1
Well of course it is silly. Who do you think gave you the bible. The Catholic Church Silly!!]
Hey, rinn; could you elaborate on this transitional place, ot state? Which Holy scriptures describe it?It isn’t 1Cor 3:13-15; this talks of a man’s “works” being tested by fire! Oh, wait, it’s probably a catholic thin, right?![]()

I was talking about judgement day. The fire either saves a man or destroys him. Why 1veleevr, what does your faith say that the scripture says.]
Hey, rinn; could you elaborate on this transitional place, ot state? Which Holy scriptures describe it?It isn’t 1Cor 3:13-15; this talks of a man’s “works” being tested by fire! Oh, wait, it’s probably a catholic thin, right?![]()
]I was talking about judgement day. The fire either saves a man or destroys him. Why 1veleevr, what does your faith say that the scripture says.
]Well of course it is silly. Who do you think gave you the bible. The Catholic Church Silly!!
Every single piece of scripture you read is a Catholic thing!![]()
Thats the way I understand it. And this place could not be heaven at that time. My point is it existed then, and it exists now. A holding place for the righeous souls.
Purgatory is the name given today to the place for souls that need to be perfected in CHrist though the cleansing fires. It was called Hades, Paradise, or the Bossom of Abrahan then. But either way they are both paradise because you know you are heading to heaven. You are very very happy because when you made it to purgatory just like Bossom of Abraham in the O.T you are considered rigtheous in the eyes of God.]/QUOTE]
]Thats the way I understand it. And this place could not be heaven at that time. My point is it existed then, and it exists now. A holding place for the righeous souls.
Purgatory is the name given today to the place for souls that need to be perfected in CHrist though the cleansing fires. It was called Hades, Paradise, or the Bossom of Abrahan then. But either way they are both paradise because you know you are heading to heaven. You are very very happy because when you made it to purgatory just like Bossom of Abraham in the O.T you are considered rigtheous in the eyes of God.
As Catholics, we believe that everyone who is repentent and his/her final destination is to be with our Creator must pass through purgatory. To enter Heaven, and to be with God forever, a soul must be clean of all stains of sin and pure since “nothing impure may enter Heaven.”]
So, onl catholics go to purgatory, right?

Huh?? You know 1B you can sure read things into something that were never said. Is it a gift]
So, onl catholics go to purgatory, right?
Oh, so you are saying the Prophets and Apostles were not Catholics now. Silly Silly Silly]
You are so sily, rinnie!The catholics didn’t give me the Bible; God did through His prophets and apostles!
Silly!
there’s no use for it today
in the old days it was impossible to get to Heaven. Jesus made that possible. since we can get to heaven now, what is the use of a holding place for righteous souls who deserve heaven anyway? its not like Abraham and the others in Limbo didn’t deserve heaven, they did. they just can’t get there until Jesus makes the path for them
Purgatory is a completely different thing. its a purification process. Limbo did not purify those who were there
as is usual in thinking from outside of our Faithusccb.org/comm/archives/2006/06-212.shtml
The issue, at least for me as a Lutheran, is not that there might be a moment of cleansing to enter Heaven, but that this cleansing can be affected by indulgences, or a “treasury of merits”. Jon
I agree. Indulgences are part of the Churchs infallible teachings.This means no catholic is at liberty to disbelieve them. The council of the trent condemms with anathema those who say that indulgences are useless or that the Church does not have the power to grant them.as is usual in thinking from outside of our Faith
to attempt to grasp the “abstract” of God’s Truths one can get confused.
I think the subject of Purgatory and “”[SIGN]indulgences[/SIGN]" isn’t that easy to just figure it
out in our heads… one can approach this from a “reasonable” position and be
able to understand the confusion it can bring.
There is data for both sides of the issue… and again I think it is where one has to
measure the degrees closely in order to try and evaluate it.
My thinking goes like this: We are what we are… but we are not what we “ought” to be.
When we pass from our Christian life we are not what we should have become…
In order for us to actually enter into Heaven over yonder… we have to shed some remaining sins, and to grow into that which we didn’t grow into…
This processing is what is considered as Purgatory… it can be confusing to understand as we will not be there in our physcial bodies but in our spiritual (soul) ones.
