J
Joannm
Guest
I am on our diocesan committee for the catechumenate and we were never notified about such a directive. I don’t think one exists.Please provide a link for this directive - I’ve tried google and came up empty handed.
I am on our diocesan committee for the catechumenate and we were never notified about such a directive. I don’t think one exists.Please provide a link for this directive - I’ve tried google and came up empty handed.
Thank you for the link.Okay, my RCIA coordinator has sent me generally the information on the changes I mentioned, though so far I have been unable to find the initial source of direction for such changes.
My coordinator was required to attend a workshop this summer as part of her committment. That workshop was put on by the North American Forum on the Catechumenate. Their web site is www.naforum.org and you can click newsletters and read a short discussion of what they refer to as the movement from textbook style RCIA to liturgical style RCIA. It begins on page one of the Spring 2008 newsletter.
I will continue to search for more information on the subject.
It’s not Advent yet; you are still in the Period of Inquiry. You’ll start your RCIA Catechism classes after the First Sunday of Advent. There will be a special ceremony for those who haven’t been baptized yet, to enroll them in the Order of Catechumens. After that, you should start seeing them buckle down to a much more academic-style format. Right now, it’s still a casual, welcoming atmosphere for the Period of Inquiry.Also, we haven’t studied out of the Catechism once since I’ve been in RCIA, and this really bothers me.
That’s really great!I’ve been studying the Catholic faith online extensively, because I’ve had a lot of questions.
Before you go accusing your teacher of heresy, make sure you understand the actual teaching of the Church that she was discussing. Look it up in the Catechism, and get together with her privately to get clarification.I really don’t believe that our RCIA coordinator is properly representing the Church.
This was a question of a matter of opinion; she certainly was not denying that Jesus is God - only that He didn’t become God at the Incarnation - He always was God, even before He became Jesus, and could certainly have inspired the Old Testament even without ever becoming Incarnate.Here’s what happened in RCIA the other day. The RCIA coordinator gave us a handout with a bunch of questions. She told us that there was no right or wrong answer to the questions. One of the questions was about whether I thought that the Hebrew Scriptures would have meant anything without Jesus. I answered the question with an absolute no, and I explained that the reason I said no was because Jesus is God, and without him, there would not have been any Hebrew Scriptures to write. The RCIA coordinator then said that she didn’t agree with me. This shocked me, because in not agreeing with me, wouldn’t she have denied that Jesus is God, part of the Trinity? I haven’t played back the recording yet, but there may even be more to it than that.
Did they actually say “not true” or did they say that the bit with the snake, etc. is most likely allegorical?Also, during our lesson about sacred Scriptures, the speaker said that the Church didn’t believe that the story of Adam and Eve was true, but I’ve found several Church documents that prove otherwise.
Certainly, I respect your right to be skeptical, but I am likewise skeptical of the article you linked. The site says that part of their mission is commentary. I am not familiar with Stephanie Block, so I have no idea what her background is, but I do see that the part you bolded is likely her opinion. I can find nothing to show that the NA Forum encourages political or social opinions to be passed from RCIA “teachers” to catechumens/candidates.Thank you for the link.
I am a bit skeptical of this North American Forum, this article from Catholic Culture quotes the founder (bold added):
catholicculture.org/news/features/index.cfm?recnum=31280
Father Lee told conference participants that his agenda for ecclesial change is closely tied to the process of catechesis. To explain, he quoted the late Father James Dunning, founder of the North American Forum on the Catechumenate. (That organization, created to promote the RCIA, pioneered an “initiation” process that avoids a dogmatic approach to the faith while emphasizing the affective aspects of religion. The program also gives itself a great deal of room in which teachers can interject political or social messages, as many bewildered converts—and would-have-been converts—have discovered.) Father Dunning was not known for his orthodoxy. Reportedly, he once told participants at a seminar in Michigan, “For heaven’s sake, the Eucharist is not literally the body and blood of Jesus… Jesus does not exist in a crumb!” But here Lee recalled Dunning’s remarks at the 1994 conference of the North American Forum for Small Christian Communities: “I see little long-term hope for the catechumenate unless there’s a connection between SCCs before, during, and after initiation.” SCCs, Lee explained, “give a cohesiveness, a sense of who we are, a Catholic identity at a level that, if it takes hold there, will catch on at the parish level and the whole Church.”
