Maybe I just never encountered sincere Catholics in my parish although I am sure there were many my parish was filled with people who couldn’t wait to get out and if the homily was more then 10 minutes they were upset my parents only went to church on Easter so that was my experience. When I went to the Evangelical church people seemed to be there because they wanted to be. There was the ability to discuss the Bible and I encountered so much sincerity. Not they were not without fault but it was a different experience. I never disliked the Catholic Church I just thought I found what I was looking for
Couple quick thoughts.
It’s true that there will be more Catholics at Sunday Mass who don’t seem to ‘want’ to be there on a given day, than evangelicals at church who don’t seem to ‘want’ to be there on a given day… but maybe that’s because the Catholic Church makes it clear that it’s an obligation to attend Mass on Sunday and a mortal sin not to.
Whereas evangelicals (in my understanding) will typically not accuse themselves of mortal sin if they miss a Sunday service. So only the ones who are enthusiastic on that particular day show up.
Human psychology being what it is, I’m not surprised that in a building where the only people who showed up are self-selectively enthusiastic enough to show up for their own reasons… there’s more enthusiasm than in the room where there’s a
very diverse community of people from diverse spiritual life stages (and moods), some of whom would have happily come in anyway that day (often probably the ones you see at daily Mass too) but others of whom are genuinely offering up their Sunday participation as a sacrifice to God. They ain’t feelin’ it today… but they’re
there. And that to me is actually a beautiful thing in its own way. People participating in worshipping God even when they aren’t ‘feeling’ like it. Performing spiritual works even while in a period of spiritual dryness.
I reckon human psychology also enables Protestant ceremonies to perhaps feel emotionally ‘warmer’, because they’re often less structured and the ideas about liturgy are
very different from the Catholic (and, it sounds like from Patty’s words, Jewish) liturgies. I reckon it’s easier to seem warm and sincere when you can ad lib and speak or move ‘off the cuff’, perhaps. Whereas our priests and liturgy are more like… a living Bible, themselves. They don’t get to stop preserving the same words on the page. They don’t get to ad lib new ones. In a global Church spanning basically every country and culture and political regime on earth, any potential innovations (in theory) must be approved from above, lest some rogue priest who thinks he’s the bees knees accidentally lead his congregation into seven different heresies and three symbolically catastrophic pitfalls. The priests at Mass aren’t there to be charismatic, though if their homily is soul-tingling that’s great — they’re there to cooperate with Jesus in offering the sacrifice of the Mass. And that Mass must be substantially one, across the world.
(ctd next comment)