Questions about the charismatic renewal...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikaele
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
granny,

You said: “Perhaps the reason people misunderstand the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is that people, including some Catholics, do not understand what it means to be Catholic.”

I don’t THINK you meant what it implies, but the above statement really comes across as saying: “Unless you embrace or encounter Catholic Charismatic Renewal, then you are not going to truly understand what it is to be Catholic.”
Absolutely not.

What this statement implies is that FIRST one must understand what it means to be Catholic in order to understand where the Catholic Charismatic Renewal belongs within the Catholic Church.

This implies knowing that the Sacrament of Baptism has an indelible mark. This bit of Catholic doctrine is one of the things Catholics should understand before attacking the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. Another thing that Catholics should understand before attacking the Renewal is that the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Catholic Faith. Judging from the attendance at the Sunday Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, some Catholics better brush up on this fact because the Catholic Charismatic Renewal promotes a deep relationship with Jesus Christ. And how is that relationship to be obtained by Catholics. The Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is key.
That is a very presumptuous statement on someone’s part. What about all of the Catholics who lived between the time of St. Paul and the late 1960’s - did they, too, not understand what it meant to be Catholic?
This is where “rules of evidence” should be considered. As I recall, personal depositions are allowed in court. Even prior stipulations can merit acceptance.
From a purely logical point of view: if one claims that the Holy Spirit imparts the charisms of speaking in tongues or prophecy, then the conclusion one is bound to make is that if one is NOT part of that group and one will NOT experience those particular charisms.
That is a strange departure from the examples of Saints and from Catholic teaching.

Aside from the group thing, one has to realize that charisms (in the Catholic sense) are generally tied to minisitries. Obviously St. Francis had a different ministry from St. Ignatious and from Catholic monks. It sounds like some of the tenets of some of the Penticostal movements are being transferred to Catholicism. This is a wrong adaptation.

The reason is found in St. Paul’s teaching of the Mystical Body of Christ. Apparently the Mystical Body of Christ is now being ignored. This is a very good example of why one should understand what being a Catholic means before attacking the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.

By the way, the Holy Spirit is not limited by membership in a group when it comes to the ordinary Holy Spirit gift of praying in Tongues. Nor does an individual have to be prayed over in order to receive St. Paul’s gift which was to pray in Tongues to God.

By the way, the Charismatic (Catholic Renewal) Gift of sharing Divine Revelation and Catholic teachings is found in lives of the Saints as also the Charismatic (Catholic Renewal) gift of miracles which includes the Charismatic (Catholic Renewal) gift of healing (spiritual and corporeal). The Doctors of the Church had the Charismatic (Catholic Renewal) gifts of Faith, Wisdom, Knowledge and Discernment. These are the same Holy Spirit Gifts present in the Apostolic Age and listed by St. Paul. Apparently, the Saints did not ignore St. Paul.

Again, the purpose of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal (I cannot speak for the other groups) is to use the gifts present at Pentecost as they are meant to be used in building up the Catholic Church. There is a huge difference between simply renewing gifts, as found in some other communities, and the purpose(s) of the Catholic Church which the Catholic Charismatic Renewal serves. If there are people who are not sure about the purpose(s) of the Catholic Church, then that topic should be brought up separately.

Note: The purpose(s) of the Catholic Church are many.
 
Here is my personal question regarding the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.

What are the flaws in the popular objections to the Catholic Charismatic Renewal?


Reading the various threads about objections to the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, I have discovered some interesting flaws.

The first obvious flaw is that the history of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is presented without a correct understanding of the difference between it and Pentecostalism.

A second flaw suggests that because some of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit are difficult to understand, they should be dismissed as worthless.

A third flaw is that objectors cannot move beyond the early days of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal when there were obvious growing pains. Along with this, examinations of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal are ignored out of hand.

Another flaw is that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal has to meet personal expectations as to its validity.

The most misleading flaw of all (reminds me of Jesus’ name for the devil in John 8: 39-44) is the cleaver assumption that any charismatic group can be quietly assumed to be the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. This underlying flaw is assumed guilt by wrongful association. This simple twisting of truth (by omission) confuses ordinary folk into thinking that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is somehow attacking both the Catholic Church and the Holy Spirit as seen in the New Testament.

Work of the Father of Lies?
 
Don’t you see how easy it is to conclude that when one labels a mass a “healing mass”, then those who are sick who do not attend the “healing mass” must be missing out on some special “power” for those who are ill? By definition/description, calling a particular mass a “healing mass”, one cannot escape the conclusion that such a mass is intended for those who are ill and need help with their illness. I personally find it abhorent to suggest that if we are sick, we need to attend healing masses. That, to me, puts far too much constraint on he who is not subject to constraints: God.
What usually happens at a “healing Mass” is that the Sacrament of Anointing the Sick is given. This Sacrament is also given after the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass on Sunday at certain times in the year. At our parish, the Sacrament of Anointing which is given to people before surgery is also given after a weekday Mass. This Sacrament of Anointing the Sick is available in the hospital and at home. A friend of mine went to the parish rectory to receive this Sacrament. Our parish priest, one morning at a weekday Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, admitted he was very tired because the hospital had called him, around 3:00 AM, to come and give a patient the Sacrament of Anointing the Sick.

The availability of the Sacrament of Anointing the Sick is another thing about the Catholic Church which a Catholic needs to know before getting hung up on an individual activity often sponsored by the Parish Catholic Charismatic Renewal or the Catholic Diocesan Steering Committee for the Renewal.

