee to God…and delaying that won’t be easy.
 
For you, perhaps.

And for me:

It will be existence without tinnitus so I might hear that otherworldly voice saying, “You had to bring the flannel when you had so many nice cotton nightgowns??”

marietta
Meaning exactly what? I am not sure of your description of what you are expecting - the business class or the First class?🙂
 
mattkubes:

And what do you surmise will be in store for those who have no personal, intimate relationship with God, particularly as the Catholic Church explains God? And what if those teachings were errant, having been bastardized by laypersons who taught elementary catechism as a service to the church, but having offered instead a disservice to the children? Say these persons were baptized and confirmed but moved away from the Church in adulthood for one reason or another? They have lived good, moral, honest lives, or they have been repentant for their sins and have always tried to make honest amends for their transgressions. Where do they wind up? Do they still go to the Blue Room or the Red Room or the Flannel Room in Purgatory to sweat it out? Hell? Limbo? Bakersfield?

Just wondering what your take is on this.

marietta
 
This theory does not even come close to addressing the questions put forth in the opening of this thread.

yinekka writes:

“If you wish to see what the Baltimore Catechism taught this age child just enter Baltimore Catechism Vol 1 in Google and it should come up”. I guess you missed my post # 10 in which I described the Baltimore Catechism rendition of Purgatory for Children.

mattkubes writes:

*“The confusion is much more likely to have been caused by a lack of catechesis in recent decades, focusing solely on community and a feel-good Gospel. **Church teaching remains ***fairly clear on this doctrine.” Didn’t the whole formation of the vague and veiled references to purification come from Gregory the Great? Until he honed the images, the Church was not clear on this “doctrine” - it was not even “fairly clear on this doctrine”.

Consider the impact of “poor catechesis” - lives and souls lost and damaged, many never to return to Catholicism, never to trust “doctrine”, never to even have a remote desire for “redemption” because the terms, as laid out by laypersons with good intentions, were too harsh.

I have no intention of trying to dismantle faulty teachings that have both shaped me and impaired me for fifty years. I choose to keep whatever remnants of good remain and leave the rest. If Purgatory exists I suppose I will do my time. I’ll be sure to take my fire-retardant pajamas.

marietta
You sound very very bitter and very very angry. Why? Because a doctrine of the Church doesn’t jibe with what you want to believe? Or perhaps the way that doctrine was presented to you? Or perhaps because you can’t see a just God having a place like Purgatory or maybe even Hell for that matter?

Do you have issues with other areas of Church doctrine as well? Or is it just this one specific thing?
 
Meaning exactly what? I am not sure of your description of what you are expecting - the business class or the First class?🙂
The more I read the posts on this forum, the more I think I can expect no more than Cargo. :sad_bye:

marietta
 
mattkubes:

And what do you surmise will be in store for those who have no personal, intimate relationship with God, particularly as the Catholic Church explains God? And what if those teachings were errant, having been bastardized by laypersons who taught elementary catechism as a service to the church, but having offered instead a disservice to the children? Say these persons were baptized and confirmed but moved away from the Church in adulthood for one reason or another? They have lived good, moral, honest lives, or they have been repentant for their sins and have always tried to make honest amends for their transgressions. Where do they wind up? Do they still go to the Blue Room or the Red Room or the Flannel Room in Purgatory to sweat it out? Hell? Limbo? Bakersfield?

Just wondering what your take is on this.

marietta
You sound very very bitter and very very angry. Why? Because a doctrine of the Church doesn’t jibe with what you want to believe? Or perhaps the way that doctrine was presented to you? Or perhaps because you can’t see a just God having a place like Purgatory or maybe even Hell for that matter?

Do you have issues with other areas of Church doctrine as well? Or is it just this one specific thing?
 
Just wondering what your take is on this.
I just follow what the Church teaches - there is no salvation outside the Church. Even still, that just means that if these people go to heaven (which I believe they can), they go there because of the merits of Christ on the Cross and the grace given through His Church. That’s the long winded way of saying that God can give grace to whoever He wants, whenever He wants…but that it all comes from the same place!

I don’t think anyone leaves the Church who fully understands the teachings. I just can’t imagine anyone thinking “I know all this to be true, and I accepted it with full understanding at one point, but I still want to snub God.” It certainly doesn’t make it any easier to get to Heaven if we’re outside of the visible Church, but God alone knows our intentions.
 
mattkubes:

And what do you surmise will be in store for those who have no personal, intimate relationship with God, particularly as the Catholic Church explains God? And what if those teachings were errant, having been bastardized by laypersons who taught elementary catechism as a service to the church, but having offered instead a disservice to the children? Say these persons were baptized and confirmed but moved away from the Church in adulthood for one reason or another? They have lived good, moral, honest lives, or they have been repentant for their sins and have always tried to make honest amends for their transgressions. Where do they wind up? Do they still go to the Blue Room or the Red Room or the Flannel Room in Purgatory to sweat it out? Hell? Limbo? Bakersfield?

