J
javid
Guest
Hi.
But two distinct beings, can’t be same in all details. So if there are no differnce between christ and his copy, so in fact we have no copy and we must accept that his self-knowledge doesn’t give us a new person.but since there would be no way to differientiate Christ and the copy, and Christ is an ifinite being that is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent
I see no relation between your example and my question. we have two distinct pennies because they have to different places, so they are not same in all details. So why we must think you have one penny?as saying there are two pennies in my hand which both occupy the same spot when all you see is one penny.
he is the self-knowledge of the Father. Being the self-knowledge of God means that he is only distinct of God in that He is the physical embodiment of this self-knowledge. I would point you back to the first part of this to see that this self-knowledge can’t be multiple beings. If you want the original and better analysis of this bit of speculation
Do I must think that “self-knowledge” is a person? How can we think that self-knowledge is a person?God the Father’s self-consciousness doesn’t make copies of the Father because that would be illogical. Not even God self-generates. Neither does God the Son’s self-consciousness make copies of the Son.
Rather, God the Son is the self-consciousness (the Word) of God the Father.