Re: What book are you reading? #4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Potter
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Faith and Treason: the Gunpowder Plot, Antonia Fraser

I was very impressed by her compassionate treatment of the conspirators. Definitely unexpected given that they intended the young child-prince to be among their exploded victims.
 
The Evidential Power of Beauty by Thomas Dubay. A truly remarkable book. Every time I pick it up, I feel like singing,
 
Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume
Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant
 
I just finished a history of the Klan (The Fiery Cross), which was utterly depressing. Good thing I have PG Wodehouse to drive the gloom away.
 
I finished reading “Not God’s Type,” by Holly Ordway. A conversion story, but a rather unique one. I’ve read others, and also seen interviews with some on “The Journey Home” program. Ms. Ordway started from a position of not just atheism, but almost militant atheism, viewing theism not as simply wrong but superstitious and unreasonable, akin to the stories of Greek or Roman or Norse gods. Not even worth the time to investigate seriously.

That was a little unusual because she was a professor of English literature, much of which has its underlying inspiration in Catholic theology and scripture. Catholic poems especially influenced her, though not as a reason to investigate the Faith.

She got started in theistic investigation because she got interested in fencing as a sport. She put a great deal of study just into studying whether there was a rational basis for accepting God’s existence, (just as she was putting a lot of effort in the study of fencing.) Then she had to decide whether God was merely an uncaused cause, or a Person. It was a difficult journey, and when she finally decided to become a Christian, she entered into an Evangelical congregation.

But she was drawn to a more liturgical style of worship, and to prayer based on liturgy, so she eventually ended up Anglican and then Catholic, necessitating a new struggle with what she perceived originally as difficulties with Catholic doctrine. But that struggle was easier.

An interesting read, in any case.
 
Well I just finished a few H.G. Wells books - The Island of Dr. Moreau and The Time Machine - both pretty cool.

Now I’m re-reading Islands in the Stream - I love Hemingway and this is my fav. by him
I’m also just starting the Picture of Dorian Gray
 
Edith Stein and Companions: On the Way To Auschwitz by Fr. Paul Hamans
 
I just finished American Colonies by Alan Taylor, a sweeping history of European colonization of Northern America. It’s comprehensive, but definitely biased toward a materialistic worldview in which everything hinges on economic exploitation. Taylor is also hostile about his European subjects, especially the English, which is justified to some degree but not attractive.

Before that I read a biography of John Dickinson, and am about to start one of Charles Carroll, a Catholic founding father. That will kick off my American Revolution series.
 
Just finished The Fifth Gospel, by Ian Caldwell.

I feel kind of bad that I didn’t like this book better. When Raymond Arroyo interviewed the author on “The World Over,” it sounded interesting. The Shroud of Turin, a mysterious killing, an Eastern Catholic priest abandoned by his wife and left to raise his young son alone while working at the Vatican as a scripture professor, all figure into the plot, as does his brother who is a Roman Catholic priest working at the Vatican Secretariat of State, and who ends up being accused of murder, and tried in, of all places, a canon law court. The history of the Shroud figures in, as do differences between the gospels, and questions of the historicity of the Gospel of John.

Maybe it’s just that I don’t care that much for murder mysteries with the various plot twists involved. And I can’t get excited about the discussions of gospel differences and historicity since I often don’t agree with their conclusions. And for me at least, the characters were hard to empathize with. After all, how many people spend their lives at the Vatican either as a married priest or in the diplomatic corps? I found myself getting exasperated with the theological and plot twists and just wishing it was shorter. But, it did get good reviews, so don’t take my tepid one as a reason to not read it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top