T
tonyrey
Guest
How can anyone genuinely believe purposeful activity is produced by material objects?
They lack insight let alone foresight!
They lack insight let alone foresight!
The remarkable success of science has led many people to believe it is the highest - or even the sole - form of knowledge. This implies that only material objects exist and our thoughts are produced by our brain. But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?How can anyone genuinely believe purposeful activity is produced by material objects?
They lack insight let alone foresight!
noHow can anyone genuinely believe purposeful activity is produced by material objects?
They lack insight let alone foresight!
I take it that you believe it’s impossible.How can anyone genuinely![]()
I think its possibleI take it that you believe it’s impossible.![]()
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!I think its possible![]()
It’s purpose is to run on algorithmic survival instincts, controlling our physical bodies to adapt to changes.But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?
A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!![]()
What do you say about our brains creating a possibility not based on evidence then?This implies that only material objects exist and our thoughts are produced by our brain.
I have never heard that before.A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!![]()
I have no idea.There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
Can you provide evidence that a possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering so that we may try and determine if your thesis is worthy of our consideration?A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!
There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
I am saying that those who argue that man coming from nowhere and going to annihilation could somehow have meaning in the twain has built his castle in the air since all such meaning would be subjective by force of irresistible logic. Therefore such subjective meaning, being based on feeling and want, would be impossible to prove objectively.I take it that you believe it’s impossible.![]()
That is not a conscious purposeBut our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?
What do you say about our brains creating a possibility not based on evidence then?A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!
Our brains are not concerned with possibilities. They don’t even **know **what a possibility is!
If meaning is based solely on feeling and want it may well be meaningless!I am saying that those who argue that man coming from nowhere and going to annihilation could somehow have meaning in the twain has built his castle in the air since all such meaning would be subjective by force of irresistible logic. Therefore such subjective meaning, being based on feeling and want, would be impossible to prove objectively.
God Bless
Then it’s original - but not thereby false!A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!
I have no idea… It would seem that I have no good reason to think that purpose can be a product of chaos.There are no intermediate stages. Either a being has a purpose or it doesn’t. How could it be semi-purposeful?
But I am going to say that it can happen anyway just to annoy you.
I’m not annoyed, just amused.How does purpose come from chaos?
I agree but it doesn’t follow that all purpose is an illusion!A thing can appear purposeful and yet have no objective purpose. That is to say that there can be the illusion of purpose if events accidentally coincide in such a manner that we can identify aspects of it as corresponding to our idea of purpose, much in the same way that a mirage corresponds to our idea of an oasis.
That is not a devine purpose. From the very smallest forms of life to us, all life, is conscious enough to “know” that sleep, food, and reproduction are key to survival. A conscious purpose might be understanding that we are all the center of a single point, and allowing us to create our own purpose.That is not a conscious purpose
You are your brain, so how doesn’t it know what possibility is?Our brains are not concerned with possibilities. They don’t even **know **what a possibility is!
But our brain doesn’t know what it is doing or what is going to happen… So can it possibly be purposeful?That is not a divine purpose. From the very smallest forms of life to us, all life, is conscious enough to “know” that sleep, food, and reproduction are key to survival. A conscious purpose might be understanding that we are all the center of a single point, and allowing us to create our own purpose.Code:Its purpose is to run on algorithmic survival instincts, controlling our physical bodies to adapt to changes. That is not a **conscious** purpose
We are at cross-purposes! There are two types of purpose: conscious and unconscious. There is no evidence that amoeba** know** what they are doing but they act in order to survive. Highly complex inorganic structures have no such goal. So how and why did the amoeba’s goal-seeking activity originate?
*what a possibility is!Our brains are not concerned with possibilities. They don’t even **know **
You are your brain, so how doesn’t it know what possibility is?
Only a materialist equates the mind with the brain. Why distinguish them if they are one and the same thing?
“You are your brain” seems to leave no room for doubt because “you” is usually taken to mean the mind and brain. So mind+brain=brain!I think perhaps he is failing not to distinguish mind from brain but perhaps to equate mind with self.
Why isn’t the mind physical?“You are your brain” seems to leave no room for doubt because “you” is usually taken to mean the mind and brain. So mind+brain=brain!![]()
Why isn’t everything physical when God created a material world?“You are your brain” seems to leave no room for doubt because “you” is usually taken to mean the mind and brain. So mind+brain=brain!![]()
Obviously true. Though some may argue that the “evidence” is in the eye of the beholder.A possibility is not worth considering unless there is evidence to make it worth considering!![]()