Question about Iglesia Ni Cristo [Church of Christ]

  • Thread starter Thread starter ETE
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The problem you will experience with all true Christians is that yours is yet another “restoration” church which cannot identify exactly when the gates of hell prevailed against Christ’s church. The very concept being 100% against scripture. It’s command structure is distinctly secretive, which smacks of so many other cults that cropped up in the 1800s and early 1900s.
The Power of death or Hades refers to the members that faithfully obey the commandments, and not in the organization itself, the Church. Meaning, the second death will not overpower the Members of the Church, the members who did not take part in the apostasy.
We admire any and all zeal you have, but we also realize that, like LDS, Yahweh’s Witnesses and all the others, the spirit of antichrist greatly mislead the founders.
If that is the case then we need to follow the prescribed testing on which one is the Anti_Christ through comparison of Spirit …since false teachers are but dominant in this world is it not?

*1 Cor 2:13 These things we also speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches but which the Holy Spirit teaches, **comparing spiritual things with spiritual.

 
no need to discuss any further, i am only interested in the one, holy, catholic and apostolic church which is the catholic church that JESUS founded. anything else i don’t consider a religion. period!!!
If that is the case, then even though it is going into destruction then so be it, right?
 
ETE,

which scriptures do ING consider to be authentic and why ?
what is the relationship between the scriptures and the faith of INC ?
What were the revelations that Felix Manalo claimed to have received ?
Were any of them to do with interpreting or accepting the scriptures ?

Peace be with you.
 
From Wikipedia:
Military intelligence sources say that the Iglesia has 1,000 to 2,000 high-caliber firearms in its armory, apart from guns owned by individual members who include soldiers and policemen.
In September 1972, INC members shot at and killed three Marine soldiers who were part of a contingent sent by Marcos to shut down the church’s DZEC radio tower.
On March 8, 1992, around twelve members of the Iglesia ni Cristo were angered about losing an altercation during a basketball game against some college students from the nearby Polytechnic University of the Philippines. They physically assaulted the other team which fueled the conflict. A brawl took place afterwards where two of the INC members were badly mauled. In revenge, the INC members, with the help of a local policeman who was also member of the INC, kidnapped eight students but later released the three after threatening them not to tell anyone. The remaining five students were immediately brought inside the chapel of Iglesia ni Cristo in Sta. Mesa, Manila where they were tortured to the point of death. According to court documents, the victims were mauled, tortured and beaten by their captors, who were deacons of the INC, as well as by their cohorts, using steel tubes, lead pipes, guns and other blunt instruments, inside the basement of the church. A witness saw one of the perpetrators bringing a blow torch inside the basement where the victims were kept while hearing cries for mercy. Three days later, or on 10 March 1992, the victims’ decomposing bodies were found floating on the Pasig River. Postmortem examinations on the cadavers showed that one of the victims sustained lacerated wounds, contusions, ligature marks and hematoma and died from a gunshot wound on the head. Another victim had his genitals cut off. Most of the victims’ death were caused by "asphyxia by strangulation; hemorrhage, intracranial, traumatic with skull fracture” and/or “asphyxia by drowning”, indicating that some of the victims were still alive when they were thrown into the river. Although eye witnesses told police that around a dozen members of the INC participated in the kidnapping of the victims, only four of them, including the policeman, were arrested and eventually convicted for the murders. The four were given life sentences.
In October 2007, members of the Iglesia ni Cristo in Tondo, Manila assaulted three preachers of the Pentecostal Missionary Church of Christ (PMCC) after a religious debate.
 
