T
tgGodsway
Guest
Reuben, all this proves is that you got a confused Protestant to go CC. So what. By the way, the early church did teach new birth. Ironically we find it in Peter’s teachings. Add them to John’s and there you go. We
Uhh… no again MT… I am not saying that.Now your back to arguing that John’s Gospel is the only one that speaks of eternal life
No again. I’m not saying that. You are good at projecting onto me what you say I believe.So no one knew the truth until John wrote some 60 years after the Resurrection? Matthew, Mark and Luke are of no benefit in figuring out salvation. Seriously?
Yes, for the Apostles, and up until the time of the Anabaptists, “belief” was expressed in becoming baptized “calling upon the name of the Lord” (reciting the Creed)."And he (the Jailer) took them, (Paul and Silas) the same hour of the night and washed their stripes. And IMMEDIATELY he and all his family were baptized.
If I wanted to argue from the standpoint of the literalness of this verse, I could say that the Jailer and his family were not water baptized at all, seeing that the passage doesn’t literally say so. Nor does it give any detail about how they were baptized. I could argue from a 1st. Cor. 12:13 point of view here that “by one Spirit we are all baptized into one body…”
But honestly I don’t know. What I do know is that Paul answered the man’s question about what it takes to get saved in verse 31. “believe” and in verse 34 the bible says the Jailer and his family met those qualifications. “… having believed in God with all his household.”
Again, Paul and Silas shared this one divine condition on eternal salvation with the gospel of John which is to “believe” Jesus is the Christ.
Wow, that is a stretch that is new to me! How can you defend the position that John was Jesus “earthly pastor”?Jesus subjected Himself to His (earthly pastor) John the Baptist who took Him under the water, symbolizing a spiritual death, according to Rom. 6:3,4 (yet to be realized at the cross.) John then took Him up out of the water, symbolizing a resurrection, (yet to be realized three days after the cross,)
Where does scripture teach that Baptism “declares to others…” anything?Everyone who is in Christ should be baptized. Why do it? Because it declares to others that we too have died spiritually, and resurrected spiritually and now a voice from heaven has said, this is my beloved child…"
Catholics will agree with you on this point. God saves whoever He wants, however He likes. He has commanded us to express our saving faith through the sacrament of baptism, which unites us with the Body of Christ, and to His death and resurrection. Saving faith is obedient faith, and saving faith includes baptism.But notice the Mark 16:16 passage again,
“he who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.”
Notice when Jesus reverses His logic by saying "he who does not believe will be condemned, He failed to reverse the consequences of not being water baptized.
It should read like this, He who believes and is baptized will be saved, but he who does not believe and is not water baptized will be condemned."
Every word is deliberate. Logic concludes that
We understand the passage in context. Jesus and the Apostles never separated the water from the Spirit.“I assure you; Anyone who BELIEVES has eternal life.” Jn. 6:47.
Was John simply not paying attention with his repetitious message to just believe? Or was he driving home a point that you simply hate.
Sorry my answer is still no.Do you believe MT, every child of God called to Eternal Life, at their Initial Justification receives God’s special grace His Gift of Final Perseverance which is an Eternal Protection of their Eternal Life, so they are Once Saved Always Saved?
I say no because every child of God is not automatically called to eternal life.I believe every child of God called to Eternal Life
Here there have historically been two usages. On the one hand, one can be can be predestined to come to God and become a true Christian. On the other hand, a true Christian can be predestined to stay with God and persevere to the end of life. These two uses have historically been known as predestination to grace and predestination to glory. One is predestined to grace if one is predestined to enter the graces of the Christian life, and one is predestined to glory if one is predestined to enter the glory of heaven…Thus in Ephesians 1:3-12 we have a reference to predestination to grace and in Romans 8:28-30 we have a reference to predestination to glory. So my opponent’s claim that there is no exegetical distinction between being predestined to grace and predestined to glory goes up in smoke. It is just linguistically false. The word “predestined” is used in Scripture for both the entrance into the Christan life and entrance into heaven.
