purgatory

  • Thread starter Thread starter durhamfire
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
PRmerger:
The Fire of Christ’s Love? What’s so wrong about that?
Just like blood is the atoning agent in your view. The Blood of Christ’s love.
The blood of Christ is the atoning agent in God’s view, according to His Word. But His Word states NOTHING about Purgatory, much less the fires of Purgatory being Christ’s love. “Purgatory” is uniquely RC.
"Some recent theologians are of the opinion that the fire which both burns and saves is Christ himself, the Judge and Savior.
True Christianity isn’t based on the “opinions” of men. It’s based entirely on what God Himself has revealed. This is what distinguishes true Christianity from all the man-made religions and cults on earth.
 
Randy Carson:
Even those Christians who deny that Maccabees 1 & 2 belong are inspired and belong in the canon of the Old Testament must admit that this passage reveals that the Jews believed that that the living may pray for the dead and make sacrifices for them in order that they might be freed from the sins they had committed. It was with this cultural understanding as a backdrop that the New Testament verses supporting purgatory come into focus.
As I stated in a previous post, there were no sacrifices for the dead in the Law of Moses. Nor are there any N.T. verses that support (teach) Catholic Purgatory. In the Epistles it is taught that ALL sins were dealt with, once for all, through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. And now those who believe this Divine message receive forgiveness of ALL sins and are born again out of Adam and into the risen Christ, the “Last Adam,” in whom they have redemption, the forgiveness of sins (Col. 1:14). Therefore, in Biblical Christianity there is no need for a place like Catholic Purgatory, or its terrible sufferings.
Does the Bible record St. Paul praying for a dead man?
In 2 Tim. 1:16-18 Paul is not praying for a dead man but affectionately mentioning a man’s household to his readers. “The Lord grant him to find mercy from the Lord on that Day” is a statement of gratitude, not a prayer for a man in Catholic Purgatory. In fact, NONE of this states anything about Catholic Purgatory. You’re like the others here who read your fully formed doctrine into your selected verses. Now if Paul would have written something like, “May the Lord grant mercy to Onesiphorus and lessen his present suffering in the afterlife,” then you could say Paul taught on Purgatory. But he didn’t. Hence, nor can you say he did. But rather Paul stated that to be absent from the body (upon death) is to at Home with the Lord. BIG different between what Paul wrote by the Holy Spirit and what Rome teaches by imagination.
 
