B
brotherhrolf
Guest
Indeed. Veritas! The more of us who post what we know to be truth, the better.Welcome to the firums and the good fight. Glad to have you:thumbsup:![]()
Indeed. Veritas! The more of us who post what we know to be truth, the better.Welcome to the firums and the good fight. Glad to have you:thumbsup:![]()
Sense of Serious Business Occuring;
Personalities of those involved neutralised;
Excellent!! I add two more reasons. The EF envelopes us in the mysteries of our Faith and there is no room for the celebrant as celebrity. The focus is God in Father, Son and Holy Spirit.Ad Orientem - This reminds me that we are worshipping God and that the Priest at the Altar, acting in the person of Christ, is praying for us. The Priest facing the Tabernacle reminds me that the Priest is conversing with God. This position reminds us that the Mass is not a community meal but a Sacrifice.
Prayers At the Foot of The Altar - These prayers help us to prepare ourselves to meet the Most Holy Trinity. They help me to remember that I am a miserable sinner in need of Divine Mercy. These prayers help us all to humble ourselves before the Lord. The prayers at the Foot of the Altar also remind us that the Sanctuary is a sacred space that is comparable to the Holy of Holies in the Temple of Jerusalem. This is the place where the Lord dwells. When we realise this, we become more aware of our sins and our need for mercy.
The Confiteor - The traditional Confiteor is longer and is said twice, once by the priest and once by the server. The traditional version of this prayer more clearly expresses our sinfulness, our need for mercy, and the community of saints; in the traditional confiteor, the intercession of the saints is more frequently sought. It is also a humbling experience to pray the confiteor while kneeling. I can never understand why the confiteor is said while standing in the OF.
The Credo - I like the fact that the faithful kneel at the words “Et incarnatus est de Spíritu Sancto ex María Vírgine et HOMO FACTUS EST…” This is an act of worship reminding us that the Second Person of the Most Holy Trinity became man to save us from our sins. It is very reverent. The faithful are supposed to bow at this point in the OF but this is rarely done.
The Offertory Prayers - The older offertory prayers express Catholic doctrine beautifully. The sacrificial nature of the Mass is clearly stated. The prayers of the EF are beautifully ancient and express Catholic doctrine brilliantly.
Kneeling at the Agnus Dei - I think the posture of kneeling is more reverent and is more appropriate; we are kneeling before the Most Holy Eucharist while humbly seeking mercy and forgiveness. We know we are sinners and we know that we are not worthy to receive the Eucharist. However, we are confident in the mercy of God.
The recital of “Domine Non Sum Dignus” three times - This is one of the best parts of the EF. By praying this prayer three times, we can really meditate on the fact that we are not worthy to receive the Lord. We can humble ourselves before His Divine Majesty on the Altar. Also, we can say this prayer to each of the Three Persons of the Most Holy Trinity.
I could write far more but I think I would end up going through the whole Ordinary part by part. I love the EF Mass and I think it is truly beautiful. I also love the OF Mass but I think the EF Mass offers far more reverent worship. It is just my opinion, but I think the EF Mass is superior in terms of spirituality, prayers, and in expressing Catholic doctrine.
Certainly. Let’s see. There are private devotions such as being invested as a member of the Confraternity of the Sacred Heart since 1964 and attending to the promises Our Lord made to St. Margret Mary Alaquoque as well as the monthly prayer intentions of the Confraternity.I have said on this thread, and elsewhere, too, that there is more to traditional Catholicism than a preference for the Extraordinary Form.
In fairness to others, allow me to clarify.
As I heard one traditionalist priest point out at a sermon delivered at an EF mass, patience, forbearance, charity, and especially assuming the best of those who disagree with you are traditional Catholicism, as well.
Surely this is something with which we can all agree, regardless of which rite of the Eucharistic Sacrifice we prefer.
Excellent, both of you!! Hopefully, I can add a couple of thingsExcellent!! I add two more reasons. The EF envelopes us in the mysteries of our Faith and there is no room for the celebrant as celebrity. The focus is God in Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
You mentioned “private devotions”, Brothefhrolf & it reminded my of a public devotions that I truly miss. Twice a year my pre-Vatican II parish offered a Novena to the Holy Spirit each evening for 9 days.Certainly. Let’s see. There are private devotions such as being invested as a member of the Confraternity of the Sacred Heart since 1964 and attending to the promises Our Lord made to St. Margret Mary Alaquoque as well as the monthly prayer intentions of the Confraternity.