Just wondering what your take is on this.

marietta
I really think that there are different faiths and different messages for different folks along their particular journey. I think that the Holy Spirit is speaking to you right now.

You and many catholics have the benefit of the Catechism - look up each one of your questions and see that your faith is very deep and moving. Unfortunately there are not very many folks like Scott Hahn and Corapi putting a personal touch on this.

Listen to Charles Stanley and even Joel Osteen and classic sermons from Billy Graham. Read BG’s book about the angels. There were 12 legions - legions of angels that were protecting Jesus on his journey here. They were told to abandon Him at the cross so he could die a like one of us. They weeped.

He commands them today to protect and watch over all of us - most of all the believers. Pray that these angels and the Holy Spirit will minister to these folks you have mentioned. Do not let the mistakes of maybe poor teaching prevent you from enjoying the fruits of your salvation. Merry Christmas!
 
Volume 1 of the New Saint Joseph Baltimore Catechism, Part 3, Section 33 (copyright 1964 by Catholic Book Publishing Co., New York) addresses Temporal Punishment and Indulgences, but it does not directly refer to Purgatory. It tells us that in order to be acceptable to God, " . . . we must be willing to suffer for a while . . . " and, “Our Lord cleanses us as a washing machine cleans clothes so that our souls will be entirely clean.”

Do you truly wish you had been brought up on that? . . .
Uh, nooooooooo, I was referencing Volume 1 of the Baltimore Catechism (I did check it at home, briefly - don’t have one here at the office), not some New Saint Joseph version of the great earlier work (am I the only one that tends to distrust anything labeled as “new” in the area of catechesis?).

Volume 1 as it sits on my shelf does directly reference purgatory, as it should, and describes, in simple terms, what the Church means by that term.

Washing machine? Yikes, that’s horrid. That is most certainly NOT in the Baltimore Catechism (and shouldn’t be in any catechism…).

As my home internet is out, I will take this time to wish all of you, espcecially you, Marietta, a peaceful and Christ-filled holiday.

In His peace,

Terry
 
I just follow what the Church teaches - there is no salvation outside the Church. Even still, that just means that if these people go to heaven (which I believe they can), they go there because of the merits of Christ on the Cross and the grace given through His Church. That’s the long winded way of saying that God can give grace to whoever He wants, whenever He wants…but that it all comes from the same place!

I don’t think anyone leaves the Church who fully understands the teachings. I just can’t imagine anyone thinking “I know all this to be true, and I accepted it with full understanding at one point, but I still want to snub God.” It certainly doesn’t make it any easier to get to Heaven if we’re outside of the visible Church, but God alone knows our intentions.
The CC accepts those as christians who practice faithfully and were born into their faith - outside of the catholic church. There is salvation - maybe not the “fullness of the faith” but there is salvation in other denominations. Is the road map as clear - especially as the road drags on, life takes its toll on us and are salvation experience is in the rear view mirror - maybe not. The CC as I see provides clear directions along the way. Maybe tooo graphic and assumptive in this case.
 
Uh, nooooooooo, I was referencing Volume 1 of the Baltimore Catechism (I did check it at home, briefly - don’t have one here at the office), not some New Saint Joseph version of the great earlier work (am I the only one that tends to distrust anything labeled as “new” in the area of catechesis?).

Volume 1 as it sits on my shelf does directly reference purgatory, as it should, and describes, in simple terms, what the Church means by that term.

Washing machine? Yikes, that’s horrid. That is most certainly NOT in the Baltimore Catechism (and shouldn’t be in any catechism…).

As my home internet is out, I will take this time to wish all of you, espcecially you, Marietta, a peaceful and Christ-filled holiday.

In His peace,

Terry
The edition of the Baltimore Catechism that I own, and from which I quoted, is “dedicated to St. Joseph, the Foster Father of Jesus, the First Teacher of these truths.” Inside the front cover is this: “The text of Catechism No. 1 contained in this book is reproduced by the license of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C., the only owner of the copyright of the Revised Edition of the Baltimore Catechism No. 1. Used with its permission. All rights reserved. Nihil Obstat: Richard Kugelman, C.P., S.T.L., S.S.L., Censor Deputatus; Imprimi Potest: Gerard Rooney, C.P., Provincial; Nihil Obstat: John A. Goodwine, J.C.D., Censor Librorum; Imprimatur: Francis Cardinal Spellman, Archbishop of New York.”