The Catholic Charismatic Renewal places the Sacraments first when it comes to healing. When possible, at certain Charismatic events, priests will hear Confessions because the Sacrament of Reconciliation is considered a healing sacrament. Individuals, who have the Gift of Prayer Tongues, will often serve in ministry to the sick, for example, bringing the Sacrament of the Eucharist to the hospital and to those who are homebound. Some serve in the Hospice ministry.

There are a few individuals within the Catholic Charismatic Renewal who have the Charismatic Gift of Healing in the same way that some of the Saints had this gift. This special charism requires both proper preparation and critical discernment. Catholics must not confuse this charism with a parish prayer tree praying for an individual and the person does get well.

The issues of healing which include both the miracles performed by Jesus and His instructions to us to pray to our Heavenly Father are important things that Catholic should know before attacking the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.

Yes, there are fakes when it comes to “healing powers”. I am not sure how this is worded, but a diocese maintains a list of approved speakers. It is my understanding that an organization such as a parish or a group, has to get permission to sponsor a speaker who is not on the Diocesan’s approved list. Normally, this can be done without problems. The process is a protection against wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Part of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is to encourage study of the Catholic Faith so that errors can be recognized. Recently, the Catholic Charismatic Renewal groups in my area received a notice from the diocesan liaison to the Renewal warning them about an unapproved speaker who was in the area. This is one of the ways the diocese and the Catholic Charismatic Renewal work together to keep out those people who can harm the faith of Catholics.
 
granny,

This is a VERBATIM recitation from Christ the King Catholic Church in Ann Arbor, MI about “catholic charismatic renewal”:

“A charismatic style of prayer is common at Christ the King. People are free to raise their hands in prayer and during songs, many pray their own prayers audibly, some pray in tongues, etc… They pray with expressive or charismatic prayer at monthly parish prayer meetings, at the beginning of parish meetings, and most especially during certain moments in the Holy Mass. These are some of the external markers of a charismatic parish. Internal markers include a radical surrender to the Lordship of Jesus Christ in all parts of life, a strong adherence to the Gospel and the teachings of the Catholic Church, and the pursuit of strong friendships centered on Christ.”

I don’t need a degree in theology to know that this CLEARLY goes against the GIRM. And NO PRIEST OR BISHOP HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DO THAT.

If they want this to happen at a special “prayer meeting” or a “parish meeting”, then fine - let it be.

But this is NOT to be done during Holy Mass.

If I attended a Mass where this was happening, I would immediately think if I had entered a Pentecostal Church by mistake . . .

In closing (and I am finish “debating” this, as I don’t see where it is going), what you and the Charismatic Renewal Movement members claim are “charisms of the Holy Spirit” are what I have said since the beginning of this discussion - they are a group of people who have set themselves apart from other members of the Church and claim that the Holy Spirit has deigned them with special “charisms” whereas we others are lacking.

I am sorry, but I cannot come to any other conclusion: do you really believe that ALL of us who question the “charismatic movement” are that stupid or ignorant or lacking in an understanding of the Catholic faith? I just don’t see how the charismatic movements is so important, when it did not even exist until my lifetime, (excepting Apostolic times) which is a drop in the bucket in the lifetime of the Church. You might be able to cite a “saint” here or there over the past 2000 years who might have exhibited the charism of speaking in tongues - but you won’t find an entire “movement”. That is absolutely a new “thing” in the Catholic Church.

I do, sincerely, wish you well in your journeys.
 
granny,

This is a VERBATIM recitation from Christ the King Catholic Church in Ann Arbor, MI about “catholic charismatic renewal”:

“A charismatic style of prayer is common at Christ the King. People are free to raise their hands in prayer and during songs, many pray their own prayers audibly, some pray in tongues, etc… They pray with expressive or charismatic prayer at monthly parish prayer meetings, at the beginning of parish meetings, and most especially during certain moments in the Holy Mass. These are some of the external markers of a charismatic parish. Internal markers include a radical surrender to the Lordship of Jesus Christ in all parts of life, a strong adherence to the Gospel and the teachings of the Catholic Church, and the pursuit of strong friendships centered on Christ.”
I put the “Internal markers” in bold" because unfortunately there are some people who attack the Catholic Charismatic Renewal without understanding its Catholic foundation.

Please note that it is the responsibility of Catholics to report abuses of the “internal markers” to the diocesan liaison for the Catholic Charismatic Renewal or to the proper office of the diocese or to the Bishop himself.

Regarding the parish presented in post 222. In some parts of the U.S., this mode of Catholic Charismatic Renewal has been advocated for years under Catholic Diocesan authority and the subsequent authority of Catholic pastors of Catholic parishes. Because Bishops can act independently regarding the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, there will be differences between dioceses.

Notice that the paper from Christ the King Catholic Church says "DURING CERTAIN MOMENTS in Holy Mass.

I am willing to bet that there are only a few people who are aware of what those CERTAIN MOMENTS are. It would be great if I were proven wrong.

This is because most people take the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass for granted. Fortunately, with the new translation, some “awake” people are spotting where certain priests are deviating from the proper prayers. (See the Catholic News Forum) Years ago, Charismatic Catholics, because understanding the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is part of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, spotted irregularities in some of the “Masses” after Vatican II and reported these to the proper authorities. They were a small voice, but a correct voice.