There is having an awareness that one’s direct ancestor knew and helped a saintly priest in her parish in a yellow fever epidemic close to 150 years ago and having one’s family pray for his beatification and seeing it come to fruition in my generation - Blessed Father Francis X. Seelos, a Redemptorist priest.
There is the profound sense that when one enters into the presence of Our Lord that one, indeed, is in His presence and one tries to act accordingly and not ignore His presence as a pretext for “community”.
There is having one’s conscience formed in the past and striving to attain to the demands of that conscience (and all that that entails) for one’s entire lifetime all the while knowing that one consistently falls short of the mark.
There is the sense of respect for the traditions (small “t”) of the Latin Rite Catholic church and a respect for those traditions of Eastern Catholic churches and those of our separated brethren instead of just “blowing them off” as ancient history…
For some of us, it means having remained faithful to HMC and never having stopped praying that we would one day recognize all that we have lost.
I am happy to say, Bishop,** that there are several of us on this forum **who are more than aware of what it means to be traditional Catholics.
Exactly right. After they caught up to him, Bugnini was shipped out – as ambassador to Iraq. In Vatican terms, exile, but it was too late.My reason for loving the traditional Mass (“Extraordinary Form”) is pretty simple–because its CATHOLIC! I don’t consider the Novus Ordo rite to be truly Catholic since it was created by a committee and designed to be closer to the Protestant liturgies in the name of false ecumenism. Its main architect, Bugnini, was a Freemason and the committee that created it included nine Protestant ministers, and it shows.
How is the OF, when the black is said and the red is done, anything like a Protestant liturgy. There was venacular before Vat II and if they weren’t delayed, Protestants would have been at Trent (not to observe like Vat II) but to actually comment.My reason for loving the traditional Mass (“Extraordinary Form”) is pretty simple–because its CATHOLIC! I don’t consider the Novus Ordo rite to be truly Catholic since it was created by a committee and designed to be closer to the Protestant liturgies in the name of false ecumenism. Its main architect, Bugnini, was a Freemason and the committee that created it included nine Protestant ministers, and it shows.
Actually, even worse than Iraq at the time, Iran.Exactly right. After they caught up to him, Bugnini was shipped out – as ambassador to Iraq. In Vatican terms, exile, but it was too late.
**Except for the last, all of these are possible with the Ordinary Form.Quiet reverence;
Beautiful prayers;
All facing the Sacred Matter, the Crucifx and the Orient;
Beautiful hymns which lift up hearts;
Sense of Serious Business Occuring;
Personalities of those involved neutralised;
Possibility of personal reverie and prayers, uninterrupted.
Sure, they’re possible. They just don’t occur. You can argue, at a stretch, for this or that change to the Latin Rite as having a precedent or being tolerable, of itself.**Except for the last, all of these are possible with the Ordinary Form.
This last, however, is spiritually dangerous. It goes against the spirit of the Liturgy and mind of the Church and teaching of various popes (Pius X comes immediately to mind) against using a mass as a pretty background for one’s own personal prayers. In fact, to indulge in them during the liturgical services is, in effect, an act of schism.
Moreover, the holy fathers warn us against confusing reverie and daydreaming for prayer. This is a fast road to spiritual delusion (prelest** or plani).
Well, interestingly, the Pope considers that while it was an abrupt change rather than an organic one, that the Mass is truly Catholic; I know of no Protestant liturgies that existed before the OF was promulgated that looked anything like the OF P(perhaps you can enlighten us); the OF is the Mass the Pope says, as well as the vast majority of Cardinals, bishops, and priests of the Roman rite; there has never been any proof offered which I can find that shows that Bugnini was a Freemason (never mind the issues of libel and slander, both of which, if I recall, can amount to a mortal sin) and so perhaps you can enlighten us with evidence - something other than “so and so said it” which is called hearsay.My reason for loving the traditional Mass (“Extraordinary Form”) is pretty simple–because its CATHOLIC! I don’t consider the Novus Ordo rite to be truly Catholic since it was created by a committee and designed to be closer to the Protestant liturgies in the name of false ecumenism. Its main architect, Bugnini, was a Freemason and the committee that created it included nine Protestant ministers, and it shows.