The copyright is 1964, Catholic Book Publishing Company, New York. This is the book from which I was taught in Catechism classes from 1964 up until my mid-latter teens. I didn’t just buy the book from the inside of some bum’s trench coat.

“Washing machine?” you exclaim, *“Yikes, that’s horrid. That is most certainly NOT in the Baltimore Catechism (and shouldn’t be in any catechism…).”
*
The passage quoted above can be found in my edition of the Baltimore Catechism in Lesson 33, page 160.

What does your version say?

palmas85 writes:

*"You sound very very bitter and very very angry. Why? Because a doctrine of the Church doesn’t jibe with what you want to believe? Or perhaps the way that doctrine was presented to you? Or perhaps because you can’t see a just God having a place like Purgatory or maybe even Hell for that matter?

Do you have issues with other areas of Church doctrine as well? Or is it just this one specific thing?"*

Over the last 40 years, bitterness has made way for disgust, not just with any particular doctrine of the Catholic Church but the way the Catechism was taught, with rigidity and threats from laypeople and nuns alike; it was a fear-based marketing effort and after giving it the good ol’ college try I sought spiritual connection elsewhere.

A nun asks an 8-year-old child a question about the Crucifixion. The child answers the nun correctly. The nun says, “Well done, my child. I have a little reward for you.” The nun holds out her hands: one holding a piece of rhinestone jewelry, multi-colored, glittering, enthralling; the other holding a brown wooden crucifix. The manipulation is staggering. Should the child take what she wants and hold tight to the colored trinket? Or should she begrudgingly take the crucifix, even though her home has one in every single room and she knows that’s what the nun wants her to do?

This type of shrewd yet fraudulent indoctrination method was in play every week in my CCD classes in the sixties (and this particular episode took place outside the classroom, in a dark, quiet hallway where no one could observe the incident). When I came into my mid-teens I called it as I saw it, but when I was younger, and so tender and impressionable, this tactic was a violation of trust and gave me a lasting impression of God, of Jesus, of the Church and Her representatives. So we’re in a once burned - twice learned standoff. The main reasons I left the Church are 1) I refuse to be manipulated if there is any way I can avoid it, and 2) I will not be lied to in the name of salvation. I’d rather be out here without a roadmap than be lied to.

marietta
 
The edition of the Baltimore Catechism that I own, and from which I quoted, is “dedicated to St. Joseph, the Foster Father of Jesus, the First Teacher of these truths.” Inside the front cover is this: “The text of Catechism No. 1 contained in this book is reproduced by the license of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C., the only owner of the copyright of the Revised Edition of the Baltimore Catechism No. 1. Used with its permission. All rights reserved. Nihil Obstat: Richard Kugelman, C.P., S.T.L., S.S.L., Censor Deputatus; Imprimi Potest: Gerard Rooney, C.P., Provincial; Nihil Obstat: John A. Goodwine, J.C.D., Censor Librorum; Imprimatur: Francis Cardinal Spellman, Archbishop of New York.”

The copyright is 1964, Catholic Book Publishing Company, New York. This is the book from which I was taught in Catechism classes from 1964 up until my mid-latter teens. I didn’t just buy the book from the inside of some bum’s trench coat.

“Washing machine?” you exclaim, *“Yikes, that’s horrid. That is most certainly NOT in the Baltimore Catechism (and shouldn’t be in any catechism…).”
*
The passage quoted above can be found in my edition of the Baltimore Catechism in Lesson 33, page 160.

What does your version say?

palmas85 writes:

*"You sound very very bitter and very very angry. Why? Because a doctrine of the Church doesn’t jibe with what you want to believe? Or perhaps the way that doctrine was presented to you? Or perhaps because you can’t see a just God having a place like Purgatory or maybe even Hell for that matter?

Do you have issues with other areas of Church doctrine as well? Or is it just this one specific thing?"*

Over the last 40 years, bitterness has made way for disgust, not just with any particular doctrine of the Catholic Church but the way the Catechism was taught, with rigidity and threats from laypeople and nuns alike; it was a fear-based marketing effort and after giving it the good ol’ college try I sought spiritual connection elsewhere.

A nun asks an 8-year-old child a question about the Crucifixion. The child answers the nun correctly. The nun says, “Well done, my child. I have a little reward for you.” The nun holds out her hands: one holding a piece of rhinestone jewelry, multi-colored, glittering, enthralling; the other holding a brown wooden crucifix. The manipulation is staggering. Should the child take what she wants and hold tight to the colored trinket? Or should she begrudgingly take the crucifix, even though her home has one in every single room and she knows that’s what the nun wants her to do?