Getting back to “DURING CERTAIN MOMENTS”. It sounds like the parishioners are educated about the “order” of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. It also sounds like these parishioners know that the purpose of music during the Mass is not for the entertainment of the congregation, but rather to offer praise and thanksgiving to God.
In addition there are some songs which encourage people to follow Jesus’ teachings. Or they express submission to the will of God.

People who understand the place of music, vernacular and Latin, in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass will also understand why “praying or singing in Tongues” is allowed at CERTAIN MOMENTS in Holy Mass under the same Church regulations regarding public music which should be prayerful during these certain moments. There is one normal exception. The pastor of the Catholic parish is responsible for the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass so he would be the one to o.k. the substitution of prayerful Tongues during certain moments in the Holy Mass. Obviously, the pastor would be acting in accord with the Bishop’s directions These directions can vary from diocese to diocese and from pastor to pastor. Catholic Charismatics act in obedience to the pastor of their Catholic parish.
If I attended a Mass where this was happening, I would immediately think if I had entered a Pentecostal Church by mistake .
Pardon me. I would hope that people understand that it is the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass which makes it different from a Pentecostal Church service. Music and public prayer are not defining characteristics.
In closing (and I am finish “debating” this, as I don’t see where it is going), what you and the Charismatic Renewal Movement members claim are “charisms of the Holy Spirit” are what I have said since the beginning of this discussion - they are a group of people who have set themselves apart from other members of the Church and claim that the Holy Spirit has deigned them with special “charisms” whereas we others are lacking.

I am sorry, but I cannot come to any other conclusion: do you really believe that ALL of us who question the “charismatic movement” are that stupid or ignorant or lacking in an understanding of the Catholic faith? I just don’t see how the charismatic movements is so important, when it did not even exist until my lifetime, (excepting Apostolic times) which is a drop in the bucket in the lifetime of the Church. You might be able to cite a “saint” here or there over the past 2000 years who might have exhibited the charism of speaking in tongues - but you won’t find an entire “movement”. That is absolutely a new “thing” in the Catholic Church.

I do, sincerely, wish you well in your journeys.
Thank you. You are in my prayers.
 
Here is my personal question regarding the Catholic Charismatic Renewal.

What are the flaws in the popular objections to the Catholic Charismatic Renewal?


Reading the various threads about objections to the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, I have discovered some interesting flaws.

The first obvious flaw is that the history of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is presented without a correct understanding of the difference between it and Pentecostalism.

A second flaw suggests that because some of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit are difficult to understand, they should be dismissed as worthless.

A third flaw is that objectors cannot move beyond the early days of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal when there were obvious growing pains. Along with this, examinations of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal are ignored out of hand.

Another flaw is that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal has to meet personal expectations as to its validity.

The most misleading flaw of all (reminds me of Jesus’ name for the devil in John 8: 39-44) is the cleaver assumption that any charismatic group can be quietly assumed to be the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. This underlying flaw is assumed guilt by wrongful association. This simple twisting of truth (by omission) confuses ordinary folk into thinking that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is somehow attacking both the Catholic Church and the Holy Spirit as seen in the New Testament.

Work of the Father of Lies?
The first obvious flaw is that the history of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is presented without a correct understanding of the difference between it and Pentecostalism.

I think you need to re-read the history of this “movement” post Apostolic times.

A second flaw suggests that because some of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit are difficult to understand, they should be dismissed as worthless.

No, we recognize “As a consequence, the Church teaches that Faith, Hope and Charity are necessary for salvation but the charismata are not. St. Paul’s experience at Corinth demonstrated rather early in the Church how susceptible these charisms are to exaggeration. In another context, he would even warn the Corinthians that the devil can appear as an angel of light (1 Cor 11:14). Similarly, both St. Peter and St. John (1 Pet 5:8-9; 1 John 4:1) warn us of this danger.” source: ewtn.com/expert/answers/charismatic_renewal.htm

A third flaw is that objectors cannot move beyond the early days of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal when there were obvious growing pains. Along with this, examinations of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal are ignored out of hand.

**Can you cite one Catholic Charismatic Convenant Community that has never misled its’ people and has never been reprimanded by the Church? (e.g. Sword of the Spirit, People of Praise, People of Hope, CFC, CFC-FFL, etc.) All of these communities have misled and continue to mislead because of its’ proclivity to do so. **

Another flaw is that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal has to meet personal expectations as to its validity.

**No, it’s the other way around for most people in these communities. People believe what they see in signs and wonders. Such belief (as stated from a previous EWTN post) is blind. **

The most misleading flaw of all (reminds me of Jesus’ name for the devil in John 8: 39-44) is the cleaver assumption that any charismatic group can be quietly assumed to be the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. This underlying flaw is assumed guilt by wrongful association. This simple twisting of truth (by omission) confuses ordinary folk into thinking that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is somehow attacking both the Catholic Church and the Holy Spirit as seen in the New Testament.

Work of the Father of Lies?

I disagree completely that this movement is the “solution” to our Catholic Church. This movement started as an ecumenical movement and that is ultimately its’ greatest flaw. This movement cannot help but confuse and deceive.
 
This is because most people take the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass for granted. Fortunately, with the new translation, some “awake” people are spotting where certain priests are deviating from the proper prayers. (See the Catholic News Forum)
Granny, do you recognize your pretentiousness in this post and some of your other posts? Do you not know that God loves us all, regardless of how spiritually mature we are in our faith? By the way, this is the kind of thing that turns people off many people from Charismatics and rightfully so. To assume that people are not awake such as Charismatics like yourself is wrong.

