G
Where’s the evidence Putin ordered it. Where’s the evidence these two men carried out the crime. Anyone could have carried Po around with them and left traces in places to set ‘anyone’ else up. Intelligence agencies, as per their namesake, are meant to be ‘intelligent’.No evidence??? One really really knows this case well??
Perhaps this was the best defence was to accuse the British government of something sinister.
litvinenkoinquiry.org/
litvinenkoinquiry.org/evidence
They have all kinds of evidence, film of the two Russians on Close Circuit TV, the tea pot, maybe fingerprints. Eyewitness accounts. A trail of polonium radiation.
Furthermore, I see Litvenenko’s wife all over the news; per whatever his brother said, his wife’s word must mean something as well.
No, not anyone can carry around Polonium -210;Where’s the evidence Putin ordered it. Where’s the evidence these two men carried out the crime. Anyone could have carried Po around with them and left traces in places to set ‘anyone’ else up. Intelligence agencies, as per their namesake, are meant to be ‘intelligent’.
Read more: dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3411562/Litvinenko-report-Russian-spy-accused-murder-says-judge-clearly-gone-mad.html#ixzz3xz7YoTQJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
*Sir Robert’s detailed report suggested that Lugovoi may have been set up by the Russian authorities to pretend to be a dissident who had been jailed for helping one of Litvinenko’s friends break out of prison.
‘I’ve seen the nonsense conclusions of your judge who has clearly gone mad,’ Lugovoi said.
'I saw nothing new there. I am very sorry that 10 years on nothing new has been presented, only invention, supposition, rumours.
‘And the fact that such words as “possibly” and “probably” were used in the report, means there is no proof, nothing concrete against us.’*
The country’s embassy in Britain today mocked the report, calling it ‘a welcome admission of defeat in scheming to undermine Russia’ and claiming that the UK was trying to pick a fight because of embarrassment over the Iraq War.
They also found “primary contamination” on the Pine Bar table used by the three men, on the chairs, and “extremely high” readings on just one of the bar’s white teapots.
The highest readings were on the inside of the spout.
Given the amount of polonium possessed and used by the assassins, it “strongly indicated” the involvement of a state, Sir Robert said.
All evidence points to the Russians, who Litvenenko was with and to be able to go to a reactor to get this shows involvement of the highest government.“Ordinary criminals might have been expected to use a straightforward, less sophisticated means of killing … the polonium-210 used to kill Mr Litvinenko must have come from a reactor and such reactors are in general under state control.”
Yuri Shvets told the inquiry “I strongly believe that [the killing] couldn’t be done without Vladimir Putin’s knowledge, because of one of the key traditions of the KGB … KGB rule No. 1 [is] cover your back, and covering your back is to get approval from your superior.”
And Russian dissident Alex Goldfarb, who helped Litvinenko escape Russia, said it was an “inevitable conclusion” that “no one else than Mr Putin” approved the killing – “traditionally this sort of active measures from Soviet times are authorised at the highest political level”.
You have Russia now, with their Chechen heavy, actually using menacing language about Russian opposition as if they were not powerful enough in the first place.In his report, Sir Robert said these men could not claim to be impartial observers. He relied instead on Robert Service, a professor of Russian history at Oxford University.
Chechnya’s Ruler a ‘National Security Threat,’ says Russian Politician
tol.org/client/article/25483-russia-yashin-kadyrov-nemtsov-chechnya.html
It does not ‘point’ to Russia anymore than MI6, or any other ‘intelligence’ agency wishing to set Russia up. The fact the outcome was a ‘probable’ finding, means that after spending £8 million pounds - there was no definitive outcome. A complete waste of money.No, not anyone can carry around Polonium -210;
wauchopegazette.com.au/story/3680491/alexander-litvinenko-ex-kgb-agents-death-by-polonium-210-leaves-long-trail/?cs=5
All evidence points to the Russians, who Litvenenko was with and to be able to go to a reactor to get this shows involvement of the highest government.
Furthermore, those who perpetrated this crime probably figured, they could not be caught but they found a new way to find polonium as the article indicates.
Kremlin, Putin, it’s basically all the same and just like the assassination of Nemtsov, it may be done in such a way to have a “plausible denial”.
You have Russia now, with their Chechen heavy, actually using menacing language about Russian opposition as if they were not powerful enough in the first place.
So sure, this is some speculation, but the Russian state, state media, a strongman to Putin threatening the opposition which is undeniable, none of this bodes well for the defense.
