Question about Gay Marriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter randomguy0187
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You said sodomite, not sodomy, they are different.
You said, “Sodomite is a fairly broad term. Strictly speaking it means much more than just anal sex.”

A sodomite is not sex; a sodomite is one who practices anal sex and other deviant forms mentioned in the definition of sodomy.
 
You said, “Sodomite is a fairly broad term. Strictly speaking it means much more than just anal sex.”

A sodomite is not sex; a sodomite is one who practices anal sex and other deviant forms mentioned in the definition of sodomy.
I would like to get married, it would be considered a ‘homosexual’ marriage, yet my partner and I are celibate. I am sure this is not common, but I know more than one couple like ourselves. Sex isn’t the be all, end all of a relationship.
 
The Catechism of the Catholic Church states very clearly the obligations of civil authorities in a free society…one that is truly free like ours is…based on the constant and unwavering truths found in Judeo-Christianity:

2235 Those who exercise authority should do so as a service. "Whoever would be great among you must be your servant."41 The exercise of authority is measured morally in terms of its divine origin, its reasonable nature and its specific object. No one can command or establish what is contrary to the dignity of persons and the natural law.

I have highlighted the bolded part…a truly free society must govern in accordance with natural law and also with respect to the dignity of persons…to make policies that are out of touch with the reality of natural law is an affront to true liberty…and the reality in this case is that marriage is not a right…it is an institution that is intrinsic to our nature as human beings…and this institution is where we bind ourselves in true love with another person…but what is true love?

True love is love that is open to the gift of new human life…for as the Father created the universe and all life within it out of perfect love, we, as human beings created in His image and likeness, are called to do likewise…create new human life from a pure and holy love for another person…therefore it is IMPOSSIBLE for 2 people involved in the homosexual lifestyle to have bestowed upon their union the honor and dignity of holy matrimony…because their “union” is not and can never be open to the natural creation of new human life…only pure and holy love between a man and a woman can do this

for us to have true liberty actions and lifestyles known to be contrary to human nature must be rejected…then and only then do we truly have the freedom to debate matter of prudential judgment…because to disregard natural law is to disrespect the dignity of persons
 
I would like to get married, it would be considered a ‘homosexual’ marriage, yet my partner and I are celibate. I am sure this is not common, but I know more than one couple like ourselves. Sex isn’t the be all, end all of a relationship.
well if you’re not actively engaging in the homosexual lifestyle you could actually become full members of the Catholic Church…in the Church there is a group called “Courage” made up of people who have not yet been able to divest themselves of the desire…but have given up the lifestyle

however…marriage is something altogether different…it is the way people who truly love each other commit themselves to each other…and sex is the crowning achievement of marriage…sex performed in accordance with natural law that is…sex that is naturally ordered towards the creation of new human life…that is when true love between human beings is fully realized
 
well if you’re not actively engaging in the homosexual lifestyle you could actually become full members of the Catholic Church…in the Church there is a group called “Courage” made up of people who have not yet been able to divest themselves of the desire…but have given up the lifestyle

however…marriage is something altogether different…it is the way people who truly love each other commit themselves to each other…and sex is the crowning achievement of marriage…sex performed in accordance with natural law that is…sex that is naturally ordered towards the creation of new human life…that is when true love between human beings is fully realized
Courage has nothing for me, I’ve tried to join them before.

So, you’re saying, I’m not capable of love? I’ve been told this before. Does this mean all infertile and all sterile couples are incapable of loving each other?
 
well if you’re not actively engaging in the homosexual lifestyle you could actually become full members of the Catholic Church…in the Church there is a group called “Courage” made up of people who have not yet been able to divest themselves of the desire…but have given up the lifestyle

however…marriage is something altogether different…it is the way people who truly love each other commit themselves to each other…and sex is the crowning achievement of marriage…sex performed in accordance with natural law that is…sex that is naturally ordered towards the creation of new human life…that is when true love between human beings is fully realized
What is “homosexual lifestyle”? Does that include shopping for rainbow flags at Macy’s? What is “sex performed in accordance with natural law”? Does that include alfresco sexual activities?
 
