F
FaithofAbraham
Guest
My reply was to someone about pagan deities.what’s pagan got to do with it really? why have any deity if you are not better with it than without it? (materially OR spiritually?)
My reply was to someone about pagan deities.what’s pagan got to do with it really? why have any deity if you are not better with it than without it? (materially OR spiritually?)
Considering I follow the Hellenic religion, it is a fairly big deal to me to see it accurately portrayed. What we have exchanged hardly qualifies as “arguing”, particularly in the context of these boards.I really don’t know why you’re taking this as such a big deal… a question was asked, I answered it. I didn’t really come to these forums to argue. It seems like you’re preparing to debate something with me here and I’m all debated out to be honest.
You said you had studied it extensively and seemed familiar with the story, and I was not aware of any other source for this tale than Plato’s “Symposium”, so I thought you might know.As for references, that will take some digging up. It’s been years since I studied this, and I can’t remember what reference I’m thinking of. But does it really matter?
Reconstructionist and revivalist religions are current modern religions.well actually I was thinking more in terms of current modern religions rather than ancient or reconstructionist ones. I know there are many that come under the umbrella of modern paganism that do not believe humans are imperfect/defective/in need of a savior. But I find the ancient ones also fascinating.
Why does anyone follow any religion? I follow my religion because it is the best reflection of the spiritual reality that I have encountered. The Gods are not accessories to be picked up to enhance one’s appearance or behavior, nor are they constructs of humanity to fill some unnamed deficiency or to be called on like the Maytag repairman when desired and otherwise ignored. The Gods quite simply are.Why would you have a pagan deity if it didn’t make you better than you would be if you didn’t have it?
If it’s not about getting things you can’t do for yourself, why do you need an outside religion to challenge you, why can’t you just do that on your own without it?My religion is not about getting things that I can’t do for myself. Rather it challenges me to take full responsibility for my own actions and needs.
Did I say it was “special”, to use your (rather condescending) terminology? It is not a matter of what I “want” my religion to be. My religion is what it is…period.I know you want your religion to be different and special, but it’s not than any other
True satanists do not worship satan. In fact, they do not even believe in satan as they don’t even believe in god. What they do believe in is natural desires. We, humans, according to the satanists, should not be afraid to act out our natural desires. Religion was concocted by the human being to curb such desires.I think the responses are relevant to the question, Ravyn.
If Satanism truly holds that human beings are perfectly fine in and of themselves then what purpose the worship of Satan?
Worship surely happens, regardless of faith tradition, because people hope to gain some spiritual benefit that they need (or at least think they need). Even if that benefit is only a reassurance that they ARE fine, this need for reassurance is in itself an imperfection and flaw in the human character, no?
Levay in his book claims that human beings need some sort of dogma or religious ritual. Thus, satanism gives a further meaning to ritual and dogma under the umbrella of satanism. Whereas an atheist may not have rituals and dogmas.If she doesn’t need religion, why does she self-identify as a Satanist rather than just an atheist?
Why me,True satanists do not worship satan. In fact, they do not even believe in satan as they don’t even believe in god.