From Wikipedia:
Military intelligence sources say that the Iglesia has 1,000 to 2,000 high-caliber firearms in its armory, apart from guns owned by individual members who include soldiers and policemen.
In September 1972, INC members shot at and killed three Marine soldiers who were part of a contingent sent by Marcos to shut down the church’s DZEC radio tower.
On March 8, 1992, around twelve members of the Iglesia ni Cristo were angered about losing an altercation during a basketball game against some college students from the nearby Polytechnic University of the Philippines. They physically assaulted the other team which fueled the conflict. A brawl took place afterwards where two of the INC members were badly mauled. In revenge, the INC members, with the help of a local policeman who was also member of the INC, kidnapped eight students but later released the three after threatening them not to tell anyone. The remaining five students were immediately brought inside the chapel of Iglesia ni Cristo in Sta. Mesa, Manila where they were tortured to the point of death. According to court documents, the victims were mauled, tortured and beaten by their captors, who were deacons of the INC, as well as by their cohorts, using steel tubes, lead pipes, guns and other blunt instruments, inside the basement of the church. A witness saw one of the perpetrators bringing a blow torch inside the basement where the victims were kept while hearing cries for mercy. Three days later, or on 10 March 1992, the victims’ decomposing bodies were found floating on the Pasig River. Postmortem examinations on the cadavers showed that one of the victims sustained lacerated wounds, contusions, ligature marks and hematoma and died from a gunshot wound on the head. Another victim had his genitals cut off. Most of the victims’ death were caused by "asphyxia by strangulation; hemorrhage, intracranial, traumatic with skull fracture” and/or “asphyxia by drowning”, indicating that some of the victims were still alive when they were thrown into the river. Although eye witnesses told police that around a dozen members of the INC participated in the kidnapping of the victims, only four of them, including the policeman, were arrested and eventually convicted for the murders. The four were given life sentences.
In October 2007, members of the Iglesia ni Cristo in Tondo, Manila assaulted three preachers of the Pentecostal Missionary Church of Christ (PMCC) after a religious debate.
 
The first verse is from John’s Gospel. Please note that that was NOT written by Ignatius. None of these passages were.
That is my point of view. Why in the world Ignatius will bring a doctrine that Jesus is God? And the verses that you have provided did not give us a point blank answer that Jesus is God either, rather a mere speculation of his existence that you would like to tie in with the Almighty God is it not?
Exstance is the issue with the first quotes that I wrote. How did Jesus exist before anyone else? There is only One eternal One. To claim equality with God, which Jesus did, is to claim to be God. That is what equal means, the same as.
How did Jesus exist before anyone else? Did you read what John said? He said, “in the beginning was the Word” and the “Word” refers to the existence of Jesus in the beginning is it not?
Yes, the Jews did not and do not now look for God made man. Does that mean that it is not possible?
The point is, why would God announced the coming of the Messiah since the time of the Fathers and the prophets, then he is the one who will come? Is God the Messiah?

There is no sense in that reasoning.
 
ETE, you quoted the “New Catholic Encyclopedia”, and out of context. Please do not scold someone else for quoting another source.

Also, please feel free to address my arguments, all of the arguments you haven’t addressed since page 1, including the Scriptures, whenever it so suits you.
 
ETE,

which scriptures do ING consider to be authentic and why ?
All Scriptures is inspired by God and will lead men for salvation.

2 Tim. 3:16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work.
what is the relationship between the scriptures and the faith of INC ?
The faith of the INC is based on the scriptures, meaning if it is not written, then we are silent.
What were the revelations that Felix Manalo claimed to have received ?
Our basis is the prophetical declaration of God, a testimony that validates the one God sent. In the same manner of Jesus testimony …

Rev. 19:10 “…Worship God! For the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy.”
Were any of them to do with interpreting or accepting the scriptures ?

Peace be with you.
Interpreting the scriptures cannot be done by anyone else, nor the world wisdom can unlock God wisdom, it can only be done by the one sent

John 3:34 The one whom God has sent speaks God’s words, because God gives him the fullness of his Spirit.

and to those whom God gave the knowledge to know the mystery of God’s Kingdom…

Mark 4:11 And He said to them, "To you it has been given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God; but to those who are outside, all things come in parables,

Other than them, everything comes in parables, and you can easily detect if it is in parables, cause confusion and contradictions preceded to such who has not received the knowledge of God’s kingdom.

May God bless you too my friend.
 
Abandoning a thread where the OP baits us to ask questions, then answers with straw man fallacies, begging-the question, ad ignorantum, quoting sources out of context, and the favorite abusive cult tactic of saying the language of Scripture really means something else–with no regard for literaly thousands of years of scholarship from people who can actually READ koine greek and hebrew.

Going now, suggest all other forum members also stop giving the OP the attention he craves.
 
ETE, you quoted the “New Catholic Encyclopedia”, and out of context. Please do not scold someone else for quoting another source.
Which one? That Jesus deity’s development happened in the later times? Lot’s of historians, Catholic or not declares the same my friend, you cannot deny what really did happen and when it happened…if you will close your mind.
Also, please feel free to address my arguments, all of the arguments you haven’t addressed since page 1, including the Scriptures, whenever it so suits you.
I will, and I have started John 20:28, I wish you will respond accordingly for clarification of the truth.
 