As I said, TRUE Christianity is based on Divine revelation, not men’s imagination or "pop culture."You suggested there may not be suffering by bringing up Solomon’s bizarre 5 people theory. But your problem still remains, Paul, there’s absolutely no Divine revelation to support Catholic Purgatory.
First of all, for you the only source of Divine revelation is what is written in Scripture. The Apostles lived with Jesus for 3 years and also had revelation throught the Holy spirit. This is not all contained within the 27 New testament books but is part of Catholic Tradition, which you of course, deny.
Secondly, there are references to praying for the dead in Scripture, which is of course not necessary if there is no Purgatory. How do you explain 1corinthians 15: 29:
29 Otherwise, what will people accomplish by having themselves baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, then why are they having themselves baptized for them? Doesn’t this state that they are being baptized for the Dead. why would this be necessary if there wasn’t a Purgatory?
This is not true. I believe what the Scriptures teach, that man’s responsibility in salvation is to “believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.” Apart from faith in Him no man can be saved
This is absoltuely true. Without Faith, no man can be saved. However, it isn’t the end of the requirements for salvation. It is only the start.
.Scripture doesn’t say that God “offers” salvation and men need to accept it (salvation). What it does say is that God sent the Son into the world via the incarnation that the world might be saved through Him (i.e., His substitutionary, sacrificial death):John 3:17 "For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him."What men are required to do for salvation is BELIEVE the message of what God has DONE through the substitutionary sacrifice of His beloved Son. And upon personal belief God Himself, “by grace,” and grace alone, saves the believing sinner from his sins (redemption), forgives ALL his sins (Acts 10:43; 13:38), and as a gift justifies him (Rom. 3:23) and gives him eternal (everlasting)*** life*** (Jn. 3:14; 5:24; Rom. 6:23).The will of God is that you believe in His Son.
sure, its the will of God that you believe in his son. But that’s not all he wants. He wants you to love God and love your neighbor as yourself. Jesus tells us throughout scripture to “Follow Me”. To walk in his way… St. Paul Says in !Corinthians 13 that love is more important than Faith. In John, Jesus gives us a new commandment: Love each other as I have loved you. St. James says Faith without works is Dead. Why can’t you grasp that while Faith is necessary for salvation, more is required - specifically Love.
.Man has the free will to believe or to not believe in the Person and sacrificial work of Jesus Christ alone for salvation.
we all agree with this.
To not believe and cling to works instead is as much a free will action as believing. But there’s no salvation with the free will action of clinging to works - Catholic or Protestant.
this is a misunderstanding of the Catholic postion. We don’t cling to works. We do good works as a completion of our calling to the Lord. We are following his example and striving for holiness, not for reward, but out of Love for Christ. do you not do the same?
Matt 25:31ff is about separating Christ’s sheep (believers) from the goats (unbelievers) at His 2nd Advent to this earth when he sets up His Millennial, Messianic Kingdom on earth. It’s not the “Last Judgment.” It’s a separation of the living, not the dead.
This is simply not true. The goats are believers, Do they not call Jesus “Lord” in verse 44, jsut as the sheep do in verse 37? No, the differentiation between them is that the sheep performed works of mercy, while the Goats do not. And why do you say that this does not describe the last judgement? It says that its after he comes in glory, does it not? and the result is that the sheep go to heaven, while the goats are condemned to hell. sounds like the last judgement to me.
ALL sins are forgiven when a man turns to God through faith in Jesus Christ who, Himself, made purification of sins, once for all, at Calvary.The true believer is no longer in Adam but now in the resurrected Christ, the “Last Adam.” He’s been made righteous “in Him” (Rom. 5:19). Not having a righteousness of his own but “that which comes from God on the basis of FAITH” (Phil. 3:9).No different than what I wrote here.
Sure, all sins are foregiven when man turns to God though faith in Jesus Christ and is Baptized. But that means all previous sins, not all future Sins. Even Saint Paul, as holy as he was, recognized that the possibility of being condemned existed if he didn’t persevere. Jesus said in Reveleation that nothing unclean would enter heaven. Thisis a call to holiness, not a statement that says we can sin all we want because they won’t be counted against us if we only believe.
 
To Moondweller:

**In the First Book of Samuel 31:13, the survivors fasted for the dead, which makes no sense if the deceased were not in a place where that penance (fasting) could do some good for them. In Matthew 12:31, Jesus told the parable about blaspheming the Holy Spirit (not believing that the Holy Spirit can save you, no matter what – the sin of despair), and said that anyone who does blaspheme the Holy Spirit

“will not be forgiven in this age or the age to come” (Matthew 12:32).

Since sins aren’t forgiven in Hell, and those in Heaven are already forgiven for their sins, then this one statement indicates another place after death where sins can indeed be forgiven. When Jesus told the parable of the man beating up others who owed him money, after he himself had been forgiven his debts (Matthew 18:23-34), He said

“And in anger his lord delivered him to the jailers, till he should pay all his debt. So will my heavenly Father do to you, unless each of you forgives his brother from his heart" (Matthew 18:34-35).

Since there is no release program in Hell, and no one wants to ever leave Heaven, this also indicates that there is another temporary place of torment where saved sinners go who have been forgiven their sins, but who have not paid all of their debt, down to the last penny, for their sins. In fact, in Matthew 5: 25-26, Jesus says

“Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.”

