Question on Islam -- round 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aydan
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think what you originally said was “Islam has always been in a bad place,” which granted, could mean a lot of different things, but I took it to mean that the countries which practiced Islam were always stuck in a rut materially and spiritually. I don’t think that’s a fair assessment since there was this period from roughly 800 to 1250 (until the Mongols invaded Baghdad and ended the Caliphate by beheading said Caliph) when theirs was the leading civilization on earth, measured in terms of scientific, technological and artistic achievements.

It’s true that some of their achievements were revivals of knowledge from the ancient world or the civilizations they conquered and absorbed, but much of it was original or a synthesis of Islamic thought and pre-existing knowledge. So Islam has this very rich cultural and intellectual heritage which I wish more people were aware of because it’s really all of the world’s heritage in many respects (mathematics in particular) and because awareness of it would make it more difficult for people to engage in overly simplistic thinking about this complex topic.
What I am trying to say tomarin is that while you attribute this to Islam, it was the areas that they were conquering (look at that list I gave to you) that were rich, NOT because of Islam. When Islam took hold and as the years passed, Islam actually caused the decline. One cannot spend hours reading/memorizing a Quran and then go out and develop anything. In fact, they usually cannot even do anything constructive with that sort of knowledge.

Eventually, even the dhimmi went into a decline too. They were not allowed to delve into scholarship, or do anything that was of consequence either.

If you want to look at a country that went from a thriving country both economically and socially - look at Lebanon. In the short span of about 3-4 decades they declined into another Muslim majority country. It used to be a tourist center, a ‘Riviera of the ME’, and now Muslim snipers shoot at Christians, Hezbollah lobs bombs into Israel on a daily basis (oh, yeah - the news medias sort of forget to bring that up!) and basically it is going into decline too.

Islam/Muslims have nothing to offer. They want everything but don’t know what to do when they get it, except let things fall backwards into a decline.
 
In fact there is a correlation between IQ, test scores, profession, and an individuals religious preferences (See: kspark.kaist.ac.kr/Jesus/Intelligence%20&%20religion.htm, the source cites numerous studies showing this to be true).

We have the highest SAT scores, most scientists (including physicists who actually have the lowest number at only 20%), biologists, mathematicians, etc. do not believe in god, and so on.

Just look at the real numbers:

The Federal Bureau of Prisons does have statistics on religious affiliations of inmates. The following are total number of inmates per religion category:[8]
Code:
*
      o Catholic 29267 39.164%
      o Protestant 26162 35.008%
      o Muslim 5435 7.273%
      o American Indian 2408 3.222%
      o Nation 1734 2.320%
      o Rasta 1485 1.987%
      o Jewish 1325 1.773%
      o Church of Christ 1303 1.744%
      o Pentecostal 1093 1.463%
      o Moorish 1066 1.426%
      o Buddhist 882 1.180%
      o Jehovah Witness 665 0.890%
      o Adventist 621 0.831%
      o Orthodox 375 0.502%
      o Mormon 298 0.399%
      o Scientology 190 0.254%
      o Atheist 156 0.209%
freethoughtpedia.com/wiki/Percentage_of_atheists

In addition, you might like to know democrats overwhelmingly believe god exists. 65% of democrats believe god is the “all-knowing, perfect creator and ruler of the universe” (see Barna study, link here).

As for happiness studies:

Denmark, Finland and the Netherlands rated at the top of the list, ranking first, second and third, respectively. Outside Europe, New Zealand and Canada landed at Nos. 8 and 6, respectively. The U.S. did not crack the top 10. Switzerland placed seventh and Belgium placed tenth. Russian Federation is not even listed in the report.

Forbes did the study (see link here).

As far as it’s methodology, you can question it if you like (and dig deeper into it). However, having been to Europe many times I don’t question the study (not to mention Forbes can hardly be called a tool of the left).

Not that I’m saying Hitler was a Christian (because I don’t think he was). However, the inference you’re trying to draw here is not only bizarre and illogical, but it really makes your bigotry shine.