Believe it or not, not everyone wants or needs an EXTRAORDINARY gift, such as praying in tongues. In fact, the Vatican warns again seeking such extraordinary gifts rashly. You’ve defined some gifts, such as Knowledge, Wisdom, etc. which are not extraordinary (such as the 7 Gifts of the Holy Spirit) which every Catholic can receive during Baptism/Confirmation. No fake-ritual of Baptism of the Holy Spirit is necessary for those 7 gifts and I want to make that clear for anyone else reading this post.

This feeling that Charismatics are the anointed ones of the Church and the subsequent pride they have… is their downfall.

Luke 18:9-14

9 He also told this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous and despised others:
10 “Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector.
11 The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee that I am not like other men, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax collector. 12 I fast twice a week, I give tithes of all that I get.' 13 But the tax collector, standing far off, would not even lift up his eyes to heaven, but beat his breast, saying, God, be merciful to me a sinner!’
14 I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for every one who exalts himself will be humbled, but he who humbles himself will be exalted.”
 
There are a few individuals within the Catholic Charismatic Renewal who have the Charismatic Gift of Healing in the same way that some of the Saints had this gift. This special charism requires both proper preparation and critical discernment. Catholics must not confuse this charism with a parish prayer tree praying for an individual and the person does get well.
Have these miracles been authenticated by the Church?

Can you please cite the names of these persons who claim to have the gift of healing?

Because yes, believe or not, someone that spoke at our seminar said that they had this gift. I found it absolutely astounding. The same gift of healing from the Apostles no less…
 
A friend of mine was a member of a charismatic prayer group (or community as they call it too) for 15 years. He told me of the many times that the charisms of the Holy Spirit proved to be otherwise. This is one example: during an assembly of the members of group (more than 500 members), one member that had the charisms of prophesy said that the Holy Spirit had revealed to him that the mother of one of the members, who was in the terminal phase of cancer, was healed, that she had cancer no more. All the assembly erupted in cheers and praise to the Lord for the miracle. Two weeks later the lady died of cancer.

This is just one example of the many he has told me of prophesies unfulfilled, Friday after Friday (assembly day) for more than a decade. Charismatic groups sprang all over the world since the 1970s in the same fashion that protestant denominations are born every month. Their intentions are good, no doubt about that. But the “democratization” of the Holy Spirit charisms has gone way too far. Now in every community you’ll have members making prophesies about anything, from people healing, rain for the crops, the economy and even political races outcome. Discernment is obviously missing in many of these groups, yet more and more people are joining, with the wonders of miracles and prophesies being the main attraction to join. The Holy Spirit is with them!

What should we do when a prophesy fails?

If any prophet speaks in the name of Yahweh and if that which he says does not happen, you shall know that the word does not come from Yahweh. The prophet has spoken to boast and you shall not pay any attention to him.” Deuteronomy 18:22

But Yahweh said, "These prophets have proclaimed untruths in my name. I did not send them, nor did I command them or speak to them. False visions, worthless divinations and delusions of their own imagination - that is what they prophesy. And Yahweh added, "These prophets whom I did not send and who prophesy in my name, saying that the sword and famine will not touch this land - these same prophets will perish by the sword and famine”." Jeremiah 14:14-15

But these groups continue as if nothing happened after the failed prophesies.

The problem with the charismatic movement is that it’s too “subjective”. All you have is the person’s word that he received a message from the Holy Spirit and all believe it to be so. But tradition in the Church has been that, when an individual appears to show he is charismatic, the Church takes a very long time to confirm as such. That’s been the case of many saints like St. John of the Cross or St. Teresa of Avila to name a couple. Today our regular folks, who live next door and are members of the group, are receiving messages and are making prophesies in such numbers all over the world that it’s becoming too confusing and too complicated. St. John of the Cross said that, if a spirit talks to you, test him. Let that spirit prove it comes from God, again and again and again. None of this happens in this group, everything is taken at face value, no testing, testing, testing, everything comes from the Holy Spirit, from God, period.

It was common that these groups didn’t have a priest for guidance when they began. The group was formed by lay individuals who, after creating the group learned about similar groups in the USA and attended an ecumenical gathering I think in Indiana. This happened in 1977 and the leaders of the group saw among the Protestants present there the works of the “Spirit”. They saw the Protestants had the charisms.

The leaders never saw the need to have a priest to guide them when forming the group, or when writing the articles of constitution of the group and even less when shepherding. They were guided by other lay people with no priests supervising them. The group is now part of an international ecumenical group called “The Sword of the Spirit” (I’m writing from memory here, I might have the wrong name).

One trait that was immediately obvious was the absence of devotion for the Virgin Mary. This is a Catholic group that didn’t pray the Rosary nor even mentioned it or encouraged its members to pray it, and we live in a country with a very high devotion for the Virgin Mary. Our Patron Saint is the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary, celebrated December 8, and we have a special celebration on the vigil (December 7 evening) with altars devoted to the Virgin Mary in people’s homes. Thousands of people in every city and town go out to the homes that have these altars and sing songs dedicated to the Immaculate Conception, it’s a huge national Catholic celebration. My friend’s charismatic group never celebrated this holiday that we call “La Purisima” (“The Purest One”), never in the 15 years he was a member. Same thing regarding the Saints of the Church, the group is very Protestants in this respect.