This type of shrewd yet fraudulent indoctrination method was in play every week in my CCD classes in the sixties (and this particular episode took place outside the classroom, in a dark, quiet hallway where no one could observe the incident). When I came into my mid-teens I called it as I saw it, but when I was younger, and so tender and impressionable, this tactic was a violation of trust and gave me a lasting impression of God, of Jesus, of the Church and Her representatives. So we’re in a once burned - twice learned standoff. The main reasons I left the Church are 1) I refuse to be manipulated if there is any way I can avoid it, and 2) I will not be lied to in the name of salvation. I’d rather be out here without a roadmap than be lied to.

marietta
Fair enough, at least now we know exactly where you are coming from. You had some bad experiences and you have let the bad feelings fester for years until now. Well, all I can say is that I hope you find peace because it seems to me, just an observation mind you that the bitterness and anger that you still have for the Church has pretty much taken control of you. And that is bad.

You hate the Church, maybe with good reason, maybe not, and want to strike back somehow. This is your way of doing that. Maybe you feel that you can save someone from experiencing what you experienced. Who knows?

As an aside, I went through most of my Catechism classes years before you and I don’t remember such things as you describe above. We also had no lay people at all instructing us, only Sisters, Priests and in High School, religious Brothers.

So, I can say that your experience was not the norm at least pre Vatican 2 and where I lived. Perhaps it was so afterwards and in other places…

Merry Christmas my friend, I pray that you find some measure of peace in your heart and in your life.
 
The edition of the Baltimore Catechism that I own, and from which I quoted, is “dedicated to St. Joseph, the Foster Father of Jesus, the First Teacher of these truths.” Inside the front cover is this: “The text of Catechism No. 1 contained in this book is reproduced by the license of the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine, Washington, D.C., the only owner of the copyright of the Revised Edition of the Baltimore Catechism No. 1. Used with its permission. All rights reserved. Nihil Obstat: Richard Kugelman, C.P., S.T.L., S.S.L., Censor Deputatus; Imprimi Potest: Gerard Rooney, C.P., Provincial; Nihil Obstat: John A. Goodwine, J.C.D., Censor Librorum; Imprimatur: Francis Cardinal Spellman, Archbishop of New York.”

The copyright is 1964, Catholic Book Publishing Company, New York. This is the book from which I was taught in Catechism classes from 1964 up until my mid-latter teens. I didn’t just buy the book from the inside of some bum’s trench coat.

“Washing machine?” you exclaim, “Yikes, that’s horrid. That is most certainly NOT in the Baltimore Catechism (and shouldn’t be in any catechism…).”

The passage quoted above can be found in my edition of the Baltimore Catechism in Lesson 33, page 160.

What does your version say?
Well, for one, the Baltimore Catechism No. 1 that I have has an imprimatur of April 6, 1885 and copyright of the same year. It is in a simple question and answer format.

And NONE of the answers mention common household appliances. I stand by my “yikes”.
 
Well, for one, the Baltimore Catechism No. 1 that I have has an imprimatur of April 6, 1885 and copyright of the same year. It is in a simple question and answer format.

And NONE of the answers mention common household appliances. I stand by my “yikes”.
And that is fine - I’m grateful that you made the distinction, because the one I have has been dumbed-down and distilled to the point where no child could make sense of much of it, nor could s/he much care about the rest of it.

I knew that Baltimore Catechism went back to the 19th century, but the one in use when I was a kid was nearly worthless. That is the one I was referring to in my original post. Maybe I should give the thing to my niece; she’s considering raising her kids in the Catholic Church.

marietta
 
Where can I view an actual lesson plan designed by a genuine Catholic elementary school teacher with regard to this topic?

Thanks.

marietta
Dear Marietta,
You really can’t. Catholic school teachers are as different as the people who walk the planet. An interesting way to find out about the teachers who work in your Catholic schools is to check out their MySpace page or their Facebook page. :eek: Then you’ll get a sense of who is in the classroom.
 
And that is fine - I’m grateful that you made the distinction, because the one I have has been dumbed-down and distilled to the point where no child could make sense of much of it, nor could s/he much care about the rest of it.

I knew that Baltimore Catechism went back to the 19th century, but the one in use when I was a kid was nearly worthless. That is the one I was referring to in my original post. Maybe I should give the thing to my niece; she’s considering raising her kids in the Catholic Church.

marietta
If the version you have is the watered-down, possibly worthless edition from the 1960’s, perhaps you should think twice about giving it to your niece (to save her from something like you went through)(unless you don’t like this particular niece:p. . . ).

How about if you toss the modern version, and I send you my 1885 version for your niece? I bought it to “catch up”, so to speak (I was raised in the '60s with little or no good catechesis, either) and have now realized I am too old to memorize the answers.

It’s a thought, anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top