Questions for any Protestants

  • Thread starter Thread starter rinnie
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It was told to the apostles and they in turn made disciples(you and me) of all nations.
Yes, they did. However, the apostles preaching and making disciples of you and me is not quite the same as Jesus making Apostles who were infallible, is it?

We have already demonstrated and agreed that you and all individual Christians are not infallible.

Jesus spoke the words of John 16 NOT out on a hillside to thousands but in a closed room to a very select group.
 
I never would have asked my Protestant pastor that because I believed my sins were already forgiven by God. It never would have occurred to me to ask a human to forgive my sins when God had already done so by dying on the cross.
Important point: Only Jesus forgives sin in the confessional. Like baptism, the priest is the earthly instrument used by God to forgive sins, which is why the priest never says - I absolve you in my name - but rather I absolve you from all your sins: In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy. Spirit. I am always surprised to see so many non-Catholics believing that sinful, fallible men offer forgiveness that can only come from God.
 
Typical 1-post troll.

Show some respect for the Holy Mass and remember that you are on a CATHOLIC forum. A less sensitive man (or woman) may find your statement about the Holy Mass offensive and possibly even scandalous.

😃
Yes these are Catholic forums. And i was waiting to say that seeing aswe are posting under “other religions” or what have you, so should we “anti-Catholics” not be able to say what we want to say here, as long as we aren’t belligerent? Or is this another thread where only Catholics point of view is always right? Cuz if so, then why open it up to anyone who isn’t a rite, or Rite, in case i offend someone. And please correct me in that spelling so i know.
 
Yes these are Catholic forums. And i was waiting to say that seeing aswe are posting under “other religions” or what have you, so should we “anti-Catholics” not be able to say what we want to say here, as long as we aren’t belligerent? Or is this another thread where only Catholics point of view is always right? Cuz if so, then why open it up to anyone who isn’t a rite, or Rite, in case i offend someone. And please correct me in that spelling so i know.
You can disagree all you want. Just be nice most of the time. 😉
 
Yes, they did. However, the apostles preaching and making disciples of you and me is not quite the same as Jesus making Apostles who were infallible, is it?
The apostles were infallible ? Your discipleship view does not fit. Do things get lost in translation ? There is no such thing as "not quite the same "disciple by definition.
We have already demonstrated and agreed that you and all individual Christians are not infallible.
I agree that the CC has set it up that way in its treatises. Two classes again, right back to OT. The irony is there are giftings and offices but not “classes” ala OT. As Pater said, “the Holy Ghost has fallen upon them just like he did us”.
Jesus spoke the words of John 16 NOT out on a hillside to thousands but in a closed room to a very select group.
So anything said in private is not for us ? John contradicts himself in his epistles ? Maybe the “little children” and “brethren” must mean apostles successors to whom John wrote to ? Don’t think so.
 
The apostles were infallible ? Your discipleship view does not fit. Do things get lost in translation ? There is no such thing as "not quite the same "disciple by definition.
Each of the Apostles was individually infallible.
I agree that the CC has set it up that way in its treatises. Two classes again, right back to OT. The irony is there are giftings and offices but not “classes” ala OT. As Pater said, “the Holy Ghost has fallen upon them just like he did us”.
So anything said in private is not for us ? John contradicts himself in his epistles ? Maybe the “little children” and “brethren” must mean apostles successors to whom John wrote to ? Don’t think so.
John was writing to the Church, not to a private individual. Even Paul’s letters to Timothy and Titus, etc., do not fall into the same category as the private instruction Jesus gave to the Twelve.
 
He means: can we trust your authority, as coming from God, regarding the resolution of doctrine i
As others have said, christian authority is justified when it is right, not necessarily dependent on its form or conveyance. No ones authority is “alone”. It comes from above, and down to us thru the church. Things can be "checked out’’ (prayer, bible, tradition,history, brethren). This can be done one on one, or two on one, or with the whole congregation, or a bunch of congregations. We can not or should not say the HS only guides a bunch of congregations when called upon, or one congregation, but beginning at the individual (one on one),and not just one person as in respector of.