I just did …
Reread your posts, maybe your high IQ will show you who the real bigot is.
 
I do not believe in an Islamic golden age. This letter may just be one man’s opinion, but all of my independent research (about three months worth, done in preparation for a talk I gave in January at the local university on the Assyrians and their language and history) has more or less confirmed what is contained therein. Please note that I am NOT saying that the Arabs never contributed anything or have no culture or anything like that, only that the so-called “golden age of Islam” was the result of Arab Muslim appropriation of other peoples’ knowledge, just as the Islamic empire was the result of Arab Muslim conquest of other peoples’ land (Assyrian, Coptic, Zoroastrian, etc). The Assyrians have never really gotten their proper credit, because the narrative of Middle Eastern history has been so thoroughly dominated by Arab Muslims and their interpretations of everything (just like any other situation, I guess; “history is written by the victors”, etc). 😦
 
What I am trying to say tomarin is that while you attribute this to Islam, it was the areas that they were conquering (look at that list I gave to you) that were rich, NOT because of Islam. When Islam took hold and as the years passed, Islam actually caused the decline. One cannot spend hours reading/memorizing a Quran and then go out and develop anything. In fact, they usually cannot even do anything constructive with that sort of knowledge.
I don’t think that’s quite right, Agabriel. Islamic civilization was the product of Persia and its ancient civilization (including its Greco-Roman heritage) being incorporated into the Islamic world (which up until then was an Arabic kingdom), so yes, the original impetus was contact with a far greater and older civilization than the Arabs had ever produced. But the resulting culture was a new synthesis, not just a recycling of Persian civilization, and it wasn’t limited just to Persia, either. And the decline didn’t take place until 500 years later, so it’s not correct to say as you do that Islam caused the immediate decline of its subject people’s way of life.

These are basic historic facts so I’m pretty sure any book on this topic will confirm what I’m saying.
 
I do not believe in an Islamic golden age.
So if there were no Golden Age how do you account for the careers and achievements of Ibn Khaldun, Avicenna, Muhammad ibn Musa al Kwarizmi (father of algebra), Ibn Rushd, and Maimonides (who was Jewish but was still influenced by the Islamic culture around him and wrote in Arabic)? What about all the poetry, architecture, calligraphy and so on? It’s difficult to hide an entire civilization.
 
I do not believe in an Islamic golden age. This letter may just be one man’s opinion, but all of my independent research (about three months worth, done in preparation for a talk I gave in January at the local university on the Assyrians and their language and history) has more or less confirmed what is contained therein. Please note that I am NOT saying that the Arabs never contributed anything or have no culture or anything like that, only that the so-called “golden age of Islam” was the result of Arab Muslim appropriation of other peoples’ knowledge, just as the Islamic empire was the result of Arab Muslim conquest of other peoples’ land (Assyrian, Coptic, Zoroastrian, etc). The Assyrians have never really gotten their proper credit, because the narrative of Middle Eastern history has been so thoroughly dominated by Arab Muslims and their interpretations of everything (just like any other situation, I guess; “history is written by the victors”, etc). 😦
Thank you, you said it better than I have been trying to say it. And I appreciate sharing your research with us!!
 
I do not believe in an Islamic golden age. This letter may just be one man’s opinion, but all of my independent research (about three months worth, done in preparation for a talk I gave in January at the local university on the Assyrians and their language and history) has more or less confirmed what is contained therein. Please note that I am NOT saying that the Arabs never contributed anything or have no culture or anything like that, only that the so-called “golden age of Islam” was the result of Arab Muslim appropriation of other peoples’ knowledge, just as the Islamic empire was the result of Arab Muslim conquest of other peoples’ land (Assyrian, Coptic, Zoroastrian, etc). The Assyrians have never really gotten their proper credit, because the narrative of Middle Eastern history has been so thoroughly dominated by Arab Muslims and their interpretations of everything (just like any other situation, I guess; “history is written by the victors”, etc). 😦
Very interesting letter! Thanks for the link!