The only possible prison that there could be that one gets out of eventually is purgatory.**

Joann:)
 
I believe what the Scriptures teach, that man’s responsibility in salvation is to “believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.”
See what else the Scriptures say are required for our salvation:

We are saved…

By believing in Christ (Jn 3:16; Acts 16:31)

By repentance (Acts 2:38; 2 Pet 3:9)

By baptism (Jn 3:5; 1 Pet 3:21; Titus 3:5)

By the work of the Spirit (Jn 3:5; 2 Cor 3:6)

By declaring with our mouths (Lk 12:8; Rom 10:9)

By coming to a knowledge of the truth (1 Tim 2:4; Heb 10:26)

By works (Rom 2:6-7; James 2:24)

By grace (Acts 15:11; Eph 2:8)

By his blood (Rom 5:9; Heb 9:22)

By his righteousness (Rom 5:17; 2 Pet 1:1)

By his Cross (Eph 2:16; Col 2:14)

Can we cut any one of these out of the list and proclaim it alone as the means of salvation? Can we be saved without faith? Without God’s grace? Without repentance? Without baptism? Without the Spirit?

The Answer:

These are all involved and necessary; not one of them can be dismissed as a means of obtaining eternal life. Neither can one be emphasized to the exclusion of another. They are all involved in salvation and entry into the Church. The Catholic Church does not divide these various elements of salvation up; overemphasizing some while ignoring others; rather, she holds them all in their fullness." cited from Steve Ray
 
In 2 Tim. 1:16-18 Paul is not praying for a dead man but affectionately mentioning a man’s household to his readers. “The Lord grant him to find mercy from the Lord on that Day” is a statement of gratitude, not a prayer for a man in Catholic Purgatory. In fact, NONE of this states anything about Catholic Purgatory. You’re like the others here who read your fully formed doctrine into your selected verses. Now if Paul would have written something like, “May the Lord grant mercy to Onesiphorus and lessen his present suffering in the afterlife,” then you could say Paul taught on Purgatory. But he didn’t. Hence, nor can you say he did. But rather Paul stated that to be absent from the body (upon death) is to at Home with the Lord. BIG different between what Paul wrote by the Holy Spirit and what Rome teaches by imagination.
Whoa, Moondweller…one step at a time.
  1. Did Paul pray for Onesiphorous?
  2. Was Onesiphorous dead?
Okay, that’s two steps. 😛
 
My faith is in the Word of God and in the Word of God there is no “purifying fire,” only the cleansing blood of Jesus Christ.
Okay moondweller. You know when I talk to you it reminds me of the saying wheels on the bus go round and round:D

Okay you deny the purifying fire, You say you only go by the word of God, fair enough. But we have a problem. Here it is. The word of God. How do you explain it, You say there is no purifying fire. okay then what is this?

Each mans work will become manfest for the day will disclose I because it is REVEALED WITH FIRE and the fire will test what sort of work each one has done. If the work which any man has built on the foundation survives he will receive a reward. If any mans work is BURNED UP he will SUFFER loss though HE HIMSELF will be SAVED but ONLY THROUGH FIRE.

Now does it or does it not say he HIMSELF will be saved but only through Fire.

Now lets put that with other scripture, nothing unclean will enter heaven, etc. then back to his works will be lost. common sense tells us if a mans works will be burned up they must not have been very good works, would you not agree. sounds like sin to me. And if Mans works has been built on foundation (would you not agree thats good works, and truth) ?

Now you claim this scripture does not exist. But I have showed you time after time it does. Again how does your CHURCH teach it?
 