Already we have a mystery… how are we to perceive that experience there if we don’t have our five body senses… ?
The second part of this issue… is Indulgences… what are they and how were they distorted by the church… from Luther’s point of view…
Scripture states… “the prayer of a rightious man availth much”… “if two or three of you agree on one thing and ask it in my name it will be granted too you”
The church taught then and now, that certain men and woman who lead a Holy life
had powerful prayers… And if two or more of these “rightious” christians came together their prayers were more powerful than ours alone…
Therefore, we might need prayers of the living church to help us get through that final processing of our souls… (purgatory) and the church had powerful praying christians in their monasteries. etc…
One could go to the chruch, (even now) and ask the church to pray for a need for us in this life and for our loved ones who were passed away…
The church would ask for a little donation to have a special prayer service for someone
living or dead… (they still do) But where the distortion came in, was where there were
some christians who came to the church and donated money, so that when they died
they felt they could by pass the processing plant… and they wouldn’t have to endure
the wait or purging of their souls.
I don’t believe Luther denied the doctrine of Pugatory but just thinking that one could pay for it and not have to be responsable for the consequence of their sins…
As some took that as a free pass to commit sins and not worry about them.
I personally think that there is good in doctrine of Purgatory but as it being a process
more than a place… but I agree with Luther that the idea can be distorted by some people to give them a free license to sin…
One of the reasons I’m here is to understnad from the Catholic perspective.=Monte1945;6292635] as is usual in thinking from outside of our Faith to attempt to grasp the “abstract” of God’s Truths one can get confused.
My thinking goes like this: We are what we are… but we are not what we “ought” to be.
When we pass from our Christian life we are not what we should have become…
In order for us to actually enter into Heaven over yonder… we have to shed some remaining sins, and to grow into that which we didn’t grow into…
Not much here I will argue with.This processing is what is considered as Purgatory… it can be confusing to understand as we will not be there in our physcial bodies but in our spiritual (soul) ones.
And without an explicit statement regarding it from scripture.Already we have a mystery… how are we to perceive that experience there if we don’t have our five body senses… ?
Actually, I think one could truthfully say that, at least at first, he didn’t blame the Church but corrupt people acting in its name.The second part of this issue… is Indulgences… what are they and how were they distorted by the church… from Luther’s point of view…
Scripture states… “the prayer of a rightious man availth much”… “if two or three of you agree on one thing and ask it in my name it will be granted too you”
The church taught then and now, that certain men and woman who lead a Holy life
had powerful prayers… And if two or more of these “rightious” christians came together their prayers were more powerful than ours alone…
Lutherans would not question, in general, that prayers of the faithful are of great value and importance.Therefore, we might need prayers of the living church to help us get through that final processing of our souls… (purgatory) and the church had powerful praying christians in their monasteries. etc…
One could go to the chruch, (even now) and ask the church to pray for a need for us in this life and for our loved ones who were passed away…
Private masses for the dead was a particular bone of contention for the reformers.The church would ask for a little donation to have a special prayer service for someone
living or dead… (they still do) But where the distortion came in, was where there were
some christians who came to the church and donated money, so that when they died
they felt they could by pass the processing plant… and they wouldn’t have to endure
the wait or purging of their souls.
I don’t believe Luther denied the doctrine of Pugatory but just thinking that one could pay for it and not have to be responsable for the consequence of their sins…
Certainly at first this was probably the case.As some took that as a free pass to commit sins and not worry about them.
Yes, that is why I like Father Tavard’s comments on the subject. As you said, it is a mystery, and to that end, it seems we ought to be willing to consider various expressions - Orthodox, Anglican, etc.I personally think that there is good in doctrine of Purgatory but as it being a process
more than a place… but I agree with Luther that the idea can be distorted by some people to give them a free license to sin…
If only Luther would have fought for reform within the church, what a big difference it would have made for today. If Luther had stayed, with the backing of the German princes, and fought for reform we wouldn’t have a splintered Christianity that is so evident today. But the German princes, tired of being monetarily bled by corruption within the church, manipulated Luther and caused the irreparable damage that has resulted in what we have in the world today. Oh, well. Such is man’s greed and avarice. Just because a man wears a Roman collar does not mean he is holy or sanctified. After all, look at Judas.First, Monte, I appreciate your well thought out post.
