G
GregoriusC
Guest
She’s not the supreme “head” of the church in England as Henry Tudor claimed himself - she is however the ‘supreme governor’ of the church in England, as really does not claim any ecclesiastical authority over the Anglican church - I’m not sure that she feels it’s a queen’s proper place to assume the role that is historically and canonically for males (even if Anglicanism broke this rule.) She really does not have that much authority even in parliament - the house would likely never permit such a drastic move on her part as the British monarch is no longer an ‘absolute’ monarch.But, the Monarch is head of the Church of England. She would just be bringing it back into union with Rome. She could just tell Parliament to sod off.