I agree with Salvatore123 and jjkp777 on this issue. The way I see it is that not all that glitters is gold. Some members in leadership position in the group have left. For those joining there is what is called “group pressure”, people actually “acting” when speaking in tongues, which is the universal or more common charisms in the group. When they enter the group they hear all this unintelligible sounds, all different from one member to the next, and they hear a constant repetition of the same noises. Eventually for pure pressure they start doing the same thing. Other charisms are much harder to act out.

Another practice in the group is that they are asked to give the tithe. Many that were in the group more than 15-20 years fell on hard times and couldn’t keep up giving the tithe, the leaders decided to ask them to pay or leave. Has the Church ever asked us to give alms or leave? This is not a Church practice. In this group “brothers” were expelled for falling on hard times, very un-Christian I must say. They were kicked out literally. Once out they are like pariah, friendships are lost, members are told to avoid the ones that were told to go. The same thing happens to those who leave voluntarily, no more brotherly love.

I know that this is not the norm in all groups, but when guidance is left to lay people this is what happens, and most of the stories I know about these groups is about the same, lay people guiding these groups. It’s like the blind guiding the blind.
Thank you for your post. This experience, unfortunately, is very common in Charismatic communities… I’ve got stories about the Tithe, for example, that will enlighten many, many people… Long story short, the tithe is taught in these Charismatic covenant communities (tithing to the community) while it is not taught in the Catholic church. For me, that alone, considering what Judas did for 30 pieces of silver should make people reflect long and hard what this movement is all about.

One reason they recruit so aggressively? They need the money from new recruits to make of for those that have left or are “inactive” in the community. Ponzi… plain and simple.
 
**Can you cite one Catholic Charismatic Convenant Community that has never misled its’ people and has never been reprimanded by the Church? (e.g. Sword of the Spirit, People of Praise, People of Hope, CFC, CFC-FFL, etc.) All of these communities have misled and continue to mislead because of its’ proclivity to do so. **
Briefly.

May I respectfully remind you that I have consistently respected your position on covenant communities.
In fact, I have posted what Catholics should be doing in regard to abuses in covenant communities.
In fact, I followed one of your links about a covenant community and was able to post a link to the proper office in their diocese to which abuses should be reported.
In fact, I have posted a warning that Catholics who are interested in a covenant community should first check with their diocese offices as to the standing of that particular community.
In fact, I have consistently honored your position regarding covenant communities.

It is not my place to search out covenant communities and evaluate them. This is the responsibility of Catholics living in the area of covenant communities which claim to be Catholic. Since you are very knowledgeable about covenant communities, and you personally deeply care about people being misled, you certainly should evaluate them regardless of their location and report your findings to the Bishop. And you could continue to warm people about the possible dangers of covenant communities.

My position is to share information about the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and to answer questions. This, I have done and I will continue to do so.
 
Thank you Granny for clarifying. Those points had not been clear to me.

However, we are called to love the sinner and hate the sin. I love you as my sister but am also called to hate the sin of pride which I have seen in these Charismatic communities. It’s the very reason that so many stay… because they’ve made a name for themselves in the community, regardless of the Truth. and subsequently (as the norm for all these communities), isolate themselves because they see themselves as “set apart” from others.

Did our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ come to save sinners and be with sinners? Did he set himself apart and not dwell with evil doers? Did Jesus say, get the Baptism of the Holy Spirit first before joining his community?

No, Jesus saved people, regardless of whether or not they were part of a community. These Charismatic communities who ask for membership into their community at the end of their seminars and then ask for tithes for their community do not honor our Church.

Education about the Catholic faith should be free and membership into a covenant community and tithing to it should not be taught… So again, the better way to “re-evangelize” is to offer Adult Faith Formation classes for free (yes, without cost or membership into some psuedo Catholic community), which our Archdiocese is already beginning to do…

Whoever is reading this… whether you’re already in a community or not… be wary and guard your soul!
 
Did our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ come to save sinners and be with sinners? Did he set himself apart and not dwell with evil doers? Did Jesus say, get the Baptism of the Holy Spirit first before joining his community?
Matthew 28: 16 - 20 are Jesus’ words about the Catholic Sacrament of Baptism.

Since it operates from within the Catholic Church, the Catholic Charismatic Renewal will review this primary Sacrament as an important part of Adult Faith Formation. It is made clear that this Sacrament is not the same as the *additional *
prayer experience of committing one’s life to Jesus which was part of the early Church celebration of the Initiation Sacraments (Baptism, Eucharist, and Confirmation) for adults. This serious prayer commitment is now referred to as baptism of the Holy Spirit which is not a replacement for the Sacrament of Baptism.

Please refer to Chapter Ten in Acts. Verses 44-48 clearly distinguishes the difference between the gift of Prayer Tongues from the Holy Spirit (which is optional today) and the Sacrament of Baptism which is necessary today.

I realize that it is difficult to transpose what was happening in the early Church to today’s world immersed in secularism. Without studying the Catholic Charismatic Renewal in depth, it is difficult to understand that what is referred to as baptism in the Holy Spirit is not the Sacrament. My own guess is that because the Holy Spirit’s gift of Prayer Tongues is the direct action of the Holy Spirit, the personal commitment to Jesus and the Catholic Church is seen as a baptism of the Holy Spirit.
 
Important Note

While it is my place to share information about the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and to answer questions the best way I can…

…this does not mean that the Catholic Charismatic Renewal is the only way one can be part of the Catholic Church. Yes, the issue of pride is there, but please remember that pride is not a gift of the Holy Spirit.