Toward that end, my saintly pastor will celebrate TLM for the first time this evening at 7, and every Thursday during Lent. By Easter he’ll be so used to it he’ll make it a weekly Mass.I vote this era be called the Minor Attrition of the Roman Catholic Church. The boil of modernism bulging up, to be lanced by time, indifference, mortality and the efforts of scattered traditionalists keeping the patient on life-support until the wound is healed
OTJM, there are many documented instances in which it is apparent that the Novus Ordo was made to resemble Protestant liturgies–especially the Lutheran service. There are statements from pariahs of Vatican II from the period which corroborate this. The introduction of additional Eucharistic prayers to choose from (two of which do not even mention sacrifice), omission of prayers referencing the Blessed Virgin Mary and saints; discouragement of private Masses; encouragement of creativity and countless “options” in which parts of the Mass can be omitted or committed at the whim of the priest (if the priest even has a role, typically in the Novus Ordo such matters are predetermined by a lay-run “liturgy committee”); Mass facing the people, on a table rather than a consecrated altar, lay people distributing communion, handling the sacred vessels, blurring of distinction between priest and laity, vernacular, etc. are all innovations introduced and encouraged by Martin Luther and other “reformers” like Cranmer. Sure, the Novus Ordo CAN be celebrated to “look” like a traditional Mass, in Latin even…all of these are superficial changes. The prayers and nature of the New Rite still remains banal and Protestant as ever. (The Anglican and Lutheran services can also be celebrated to look like Catholic Mass, but they are still essentially Protestant). Having the Novus Ordo in Latin, ad orientem, sort of defeats its purpose anyway.Well, interestingly, the Pope considers that while it was an abrupt change rather than an organic one, that the Mass is truly Catholic; I know of no Protestant liturgies that existed before the OF was promulgated that looked anything like the OF P(perhaps you can enlighten us); the OF is the Mass the Pope says, as well as the vast majority of Cardinals, bishops, and priests of the Roman rite; there has never been any proof offered which I can find that shows that Bugnini was a Freemason (never mind the issues of libel and slander, both of which, if I recall, can amount to a mortal sin) and so perhaps you can enlighten us with evidence - something other than “so and so said it” which is called hearsay.
So what if all of these are “possible”?? All of these are “possible” in a Protestant service, too! The smells-and-bells alone do not make a rite truly Catholic. You know what else is possible (more likely PROBABLE) in the OF??–communion in the hand, guitar/folk/rock music, hand-holding, lay “ministers” of communion, Mass on a table (NO does not require an altar much less one with relics), communion in the hand, etc. are possible in the OF too and, in fact, are the NORM. The nature of the traditional Mass (“EF”) does not allow for any of these travesties.**Except for the last, all of these are possible with the Ordinary Form.
This last, however, is spiritually dangerous. It goes against the spirit of the Liturgy and mind of the Church and teaching of various popes (Pius X comes immediately to mind) against using a mass as a pretty background for one’s own personal prayers. In fact, to indulge in them during the liturgical services is, in effect, an act of schism.
Moreover, the holy fathers warn us against confusing reverie and daydreaming for prayer. This is a fast road to spiritual delusion (prelest** or plani).
Respectfully, can you provide any specific evidence?OTJM, there are many documented instances in which it is apparent that the Novus Ordo was made to resemble Protestant liturgies–especially the Lutheran service. There are statements from pariahs of Vatican II from the period which corroborate this. The introduction of additional Eucharistic prayers to choose from (two of which do not even mention sacrifice), omission of prayers referencing the Blessed Virgin Mary and saints; discouragement of private Masses; encouragement of creativity and countless “options” in which parts of the Mass can be omitted or committed at the whim of the priest (if the priest even has a role, typically in the Novus Ordo such matters are predetermined by a lay-run “liturgy committee”); Mass facing the people, on a table rather than a consecrated altar, lay people distributing communion, handling the sacred vessels, blurring of distinction between priest and laity, vernacular, etc. are all innovations introduced and encouraged by Martin Luther and other “reformers” like Cranmer. Sure, the Novus Ordo CAN be celebrated to “look” like a traditional Mass, in Latin even…all of these are superficial changes. The prayers and nature of the New Rite still remains banal and Protestant as ever. (The Anglican and Lutheran services can also be celebrated to look like Catholic Mass, but they are still essentially Protestant). Having the Novus Ordo in Latin, ad orientem, sort of defeats its purpose anyway.