Abandoning a thread where the OP baits us to ask questions, then answers with straw man fallacies, begging-the question, ad ignorantum, quoting sources out of context, and the favorite abusive cult tactic of saying the language of Scripture really means something else–with no regard for literaly thousands of years of scholarship from people who can actually READ koine greek and hebrew.

Going now, suggest all other forum members also stop giving the OP the attention he craves.
If it is out of context, then prove it…if you can’t it will stand.

If a person believes he/they have the truth, he will fight for it with no whining whatsoever is needed, just pure scriptures, logic, common sense and historical facts.
 
If the development of Jesus as deity occurred only in later times, then the Scriptures must be sorely mistaken when they call Him Lord and God. You deny the Scriptures.

I have responded accordingly to your rhetorical argument on John. I responded, if you read it, with Thomas’ own words, in their context, directly from Scripture. You failed to make any more mention of it.
19 Now when it was late that same day, the first of the week, and the doors were shut, where the disciples were gathered together, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in the midst, and said to them: Peace be to you. 20 And when he had said this, he showed them his hands and his side. The disciples therefore were glad, when they saw the Lord.
21 He [Jesus] said therefore to them again: Peace be to you. As the Father hath sent me, I also send you. 22 When he had said this, he breathed on them; and he said to them: Receive ye the Holy Ghost. 23 Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them; and whose sins you shall retain, they are retained. 24 Now Thomas, one of the twelve, who is called Didymus, was not with them when Jesus came. 25 The other disciples therefore said to him: We have seen the Lord. But he said to them: Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the place of the nails, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.****
26 And after eight days again his disciples were within, and Thomas with them. Jesus cometh, the doors being shut, and stood in the midst, and said: Peace be to you. 27 Then he saith to Thomas: Put in thy finger hither, and see my hands; and bring hither thy hand, and put it into my side; and be not faithless, but believing. 28 Thomas answered, and said to him: My Lord, and my God. 29 Jesus saith to him: Because thou hast seen me, Thomas, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and have believed.
You also have not answered how you “accept” the Scriptures, but ignore them, and at the same the Councils that established such Scriptures. This is outright contradictory. As I said earlier, you can’t have your cake and it eat it, too.
2 Tim. 3:16 All Scripture is inspired by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for training in righteousness; 17 so that the man of God may be adequate, equipped for every good work
Maybe you should try reading these God-inspired Scriptures more often.

And believing them.

Read the Scriptures above and the other four-or-so verses I gave you. Also, respond to the councils and how we determine the Scriptures. Furthermore, respond to the marks of the true Church of Jesus Christ. You have not responded to anything. At all. You have dodged the sharp questioning and given wishy-washy answers.
 
Whoa now. The Church of Christ in the United States has absolutely nothing to do with the Iglesia Ni Cristo. I have been Church of Christ in the United States all of my life. The confusion probably comes from the fact that the Spanish translation for Church of Christ is Iglesia de Cristo. The gap between Church of Christ and Iglesia Ni Cristo is probably as great as the gap between Islam and Hindu.

The Church of Christ fully accepts the divinity of Jesus. I even once heard a Church of Christ preacher say in a sermon about the Trinity, “The Catholic Church is 100% correct on its teachings on the Trinity.” We have the exact same beliefs as the Catholic Church when it comes to the Trinity.

Oh and the most Church of Christ members do not think we are the only ones going to heaven. That would totally contradict history. The breed of Church of Christ that thinks we are the only ones going to heaven is quickly dying off.
The confusion is from the history of the Restoration movement. Among the leaders was Barton Stone, he was an Arian in christology and as such denied the deity of Christ. The Restoration Movement along with other movements like the Adventist movement were heavily influnce by a sect called the Christian Connextion Movement which were basically a group of boston unitarians who came out of the congregationists. So, don’t be suprised that there is a wide range of beliefs among the off shouts of the so-called Restoration movement. BTW, the modern Bible Alone viewpoint was inherited from this same Christian Connection movement too.

So, today you can have too groups calling themselves “church of christ” one Trinitarian and the other denying the deity of Christ.