Can you trust me or vive versa ? Well, if I should say the Lord is coming back, should you believe me ? Is it authoritative, carry any weight ? Could the Lord tell you on judgement day,"you did not believe this though Benhur (and others) told you so, shame on you) ? Likewise, if I tell you He is coming March 23 of next year, is it authoritative with accountability?
I think it is safe to say that the Holy spirit was not sent to you or me to settle doctrinal disputes when they arise - yes or no? 🙂
What are we all doing here on CAF ? We are not bystanders on doctrinal issues.The HS is in us as He is in our leaders and teachers and dispute settlers. The HS desires understanding for us all. That some are more mature,even spiritual, even gifted, does not do away with this basic christian makeup.
 
Each of the Apostles was individually infallible.

John was writing to the Church, not to a private individual. Even Paul’s letters to Timothy and Titus, etc., do not fall into the same category as the private instruction Jesus gave to the Twelve.
I agree: “John was writing to the Church, not to a private individual. Even Paul’s letters to Timothy and Titus, etc., do not fall into the same category as the private instruction Jesus gave to the Twelve”.

The apostles were fallible men who wrote infallibly vis-a-vis the word of God, thanks to the guidance of the Holy Spirit - right?
 
Funny. :DHowever, you make a great point when it comes to the notion that each individual has the authority to teach and discern truth, as well as **settle disputes **as the CC did in the 4th century for example e.g. the Catholic Ecumenical Councils. :)👍 A silly notion…
All can** teach**, discern, and settle, just that some are gifted at it, even given of God for our benefit. There isn’t one parent that doesn’t display this. Again our "makeup’ is basic and from there God matures and gifts for the edifying of the body. It is not all or nothing, this gifting, this authority.
 
]benhur;12617866]As others have said, christian authority is justified when it is right, not necessarily dependent on its form or conveyance. No ones authority is “alone”.
The big question remains: Who decides what is right i.e. who has the God-given authority to definitively settle doctrinal disputes when they arise, thus ensuring that truth has been preserved within Christendom? You have yet to answer that question.
It comes from above, and down to us thru the church.
Which church? Please be specific; after all there are hundreds of churches.
Things can be "checked out’’ (prayer, bible, tradition,history, brethren).
Sure. You and I for example can check out things via prayer, bible, tradition, history and brethren, but you and I were not entrusted with the authority to definitively settle doctrinal disputes when they occur - yes or no? 🙂
This can be done one on one, or two on one, or with the whole congregation, or a bunch of congregations. We can not or should not say the HS only guides a bunch of congregations when called upon, or one congregation, but beginning at the individual (one on one),and not just one person as in respector of.
:confused:
Can you trust me or vive versa ?
No, I cannot trust you or myself when it comes to discerning truth. Who was charged with the role of infallibly (via the guidance of the HS) settling disputes when you and I disagree?
Well, if I should say the Lord is coming back, should you believe me ?
Yes. However, what happens if someone should disagree with us, claiming that they have truth regarding this issue via the guidance of the HS i.e. they claim to possess the God-given authority to infallibly settle the matter vis-a-vis your question e.g. if I tell you that the Eucharist is Jesus’ body and blood and someone else tells you that I am wrong, and you agree with me, then who was charged with the authority to settle this dispute for the three of us? It’s not me, you or my sister.
Is it authoritative, carry any weight ? Could the Lord tell you on judgement day,"you did not believe this though Benhur (and others) told you so, shame on you) ?
Bingo. 👍
Likewise, if I tell you He is coming March 23 of next year, is it authoritative with accountability?
You were not given the authority to discern truth (when divsion rears its ugly head) for Christendom, nor was I.
the What are we all doing here on CAF ?
We are discussing various things e.g. beliefs etc. None of us can discern truth for the other person when impasses are realized. In the end Catholics defer to the authority of the Catholic church. To whom do you defer? Is it you, a particular church, or another person, or no one?
We are not bystanders on doctrinal issues.The HS is in us as He is in our leaders and teachers and dispute settlers.
This idea has divided Christianity. I agree: We are not bystanders on doctrinal issues. Yes, the HS is in us as He is in our leaders and teachers. However the HS is not guiding all dispute settlers unless the HS is teaching different things to different people.
The HS desires understanding for us all.
Yup. How does the HS accomplish this? It’s not by guiding each and every individual e.g. you, me and my sister, into all truth. If it is then the HS failed.
That some are more mature,even spiritual, even gifted, does not do away with this basic christian makeup.
It has nothing to do with intellect, spiritual maturity etc…🤷 It’s about God guiding Jesus’ church into all truth, beginning with the apostles, who passed on those doctrinal truths to their successors etc. etc…Determining which church that is, is ultimately up to each person. One thing is certain: God is not infallibly guiding every Christian in terms of definitively settling doctrinal differences. Again, if I am wrong and this is God’s approach to preserving doctrinal truth, then God failed. 🤷
 
