Yes, but I said the "fire’ is not only now but also after we die, at the judgement seat of Christ , where we will be given our reward for Christian service (our works finally judged).
Exactly. I agree with you.
Now after the we die part. 1 Cor 3:15 If the work is burned, the builder will suffer loss; the builder will be saved, but only as through fire.
At the judgment seat of Christ, **every such man shall suffer a loss, when his works are burnt, but he himself shall be saved, yet so as by fire. **
Could, when Paul speak of this that there is some signification? Of a fire which shall not only try, and examine, but also burn, and punish the builders, who notwithstanding shall also, after a time, escape from the fire, and be saved by fire, and in the day of the Lord, that is, after life?
As if the fire purifies after which he will be saved.
Something like that Reuben, and I appreciate your patience. I would say it is more wrong now than then . At least back then it was out of a lesser light yet light enough to know purity was required, though they did not fully realize that purity would be fulfilled in Christ and Calvary. So at best it was showing a need for "appeasement’’, and there is spiritual merit or maturity in realizing that.
Again I agree if you say the purification is fulfilled by Christ at Calvary. The doctrine of purgatory says this. We certainly have no hope without the death of Christ at Calvary.
Yet nothing impure can enter heaven and thus the saved who has not achieved perfection needs to be purified first. The Jews knew this and they did it through prayers and sacrifice. We now do not need sacrifice anymore because the Lamb of God is already slain.
But here is the rub. Paul said when he was a child he did as a child but put those things away when a man. We now have a fuller light, a much better “appeasement”, where we can boldly go into the holiest of places and to be absent from the body is to be with Him.
I cannot see how this verse is connected to the topic. He was speaking about people would tie a belt around his waist and went to a place that he did not want to go. Tradition has it that he was executed by the Romans in the later part of his life in Rome.
Nevertheless the appeasement by Jesus’ death is of course for true repentant. We believe that. It is not, however, a blank cheque for salvation. Luke-warmness is certainly not acceptable. We need to have better than mere lip-service repentance. Yet, it seems unjust to put these in hell and at the same time they cannot enter heaven because of impurity that had not been totally repented of.
So without heaven and hell, they have to be somewhere else other than them.
Purgatory in a nutshell is such a place or state rather.
Further, Jesus had a perfect opportunity to teach on the issue with Lazarus and the rich man. There was no purgatory in this true story. The rich man did not ask for prayers to “speedup” the"purification or be loosed from his sins, even judgement (though he did try to weasel his way out with pretense of warning his brothers about the place).
I believe in that episode it was about the rich man who was beyond saved, “between you and us a great chasm has been fixed”. Nothing could therefore able to help him, it was already too late. “If they do not listen to Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.”
I think it is better to look for the idea of purgatory in Mt. 12:32 “ … but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in
the age to come.”
There may be forgiveness in
the age to come except for the sin against the Holy Spirit, where there will be none.
Some also say the Jews believed in a type of reincarnation, as evidenced by some thinking Jesus was a former prophet. So discernment is needed on what to build upon. .
Reincarnation? No, Catholics do not believe in that. And you have rightly brought out a passage which says that cannot be done.
Have a blessed day.
Reuben