Purposeful from purposeless?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tonyrey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tonyrey

Guest
How can anyone genuinely believe purposeful activity is produced by material objects?
They lack insight let alone foresight!
 
How can anyone genuinely believe purposeful activity is produced by material objects?
They lack insight let alone foresight!
The remarkable success of science has led many people to believe it is the highest - or even the sole - form of knowledge. This implies that only material objects exist and our thoughts are produced by our brain. But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?
 
I think its possible:)
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering! 🙂

There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
 
But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?
It’s purpose is to run on algorithmic survival instincts, controlling our physical bodies to adapt to changes.
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering! 🙂
This implies that only material objects exist and our thoughts are produced by our brain.
What do you say about our brains creating a possibility not based on evidence then?
 
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering! 🙂
I have never heard that before.🙂
There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
I have no idea.:). It would seem that I have no good reason to think that purpose can be a product of chaos.🙂

But I am going to say that it can happen anyway just to annoy you.🙂

A thing can appear purposeful and yet have no objective purpose. That is to say that there can be the illusion of purpose if events accidentally coincide in such a manner that we can identify aspects of it as corresponding to our idea of purpose, much in the same way that a mirage corresponds to our idea of an oasis.
 
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering! 🙂

There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
Can you provide evidence that a possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering so that we may try and determine if your thesis is worthy of our consideration?
 
I take it that you believe it’s impossible. 🙂
I am saying that those who argue that man coming from nowhere and going to annihilation could somehow have meaning in the twain has built his castle in the air since all such meaning would be subjective by force of irresistible logic. Therefore such subjective meaning, being based on feeling and want, would be impossible to prove objectively.

God Bless
 
But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?
That is not a conscious purpose
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!
What do you say about our brains creating a possibility not based on evidence then?

Our brains are not concerned with possibilities. They don’t even **know **what a possibility is!
 
I am saying that those who argue that man coming from nowhere and going to annihilation could somehow have meaning in the twain has built his castle in the air since all such meaning would be subjective by force of irresistible logic. Therefore such subjective meaning, being based on feeling and want, would be impossible to prove objectively.

God Bless
If meaning is based solely on feeling and want it may well be meaningless!
 
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!
Then it’s original - but not thereby false!
There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
I have no idea… It would seem that I have no good reason to think that purpose can be a product of chaos.
But I am going to say that it can happen anyway just to annoy you.

I’m not annoyed, just amused. 🙂 How does purpose come from chaos?
A thing can appear purposeful and yet have no objective purpose. That is to say that there can be the illusion of purpose if events accidentally coincide in such a manner that we can identify aspects of it as corresponding to our idea of purpose, much in the same way that a mirage corresponds to our idea of an oasis.
I agree but it doesn’t follow that all purpose is an illusion!
 
That is not a conscious purpose
That is not a devine purpose. From the very smallest forms of life to us, all life, is conscious enough to “know” that sleep, food, and reproduction are key to survival. A conscious purpose might be understanding that we are all the center of a single point, and allowing us to create our own purpose.
Our brains are not concerned with possibilities. They don’t even **know **what a possibility is!
You are your brain, so how doesn’t it know what possibility is?
 
But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?
Code:
                             Its purpose is to run on algorithmic survival instincts, controlling our physical bodies to adapt to changes. That is not a **conscious** purpose
That is not a divine purpose. From the very smallest forms of life to us, all life, is conscious enough to “know” that sleep, food, and reproduction are key to survival. A conscious purpose might be understanding that we are all the center of a single point, and allowing us to create our own purpose.

We are at cross-purposes! There are two types of purpose: conscious and unconscious. There is no evidence that amoeba** know** what they are doing but they act in order to survive. Highly complex inorganic structures have no such goal. So how and why did the amoeba’s goal-seeking activity originate?
Our brains are not concerned with possibilities. They don’t even **know **
*what a possibility is!
You are your brain, so how doesn’t it know what possibility is?

Only a materialist equates the mind with the brain. Why distinguish them if they are one and the same thing?
 
I think perhaps he is failing not to distinguish mind from brain but perhaps to equate mind with self.

God Bless
 
I think perhaps he is failing not to distinguish mind from brain but perhaps to equate mind with self.
“You are your brain” seems to leave no room for doubt because “you” is usually taken to mean the mind and brain. So mind+brain=brain! 🙂
 
“You are your brain” seems to leave no room for doubt because “you” is usually taken to mean the mind and brain. So mind+brain=brain! 🙂
Why isn’t everything physical when God created a material world?

Your OP question gives an opportunity to trot out Richard Feynman’s fine poem:

*There are the rushing waves…
mountains of molecules,
each stupidly minding its own business…
trillions apart
…yet forming white surf in unison.

Ages on ages…
before any eyes could see…
year after year…
thunderously pounding the shore as now.
For whom, for what?
…on a dead planet
with no life to entertain.

Never at rest…
tortured by energy…
wasted prodigiously by the Sun…
poured into space.
A mite makes the sea roar.

Deep in the sea,
all molecules repeat
the patterns of another
till complex new ones are formed.
They make others like themselves…
and a new dance starts.

Growing in size and complexity…
living things,
masses of atoms,
DNA, protein…
dancing a pattern ever more intricate.

Out of the cradle
onto dry land…
here it is standing…
atoms with consciousness
…matter with curiosity.

Stands at the sea…
wonders at wondering… I…
a universe of atoms…
an atom in the universe.

The Value of Science, address to the National Academy of Sciences 1955*
 
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering! 🙂
Obviously true. Though some may argue that the “evidence” is in the eye of the beholder.

However, every created thing has a purpose. The distinction to be considered centers around the difference between the purposefulness of material ants for example and the purposefulness of human engineers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top