"Arab/Islamic civilization is not a progressive force, it is a regressive force; it does not give impetus, it retards. The great civilization you describe was not an Arab/Muslim accomplishment, it was an Assyrian accomplishment that Arabs expropriated and subsequently lost when they drained, through the forced conversion of Assyrians to Islam, the source of the intellectual vitality that propelled it. What other Arab/Muslim civilization has risen since? What other Arab/Muslim successes can we cite? "

and

"Arabs/Muslims are engaged in an explicit campaign of destruction and expropriation of cultures and communities, identities and ideas. Wherever Arab/Muslim civilization encounters a non-Arab/Muslim one, it attempts to destroy it (as the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan were destroyed, as Persepolis was destroyed by the Ayotollah Khomeini). This is a pattern that has been recurring since the advent of Islam, 1400 years ago, and is amply substantiated by the historical record. If the “foreign” culture cannot be destroyed, then it is expropriated, and revisionist historians claim that it is and was Arab, as is the case of most of the Arab “accomplishments” you cited in your speech. For example, Arab history texts in the Middle East teach that Assyrians were Arabs, a fact that no reputable scholar would assert, and that no living Assyrian would accept. Assyrians first settled Nineveh, one of the major Assyrian cities, in 5000 B.C., which is 5630 years before Arabs came into that area. Even the word ‘Arab’ is an Assyrian word, meaning “Westerner” (the first written reference to Arabs was by the Assyrian King Sennacherib, 800 B.C., in which he tells of conquering the “ma’rabayeh” – Westerners. See The Might That Was Assyria, by H. W. F. Saggs). "

Vickie
 
So if there were no Golden Age how do you account for the careers and achievements of Ibn Khaldun, Avicenna, Muhammad ibn Musa al Kwarizmi (father of algebra), Ibn Rushd, and Maimonides (who was Jewish but was still influenced by the Islamic culture around him and wrote in Arabic)? What about all the poetry, architecture, calligraphy and so on? It’s difficult to hide an entire civilization.
Wow, 1400 years and that is all they got from it?

Ibn Khaldun, 1332-1406, Tunisian. Al-Abili was his teacher beyond the usual Quran. who was thus enabled, particularly under the supervision of al-Abili, to learn about the philosophy and the main problems of Arabo-Muslim thought. He was however to undergo much suffering. The Marinid occupation ended in disorder and bloodshed, and in addition the terrible Black Death which ravaged the world in the middle of the century, etc… see here for the whole article.

It seems that he was in Spain and not in the middle of the ME. He had a chance to get an education out of the usual Islamic one.

Avicenna, He learned Indian arithmetic from an Indian greengrocer, and he began to learn more from a wandering scholar who gained a livelihood by curing the sick and teaching the young. Not too much else on that wandering scholar, but one has to get out of the usual Islamic education to get anything else. He was a gifted person though.

On wikipedia: Though the threads which comprise Unani healing can be traced all the way back to Claudius Galenus of Pergamum, who lived in the second century of the Christian Era, the basic knowledge of Unani medicine as a healing system was developed by Hakim Ibn Sina in his medical encyclopedia The Canon of Medicine. The time of origin is thus dated at circa 1025 AD, when Avicenna wrote The Canon of Medicine in Persia. While he was primarily influenced by Greek and Islamic medicine, he was also influenced by the Indian medical teachings of Sushruta and Charaka.

Once again he had to reach outward for knowledge.

Muhammad ibn Musa al Kwarizmi, this guy isn’t the father of algebra - Diophantus is. Diophantus lived centuries before al Kwarizmi, and from what I found his works are lost.

I am sure he contributed, but I don’t know what, to algebra.

Ibn Rushd also known as Averros. He was a European it seems. Not immersed in the ME Islamic studies so was able to reach out for his acquired knowledge by other sources.

Maimonides, ironic that the Muslims want to claim a Jew. He was a Rabbi.