In what way do I meet the dictionary definition of “bigot”?

I am asking a simple question.

How?

I understand why people find it offensive but I want to know why. I know of people who believe that incestual marriage and polygamy should be legal in addition to same-sex marriage. Are they “bigots” because they equate incestual marriage and polygamy with gay marriage?

Sweden allows marriage between siblings who share one parent.

Tell me why Sweden should change it’s law and forbid incestual marriage while allowing same-sex marriage.
Sweden has forsaken God’s Laws. Pray for them.
Discussing the sin of homosexuality causes discord to say the least. However, what we must be most concerned about is what the Lord God has said about this sin.

Rom.1: 22 reads "Although they claim to be wise, they become fools.23.and exchnged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal men and birds and reptiles. 24. Therefore God gave them over in their sinful desires of their hearts to sexual impurity for the degrading of their bodies with one another. 25. they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served created things rather than the Creator- who is forever praised. 26. Because of this, God gave them over to shamful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.27. In the same way abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another…
Men commutted indecent acts with other men, and received in them selves the due penalty for thwir perversion.
.28 Futhermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, He gave them over to their depraved mind, to do what not ought to be done.
You may read the following scriptures to verse 32 for further enlightment.
Now you know the truth of God’s word, so you are without excuse.
Of course this includes all sin we committ everyday.
See, also Lev.18:22

God bless,
jean8
It isn’t easy being a Christian, is it? 🙂
 
Courage has nothing for me, I’ve tried to join them before.

So, you’re saying, I’m not capable of love? I’ve been told this before. Does this mean all infertile and all sterile couples are incapable of loving each other?
if you are capable of the marital act with a member of the opposite sex you can get married but you must be open to the possibility of new life…pray to God that He finds a way to cure you of your infertility…either directly by miracle or by working through countless members of the medical profession
 
What is “homosexual lifestyle”? Does that include shopping for rainbow flags at Macy’s? What is “sex performed in accordance with natural law”? Does that include alfresco sexual activities?
by homosexual lifestyle I mean the sexual activities homosexuals engage in…and for humans sex performed in accordance with natural law is sex with your natural sex partner (meaning heterosexual sex) performed within the bonds of marriage and is open to the gift of new life…and no it doesn’t include alfresco activities…us humans are more civilized than to put our procreative activities on public display…now for animals alfresco sexual activities are quite natural…but not for humans…for humans this is a private affair
 
by homosexual lifestyle I mean the sexual activities homosexuals engage in…
By the same token, when you refer to heterosexual lifestyle you must mean the sexual activities heterosexuals engage in, like oral and anal intercourse, I guess.
and for humans sex performed in accordance with natural law is sex with your natural sex partner (meaning heterosexual sex) performed within the bonds of marriage and is open to the gift of new life…
That must exclude any sterile relationships, since whatever they do they’ll be closed to the gift of new life…
and no it doesn’t include alfresco activities…us humans are more civilized than to put our procreative activities on public display…now for animals alfresco sexual activities are quite natural…but not for humans…for humans this is a private affair
Where in the Bible does it say you cannot procreate outdoors? If you are in a house with no ceiling, where you can see the sky, the sun, the moon/stars, does that count as public or private? Does it need to be in a specific room? Can it be in the kitchen, the bathroom or the entrance hall? Can it happen with both partners standing or do they need to lie down? Can it happen directly on the floor or does it need to be on top of something, like a table, an armchair or a bidet? Assuming both partners can shower together, can it happen in the shower? Are there any rules regulating sexual positions, like man on bottom and woman on top? Can you procreate with the lights on or do they need to be off? Can you have your socks on or do they need to be taken off? Can you do that in front of animals, like dogs, cats or spiders?
 
By the same token, when you refer to heterosexual lifestyle you must mean the sexual activities heterosexuals engage in, like oral and anal intercourse, I guess.
Those acts are only licit if they are part of foreplay leading to a completed conjugal act…depending on whom you speak with about it. Some Catholics teach that they can’t be done at all.
cristinha:
That must exclude any sterile relationships, since whatever they do they’ll be closed to the gift of new life…
Nope. “Openness to life” does not mean ability to bring forth new life. Those who are naturally sterile (e.g. past the age of menopause) can still be technically “open to life.” As long as you aren’t using artificial birth control, then you aren’t “closed to life.”
 
