Questions on Ecumenism

  • Thread starter Thread starter paramedicgirl
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think we would agree that God alone will be able to determine what “invincible” means, just as I’m sure we agree that there is, but one true Faith.
Yes, I agree on both things you said.

But this was about the watering down of the faith. Holy Mother the Church is of course not guilty of such a thing, it is impossible for her to be. Would you agree not mentioning such things to heretics and heathens, or anyone for that matter anymore - and the quote from the above member of the hierarchy is not evidence of a certain watering down of the faith?
 
Let me ask a question of those who self-identify as traditionalists: when it comes to ecumenism, what ARE you willing to compromise on, for the salvation of souls? I don’t mean doctrine or dogma, there can obviously be no compromise on that, but what are you willing to compromise on?
I’m willing to say that I am in favour of ecumenism. I believe that every person everywhere should be instructed in and invited to the Catholic faith. 😃

And I am willing to compromise when it comes to those ecumenical prayer services in other churches that we are invited to. Let them be held in the Catholic Church, with Catholic prayers, in front of the Blessed Sacrament. And all should be invited to kneel. 😃
 
Yes, I agree on both things you said.

But this was about the watering down of the faith. Holy Mother the Church is of course not guilty of such a thing, it is impossible for her to be. Would you agree not mentioning such things to heretics and heathens, or anyone for that matter anymore - and the quote from the above member of the hierarchy is not evidence of a certain watering down of the faith?
That is exactly my point, Nick. Thanks! 🙂
 
Protestantism is still around, despite the efforts of the Council Fathers at Trent, who not only invited the Protestants to observe, but also to come and participate by raising topics for discussion and participating in debate.
Well, you didn’t expect Trent to have a 100% success rate, did you? 🙂 Even Christ admitted, “I pray not for the world…”
 
And I am willing to compromise when it comes to those ecumenical prayer services in other churches that we are invited to. Let them be held in the Catholic Church, with Catholic prayers, in front of the Blessed Sacrament. And all should be invited to kneel. 😃
Are you of the mind that we must use “Catholic prayers” that are specifically offensive to protestants i.e. the Rosary? Why do we have to invite them to kneel? We don’t even kneel for all of our “Catholic prayers”. This seems to be more of a “stick it to the protestants” type of mentality. What would be anti-Catholic in inviting protestants to pray the Our Father in a Catholic church while standing to end abortion? I’ve never understood why people are so afraid to come together with protestants on what we have in common. I’m not quite certain how this is a denial of the Faith. I believe, and have seen, it lead to a place where Catholics can teach the protestants about the Faith, Sacraments, etc.
 
Are you of the mind that we must use “Catholic prayers” that are specifically offensive to protestants i.e. the Rosary? Why do we have to invite them to kneel? We don’t even kneel for all of our “Catholic prayers”. This seems to be more of a “stick it to the protestants” type of mentality. What would be anti-Catholic in inviting protestants to pray the Our Father in a Catholic church while standing to end abortion? I’ve never understood why people are so afraid to come together with protestants on what we have in common. I’m not quite certain how this is a denial of the Faith. I believe, and have seen, it lead to a place where Catholics can teach the protestants about the Faith, Sacraments, etc.
You musta missed the smilie. It was said TONGUE IN CHEEK!😉

I never really attend those things, you know.
 
St. Francis de Sales, didn’t go around with the Calvinist Heretics of Geneva praying with them; he, with love and charity corrected their error and heresy and converted many many souls back to the True Faith. Such is what is needed today, that is true ecumenism. Not the false notion that is so entrenched into the mindset of most Catholics and Priests.
 
Yes, I agree on both things you said.

But this was about the watering down of the faith. Holy Mother the Church is of course not guilty of such a thing, it is impossible for her to be. Would you agree not mentioning such things to heretics and heathens, or anyone for that matter anymore - and the quote from the above member of the hierarchy is not evidence of a certain watering down of the faith?
It rather depends on the nature of the meeting, I suppose. And it isn’t simply the hierarchy: it’s every single Catholic (which may well mean that the population of Heaven is even smaller than the most conservative of us thinks!) that fails and, I think, has failed at this. My family’s farm was two miles from the Catholic Church, we lived in what had been called “Irish Ridge,” if that tells you how Catholic it was. Yet never did a Catholic knock on the door, priest or lay, and try to evangelize my folk. Others did, JW’s, other Protestants, our fellow Baptists (just to make sure, I suppose). We went to fish fries and Catholic weddings and funerals, etc., yet never a mention of the necessity of the faith (and this was BEFORE the teachings of VII had been deseminated).

And yes, I think Cardinal Kasper is indeed a mytery to be pondered, traipsing about and saying some of the things he says.
 
Paramedicgirl. You are right on. Ecumenism is modernday sixties trash.
 