This guy should tell us that the area where the others who lived in Europe had available to them knowledge other than the usual Islamic studies.

Here is a quote on his accomplishments: is regarded by many as the greatest Jewish philosopher ever. As a doctor, rabbi, religious scholar, mathematician, astronomer, and commentator on the art of medicine, his influence has spanned centuries and cultures. He was born in Spain and educated by his father, a Jewish judge. Eventually settling in Cairo, he became court physician to two viziers of Egypt, Saladin and el Fadil, and chief rabbi of the city’s Jewish community. His Guide of the Perplexed (1190) used philosophical reasoning to argue that the Bible and Jewish faith did not conflict with Artistotle’s popular system of thought. Today, Maimonides’ “Thirteen Principles of Faith” are still recited in synagogues. His works continue to be studied by Jewish scholars, including Commentary on the Mishnah (1168), nicknamed “The Luminary,” and Mishneh Torah (1180), 14 volumes of biblical and rabbinic law, coded and compiled.

I don’t know, it just seems that you are proving my case more than your case.

And even if these men (or most of them) were Muslim they each had outside influences to help them.
 
Wow, 1400 years and that is all they got from it?
When was the last time you invented a branch of mathematics, Agabriel?
I don’t know, it just seems that you are proving my case more than your case.
No. Your quibbling about what part of the Muslim world they lived in or whether they were influenced by non-Muslims does nothing to diminish their achievements.
 
When was the last time you invented a branch of mathematics, Agabriel?

No. Your quibbling about what part of the Muslim world they lived in or whether they were influenced by non-Muslims does nothing to diminish their achievements.
That type of a question when we find out that the person who you say is the father of algebra is not the father of algebra, is rather rude.

When did you create a branch of math? Just because you popped out a name doesn’t mean that it makes you just as intelligent. I said the guy probably contributed something - I just don’t know what and didn’t really care.

So, when the going gets tough for you then you ask such a thing of me.

I didn’t create any branch of math - I just studied them in high school and then in college in order to get my degree. Personally, I don’t care if I ever looked at another algebraic equation.

Ok, so we have exactly one handful of men (one wasn’t even a Muslim, but a Jew and a Rabbi at that! 🤷) over 1400 years and not too much to speak of except that they had to reach out of the usual Islamic studies to become something.

😃

Thanks for proving my point and being sour grapes. :D:D

It is a good thing we didn’t have to get into the science of the Quran! That gets even more silly.
 
That type of a question when we find out that the person who you say is the father of algebra is not the father of algebra, is rather rude.

When did you create a branch of math? Just because you popped out a name doesn’t mean that it makes you just as intelligent. I said the guy probably contributed something - I just don’t know what and didn’t really care.
I don’t consider myself more intelligent than you, but I think I am more informed than you are on Islamic history and civilization, (only because I’ve studied it formally a little). I also think that you’re denying the obvious because your hatred of all things Islamic blinds you to what is common knowledge among minimally informed people.

I was trying to say that if you haven’t invented a branch of mathematics, perhaps you should be impressed by someone who has – even if he was a Muslim. I’m sorry if I was rude, however.

(Note to everyone else: scholars disagree whether al Kwarizmi or the ancient Greek mathematician Diophantus more fully deserve the title “father of algebra”. But it is not in dispute that al Kwarizmi refined algebra and wrote a book the title of which gave algebra its modern name.)
Ok, so we have exactly one handful of men (one wasn’t even a Muslim, but a Jew and a Rabbi at that! 🤷) over 1400 years and not too much to speak of except that they had to reach out of the usual Islamic studies to become something.
I never meant to suggest that those five constituted the sum total of medieval Islamic learning. They’re just a few of the more famous names that Dzheremi might have heard of.
It is a good thing we didn’t have to get into the science of the Quran! That gets even more silly.
No disagreement here.
 
I don’t consider myself more intelligent than you, but I think I am more informed than you are on Islamic history and civilization, (only because I’ve studied it formally a little). I also think that you’re denying the obvious because your hatred of all things Islamic blinds you to what is common knowledge among minimally informed people.