Learn about the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and then make a personal decision of agreement or disagreement which, by the way, is not a life and death issue. Learn about the opposition to the Catholic Charismatic Renewal and then make a personal decision as to whether or not specific opposition is valid in your neck of the woods.

In my humble opinion, it is valuable to learn the vocabulary of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal. This will avoid a lot of the confusion.

Thank you.
 
Here is an interesting set of guidelines from what seems to be a Catholic Charismatic community: Link here: saint-mike.org/library/rule/excerpts/spiritual_gifts.asp
  1. While recognizing that the spiritual or “charismatic” gifts operate freely in the whole Community, we also recognize that these gifts are given to those who lead the Community in an extraordinary way to help them in their ministry.
  2. When electing or appointing leadership, those who have the power to elect or appoint should look for the presence of these gifts already working in a person’s life. At the conferral of office, special prayers should be offered for the reception and strengthening of all the spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts necessary for the carrying out of each office.
148. “Charismatic” gifts, however, should not be confused with the Seven Gifts of the Spirit <1> mentioned in Isaiah 11:2. St. Justin Martyr identifies the seven gifts in Isaiah as gifts of the Holy Spirit which were bestowed on Christ in their fullness and which are again given “by Him, from the place of His Spirit’s powers, to all His believers according to their merits.” <2> As believers through Baptism and Confirmation, we are recipients of the gift of the Holy Spirit, and are thus recipients of His seven fold gifts: wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord (reverence). The fullness of these gifts in our lives is determined by our merits, but without these gifts in some measure we would not be able to live the Christian life at all for, as an example, we would be unable to understand, or to have the knowledge and wisdom to know how to live the Christ-life. <3>

149. Although some of these gifts appear to be the same as the “charismatic” gifts, they are not. All seven of these gifts are given to all believers in one measure or another so that it will be possible for them to live the Christ-life. The various “charismatic” gifts, on the other hand, are given to this person or to that person as God so pleases as an additional supernatural and particular gift to enable the person not only to live the Christian life, but to perform ministry and service to buildup the Church and the People of God for the greater glory of God.

  1. In addition, it is important to note that while there may be corollaries and similarities to natural talents and abilities, “charismatic” gifts exercise a “supernatural” ability and grace that is not dependent upon any natural talent or upon any disposition or ability that may naturally develop with spiritual maturity. Even then, for a gift to qualify as a “charismatic” gift, as Paul speaks of it, it must have the purposes of service, ministry, and building up of the Church. In addition, one should not confuse gifts with offices. A person may have the gift of pastoring, for example, without being in the office of pastor. <4>
  2. Inventory of Spiritual Gifts: Though not intended to be exclusive or exhaustive, the thirty major gifts listed here are all found in one form or another in Scripture. <5> The gifts are arranged by Category Type and include a “brief” definition in parenthesis. Scripture references are listed in brackets:…" it continues
"152. It is the responsibility of the Superior General and the Vicar General for Formation to ensure that all members receive the proper teaching concerning spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts. It is especially important to emphasize that God gives these gifts as He wills for the edification, uplifting, and building up of the Church and of the Faithful (1 Cor 12:7; Eph 4:11-13). Thus for the health of the Body, God gives every Christian at least one gift, and some may have several gifts (1 Pet 4:10), so that within the Community all the gifts that are needed will be present and available (1 Cor 12:12-31; 13:13). That is, He will ensure the presence and availability, but we who have been given those gifts must accept the responsibility and stewardship to develop, offer, and implement our gifts, and not to neglect them, for the good of the Church (1 Tim 4:12, 14). We are, in fact, to fan into flame the gifts God has graciously given to us (2 Tim 1:6) so that the Church will be healthy and able to live out its mission to spread the Good News of Jesus Christ.

153. In light, however, of misdirected and even false teaching of much of the so-called “charismatic movement” as it has developed in the twentieth century, it is important to reemphasize and for members to understand that we do not all possesses the same “charismatic” gifts — the gifts are varied (1 Cor 12:14) and are distributed by God as He sees fit (1 Cor 12:18), not as we desire.

154. It is particularly important, in the face of misdirected teaching on this subject, to understand that no particular charismatic gift is evidence of spirituality or maturity. No particular gift is evidence of “baptism in the Holy Spirit.”. Neither is the manifestation of a “private prayer language” evidence of “baptism in the Spirit” or of some level of maturity or spirituality. The gift of a “private prayer language”, as with all gifts, may be given by God to whom He pleases and as He sees fit, thus not everyone will exhibit this manifestation. <13>

155.The true evidence for spirituality, maturity, and “baptism in the Spirit” is the exhibiting of the “Fruit of the Spirit” which is love (1 Cor 13:1-3; Gal 5:22-26).

156. Neither should the concept of “baptism in the Spirit” be confused with a “second act of sacramental grace” as is taught in many Charismatic circles. “Baptism in the Holy Spirit” is not a second act of grace but rather the “personally experienced actualization of grace already sacramentally received, principally in baptism and confirmation.” <14>Perhaps a more accurate term would be “filling with the Holy Spirit” <15> since existentially that is the phenomenon actually taking place. <16> Baptism in the Spirit, or filling, is an experience whereby we intimately and personally meet our Lord and are filled with His Spirit and power. The first experience of this, in particular, can be very emotional and likened to the evangelical’s experience of being “born again.” But since the experience of “filling” cannot be sustained because of our sins, we can lose the filling and power of the Spirit in our lives, or at least have it diminished. <17> The “filling,” however, can be regained through acts of penance, devotion, prayer, and submission to God or through God’s providence to facilitate His Will in a particular situation or circumstance.