paul c:
First of all, for you the only source of Divine revelation is what is written in Scripture. The Apostles lived with Jesus for 3 years and also had revelation throught the Holy spirit. This is not all contained within the 27 New testament books but is part of Catholic Tradition, which you of course, deny.
God has been preserving His Word via theopneustos Scriptures since Moses. Prophets spoke to their immediate generation but what God wanted all subsequent generations to know he preserved in theopneustos Scriptures. Christ Himself always referred to them, not to the traditions of mere men.
Secondly, there are references to praying for the dead in Scripture, which is of course not necessary if there is no Purgatory. How do you explain 1corinthians 15: 29:
This is a very obscure verse and Paul provides us with no explanation. But one never reads where Paul or any of the Apostles ever baptized anyone for dead people. The context of that chapter is about the truth of the future resurrection of the body, not souls suffering in a place called “Purgatory.” The practice of baptizing “for the dead” was not done until the second century and ONLY then among heretics. How many baptisms have you received “for the dead” in “Purgatory” by your church, Paul? Were you given specific names? AGAIN, where is the doctrine of “Purgatory” actually taught in this verse?
This is absoltuely true. Without Faith, no man can be saved. However, it isn’t the end of the requirements for salvation. It is only the start.
Salvation, according to the written Word of God, is Divinely GIFTED, once for all, when one’s faith is in the Person and FINISHED work of Jesus Christ on the cross.Eph 2:8-9 “For by grace you HAVE BEEN SAVED through faith; and that not of yourselves, {it is} the gift of God; not as a result of works,…

Rom 9:33 "…just as it is written, "Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, and he who BELIEVES in Him will not be disappointed."You too stumble over the “stone of stumbling” because you refuse to “believe in Him.”
sure, its the will of God that you believe in his son. But that’s not all he wants. He wants you to love God and love your neighbor as yourself.
No, Paul, for salvation God requires that you believe in the Son. Believe what He accomplished, once for all, for you. It is those who do believe and are saved by grace through faith, “not as a result of works” (Eph. 2:8-9) that are then “created in Christ Jesus FOR good works” (Eph. 2:10). But it’s not the works by which they had been saved: “For by grace you have been saved through faith…the gift of God, not as a result of works….”
this is a misunderstanding of the Catholic postion. We don’t cling to works. We do good works as a completion of our calling to the Lord.
You claim works are to be done as a completion of your salvation. But God’s preserved, written Word says, “…NOT as a result of works.”
We are following his example and striving for holiness, not for reward, but out of Love for Christ. do you not do the same?
The difference is that my salvation does not depend AT ALL on my striving for holiness in this life. My salvation is based solely on God’s love toward me in Christ Jesus, not mine for Him - TO HIM BE THE GLORY! I love Him because He first loved me and sent His Son to be the propitiation for my sins (1 Jn. 4:10).
This is simply not true. The goats are believers,
No true believer can ever be called “cursed” (Christ took his curse upon Himself), nor enter the eternal fires prepared for the devil and his angels. You obviously have no idea what salvation is.
And why do you say that this does not describe the last judgement? It says that its after he comes in glory, does it not? and the result is that the sheep go to heaven, while the goats are condemned to hell. sounds like the last judgement to me.
At the end of this age He does come in glory. But He returns as “King of kings and Lord of Lords” (Rev. 19) to fulfill what the ancient Hebrew prophets foretold about the, Messianic Kingdom He’ll set up on earth at His return (for example: Is. 11:1-12; Jer. 30:1-11; 31:31-40; 32:36-41; 33:14-26; Zech. 14), and what was told to Mary at the Annunciation (Lk. 1:32-33). His “glorious throne” is on earth and those “sheep” and “goats” are Gentiles living on earth at His second Advent. His “sheep” enter His earthly kingdom (as mortals), the “goats” do not. This is a SEPARATION of people, not a judgment.

The “Last Judgment” will not occur until His 1000 year reign on earth has ended (see Rev. 20:7-15). And it’s a judgment for the DEAD, not those who have ETERNAL LIFE through faith in Christ Jesus (Jn. 3:18; 5:24).
Sure, all sins are foregiven when man turns to God though faith in Jesus Christ and is Baptized. But that means all previous sins, not all future Sins.
Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (Jn. 1:29). How long will you remain in unbelief?
 