So, ETE do you believe in the Trinity? do you believe Jesus is God? What is your interpretation of John 1:1, 8:58, 10:30? Can you show any early church documents outside the Bible which teaches your theology? How do you believe one is saved? What is your understanding of the atonement? How do you know your interpretation is authoritive and truly represents what the early church taught? Can you list your bishops starting with Peter or Linus? Feel free to answer each question as a new thread, so this one does not get bogged down. What is the history of your group? Who founded it?
 
If that is the case, then even though it is going into destruction then so be it, right?
you are sounding like an anti-christ. destruction…what?

matthew 16:18 and I say to thee: that thou art peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

if you truly believe in GOD convert to catholism now and may JESUS CHIRST our LORD have mercy on your soul. GOD bless & prayers to all!
 
Respond to JONATHAN CID:

If those verses are true and signifies JESUS IS GOD, why then based on history, JESUS IS GOD doctrine came out in the early second century? And all the writers of the NT are long long gone?

SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY. Augustus Hopkins String, D.D. Three Volumes in One, Philadelphia. The Judson Press Chicago. Kansas City, Los Angeles, Seattle. Copyright by Augustus Hopkins Strong. 1907

p. 305
“The earliest time known at which Jesus was deified was after the New Testament writers. In The letters of Ignatius, at the beginning of the second century.”

I will address your presented verses later, but for the meantime, I would like to tackle a logic and common sense discussion.
The problem with your argument is those “second” century christian leaders were taught directly by the apostles themselves, therefore any evidence from them is vaild as to what the early church taught.

The Biblical Basis of the
Doctrine of the Trinity:
An Outline Study
spotlightministries.org.uk/bowmanonthetrinity.htm

St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies (C. 180 A.D.):

“The successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient Church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious Apostles, Peter and Paul, that Church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the Apostles. For with this the whole world; and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the Apostolic tradition…”

The Martyrdom of St. Polycarp (C. 155 - 157 A.D.):

“…In this way and for all things I do praise you, I do bless you, I do glorify you through the eternal and heavenly High Priest Jesus Christ, your beloved child: through whom be glory to you with Him and with the Holy Spirit, both now and through ages yet to come. Amen.”

St. Theophilus of Antioch, To Autolycus (181 A.D.):

“The three days before the luminaries were created are **types of the Trinity: God, His Word, and His Wisdom.” **
St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies (C. 180 A.D.):

“If any one, therefore says to us, ‘How then was the Son produced by the Father?’ we reply to him, that no man understands that production, or generation, or calling, or revelation, or by whatever name one may describe His generation, which is in fact altogether indescribable. Neither Valentinus, nor Marcion, nor Saturninus, nor Basilides, nor angels, not archangels, nor principalities, nor powers (possess this knowledge), but the Father only who begat, and the Son who was begotten. Since therefore His generation is unspeakable, those who strive to set forth generations and productions cannot be in their right mind, inasmuch as they undertake to describe things that are indescribable.”

St. Ambrose of Milan, Hexameron (Post 389 A.D.):

“But let us consider the course of our own creation. He says: ‘Let Us make man to our image and to our likeness.’ Who says this? Is it not God, who made you?..To whom does He say it? Certainly not to Himself, for He does not say ‘Let Me make’ but ‘Let Us make.’ Nor to the Angels, for they are ministers; and servants can have no partnership in the operation of the master, nor works with their author. It is the Son to whom He speaks, even if the Jews will not have it and the Arians fight against it…[And it is the Son] who is the image of God the Father, the Son who always is and who was in the beginning.”

St. Augustine of Hippo (+430 A.D.), De Trinitate, Bk. 7, Ch. 4:

“For that which must be understood of persons according to our usage, this is to be understood of substances according to the Greek usage; for they say three substances, one essence, in the same way as we say three persons, one essence or substance.”

St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Romans (C. 110 A.D.):

“Ignatius, also called Theophorus, to the Church that has found mercy in the greatness of the Most High Father and in Jesus Christ, His only Son: to the Church beloved and enlightened after the love of Jesus Christ, our God, by the will of Him that has willed everything which is: to the Church also which holds the presidency in the place of the country of the Romans…To those who are united in flesh and in spirit by every commandment of His, who are filled with the grace of God without wavering, and who are filtered clear of every foreign stain, I wish an alloyed joy in Jesus Christ, our God.”