It may be the Russians. But just remember the Iraelis posed as Palestinians when they committed the terrorist act of blowing up the King David Hotel. The US government came up with a plan, Operation Northwoods, to hijack US airplanes, commit terrorist bombings, all of which would kill Americans, planning to plant evidence to make it look like the Cubans did it as a pretext to start a war. The ‘authorities’ lack credibility and have very evil plans. I tend towards agnosticism concerning international events.No, not anyone can carry around Polonium -210…
All evidence points to the Russians, who Litvenenko was with and to be able to go to a reactor to get this shows involvement of the highest government.
I will take the word of the foreign Russian intelligence agents, I find it very persuasive.It does not ‘point’ to Russia anymore than MI6, or any other ‘intelligence’ agency wishing to set Russia up. The fact the outcome was a ‘probable’ finding, means that after spending £8 million pounds - there was no definitive outcome. A complete waste of money.
I will remember Pope John Paul II stood up against Communism, this is somewhat the remnants of the old Communist regime with a blend of new flavors. No matter what one says about the wrong the US has ever done, Communism killed millions, maybe over a 100 million in the past century.It may be the Russians. But just remember the Iraelis posed as Palestinians when they committed the terrorist act of blowing up the King David Hotel. The US government came up with a plan, Operation Northwoods, to hijack US airplanes, commit terrorist bombings, all of which would kill Americans, planning to plant evidence to make it look like the Cubans did it as a pretext to start a war. The ‘authorities’ lack credibility and have very evil plans. I tend towards agnosticism concerning international events.
Then why bother with a public inquiry.Russia did not extradite these men for questioning.
The Kremlin has obstructed there being a fair hearing on this.
Therefore, we can take the word of the findings. UK did its part and that’s good enough for me.
Try actually contesting the case instead of being in absentia.
You’re right, the obstruction of justice tells us enough that the Kremlin is the guilty party in their refusal to extradite these individuals.Then why bother with a public inquiry.
They can put the £8 million towards other murder cases, of their MP’s and lawyers, that were carried out by UK citizens
That’s supposition that those two men carried out the crime, they say they’re innocent. So bringing them over would make no difference, as they would say they did not do it. There’s no evidence to prove otherwise.You’re right, the obstruction of justice tells us enough that the Kremlin is the guilty party in their refusal to extradite these individuals.
But it’s good to get the details out there nonetheless. Why spend money? Because everyone has a right to justice.
Sir or madam, I like your ideals.But it’s good to get the details out there nonetheless. Why spend money? Because everyone has a right to justice.
Communism is very evil. But just because it is evil doesn’t mean those who stand in opposition to it aren’t. Hitler didn’t like communism either.I will remember Pope John Paul II stood up against Communism, this is somewhat the remnants of the old Communist regime with a blend of new flavors. No matter what one says about the wrong the US has ever done, Communism killed millions, maybe over a 100 million in the past century.
Sure, “tu quoque” arguments can always be brought up.
It’s up to everyone’s choice as to what governments they want; this is chilling. If people parade some great belief in the governments of the USSR or Russia, it deserves a response.Kadyrov, 39, a former Chechen rebel turned Kremlin ally, has made a series of strongly-worded verbal tirades against the liberal opposition in recent weeks, calling them “enemies of the people,” a Stalin-era phrase some of Vladimir Putin’s rivals see as an implicit death threat.
euronews.com/2016/01/22/thousands-attend-rally-for-pro-kremlin-chechen-leader-kadyrov/
Kadyrov, 39, a former Chechen rebel turned Kremlin ally, has made a series of strongly-worded verbal tirades against the liberal opposition in recent weeks, calling them “enemies of the people,” a Stalin-era phrase some of Vladimir Putin’s rivals see as an implicit death threat.
So, if this system is defended and believe me, it is the government and not the people of Russia that are being defended, then have at it and it should be seen as what it is. As for me, this is fairly pitiful and bemusing as well.
Pity they wouldn’t do public inquiries and stand up for justice in relation to their own citizens, i.e. British MPs and lawyers who have been murdered, and some nearly 30 years ago.I was just reading about two countries where a suspect was extradited to the other country, these things happen all the time.
Good for the UK to stand up for justice.
Sure, if there is proof of this, by all means, let’s start a thread on it.Pity they wouldn’t do public inquiries and stand up for justice in relation to their own citizens, i.e. British MPs and lawyers who have been murdered, and some nearly 30 years ago.
The murderers, some who are allegedly from the British security forces and/or intelligence agencies, are let off and not subject to a public inquiry.
Needless to say, ‘extradition’ of such killers is neither here nor there, even IF they absconded overseas, as their killings are never investigated in the first place…![]()
A small sample already posted, but makes the whole Litvinenko inquiry hypocritical and ludicrous, when British victims’ relatives have been waiting nearly 30 years for ‘justice’, especially so when the ‘verdict’ was ‘probably’, i.e NO verdict at all.Sure, if there is proof of this, by all means, let’s start a thread on it.