157. We can speak of a “historical baptism in the Spirit” in the sense that in a particular moment in our past we came to realize for the first time the power and gift of the Holy Spirit in our lives and may have specifically asked God to bring that actualization upon us. From then on, because we now know of the possibility of the intimate filling and power of the Spirit, we can continue to experience and actualize the “filling” of the Holy Spirit, to greater or lessor degrees, as God gives us the grace to do so and as we live out the Christ-life of holiness in our own daily lives.

**
158. Many people, however, may experience this intimate and personal relationship with the Holy Spirit without ever having an emotional or historical event take place in their lives. This is also true of the “born again” phenomena — some cannot p(name removed by moderator)oint a specific date they accepted Christ as their Savior, they did not have an emotional conversion, but they do know they have converted and have proved it in their devotion and lifestyle.**
  1. Since the spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts are a manifestation of the Holy Spirit, the basic prerequisite for one to be able to have and to exercise such gifts is to have the Holy Spirit. Since the Holy Spirit is given at Baptism and Confirmation, one does not have to have the existential experience of being “baptized in the Holy Spirit” to have received and to exercise spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts. The Scriptures show us readily, in Paul’s letter to the Church at Corinth, that one does not have to be “filled with the Holy Spirit” or to be spiritually mature in order to have and to exercise the gifts.
160. With all this in mind, when legitimate and God-given spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts are manifested they are to be exhibited with order, decorum, and love–God is not a God of chaos and division (1 Cor 14:26-33, 36,40).

161. Thinking or beliefs about spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts that is contrary to the basic principles outlined in these paragraphs leads to pride, envy, strife, and division which is sinful and contrary to our charism. Thus, the manifestation of spiritual (“charismatic”) gifts shall always be under the direction and discernment of the Superior General and the Chaplain General. We must remember Paul’s warning in 1 Cor 13:1-3:

If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing."


I could not fit the entire page so must end here…
 
Baptism in the Spirit, or filling, is an experience whereby we intimately and personally meet our Lord and are filled with His Spirit and power. The first experience of this, in particular, can be very emotional and likened to the evangelical’s experience of being “born again.” But since the experience of “filling” cannot be sustained because of our sins, we can lose the filling and power of the Spirit in our lives, or at least have it diminished. <17> The “filling,” however, can be regained through acts of penance, devotion, prayer, and submission to God or through God’s providence to facilitate His Will in a particular situation or circumstance.
And there is one key paragraph. So many Charismatic rely on this filling “or being high in the Holy Spirit”, that when it becomes more and more difficult to repeat this “feeling”, they lose their faith or fall away… and that is why emotions can be dangerous. Because if you rely on them too much (which can be easy to do in a Charismatic community), you are liable to get “lost”…

Just as a simple but very important example of this… I’ve had a Charismatic tell me that their son’s Confirmation was “so solemn” (meaning it didn’t have enough excitement). I obviously thought it was perfect since Christ was present at that Sacrament. But there lies the danger… getting caught up with the Charismatic praise and worship events (or at household meetings) indirectly and directly winds up competing with the Holy Sacrifice of the mass which is completely absurd!

And therein lies again the point I’ve been trying to make all along. With unchecked emotions come deception and the proclivity to mislead. And that is why this movement will never, ever become mainstream in the Church. Never.
 
Glad to see Granny answering some of the questions abou the gift of healing and discernemt .🙂
 
Can SOMEONE who is a “charismatic renewal catholic” explain to me, in simple terms (as I apparently do not have the cognitive skills to figure it out on my own), how does one (other than those incidents authenticated by the Holy Father/Magisterium of the Catholic Church) determine that X has the charism of whatever, but Y does not?

How can ANY “charismatic catholic” tell me that they are able to TRUTHFULLY and ACCURATELY discern that so-called “charismatic protestants” such as Benny Hinn, Jimmy Swaggart, et al., are “frauds” or “false charismatics” but those who claim to have that charism, AND ARE CATHOLIC, are legitimate?

Remember - the Church has not authenticated ANY “speaking in tongues” charismatic catholics in literally hundreds and hundreds of years.

And for this post, I actually went back and re-read this ENTIRE thread from the beginning. I SINCERELY want to know HOW to discern a “true” charistmatic catholic from a “false” one. What is the “test”?

Because, you see, if you don’t have some litmus to discern a “true charismatic” from a “false charismatic” (which is EXACTLY what the Catholic Church gives to us to discern right from wrong on every matter in our lives - a “litmus” called official teachings by the Holy Father and the Magisterium, such as ex cathedra pronouncements and the catechisms), then you are running on a very dangerous litmus: emotion. Emotion is what causes people to do many awful things to one another, all in the name of religion.

I am not saying that “charismatic catholics” are doing awful things to one another or other people. I am simply saying that their “bedrock signature” that they willingly EMBRACE and so desperately want others to embrace, is a belief based on emotion. No facts, no investigation, no evidence . . . just a feeling that comes over one who suddenly “speakings in tongues” (completely unintelligible to the speaker and the listerners - something St. Paul SPECIFICALLY chastized the Corintians about) and claims they are filled with the Holy Spirit.

I AM serious when I ask: HOW does a Catholic determine if someone claiming the charism of speaking in tongues is TRULY blessed by the Holy Spirit with that charism?