God has been preserving His Word via theopneustos Scriptures since Moses. Prophets spoke to their immediate generation but what God wanted all subsequent generations to know he preserved in theopneustos Scriptures. Christ Himself always referred to them, not to the traditions of mere men.
Cathoic Traditions are not the traditions of mere men. They are what the Apostles learned from Jesus. Its nice to claim that Scriptures are God Breathed, but that doesn’t mean they are easily understood. In fact, there was always an human authority in place to interpret the scripture: the high priest in the Old Testament and the Pope in the New Testament. If you don’t beleive that such an authority is required, please explain how different people of good faith understand the same verse of Scripture so differently. Jesus send the Apostles out to teach what they had been taught and that continues through the Catholic Church today.
This is a very obscure verse and Paul provides us with no explanation. But one never reads where Paul or any of the Apostles ever baptized anyone for dead people. The context of that chapter is about the truth of the future resurrection of the body, not souls suffering in a place called “Purgatory.” The practice of baptizing “for the dead” was not done until the second century and ONLY then among heretics. How many baptisms have you received “for the dead” in “Purgatory” by your church, Paul? Were you given specific names? AGAIN, where is the doctrine of “Purgatory” actually taught in this verse?
What it means is that people were getting baptized as a testamonial to the faith of their departed dead This . It doens’t mean that the dead were being baptized. It means the living were being baptized and translating those graces to the dead in purgatory. We beleive that we can help the dead in purgatory be purified through our prayers. This is part of what is meant by the communion of the saints. Death is no barrier to our prayers.
Salvation, according to the written Word of God, is Divinely GIFTED, once for all, when one’s faith is in the Person and FINISHED work of Jesus Christ on the cross.Eph 2:8-9 “For by grace you HAVE BEEN SAVED through faith; and that not of yourselves, {it is} the gift of God; not as a result of works,…”

Rom 9:33 "…just as it is written, "Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, and he who BELIEVES in Him will not be disappointed."You too stumble over the “stone of stumbling” because you refuse to "believe in Him."No, Paul, for salvation God requires that you believe in the Son. Believe what He accomplished, once for all, for you. It is those who do believe and are saved by grace through faith, “not as a result of works” (Eph. 2:8-9) that are then “created in Christ Jesus FOR good works” (Eph. 2:10). But it’s not the works by which they had been saved: "For by grace you have been saved through faith…the gift of God, not as a result of works…"You claim works are to be done as a completion of your salvation. But God’s preserved, written Word says, "…NOT as a result of works."The difference is that my salvation does not depend AT ALL on my striving for holiness in this life. My salvation is based solely on God’s love toward me in Christ Jesus, not mine for Him - TO HIM BE THE GLORY! I love Him because He first loved me and sent His Son to be the propitiation for my sins (1 Jn. 4:10).No true believer can ever be called “cursed” (Christ took his curse upon Himself), nor enter the eternal fires prepared for the devil and his angels.
You are just restating your statement that Faith is required for Salvation, to which I agree. What you are not doing is addressing my point which is that more than just Faith is required. You must live your faith or else it is just words, a clanging gong as Paul puts it in 1Corinthians 13. Sure your salvation is based on God’s love. but you must follow in Christ paths. Remember, Matthew 7: 21-27:
21 "Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but **only the one who does the will of my Father **in heaven.
22 Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name? Did we not drive out demons in your name? Did we not do mighty deeds in your name?’
23 Then I will declare to them solemnly, ‘I never knew you. Depart from me, you evildoers.’
24 “Everyone who listens to these words of mine and **acts on **them will be like a wise man who built his house on rock.
25 The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and buffeted the house. But it did not collapse; it had been set solidly on rock.
26 And everyone who listens to these words of mine but **does not act on **them will be like a fool who built his house on sand.
27 The rain fell, the floods came, and the winds blew and buffeted the house. And it collapsed and was completely ruined.”