I was trying to say that if you haven’t invented a branch of mathematics, perhaps you should be impressed by someone who has – even if he was a Muslim. I’m sorry if I was rude, however.

(Note to everyone else: scholars disagree whether al Kwarizmi or the ancient Greek mathematician Diophantus more fully deserve the title “father of algebra”. But it is not in dispute that al Kwarizmi refined algebra and wrote a book the title of which gave algebra its modern name.)

I never meant to suggest that those five constituted the sum total of medieval Islamic learning. They’re just a few of the more famous names that Dzheremi might have heard of.

No disagreement here.
Thanks for the apology. I don’t hate as much as you think. I do hate that they think they should impose their junk on everyone else if they reject it. I hate that people are persecuted, to this day, in Islam and the ones such as the ones we discuss on these threads are oblivious to it, deny it, or would rather use tu quoque excuses, or just tell people like me that I bash them because of what their religion accepts.

They expend a lot of energy into all of this while no energy is expended into changing Islam into the concepts that they think we should believe what Islam is. To me it is nothing but deception when they do that, and then so many of them take to the streets and defend such creeps as Hamas.

I also don’t trust formal education in this area since Islamic studies are controlled by Muslims. And Muslims are what I said above.

I just watched ‘Sense and Sensibility’ on Masterpiece Theatre and I cannot say it better than the character, Marianne Dashwood (by Jane Austin), ‘It is not what we say or feel, it is what we do, or fail to do’. And that, to me, applies in how I see Muslims words versus the deeds. And that includes the actions of ‘failing to do’ anything especially when their own Muslims kill more Muslims than anyone else. But, their Sharia laws say it is only a concern when unbelievers strike back. So, who is deceiving us about what Islam is all about? The ‘radicals’ or the ‘mainstream’? (all names that our lefties give to Muslims)

I should add that I don’t want to get into a “I read more books on the subject than you did” so I am going to ask that you judge no one and not assume that they haven’t read, or studied up on it too.

I was actually thinking about taking some classes in that area, but to make sure the professor(s) were telling the truth and not their fairy tale viewpoints. You see, I don’t care about a grade or a degree anymore, so it leaves me with a great deal of freedom in that area. And maybe even tape/record them especially if I get one who is really trying to shovel some piggy doo down people’s throats. I still might do it, but I do have other things to do. I haven’t made up my mind if I will do that or not.
 
Reread your posts, maybe your high IQ will show you who the real bigot is.
I’m the bigot now … OK whatever?

The fact is I don’t say religious people are stupid. You inferred the dumbing down of America was because of increased secularization. I simply supplied you with the hard facts.

Frankly I’m not so sure America is any dumber today than it has been historically (though it’s debatable I suppose). Our secret has always been that we allow greatness to flourish whereas Europe tends to have an older mindset and they’re locked into sort of a class system. For example a Bill Gates (who emerged from a middle class family) would have likely never happened in Europe.

Even take China and Japan. Mimicking America will only get them so far (as we’ve seen with Japan, whose been mired with a stagnant economy for over a decade now). Religion has had little to do with the success of this country. Here’s a quote from Andrew Carnegie:

“Not only had I got rid of the theology and the supernatural, but I had found the truth of evolution.”

Bill Gates is an atheist. Jefferson didn’t believe any of the miracles depicted in scripture (including the resurrection) ever happened. Einstein didn’t believe in a god who answered prayers and who was involved in human affairs; and the list goes on.

The point isn’t that religion has been worthless in our history (or that religious people are stupid), but rather religion itself is no predictor of individual greatness (and it seems more often than not our greatest innovators were not religious men). In other words if you want to search for reasons behind our decaying society (if you believe it’s in fact decaying) religion or lack thereof is likely not the cause, so you should probably search elsewhere.

I understand according to your worldview you will associate everything bad with a lack of or weak adherence to the Christian religion. Well, I believe you’re wrong & the evidence seems to support my view!
 
