Seeing these remarks, I really wonder if the Mormon harrassment and abuse towards people leaving is something that should be brought out into civil light.
It is looking to me that their civil rights here in the USA to live by their own choices and free from harrassment and abuse are being violated to some degree.
Legally can anything be done to stop the mistreatment, etc., of those wanting to get out of this?
Kathleen,
Yes, it can be stopped. Will explain below.
My wife and I are currently going through the same thing! You have my prayers, friend. We still need to chat about our histories. Send me a PM if you like.
I am in the middle of all of this. Please pray for me, and for my wife.
truthseeker32 & Sunstone,
You may both already know this; We are protected by the laws of our country. We have freedom of religion, which includes the right to resign from any religion, without the religious leaders/church taking any further action against us.
The law does not allow “excommunication” or any other action against a person who has formerly resigned from a religion/church.
So, it is very important to submit a formal, written letter of resignation, when leaving the Mormon church.
The following link provides a simple summary of 2 court cases that have tested our right to this religious freedom:
**
How to Resign from the LDS Church
**
"LEGAL PRECEDENTS
There is one case in particular that has clearly established in case law a right that most of us believe we had all along: the right to simply resign from a church. A second case is important to establish the church’s vulnerability to lawsuits when they refuse to honor resignations.
GUINN V THE CHURCH OF CHRIST OF COLLINSVILLE
Final decision by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma, January 1989
Marian Guinn, a member of the Church of Christ of Collinsville, OK, hand delivered her resignation to the minister after he told her he was going to excommunicate her for fornication.
The minister refused to honor the resignation, went ahead with the ‘excommunication’ and then announced it from the pulpit. Guinn sued and was awarded $390,000. On appeal the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled that Guinn’s resignation was effective immediately and that anything the church or the minister received Guinn’s resignation was tortable.
In other words, she could sue for anything they did after she resigned. The court ruled that with her resignation Guinn withdrew her consent to being treated as a member and she withdrew her consent to being subject to church discipline.
Of extra importance is the fact that the court ruled that the right to freedom of religion also includes the right to unilaterally resign from a church.
In several subsequent court cases the Mormon church has agreed to the principles established in Guinn. They have not even attempted to argue that the principles do not apply to them.
THE NORMAN HANCOCK LAWSUIT (Mesa AZ 1985)
In 1985 the Mormon church ‘excommunicated’ Norman Hancock AFTER he submitted a letter of resignation to the church.
Hancock filed an $18 million lawsuit against the church, saying a person has a right to voluntarily resign from a church.
The suit was settled out of court and the settlement was sealed. An account on line reports that Hancock filed the suit himself, without the aid of a lawyer, after studying the Guinn case.
The same account says that church lawyers started discussing with Hancock just how much money he wanted, but he told them he didn’t want their money, that what he wanted was to have his name cleared. Church representatives agreed to change the records such that there would no longer be any record of an ‘excommuication’: the records would show that he resigned (that he asked for ‘name removal’).
. . .The Guinn and Hancock cases were the end of the era when the church told members that there was no way to stop being a member except by excommunication. The church began having a process it calls ‘name removal’.
However, the church still tells bishops and stake presidents that a member who is ‘transgressing’ should not be allowed to resign, that “name removal should not be used as a substitute for church discipline”.
If you’ve paid attention to the Guinn case, you already know that the church is wrong about that and they can be sued for ‘excommunicating’ someone who already resigned. At church headquarters they know this very well and they will usually put a quick halt to ‘discipline’ proceedings if they find out that the former members knows what his or her rights are."
© Kos Media, LLC
Site content may be used for any purpose without
explicit permission unless otherwise specified.
“Kos” and “Daily Kos” are registered trademarks of Kos Media, LLC
Helpful links from the website quoted above.
Leaving the Mormon Church
The Process
Getting Started
Sample Resignation Letter
You certainly have my prayers.
Peace and blessings,
Anna