I agree: “John was writing to the Church, not to a private individual. Even Paul’s letters to Timothy and Titus, etc., do not fall into the same category as the private instruction Jesus gave to the Twelve”.

The apostles were fallible men who wrote infallibly vis-a-vis the word of God, thanks to the guidance of the Holy Spirit - right?
It is my understanding that each of the Twelve Apostles was individually infallible and could not lead the Church astray by false teaching.

This may have extended to Paul, Barnabas and a few others, but the number is small, and the Apostles were soon succeeded by the Bishops who were and are not infallible individually apart from their communion with the Whole Church and the See of Rome.
 
I’m already forgiven by the blood of Christ when he shed it on the Cross. Why would I need to receive forgiveness from a Priest when Jesus is our great high priest?
 
I’m already forgiven by the blood of Christ when he shed it on the Cross. Why would I need to receive forgiveness from a Priest when Jesus is our great high priest?
I think it has to do with John 20:

22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, "Receive the Holy Spirit.

23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld. "
 
It is my understanding that each of the Twelve Apostles was individually infallible and could not lead the Church astray by false teaching.

This may have extended to Paul, Barnabas and a few others, but the number is small, and the Apostles were soon succeeded by the Bishops who were and are not infallible individually apart from their communion with the Whole Church and the See of Rome.
Some might conclude that you believe that these men were infallible even outside the scope of their Christian mission, which is to impart the teachings of Jesus. To me, they were fallible men like every person, who were blessed with a special charism to teach infallibly i.e. they were infallible only as it pertains to the teachings of Jesus’ Catholic Church. 🙂
 
I’m already forgiven by the blood of Christ when he shed it on the Cross. Why would I need to receive forgiveness from a Priest when Jesus is our great high priest?
Again, Jesus does the forgiving; only God can forgive sins; not the minister (who can be called priest due to the fact that he is conformed to Jesus’ One Priesthood). The priest, (as is the case with baptism), is Jesus’ earthly instrument used by Jesus to forgive sins when we fall from grace. If you have never…and will never fall from grace then your sins have been forgiven (since baptism) and you are good to go i.e. no need for further forgiveness since you have never fallen from God’s grace since your baptism. 🤷
 
I think it has to do with John 20:

22 And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, "Receive the Holy Spirit.

23 If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you withhold forgiveness from any, it is withheld. "
Non-Catholics (other than EO Christians) always ignore this obvious passage…🤷
 
I’m already forgiven by the blood of Christ when he shed it on the Cross. Why would I need to receive forgiveness from a Priest when Jesus is our great high priest?
1 John 1:8-9
“If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. 9 ** If **we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

Jon
 
Non-Catholics (other than EO Christians) always ignore this obvious passage…🤷
Hi Joe,
I don’t think it is ignored by non-Catholics but it is interpreted differently.

