oh, thanks. I’m actually with him on several of those things.
The interesting observation is that these are not statements of the Church’s teaching on faith. They’re morals – that is, the “rules” of how to live a good and holy life.
Pope Francis made an interesting statement a while back. (I think it was in the context of his exhortation to priests to preach well, IIRC.) He said that it makes no sense to preach morality if people don’t understand the core message of Christ. That makes a lot of sense to me. If I were to try to bring you to a love of baseball, I wouldn’t sit you down in a room with the MLB Official Rulebook and preach rules to you. Instead, I’d take you to a ballgame and explain what was going on. I’d buy you a hot dog and a baseball cap, and I’d share my joy of the game with you.
Only later, once you, too, agreed that baseball was a great game, might I try to explain the intricacies of the infield fly rule or enter into a discussion about designated hitters.
Same thing here. If a person disagrees with the moral teachings of the Church, without having examined its teachings on faith, then I think they’re getting it backward. Moral teachings
always proceed from underpinnings. If one assents to the underpinnings of societal norm and cultural whim, then Christian morals will look silly – evil, even! However, I
do believe that if a person learns and
assents to the teachings of the Church in terms of faith, then these underpinnings will support the moral norms of the Church.
Just sayin’…