I’m the bigot now … OK whatever?

The fact is I don’t say religious people are stupid. You inferred the dumbing down of America was because of increased secularization. I simply supplied you with the hard facts.

Frankly I’m not so sure America is any dumber today than it has been historically (though it’s debatable I suppose). Our secret has always been that we allow greatness to flourish whereas Europe tends to have an older mindset and they’re locked into sort of a class system. For example a Bill Gates (who emerged from a middle class family) would have likely never happened in Europe.

Even take China and Japan. Mimicking America will only get them so far (as we’ve seen with Japan, whose been mired with a stagnant economy for over a decade now). Religion has had little to do with the success of this country. Here’s a quote from Andrew Carnegie:

“Not only had I got rid of the theology and the supernatural, but I had found the truth of evolution.”

Bill Gates is an atheist. Jefferson didn’t believe any of the miracles depicted in scripture (including the resurrection) ever happened. Einstein didn’t believe in a god who answered prayers and who was involved in human affairs; and the list goes on.

The point isn’t that religion has been worthless in our history (or that religious people are stupid), but rather religion itself is no predictor of individual greatness (and it seems more often than not our greatest innovators were not religious men). In other words if you want to search for reasons behind our decaying society (if you believe it’s in fact decaying) religion or lack thereof is likely not the cause, so you should probably search elsewhere.

I understand according to your worldview you will associate everything bad with a lack of or weak adherence to the Christian religion. Well, I believe you’re wrong & the evidence seems to support my view!
Why don’t you start a different thread? One that wants to deal with atheism and how great it is, or secularism, or whatever you are?

I find your backup weak since it proved nothing. The ones who claimed a religion were mostly not practicing it prior to getting incarcerated, and as for anything else such as IQ points - you got to be kidding me.

This thread is about Islam and I don’t care to discuss your IQ points with you. I don’t want to discuss another failed system - socialsim, communism or secularism. Islam is more than enough of a failed government system that I want to deal with right now.

Yes, I do find you bigoted. But, since objectivity isn’t your forte we can leave it at that.
 
I also don’t trust formal education in this area since Islamic studies are controlled by Muslims. And Muslims are what I said above.
I know you don’t like to be accused of being a conspiracy theorist, but what evidence do you have for this claim? This certainly wasn’t my experience (my professor was an arabist but not a Muslim and I don’t think he or his department were controlled by anyone) and it sounds a little “out there.”
I was actually thinking about taking some classes in that area, but to make sure the professor(s) were telling the truth and not their fairy tale viewpoints. You see, I don’t care about a grade or a degree anymore, so it leaves me with a great deal of freedom in that area. And maybe even tape/record them especially if I get one who is really trying to shovel some piggy doo down people’s throats. I still might do it, but I do have other things to do. I haven’t made up my mind if I will do that or not.
I think you would find that most professional islamicists don’t accept most of the views you’ve expressed here about islam. So you’ll have your work cut out for you reporting them (to whom?). Generally speaking, the more knowledge one has about something, the more nuanced and ambivalent one’s viewpoint becomes.

Also, how is the truth you want to impose on the academics you don’t like any different from a conservative version of political correctness? I take it you don’t like political correctness?
 
In the name of Allah , Most Gracious, Most Merciful



http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/...goBlobs&blobwhere=1221557686032&ssbinary=true

Prophet Isma`il - An Obedient Model for Youth

By Altaf Husain ,Social Worker — USA

…Isma`il (peace and blessings be upon him) was the oldest of two sons of the Prophet Ibrahim (peace and blessings be upon him).

… (Praise be to Allah, Who hath granted unto me in old age Ismail and Ishaaq: for truly my Lord is He, the Hearer of Prayer!)(Sura Ibrahim 14: 39).

…We recall with wonderment the beautiful story of how the Zam Zam water sprung to life as an immediate response from Almighty Allah to the struggles of Hajar, (may Allah be pleased with her), as she ran between the valley of Safa and Marwah in search of water to nourish baby Isma`il (peace and blessings be upon him).