I’m not saying that the Catholic interpretation is wrong because I really don’t know and I am open to it because it seems readily apparent that it is addressed to the disciples (and assumed to mean those who take over for them when they die). I’m just saying that passage is interpreted differently.

One such interpretation is taken from a protestant apologetics site called *Got Questions *regarding John 20:20-23. It reads as follows:

*Only God can forgive sins, and Christ, being God, has the power to do so as well, but He never communicated any such power to His disciples, nor did they ever assume any such power to themselves. The key to understanding the meaning of John 20:23 lies in the previous two verses: “Again Jesus said, ‘Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.’ And with that he breathed on them and said, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit.’” He sent them, as He is sending us, to bring the good news of the way to salvation and heaven to the whole world. Jesus was leaving the earth physically but promised God would be with them in the person of the Holy Spirit living in them. As they proclaimed the gospel, they could honestly tell people who believed in that message that their sins were forgiven, and they could honestly tell people that did not believe in the message that their sins were not forgiven and that they stand condemned in God’s eyes. Jesus said, “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on him” (John 3:36).

Believers today have the very same mission given to us! We are obligated to share the gospel message, the way to heaven, to others in the world, and we go about that mission with the Holy Spirit living inside us, guiding us as we share His truth. We are obligated to tell people the only way to be forgiven is through faith. Jesus said in John 8:24, “If you do not believe that I am (God), you will indeed die in your sins.” This is the very core of the gospel message and the very heart of what we are to explain to the world. It was Jesus’ last command to His followers before He physically left the earth—carry forward the message of hope and save as many as will believe in Him" *

What would be the Catholic response to that? I assume it would be to take the John 20:20-23 passage at face value, no?
 
Hi Joe,
I don’t think it is ignored by non-Catholics but it is interpreted differently.

I’m not saying that the Catholic interpretation is wrong because I really don’t know and I am open to it because it seems readily apparent that it is addressed to the disciples (and assumed to mean those who take over for them when they die). I’m just saying that passage is interpreted differently.

One such interpretation is kaken from a protestant apologetics site called *Got Questions *regarding John 20:20-23. It reads as follows:

*Only God can forgive sins, and Christ, being God, has the power to do so as well, but He never communicated any such power to His disciples, nor did they ever assume any such power to themselves. The key to understanding the meaning of John 20:23 lies in the previous two verses: “Again Jesus said, ‘Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.’ And with that he breathed on them and said, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit.’” He sent them, as He is sending us, to bring the good news of the way to salvation and heaven to the whole world. Jesus was leaving the earth physically but promised God would be with them in the person of the Holy Spirit living in them. As they proclaimed the gospel, they could honestly tell people who believed in that message that their sins were forgiven, and they could honestly tell people that did not believe in the message that their sins were not forgiven and that they stand condemned in God’s eyes. Jesus said, “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on him” (John 3:36).

Believers today have the very same mission given to us! We are obligated to share the gospel message, the way to heaven, to others in the world, and we go about that mission with the Holy Spirit living inside us, guiding us as we share His truth. We are obligated to tell people the only way to be forgiven is through faith. Jesus said in John 8:24, “If you do not believe that I am (God), you will indeed die in your sins.” This is the very core of the gospel message and the very heart of what we are to explain to the world. It was Jesus’ last command to His followers before He physically left the earth—carry forward the message of hope and save as many as will believe in Him" *

What would be the Catholic response to that? I assume it would be to take the John 20:20-23 passage at face value, no?
I don’t know what the Catholic response is, but the Lutheran one is that, while this line from you quote is true ( “Again Jesus said, ‘Peace be with you! As the Father has sent me, I am sending you.’ And with that he breathed on them and said, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit.’” He sent them, as He is sending us, to bring the good news of the way to salvation and heaven to the whole world.), He also gives them authority to bind and loose sin, in His name.

Jon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top