I’m willing to say that I am in favour of ecumenism. I believe that every person everywhere should be instructed in and invited to the Catholic faith. 😃

And I am willing to compromise when it comes to those ecumenical prayer services in other churches that we are invited to. Let them be held in the Catholic Church, with Catholic prayers, in front of the Blessed Sacrament. And all should be invited to kneel. 😃
No, no, that’s not quite what I mean.

Let’s take Latin, for example. Would you insist on Latin, even if not using it might mean more souls or even one soul might make their submission to the Church (given the caveat that the first submission makes the ones that follow easier)?
 
No, no, that’s not quite what I mean.

Let’s take Latin, for example. Would you insist on Latin, even if not using it might mean more souls or even one soul might make their submission to the Church (given the caveat that the first submission makes the ones that follow easier)?
In what environment are you referring to?
 
Malcolm, what reference do you have for your above statement, the part I bolded? [Protestant centre collapsed] I find it interesting, and wonder where you got that info.
Rodney Stark and Steve Bruce are probably the two most interesting sociologists of religion writing at the moment. They have opposite views on what is happening, caused partly by the fact that Stark is American whilst Bruce is British. Another good observer, though very British, is Edward Norman, a former Anglican priest now Catholic.

The collapse of the Protestant centre has been observed by quite a few people. If you read the newspapers you will hear of evangelical churches growing, mainstream ones either declining or developing extreme ideas like blessings for homosexual unions.
 
No, my friend. I was totally serious. No smilies if you’ll notice.
Well, I do teach catechism and have for about five years. Last session, I had to tell one of the teachers in our group session that the Mass was a sacrifice, not just a meal. I made sure I addressed the whole group, so as not to single out any adults who might be poorly educated in their faith (and teaching little children).

I have been asked by some adults to teach RCIA, but we don’t have any adult converts in our parish, and haven’t for years.
 
Touching on the first matter of the last paragraph, properly understood, it isn’t a problem (ie, understanding it the way the Church understands it), except for the airy-fairy types who believe absolutely EVERYONE goes to Heaven or that you have to pull a Hitler before you go to Hell (which the Church doesn’t teach) OR that you absolutely have to be a formal card-carrying member of the Church to get into Heaven (also not taught). As for the latter two, yes, those are stumbling blocks for some, BUT I’ve never heard either denied in the interests of ecumenism (though I’ve heared them denied).

Let me ask a question of those who self-identify as traditionalists: when it comes to ecumenism, what ARE you willing to compromise on, for the salvation of souls? I don’t mean doctrine or dogma, there can obviously be no compromise on that, but what are you willing to compromise on?
Hi Kirk. I for one believe that the Catholic Church is the one true church. All other Christian sects, Orthodox, Anglican, Baptist Adventist whatever rejected the true church to form their own adulterated churches. The only truth that they can possibly have in them is what they took from the Catholic Church when they left. That is the reality and the truth of the situation. Of these groups I would consider only the Orthodox and possibly some conservative Anglican groups to have much of a chance at salvation except in some personal situations. As for the Jews and the Muslims, they explicitly and vehemently reject Christ and his role in the salvation of man completely. Since Christ himself said that no man comes to the father except through me, they seem outside the possibility of salvation as well, in the majority of cases…

I see no need to compromise at all with those who adhere to heretical and anti Catholic beliefs. hey left. They should come home where they belong. We should not make Catholicism more comfortable for them or easier for them to adhere to. Catholicism is the true faith and they need to recognize and accept that fact.
 
Hi Kirk. I for one believe that the Catholic Church is the one true church. All other Christian sects, Orthodox, Anglican, Baptist Adventist whatever rejected the true church to form their own adulterated churches. The only truth that they can possibly have in them is what they took from the Catholic Church when they left. That is the reality and the truth of the situation. Of these groups I would consider only the Orthodox and possibly some conservative Anglican groups to have much of a chance at salvation except in some personal situations. As for the Jews and the Muslims, they explicitly and vehemently reject Christ and his role in the salvation of man completely. Since Christ himself said that no man comes to the father except through me, they seem outside the possibility of salvation as well, in the majority of cases…

I see no need to compromise at all with those who adhere to heretical and anti Catholic beliefs. hey left. They should come home where they belong. We should not make Catholicism more comfortable for them or easier for them to adhere to. Catholicism is the true faith and they need to recognize and accept that fact.
Very good post, palmas.
 
That is the reality and the truth of the situation. Of these groups **I would consider **only the Orthodox and possibly some conservative Anglican groups to have **much of a chance **at salvation **except in some **personal situations.
That’s all a bit vague isn’t it?

And you would consider? How does the Church consider it?
As for the Jews and the Muslims, they explicitly and vehemently reject Christ and his role in the salvation of man completely. Since Christ himself said that no man comes to the father except through me,
Again, how does the Church interpret that verse? Be careful of cherry-picking one verse of Scripture to support your argument, what ever it is.
they seem outside the possibility of salvation as well, in the majority of cases…
Oh? They seem? What does the Church say about how the possibility of their salvation seems? Does that line up with your opinion?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top