One thing that no one has mentioned in this entire thread (so I will do so now): when someone claims that a “power” or “charism” has entered them by the Holy Spirit or God, THEY have the burden of proving they have it and that it is legitimate. So far, everyone on this thread who has claimed that the charism of speaking in tongues is legitimate TODAY and is indeed alive and well (almost 2000 years after the Apostles), has simply SAID that it exists today, and then have then turned the tables on the skeptical (yes, color me skeptical) and said, “now YOU prove that it does not exist”. I can never meet that burden. But one who LEGITIMATELY has that charism should be able to prove the legitimacy of its existence in him very easily.

I can even think of a simple “test” to determine if “speaking in tongues” (to those listening - not to God) is legitimate: tape/record the speaker who is speaking in tongues, and have an interpreter nearby, listening to all that is said. Make sure neither the speaker nor the interpreter have ANY contact with one another, both before and after. Then, interview each separately and see if what the speaker explains what he or she said is the same as that explained by the interpreter.

If someone can do that, move me from the “skeptical” column . . .

P.S. - just look, as examples, how much skepticism the Catholic Church places on claims of demonic possession, alleged visions such as as Medjugorje. Look at the rigors the Church put on Lourdes and Fatima before they were deemed authentic. It is one thing for a Holy Father to say that “charismatic renewal” serves a vital purpose in today’s church. It is quite another to say the Holy Father believes that “speaking in tongues” almost 2000 years after the Apostles are legitimate and are to be emulated or followed.

As I said above: why is the burden on those claiming demonic possession and visions, but for charism such as speaking in tongues, the charismatics put the burden on those who do NOT have or claim those charism, to prove they DON’T exist?
 
Can SOMEONE who is a “charismatic renewal catholic” explain to me, in simple terms (as I apparently do not have the cognitive skills to figure it out on my own), how does one (other than those incidents authenticated by the Holy Father/Magisterium of the Catholic Church) determine that X has the charism of whatever, but Y does not?

How can ANY “charismatic catholic” tell me that they are able to TRUTHFULLY and ACCURATELY discern that so-called “charismatic protestants” such as Benny Hinn, Jimmy Swaggart, et al., are “frauds” or “false charismatics” but those who claim to have that charism, AND ARE CATHOLIC, are legitimate?

Remember - the Church has not authenticated ANY “speaking in tongues” charismatic catholics in literally hundreds and hundreds of years.

And for this post, I actually went back and re-read this ENTIRE thread from the beginning. I SINCERELY want to know HOW to discern a “true” charistmatic catholic from a “false” one. What is the “test”?

Because, you see, if you don’t have some litmus to discern a “true charismatic” from a “false charismatic” (which is EXACTLY what the Catholic Church gives to us to discern right from wrong on every matter in our lives - a “litmus” called official teachings by the Holy Father and the Magisterium, such as ex cathedra pronouncements and the catechisms), then you are running on a very dangerous litmus: emotion. Emotion is what causes people to do many awful things to one another, all in the name of religion.

I am not saying that “charismatic catholics” are doing awful things to one another or other people. I am simply saying that their “bedrock signature” that they willingly EMBRACE and so desperately want others to embrace, is a belief based on emotion. No facts, no investigation, no evidence . . . just a feeling that comes over one who suddenly “speakings in tongues” (completely unintelligible to the speaker and the listerners - something St. Paul SPECIFICALLY chastized the Corintians about) and claims they are filled with the Holy Spirit.

I AM serious when I ask: HOW does a Catholic determine if someone claiming the charism of speaking in tongues is TRULY blessed by the Holy Spirit with that charism?

One thing that no one has mentioned in this entire thread (so I will do so now): when someone claims that a “power” or “charism” has entered them by the Holy Spirit or God, THEY have the burden of proving they have it and that it is legitimate. So far, everyone on this thread who has claimed that the charism of speaking in tongues is legitimate TODAY and is indeed alive and well (almost 2000 years after the Apostles), has simply SAID that it exists today, and then have then turned the tables on the skeptical (yes, color me skeptical) and said, “now YOU prove that it does not exist”. I can never meet that burden. But one who LEGITIMATELY has that charism should be able to prove the legitimacy of its existence in him very easily.

I can even think of a simple “test” to determine if “speaking in tongues” (to those listening - not to God) is legitimate: tape/record the speaker who is speaking in tongues, and have an interpreter nearby, listening to all that is said. Make sure neither the speaker nor the interpreter have ANY contact with one another, both before and after. Then, interview each separately and see if what the speaker explains what he or she said is the same as that explained by the interpreter.

If someone can do that, move me from the “skeptical” column . . .

P.S. - just look, as examples, how much skepticism the Catholic Church places on claims of demonic possession, alleged visions such as as Medjugorje. Look at the rigors the Church put on Lourdes and Fatima before they were deemed authentic. It is one thing for a Holy Father to say that “charismatic renewal” serves a vital purpose in today’s church. It is quite another to say the Holy Father believes that “speaking in tongues” almost 2000 years after the Apostles are legitimate and are to be emulated or followed.

As I said above: why is the burden on those claiming demonic possession and visions, but for charism such as speaking in tongues, the charismatics put the burden on those who do NOT have or claim those charism, to prove they DON’T exist?
Thank you.

I pray in the ordinary [common] prayerTongues, but do not belong to any kind of group. I am simply a member of a Catholic parish. Do I qualify to answer your questions?

Why or why not?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top