Those acts are only licit if they are part of foreplay leading to a completed conjugal act…depending on whom you speak with about it. Some Catholics teach that they can’t be done at all.

Nope. “Openness to life” does not mean ability to bring forth new life. Those who are naturally sterile (e.g. past the age of menopause) can still be technically “open to life.” As long as you aren’t using artificial birth control, then you aren’t “closed to life.”
Sterile relations cannot technically procreate without some form of help or technology. The same applies to gay relations. You can see and treat them differently, but the end result is the same. It seems to me that some people can go to any extent to justify the exclusion of the scapegoat of the day.
 
Sterile relations cannot technically procreate without some form of help or technology. The same applies to gay relations. You can see and treat them differently, but the end result is the same. It seems to me that some people can go to any extent to justify the exclusion of the scapegoat of the day.
Seems to me you just don’t understand Church teaching on the matter. Read the Catechism, educate yourself, and then try again.
scborromeo.org/ccc/p3s2c2a6.htm
 
Seems to me you just don’t understand Church teaching on the matter. Read the Catechism, educate yourself, and then try again.
scborromeo.org/ccc.htm
A better option would be to read the original biblical manuscripts in the original languages, and try to understand the original intentions and worldview, without interference from all the distorted and accumulated ideologies developed over thousands of years of many different interpretations and misinterpretations. And this must be made on a personal level. All the rest is just a game of follow the leader, whoever the leader of the day happens to be.
 
A better option would be to read the original biblical manuscripts in the original languages, and try to understand the original intentions and worldview, without interference from all the distorted and accumulated ideologies developed over thousands of years of many different interpretations and misinterpretations. And this must be made on a personal level. All the rest is just a game of follow the leader, whoever the leader of the day happens to be.
Go ahead…I thought you were trying to argue against the Catholic understanding, since you are on a Catholic forum. For that, it is a little quicker to start with the Catechism. 😉
 
A better option would be to read the original biblical manuscripts in the original languages, and try to understand the original intentions and worldview, without interference from all the distorted and accumulated ideologies developed over thousands of years of many different interpretations and misinterpretations…
This is similar to the Protestant method, although theirs does rely on a translation of the original manuscripts, so they claim.

Protestants rely on individual reading and interpretation. In addition to that, your method would require learning the original languages [not as they are today, even if they exist] Scripture was written in. Are you prepared to do that? Also, do you know the four ways to interpret Scripture? Which would you use? In addition, your method requires an infallible conscience. Do you have an infallible conscience?

What amazes me is that if a person needs brain surgery, he will seek out the best, most experienced brain surgeon. But when it comes to eternal salvation, he should rely on his own devices and not the accumulated knowledge of those who have spent over 2,000 years of study.
 
Beyond that, biblical interpretation is not for amateurs. It’s one thing to pray the Bible (everyone can do that, whatever denomination); it’s another thing to extrapolate teaching & intellectual content from it. A lot is involved in the practice of exegesis, including an understanding of anthropological factors, the polemics of the era & author or authors of the books involved, the milieu of those authors (for example, Hellenistic), and much more. There are many fabulous Protestant and Jewish exegetes; their conclusions are not necessarily always or even usually at odds with Catholic conclusions, just to put that out there.
 
Sodomites haven’t existed for thousands of years, obviously they cannot ensure our survival.
Ever heard of the towns Sodom and Gommorha from which the term sodomy came from?

The towns God destroyed because of their evil practice?
 
A human right? no I wouldn’t say so, but if they allow straight people to marry, government MUST let gay people marry as well, as long as both are consenting adults.🙂
 
A human right? no I wouldn’t say so, but if they allow straight people to marry, government MUST let gay people marry as well, as both as consenting adults.🙂
That is your opinion, of course. There is nothing based on the Constitution, Natural Law, etc. that says we "MUST."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top