As much as you would like to ignore it, Jesus says clearly that action is required to enter the Kingdom of heaven… This is the end of the Sermon on the Mount, where he describes the actions that are required of the Christian. And by the way, if you want to say that no true believer will ever be cursed, then you must acknowledge that a true believer will follow Jesus’s instructions and DO the will of his father. Because if you don’t, even if you call Jesus “Lord”, you will be condemned to Hell, just like the Goats in Matthew 25,
 
You obviously have no idea what salvation is.At the end of this age He does come in glory. But He returns as “King of kings and Lord of Lords” (Rev. 19) to fulfill what the ancient Hebrew prophets foretold about the, Messianic Kingdom He’ll set up on earth at His return (for example: Is. 11:1-12; Jer. 30:1-11; 31:31-40; 32:36-41; 33:14-26; Zech. 14), and what was told to Mary at the Annunciation (Lk. 1:32-33). His “glorious throne” is on earth and those “sheep” and “goats” are Gentiles living on earth at His second Advent. His “sheep” enter His earthly kingdom (as mortals), the “goats” do not. This is a SEPARATION of people, not a judgment.

The “Last Judgment” will not occur until His 1000 year reign on earth has ended (see Rev. 20:7-15). And it’s a judgment for the DEAD, not those who have ETERNAL LIFE through faith in Christ Jesus (Jn. 3:18; 5:24).“Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (Jn. 1:29). How long will you remain in unbelief?
Its nice that you believe you understand Salvation better than the Catholic church. What are your credentials for making such a bold claim? The Catholic church was given the keys to the kingdom through St. Peter. They’ve had millions of theologians ponder these questions for 2000 years, answering any number of skeptics, and documenting their thoughts and revelations. Yet, you, all by yourself have a better view of salvation? Why should anyone believe you?

I’m of the opinion that no one will fully understand the true meaning of Revelation until those events unfold, any more than they understood the old testament Messiah prophesies. Such is the nature of prophesy. What makes you think that the “thousand years” isn’t the period of the Church’s explosive growth from a few men to a few billion that we have today? And even if you are right (which is doubtful in this case) that there will be new kingdom before the final judgement, it has no effect on what we were actually discussing, which is that you need to demonstrate your faith with works of love, just as Jesus described in Matthew 25…
 
[SIGN][/SIGN]
[SIGN]Its nice that you believe you understand Salvation better than the Catholic church. What are your credentials for [/SIGN]making such a bold claim? The Catholic church was given the keys to the kingdom through St. Peter. They’ve had millions of theologians ponder these questions for 2000 years, answering any number of skeptics, and documenting their thoughts and revelations. Yet, you, all by yourself have a better view of salvation? Why should anyone believe you?

I’m of the opinion that no one will fully understand the true meaning of Revelation until those events unfold, any more than they understood the old testament Messiah prophesies. Such is the nature of prophesy. What makes you think that the “thousand years” isn’t the period of the Church’s explosive growth from a few men to a few billion that we have today? And even if you are right (which is doubtful in this case) that there will be new kingdom before the final judgement, it has no effect on what we were actually discussing, which is that you need to demonstrate your faith with works of love, just as Jesus described in Matthew 25…
Kinda reminds me of a quote that St Augustine.

quote: I would not believe in the Gospels were it not for the authority of the Catholic Church. unquote.

Any Christian rather they admit it or not who accepts the authority of the N.T. has to have put his trust completely in the CC that it made the right decisions in determining the canon.
 
Purgatory is based on many false assumptions, just like many Catholic doctrines. As far as tradition goes, I believe Paul answers this very well in Col. chapter 2, which he compares Philosphy, but it’s all about Christ. Some have geneitically altered the Gospel.
Peace, Jack
 
Purgatory is based on many false assumptions, just like many Catholic doctrines. As far as tradition goes, I believe Paul answers this very well in Col. chapter 2, which he compares Philosphy, but it’s all about Christ. Some have geneitically altered the Gospel.
Code:
  Peace,    Jack
Care to expand on this? What are the false assumptions you are referring to?
 
[SIGN][/SIGN]

Kinda reminds me of a quote that St Augustine.

quote: I would not believe in the Gospels were it not for the authority of the Catholic Church. unquote.

Any Christian rather they admit it or not who accepts the authority of the N.T. has to have put his trust completely in the CC that it made the right decisions in determining the canon.
Exactly. *** Each and every time ***a non-Catholic is using a verse from Scripture to object to a Catholic practice, he’s giving tacit approval to the Authority of the CC–ah, the irony! 🤷
 
The teaching Magisterium of the Church offers belief in purgatory.

