Quo Primum Tempore, binding on Pope Pius V's successors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic29
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
stmaria said:
So why are they going to change it?
Click to expand...
Actually the only mistake the Vatican made was to entrust a group called the ICEL to set their own agenda. The Vatican has always had “for many” in its promulgated Masses. It’s unfortunate that it allowed the ICEL to create doubts surrounding the validity of its “for all” Consecration. It really wasn’t necessary. The ICEL should have been disbanded a long time ago.

As far as commenting on Quo Primum binding, I wonder what the reaction would have been if today M.P. had tried to abrogate the promulgation of the 1970 Rite.
 
BobP123 said:
As far as commenting on Quo Primum binding, I wonder what the reaction would have been if today M.P. had tried to abrogate the promulgation of the 1970 Rite.
Click to expand...
The Pope would have been well within his authority if he decided to do that.
 
Genesis315 said:
The Pope would have been well within his authority if he decided to do that.
Click to expand...
Not that I don’t agree with you but can you elaborate on that a little? What reasons could he have possibly given for such?
 
Please keep on topic. If you wish to discuss side issues, start new threads in the appropriate fora. Thank you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top