Allah the Almighty recounts for us how Ibrahim (peace and blessings be upon him) prayed for a righteous son, was granted Ismail (peace and blessings be upon him) and saw a dream in which he was commanded to offer Ismail (peace and blessings be upon him) in sacrifice, and how young Isma`il (peace and blessings be upon him) responded, (O my father! Do as thou art commanded: thou will find me, if Allah so wills one practicing patience and constancy!), (As-Saffat 37: 100-110)

Not only was Isma`il (peace and blessings be upon him) immediately obedient to his father, he was in effect assisting his father to carry out a command of Almighty Allah. He did not second guess his father, he did not doubt his father’s senility given that he was old; he willingly obeyed. What is your relationship with your parents like? Where do you rank yourself in terms of obedience?

In the second incident, Ibrahim (peace and blessings be upon him) set out to raise the foundations of the Kabah, referred to in the Qur’an as the ‘House’. This was a project that required as much physical strength to lift heavy rocks as it did the stamina to withstand the arid desert heat and to accept the possibility that this was a long-term project and not just a day cleaning up the backyard. We find again that Ismail (peace and blessings be upon him) accepts the challenge to assist his father, and does so willingly.

And remember Ibrahim and Ismail raised the foundations of the House (With this prayer): ‘Our Lord! Accept (this service) from us: For Thou art the All-Hearing, the All-knowing.) ( Al-Baqarah2: 127)

…How would you respond to your own parents’ request for assistance? Would you be able to put aside your personal desires and think about the overall picture? Would you be able to be patient with your parents in the process of working alongside them? How well do you persevere in trying circumstances?

Indeed, for all of us are lessons in the life of Isma`il (peace and blessings be upon him) and Almighty Allah reminds us, (Also mention in the Book (the story of) Ismail: He was (strictly) true to what he promised, and he was an apostle (and) a prophet.) (Maryam 19: 54)

Let us aspire to emulate him!

islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1227616299372&pagename=Zone-English-Youth%2FYTELayout
 
I know you don’t like to be accused of being a conspiracy theorist, but what evidence do you have for this claim? This certainly wasn’t my experience (my professor was an arabist but not a Muslim and I don’t think he or his department were controlled by anyone) and it sounds a little “out there.”

I think you would find that most professional islamicists don’t accept most of the views you’ve expressed here about islam. So you’ll have your work cut out for you reporting them (to whom?). Generally speaking, the more knowledge one has about something, the more nuanced and ambivalent one’s viewpoint becomes.

Also, how is the truth you want to impose on the academics you don’t like any different from a conservative version of political correctness? I take it you don’t like political correctness?
The professional Islamicists do indeed disseminate incorrect information about Islam. Here is one article on it.

But, we have found out that Saudi Arabia’s brand of Islam, Wahabbism, is funding a lot of these departments in the USA.

(Wahabbism is directly tied to the Muslim brotherhood, as is CAIR, the MSA - Muslim Student Association, and tied to Al Qaeda, Abu Sayaff, etc. Source: The Link, The Secret Relationship between Saddam and Al Qaida)

The book I mention goes into the ties between Saddam and Al Qaeda, but what I reference it for is the ties between Al Qaeda and the pact between these organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood.

We have seen a rise in anti-semitism on our college campuses too. Some notable campuses where anti-semitism really got out of hand was on UCIrvine and UCBerkeley where Jews were even attacked by members of the MSA. We, the USA and the EU, have uncovered documents of the Muslim brotherhoods agenda and their tools with the MSA being one of those tools.

Government Exhibit 300-0085

Here is information on the Muslim Brotherhood’s ‘The Project’ - an article about how/when this information was found:
The Project

The Project,part2

What you are mixing up is the ‘conspiracy theories’ between the political parties vs Islam. There is no conspiracy, just Muslims following their Quran, religion, Muhammed while they are in dar al harb (the land of war - our infidel lands under man made laws).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top