There are only 2 teaches concerning purgatory.
  1. It exists
  2. Our prayers help the souls in purgatory.
 
Whoa, Moondweller…one step at a time.
  1. Did Paul pray for Onesiphorous?
I already answered this.
  1. Was Onesiphorous dead?
We don’t know. The text gives us no certainty. But Paul’s expressed desire for him was that he be rewarded by the Lord for his faithful service to him. The others in Asia had turned away from Paul but Onesiphorus did not and remained faithful.

I answered both these questions in my previous post. There’s NOTHING said or taught about Catholic Purgatory in this or any passage concerning Onesiphorus. Simple as that, my friend. Please stop trying to read your fully formed doctrine INTO the passage. It’s dishonest.
 
I already answered this.
Okay. You wrote:

“Paul is not praying for a dead man but affectionately mentioning a man’s household to his readers.”

I will take “affectionately mentioning” to mean that he is NOT praying for Onesiphorous. Please correct me if I misinterpreted your position.
“Was Onesiphorous dead?” - We don’t know. The text gives us no certainty. But Paul’s expressed desire for him was that he be rewarded by the Lord for his faithful service to him. The others in Asia had turned away from Paul but Onesiphorus did not and remained faithful.
More on this below.
I answered both these questions in my previous post. There’s NOTHING said or taught about Catholic Purgatory in this or any passage concerning Onesiphorus. Simple as that, my friend. Please stop trying to read your fully formed doctrine INTO the passage. It’s dishonest.
I have not read purgatory into this. I have laid one brick into place…Paul prayed for the dead. This means that the dead CAN be prayed for and by implication that they BENEFIT from these prayers. Since those in heaven don’t need prayer and those in hell CAN’T benefit from intercession, who can possibly gain any assistance from Paul’s prayer?

Now, about whether Onesiphorous was dead or not…

Alfred Plummer (Anglican)

Certainly the balance of probability is decidedly in favour of the view that Onesiphorus was already dead when St. Paul wrote these words. . . . he here speaks of “the house of Onesiphorus” in connexion with the present, and of Onesiphorus himself only in connexion with the past. . . . it is not easy to explain this reference in two places to the household of Onesiphorus, if he himself was still alive. In all the other cases the individual and not the household is mentioned. . . . There is also the character of the Apostle’s prayer. Why does he confine his desires respecting the requital of Onesiphorus’ kindness to the day of judgment? . . . This again is thoroughly intelligible, if Onesiphorus is already dead.

. . . there seems to be equal absence of serious reason for doubting that the words in question constitute a prayer. . . .

Having thus concluded that, according to the more probable and reasonable view, the passage before us contains a prayer offered up by the Apostle on behalf of one who is dead, we seem to have obtained his sanction, and therefore the sanction of Scripture, for using similar prayers ourselves. . . .

This passage may be quoted as reasonable evidence that the death of a person does not extinguish our right or our duty to pray for him: but it ought not be quoted as authority for such prayers on behalf of the dead as are very different in kind from the one of which we have an example here. Many other kinds of intercession for the dead may be reasonable and allowable; but this passage proves no more than that some kinds of intercession for the dead are allowable; viz., those in which we pray that God will have mercy at the day of judgment on those who have done good to us and others, during their life upon earth (Alfred Plummer (1841-1926) (Anglican): The Expositor’s Bible (edited by W. Robertson Nicoll), The Pastoral Epistles, London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1891, pp. 324-326).

James Maurice Wilson (1836-1931) (Anglican)

We have, therefore, the sanction of St. Paul for remembering inn our prayers, and interceding for, those who have now passed into the other world . . . (Truths New and Old, Westminster: Archibald Constable & Co., 1900, p. 141)

**Sydney Charles Gayford (Anglican): **

. . . the most satisfactory explanation is that Onesiphorus was dead. . . . (The Future State, New York: Edwin S. Gorham, second edition, 1905, pp. 56-57)

And so we may hold with some confidence that we have in this passage the authority of an Apostle in praying for the welfare of the departed. (ibid.)