Tatian the Syrian, Address to the Greeks (C. 165 - 175 A.D.):

“We are not playing the fool, you Greeks, nor do we talk nonsense, when **we report that God was born in the form of a man.” **

St. Melito of Sardes, Fragment in Anastasius of Sinai (C. 177 A.D.):

“The activities of Christ after His Baptism, and especially His miracles, gave indication and assurance to the world of the **Deity hidden in His flesh. Being God and likewise perfect man, **He gave positive indications of His two natures: of His Deity, by the miracles during the three years following after His Baptism; of His humanity, in the thirty years which came before His Baptism, during which, by reason of His condition according to the flesh, he concealed the signs of His Deity, although He was the true God existing before the ages.”
 
If a person believes he/they have the truth, he will fight for it with no whining whatsoever is needed, just pure scriptures, logic, common sense and historical facts
None of which you have done. And when I have done so, you have ignored them.
Abandoning a thread where the OP baits us to ask questions, then answers with straw man fallacies, begging-the question, ad ignorantum, quoting sources out of context, and the favorite abusive cult tactic of saying the language of Scripture really means something else–with no regard for literaly thousands of years of scholarship from people who can actually READ koine greek and hebrew.
Going now, suggest all other forum members also stop giving the OP the attention he craves.
I agree and I’ve already reported the unecessary second thread to moderators.
 
If the development of Jesus as deity occurred only in later times, then the Scriptures must be sorely mistaken when they call Him Lord and God. You deny the Scriptures.
Not because Thomas call Jesus Lord and God, then the gospel that they preached for salvation should have the same agenda right? But how come there is none?

And if it is true that JESUS IS GOD based on the scriptures then multiple well known historians, scholars and theologians made a big mistake in declaring, JESUS IS GOD doctrines crept up ONLY in the early second century.

Can’t you see the contradictions?
I have responded accordingly to your rhetorical argument on John. I responded, if you read it, with Thomas’ own words, in their context, directly from Scripture. You failed to make any more mention of it.
I gave you a scenario that you did not address. I’ll repeat it again, Was Thomas a Jesus is God believer or not? If he is, when did he start believing Jesus is God? On John 20:28 event? or before? Did he preach JESUS IS GOD in his almost three year gospel campaign with Jesus and after with the same gospel preached by the Apostles? I need proof for validation.

Those are the things that must and should go along with John 20:28 declaration to match and solidify history and utterance.
You also have not answered how you “accept” the Scriptures, but ignore them, and at the same the Councils that established such Scriptures. This is outright contradictory. As I said earlier, you can’t have your cake and it eat it, too.
I think you missed the point. Scriptures bonded or not are scriptures, that’s how the first century Church received it…Catholics simply canonized it in ONE BOOK.

But the council has no right, most specially Constantine to meddle with Church doctrines, and the forced he applied for the bishops to declare to all the subjects of his empire to believe as an article of faith the JESUS DEITY.

And you buy that doctrine based on 325AD’s final resolution with no question asked, right?
Maybe you should try reading these God-inspired Scriptures more often.

And believing them.
I did, I hope you too. Do you?
Read the Scriptures above and the other four-or-so verses I gave you. Also, respond to the councils and how we determine the Scriptures. Furthermore, respond to the marks of the true Church of Jesus Christ. You have not responded to anything. At all. You have dodged the sharp questioning and given wishy-washy answers.
Let me ask you this if you know your own history.

Jesus is God article of faith was established in 325AD right?..Now, when was the Holy Spirit is God article of faith invented and established by the Council?:rolleyes:

Now we can see the difference.
 
you are sounding like an anti-christ. destruction…what?

matthew 16:18 and I say to thee: that thou art peter; and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

if you truly believe in GOD convert to catholism now and may JESUS CHIRST our LORD have mercy on your soul. GOD bless & prayers to all!
I’ll make it simple for you to understand my friend.

If it is true that falling away from the faith or apostasy never happened to the Church that Jesus built in Matthew 16:18.

Then it is also true that whatever Jesus, the Apostles and the first century Christians preached and practiced on their time should have the same image of what your are doing, do you agree?

Just to make sense that the power of hades or whatever interpretation you rendered of that verse did not overcome the Church herself and the Church continues as it is where is, with the primitive Church, right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top