question on abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter trav6574
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Verity1:
Read the post properly Mike. I’m not judging the person, only the sentiment. She is not, in fact, a Catholic, either a mommy, daddy or anything else, if she condones abortion under ANy circumstances. That’s what the Church teaches. End of story.
You need to read Forum Guidelines. We do not question other beleifs. Period.
 
40.png
estesbob:
Your post is about as far outside the bounds of the expected discourse in these forums as one can get. I dont agree with catholic Mommy but i would never in a million years insult her the way you just did.
Rubbish! She calls herself Catholic in the same post as she says that abortion is acceptable in some circumstances. It isn’t. The Church says it isn’t. You can’t be a practising Catholic and hold that view.
 
40.png
estesbob:
You need to read Forum Guidelines. We do not question other beleifs. Period.
Will do, but if the Forum Guidelines state that it is wrong to correct a scandalously erroneous statement by someone suggesting that it is in -line with Catholicism, then the PC world has finally won.
 
40.png
mikew262:
If you’ll review my posts, I said I was torn on this. Your post certainly has merit, but I see the other side as well.
I accept you’re torn. But, what would you say to the baby who’s life is deemed unacceptable?
 
40.png
Verity1:
Read the post properly Mike. I’m not judging the person, only the sentiment. She is not, in fact, a Catholic, either a mommy, daddy or anything else, if she condones abortion under ANy circumstances. That’s what the Church teaches. End of story.
You pronounced her a non-Catholic based upon her actions. That is judging, which is not your place. End of story.
 
40.png
Verity1:
I accept you’re torn. But, what would you say to the baby who’s life is deemed unacceptable?
I don’t know, thats why I’m torn.
 
40.png
mikew262:
I don’t know, thats why I’m torn.
Ah. That sounds like a cop-out, Mike. Don’t you think that they deserve to be given a reason why their life is to be ended?
 
40.png
mikew262:
You pronounced her a non-Catholic based upon her actions. That is judging, which is not your place. End of story.
If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe in divorce/re-marriage, am I a practising Catholic? If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe in pre-marital sex sometimes, am I a practising Catholic? If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe that it’s OK to sometimes murder innocent people, am I a practising Catholic? If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe that sometimes adultery is acceptable, am I a practising Catholic? NO, I’m not. I may not be culpable, because of invincible ignorance or whatever, but I would NOT be a practising Catholic. That is not a personal judgement on the state of my own soul. It’s just a fact. Otherwise, WHAT does it mean to be Catholic?
 
40.png
Verity1:
Ah. That sounds like a cop-out, Mike. Don’t you think that they deserve to be given a reason why their life is to be ended?
This is the best answer I can give you at this time. Accept it or not. You ask a good question, definitely food for thought. You’ve made your point.
 
40.png
mikew262:
Question actions and opinions all you want, not beliefs.
Semantics again. A Catholic has got to believe what the Church teaches. Otherwise, they aren’t practising Catholics. To borrow your phrase, end of story.
 
40.png
mikew262:
This is the best answer I can give you at this time. Accept it or not. You ask a good question, definitely food for thought. You’ve made your point.
I do accept it. Thanks, and best wishes on your pondering.
 
40.png
Verity1:
If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe in divorce/re-marriage, am I a practising Catholic? If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe in pre-marital sex sometimes, am I a practising Catholic? If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe that it’s OK to sometimes murder innocent people, am I a practising Catholic? If I say I’m a Catholic, but I believe that sometimes adultery is acceptable, am I a practising Catholic? NO, I’m not. I may not be culpable, because of invincible ignorance or whatever, but I would NOT be a practising Catholic. That is not a personal judgement on the state of my own soul. It’s just a fact. Otherwise, WHAT does it mean to be Catholic?
These are all your personal opinions. All Catholics sin, does this mean they cease to be Catholic, no not IMO. If so, the church would be truly an empty place. Part of being a Catholic is being charitable, even to somebody you feel is sinning. Is your attack on this particular person’s faith charitable? Instead of condemning her, why don’t you in a less aggressive/zealot like manner try to show her the error of her ways. I believe Jesus gave you a pretty good example of how that is done.
 
40.png
mikew262:
Question actions and opinions all you want, not beliefs.
That is exactly what should be questioned.

A belief, by defintion is the Intellectual commitment to the truth of a proposition.

When one believes something, one holds intellectually that a particular statement is True.

That, by definition is a matter than can be debated.

This differs from an Opinion, which is a predisposition to the Truth of a proposition.

Are you seriously trying to state that a belief may not be questioned? If so, what would be the point of a debate, to engage in an intellectual examination of the proposition in question?

If you encountered someone who belived that the Earth was flat, or that penquins were actually a form of insect, that you would not attempt to convince them otherwise?
 
40.png
estesbob:
You need to read Forum Guidelines. We do not question other beleifs. Period.
I’ve re-read them now, thanks. I see nothing in what I wrote which was against the rules. If a person attaches the name “Catholic” to their name, it is my right to challenge them if they express views which are directly contrary to Catholic teaching. Of course I question the beliefs of a a professing Catholic who believes in abortion!!! Naturally, if she did not profess to be Catholic, the situation would be different.
 
40.png
Verity1:
I’ve re-read them now, thanks. I see nothing in what I wrote which was against the rules. If a person attaches the name “Catholic” to their name, it is my right to challenge them if they express views which are directly contrary to Catholic teaching. Of course I question the beliefs of a a professing Catholic who believes in abortion!!! Naturally, if she did not profess to be Catholic, the situation would be different.
I know being rude is covered in the rules.
 
40.png
Brendan:
That is exactly what should be questioned.

A belief, by defintion is the Intellectual commitment to the truth of a proposition.

When one believes something, one holds intellectually that a particular statement is True.

That, by definition is a matter than can be debated.

This differs from an Opinion, which is a predisposition to the Truth of a proposition.

Are you seriously trying to state that a belief may not be questioned? If so, what would be the point of a debate, to engage in an intellectual examination of the proposition in question?

If you encountered someone who belived that the Earth was flat, or that penquins were actually a form of insect, that you would not attempt to convince them otherwise?
I consider passing judgment on somebody’s faith as rude and over the line. I may disagree with somebody, and challenge what they are saying, but that’s as far as it goes.
 
I suggest we get back on thread, or we are going to be closed down. Maybe that is best.
 
“These are all your personal opinions.”

NO! They’re not! They are what the Church teaches.

“All Catholics sin, does this mean they cease to be Catholic, no not IMO.”

Of course all Catholics sin, and of course this does not mean they cease to be Catholic. BUT, they must acknowledge that they sin! They must strive to overcome their sin. They mustn’t say “because I’m weak, and I can see that this situation might be a temptation to me, I think it might be OK if I did it”.

“Part of being a Catholic is being charitable, even to somebody you feel is sinning.”

Is it charity to let something go on thinking/believing something that you know is deeply wrong?

“Is your attack on this particular person’s faith charitable?”

I don’t attack this person. I attack her statement that she is a Catholic but that she believes in abortion “sometimes”. NO. The two do not go together.

“Instead of condemning her, why don’t you in a less aggressive/zealot like manner try to show her the error of her ways.”

Well, maybe this is a cultural thing. I didn’t intend my statement to be aggressive. I was just stating a fact. Where I come from, we call a spade a spade, and no-one takes offence. I value the truth you see, but I take your point that perhaps I should have phrased it better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top