(cont.)
 
John Henry Bernard (1860-1927) (Anglican)

On the whole then it seems probable that Onesiphorus was dead when St. Paul prayed on his behalf . . . (The Pastoral Epistles, Cambridge University Press, 1899, p. 114:

**Donald Guthrie (1915-1992) (Anglican): **

Since it is assumed by many scholars that Onesiphorus was by now dead, the question has been raised whether this sanctions prayer for the dead. Roman catholic theologians claim that it does. Spicq, for instance, sees here an example of prayer for the dead unique in the New Testament. Some Protestants agree with this judgment and cite the Jewish precedent of 2 Macc 12:43-45 . . . (The Tyndale New Testament Commentaries, The Pastoral Epistles: An Introduction and Commentary, Grand Rapids, Michigan, Eerdmans Pub. Co., 2nd edition, 1990, p. 148)

William Barclay (1907-1978) (Presbyterian / Church of Scotland)

. . . there are many who feel that the implication is that Onesiphorus is dead. It is for his family that Paul first prays. Now, if he was dead, this passage shows us Paul praying for the dead, for it shows him praying that Onesiphorus may find mercy on the last day. (The Letters to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 3rd edition, 2003, p. 175)

I have more if you need them.
 
To Moondweller:

In the First Book of Samuel 31:13, the survivors fasted for the dead, which makes no sense if the deceased were not in a place where that penance (fasting) could do some good for them.
Does the passage say they fasted FOR the “good” of Saul? Don’t read something into the text that’s not there, Joann.
In Matthew 12:31, Jesus told the parable about blaspheming the Holy Spirit (not believing that the Holy Spirit can save you, no matter what – the sin of despair), and said that anyone who does blaspheme the Holy Spirit
“will not be forgiven in this age or the age to come” (Matthew 12:32).
Since sins aren’t forgiven in Hell, and those in Heaven are already forgiven for their sins, then this one statement indicates another place after death where sins can indeed be forgiven.
Actually Jesus stated that anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit either in this age or the age to come WILL NOT BE FORGIVEN. The age to come is the Millennial (1000 year) reign of Christ on earth. Speaking against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven during that age, either. Jesus states NOTHING about a “place” where sins are forgiven.
When Jesus told the parable of the man beating up others who owed him money, after he himself had been forgiven his debts (Matthew 18:23-34), He said
“And in anger his lord delivered him to the jailers, till he should pay all his debt. So will my heavenly Father do to you, unless each of you forgives his brother from his heart" (Matthew 18:34-35).
Since there is no release program in Hell, and no one wants to ever leave Heaven, this also indicates that there is another temporary place of torment where saved sinners go who have been forgiven their sins, but who have not paid all of their debt, down to the last penny, for their sins. In fact, in Matthew 5: 25-26, Jesus says
So you’re saying that the horrific pains yet to be experienced in your Purgatory is not about cleansing of sins but paying one’s debt for “forgiven” sins. Rather contradictory, I’d say!
“Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.”
The only possible prison that there could be that one gets out of eventually is purgatory.
So you’re saying your Purgatory is a “prison.”

That’s some God you’ve got there, Joann. A Father who sends His forgiven sons to prison. Doesn’t describe my God and Father who is full of mercy and grace, as demonstrated by His sending the Son into this world via the incarnation to be the propitiation for my sins. Doesn’t sound like Paul’s God either who said:Rom 8:32 "He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him over for us all, how will He not also with Him freely give us all things?"Neither Paul nor I have any expectation of our Father sending us to “prison.” Our debt was paid in full by Christ on the cross:Col 2:13-14 "When you were dead in your transgressions and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He made you alive together with Him, having forgiven us all our transgressions, having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of decrees against us, which was hostile to us; and He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross."Are we talking about the same God? :hmmm:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top