One of the reasons I’m here is to understnad from the Catholic perspective.
Not much here I will argue with.
And without an explicit statement regarding it from scripture.
Actually, I think one could truthfully say that, at least at first, he didn’t blame the Church but corrupt people acting in its name.
Lutherans would not question, in general, that prayers of the faithful are of great value and importance.
Private masses for the dead was a particular bone of contention for the reformers.
Certainly at first this was probably the case.
Yes, that is why I like Father Tavard’s comments on the subject. As you said, it is a mystery, and to that end, it seems we ought to be willing to consider various expressions - Orthodox, Anglican, etc.
Thanks again,
Jon

[/SIGN]as is usual in thinking from outside of our Faith
to attempt to grasp the “abstract” of God’s Truths one can get confused.
I think the subject of Purgatory and "“indulgences” isn’t that easy to just figure it
out in our heads… one can approach this from a “reasonable” position and be
able to understand the confusion it can bring.
There is data for both sides of the issue… and again I think it is where one has to
measure the degrees closely in order to try and evaluate it.
My thinking goes like this: We are what we are… but we are not what we “ought” to be.
When we pass from our Christian life we are not what we should have become…
In order for us to actually enter into Heaven over yonder… we have to shed some remaining sins, and to grow into that which we didn’t grow into…
This processing is what is considered as Purgatory… it can be confusing to understand as we will not be there in our physcial bodies but in our spiritual (soul) ones.
Already we have a mystery… how are we to perceive that experience there if we don’t have our five body senses… ?
The second part of this issue… is Indulgences… what are they and how were they distorted by the church… from Luther’s point of view…
Scripture states… “the prayer of a rightious man availth much”… “if two or three of you agree on one thing and ask it in my name it will be granted too you”
The church taught then and now, that certain men and woman who lead a Holy life
had powerful prayers… And if two or more of these “rightious” christians came together their prayers were more powerful than ours alone…
Therefore, we might need prayers of the living church to help us get through that final processing of our souls… (purgatory) and the church had powerful praying christians in their monasteries. etc…
One could go to the chruch, (even now) and ask the church to pray for a need for us in this life and for our loved ones who were passed away…
The church would ask for a little donation to have a special prayer service for someone
living or dead… (they still do) But where the distortion came in, was where there were
some christians who came to the church and donated money, so that when they died
they felt they could by pass the processing plant… and they wouldn’t have to endure
the wait or purging of their souls.
I don’t believe Luther denied the doctrine of Pugatory but just thinking that one could pay for it and not have to be responsable for the consequence of their sins…
As some took that as a free pass to commit sins and not worry about them.
I personally think that there is good in doctrine of Purgatory but as it being a process
more than a place… but I agree with Luther [SIGN]that the idea can be distorted by some people to give them a free license to sin…
]Oh, so you are saying the Prophets and Apostles were not Catholics now. Silly Silly SillyI did not know God gave us the Bible, I really did think that came from Catholic’s. I thought God gave us the word! And Catholic’s composed the Bible
I was told that the bible did not exist until long after Jesus. But the word existed from the Time of Jesus.
So I will have to make a note of that. How did we get it did it fall from the sky?![]()
Hi 1beleever:]
The Old Testament prophets were not catholic, sounds like they were Jewish! And the apostles were all Jewish, who became believers in and followers of Jesus! So, maybe we can buythe theory that people whom you choose to call catholics, put the Bible, but it was inspired and spoken by God, through His prophets and apostles! I don’t believe there will be any religion in Heaven:thumbsup: Just saints praising their Saviour all day long(and all night, too!)

]Hi 1beleever:
we have hashed and re-hashed that subject in other threads on this forum. But I most definitely agree with you as far as heaven goes. I do hope to meet you there and we can join the Heavenly Chorus praising God, our Creator and Savior, all day and night. God Bless.
PAX DOMINI
Shalom Aleichem