Considering that sexual abuse cases are still in the news, I have been re-reading Dorothy Rabinowitz’ book “No Crueler Tyrannies.” She recounts numerous cases of alleged child sex abuse at daycare centers during the 1980’s. But the most outrageous aspect of these cases is that scores of innocent people were arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and sent to prison for crimes which simply did not happen.
Evidence was fabricated, “expert” witnesses simply made up evidence, children who repeatedly told prosecutors that nothing bad happened to them were badgered repeatedly until they finally came up with fantastical and impossible stories which they thought were expected of them. Judges allowed prosecutors to disregard rules of evidence and allowed things to be brought up which were neither alleged nor in evidence nor true of the defendants but simply meant to influence a jury. Self proclaimed experts in child abuse explained that if a child said he or she was abused, the claim was clearly true, and if he or she claimed that nothing happened, he was simply in denial. If a defendant vigorously proclaimed his innocence, that was evidence of his guilt. There were numerous travesties of justice.
Yes, children were abused, but not by the defendants. They were abused by prosecutors, self proclaimed experts, and others who led them to believe in crimes which never occurred.
I had thought that this sort of prosecutorial zeal and misguided hysteria was unique to this instance until I read of other such cases having nothing to do with child abuse. For example, in the case of the “Norfolk Four,” wherein four innocent men were convicted of rape and murder, even though, during the course of the case, another man already in prison admitted to the crimes.