I agree. According to the catechism- 129: As an old saying goes, the New Testament lies hidden in the Old and the Old Testament is unveiled in the New. I think this was the point your teacher might have been trying to make. Perhaps she just isn’t a ‘born teacher’ and has difficulty in conveying the message.Perhaps what she meant was that the Hebrew Scriptures were important and meaningful to people long before they ever knew of Jesus. God had a Covenant with the people and the Scriptures told of the various aspects of their relationship. Your answer isn’t wrong – the whole Trinity is eternal – but hers isn’t wrong either since before the Incarnation the people didn’t know of Jesus but still lived according to the Scriptures.
Perhaps her answer wasn’t as clear as it could have been, but I think that describing it as an abuse and heresy (as you did in your first post) is going a bit far.
I agree again lol. It sounds like you are doing well by reading the Catechism and asking questions. If you are not happy with RCIA class, just be content with knowing that you have the Catechism to consult. As long as they are not teaching outright heresy and blasphemy, just suffer through it, and use the knowledge you gain to help others. You can teach others exactly what you were not taught!Yes, join them. After you are confirmed and become a full member of the Church, join the RCIA program. Nothing better than listening to a convert talk about Catholicism.
I am a new RCIA coordinator and was expecting similar attitudes in our program. I went into the classes with the gloves on, (so to speak), ready for a fight. I figure, if you don’t like what I’m saying, fire me. Much to my surprise, it wasn’t like that at all. The rest of the team seemed orthodox. In fact, because of this forum and Catholic Answers in general, the head coordinator, an IHM sister, was racking her brains with some of the stuff I was bringing up. I made her go back to her formal educational days. (This is largely due to what I’ve learned from Catholic Answers)
I think the only way to change situations is to join them and shape them from inside. Be strong. We aren’t called to be victorious, just faithful.
The person responsible for RCIA programs is the bishop.Is there anything that can be done about RCIA as a whole, to make it better? Why are most RCIA groups so out of line with what the Church teaches?
.
Good question.Originally Posted by TBolt1000T
Is there anything that can be done about RCIA as a whole, to make it better? Why are most RCIA groups so out of line with what the Church teaches?
The bishop is the teacher of the faith in every diocese. Part of the ministry of the bishop is to teach, to exercise the teaching authority of the Church in his church. The RCIA programs are his responsiblity and under his control. He is accountable to God for the souls in his care. He oversees the programs and approves or disapproves what is taught.Good question.
Reply:I really don’t know which forum to post this in, but I’m noticing some serious problems in my RCIA classes, which may possibly be abuses. Some of the teachers there have a very liberal way of looking at theology, and I see some of the things that have been tought as heretical. I’m hoping that I don’t have to switch perishes again, because that caused me much trouble last time. I really want to be confirmed this Spring, but if I switch perishes, it may hinder my journey. What should I do about this? Help!
This is simply not true. The Church has no restriction that prohibits any Catholic from attending or being affiliated with any parish he or she chooses.A Catholic shopping around for a Parish is like a Protestant shopping around for a denomination: very American and very unCatholic. You belong to the Parish that corresponds to your home address. If you don’t like some people in your Parish, the Priest included, learn to love them. If their teachings aren’t true, help them realize it instead of running away.
Ah, but Snowy, don’t you see, that’s the lot that we have fallen into in this day and age. Sometimes you can talk until you are blue in the face. As dioceses become larger and priests are spread thin and across parishes, things become lax and the Bishop is far too busy to know what happens in each parish and the priest is so busy in multiple parishes that they are not aware of the state of their flock. Then if a priest should be removed from a parish, their may not be a priest to replace him and so he remains. Turning a blind eye is definitely not the answer and waiting for it to get better, does not change things.If everybody followed your advice, Grandfather, our Church would effectively split in two; not along the lines of holy vs. unholy as you think, but liberal vs. conservative. The only holiness that children need is their parents’, not their priest’s. If I believe that my priest lacks holiness, my Christian duty is to help him, not to abandon him.