Yes and no. Yes for the ones predestined to glory, no for the ones predestined to grace.at their Initial Justification receives God’s special grace His Gift of Final Perseverance which is an Eternal Protection of their Eternal Life
Back to the main reason I do not agree, there is no way you can know if you were predestined to Grace or predestined to Glory.so they are Once Saved Always Saved.
So you agree then that Jesus also says one must keep the commandments to have eternal life? Mt 19:16Uhh… no again MT… I am not saying that.
I agree John 10:27 is a metaphor. What’s your point? Are you saying Jesus doesn’t teach us anything ESSENTIAL when he uses metaphor?Well the John 10:27 passage you sighted is a figure of speech.
The John 6:54 verse is not.
Totally agree, this is not a figure of speech, Jesus was being absolutely literal in this verse.“Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; 54 he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.
Do you see the establishment of the doctrine of “essential doctrine and non-essential doctrine” anywhere in the Scriptures?My point was that Paul may have treated the timing of the resurrection as an essential doctrine.
This is cute MT but again, you assume a lot. When the sheep hear the voice of their Shepherd, the reason why they can hear it, is because they are the Shepherd’s sheep. They are already the property of their Shepherd. Eternal life is not treated as a journey to be received at the end of the road. Jesus always spoke of eternal life in the present tense, in the here and now when you “believe.”But guess what Jesus also says they FOLLOW ME.
So not only do we have to believe we have to follow Jesus as well in order to be given eteranal life.
Guess what happens if a sheep doesn’t continually follow the Shepherd, all the days of their life?
Fun Fact… Well sheep tend to either follow the Shepherd or they follow their stomachs.
If they always follow the Shepherd they are kept safe (eternal life) it they follow their stomachs they tend to wander away from the flock and get eaten by predators (eternal damnation).
On what biblical bases do you come to this conclusion?You will find out whether you are “saved” after you die.
I agree what do you believe I assumed?This is cute MT but again, you assume a lot.
Agreed . Are you claiming it is not possible for a sheep to run away from the Shepherd?They are already the property of their Shepherd.
Totally agree. But you refuse to accept…Jesus always spoke of eternal life in the present tense…
The present tense applies to the coming, the following, and the believing. Making exactly what I said spot on. Not only do we have to believe we have to follow (continuously believe) in order to inherit eternal life.When Jesus describes the one who comes to him and who believes in him [3:16, 5:24, 6:35, 37, 40, 47, etc.], he uses the present tense to describe this coming, believing, or, in other passages, hearing or seeing. The present tense refers to a continuous, on-going action. The Greek contrasts this kind of action against the aorist tense, which is a point action, a single action in time that is not on-going. . . . The wonderful promises that are provided by Christ are not for those who do not truly and continuously believe. The faith that saves is a living faith, a faith that always looks to Christ as Lord and Savior.”
Dale Moody is a Baptist theologian. This interpretation is from his systematic theology, The Word of Truth.“John 10:28 is frequently used as a security blanket by those who ignore many of the New Testament warnings about going back or falling away, but a literal translation of John 10:27-28 . . . hardly needs explanation . . . ‘My sheep keep on hearing my voice, and I keep on knowing them, and they keep on following me: and I keep on giving them eternal life, and they shall never perish, and no one shall snatch them out of my hand.’ Some read the passage as if it says: ‘My sheep heard my voice, and I knew them, and they followed me, and I gave to them eternal life.’ [But] The verbs are present linear, indicating continuous action by the sheep and by the Shepherd, not the punctiliar fallacy of the past tense.” (Moody, 357)
Never said they were no longer God’s sheep. Just said they can wonder off (fall away) and suffer eternal damnation (Hell) because they were attacked by predators (Adultery, Lust, fornication, pornography, greed, murder, hatred, etc…)A Shepherd will from time to time, go after HIS lost sheep. God’s sheep do get lost, but just because they do, does not mean they are no longer HIS sheep.
uhhh… no again MT… but I understand why you think that way. You do not see eternal life as a free gift. You see it as an earned gift, as you just stated here, “… there is nothing in the bible that claims you can DO ALL those things and still be saved.” As if DOING bad things gets you to hell, while DOING good things gets you to heaven.God’s sheep or not, their is nothing in the Bible that claims you can do all of those things and still be saved