Received anointing at healing Mass - wrong?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sugarmouse
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
S

sugarmouse

Guest
I recently joined my parish choir. Last week there was a “healing Mass” for the sick, which the choir attended to sing at. I’d never been to a healing Mass before, so was a bit unsure what was going on.

When it came time for the anointing, the priest began with those who were “obviously” sick (in wheelchairs, very elderly etc.) in the front pews. He then stood at the front of the church, and the congregation formed a queue to go up and receive. I’m not exaggerating to say that everyone in the pews was joining the line.

Meanwhile, I was sitting at the end of the row in the choir stands. The other choir members (who are mostly elderly, I am the youngest member and in my 20s) ushered for me to get up and join the line. I tried to get out and let them pass by, but they continued to whisper, “on you go,” etc.

Eventually I joined the line and received the anointing on my forehead and hands. Partly it was because I felt uncomfortable in turning back, partly because I was encouraged by the choir members (who have been to healing masses before and have more experience) that it was okay to go up (likewise the priest, who knows me pretty well, didn’t give any indication that there was a problem). I also DO have issues with anxiety/depression, although they’re not as serious as they once were and I no longer need medication for them, so I knew I did have something to be “healed” from.

When I took my seat again, I suddenly became worried that I’d done something wrong. I started thinking, “wait, that was THE anointing of the sick, that’s a whole other sacrament I’ve never received before”. When I got home and checked the catechism, etc. it said that it’s supposed to be for those in danger of death or with very serious conditions (although it looks like all the people who were just elderly shouldn’t have been receiving it either? unless they were ill with something else as well).

So now I’m a bit worried that I’ve done something wrong. Like I said, I DID hesitate before receiving, and I’m not sure how much of it was due to pressure and how much because I genuinely thought it was okay (I think I thought something like, “Well, I wasn’t going to receive, I don’t think I’m really sick enough, but everyone else seems to be fine with it, and depression is a disease - oh, Father isn’t questioning it, I guess it’s fine” - and was validated by one other member of the choir in his 20s likewise receiving)

If this has to be confessed (although I guess it wouldn’t have to be, since it can’t be a mortal sin only venial), that would be awkward - my only regular opportunity for confession is with that same priest who okayed the anointing!

(posted this in AAA a few days ago, I know they can’t reply to every question)
 
Each and every mass that we ever attend is a healing mass - healing cannot be separated from the sacrifice of the mass - “But only say the word and my soul shall be healed.” According to James 5:16, those who are obviously sick are the intended recipients of the Sacrament. A creeping universalism seems to have entered in. Our Lord said that those who are sick need the physician, not those who are well. We do not want the Anointing, or any other aspect of Church practice, to assume anything resembling a superstitious practice. I am not saying that was involved, but the potential is there.
 
I think you could ask him.

We have them and while I’ve never been, I’m guessing most people who go do get anointed. The bulletin, when advertising it, mentions that everyone over a certain age or dealing with a list of issues can/should attend, including mental health.

I would just ask him, and maybe explain that you felt pressured to go by the rest of the choir. (At the same time, though, you ARE allowed to say no regardless of how well meant someone’s intentions are.)
 
Based on what you say, you should not have been anointed if you are perfectly healthy at your age (and no, not everyone should be going up to get anointed either, only those who meet the requirements should receive the sacrament). But I do not think you necessarily did anything wrong as you did not know this at the time from the sound of it. So I would not be troubled by what you did this time. If anyone was in the wrong here it might have been the priest for not being more explicit on who should receive the anointing. There have been numerous threads on this topic before; it seems that this sacrament is probably prone to abuse in many cases. It is understandable when there is a borderline case or some doubt as to someone’s condition, in which case it would be up to the discretion of the priest but these situations where the entire congregation goes up to get anointed is not how it’s intended to be done.

EDIT: I also have anxiety and I do take medication for it, but I would not consider myself to be “in danger” and wouldn’t present myself for the sacrament. Maybe some priests out there would anoint for this but I’m guessing many wouldn’t as well. While it’s not a fun condition it’s perfectly manageable (at least for me) and not life threatening (again, at least it isn’t in my case).
 
Anointing of the the Sick - is not to be given to just anyone in any condition.

So it sounds like no you ought not to have.

Now did you honestly judge that you could do what they were doing there and then – and *later * suddenly realize - hey that was the anointing of the sick? No need to say here but a question to ask oneself.

Remember to commit a mortal sin (and thus need to confess) one needs grave matter, full knowledge and deliberate consent.

Lets say Mike was invited to go up for prayer etc thinking he was not sure if he wanted to -but went anyhow - all along believe it was fine to do but just something he was not necessarily wanting to go for…then later he realizes - hey he administered the Sacrament of the Sick to me!

He would seem to have gone in good conscience and thus* not* have something to confess…
 
I can almost hear the Lord laughing at this! Of course it was okay. God loves you and wants you to receive all the good things he has for you. It was likely the Holy Spirit prompting you to get in line and now Satan is trying to steal the joy of that blessing from you by making you feel guilty about it. Just thank God for his mercy and love.
 
Our Archdiocese has them frequently and no, people do not have to have a terminal illness to be healed.
You are fine.
 
I can almost hear the Lord laughing at this! Of course it was okay. God loves you and wants you to receive all the good things he has for you. It was likely the Holy Spirit prompting you to get in line and now Satan is trying to steal the joy of that blessing from you by making you feel guilty about it. Just thank God for his mercy and love.
I would not put it quite that way. Yes of course God loves him. But if he was not to receive the Sacrament then he was not prompting him to get into line.
 
Catechism

1514 The Anointing of the Sick “is not a sacrament for those only who are at the point of death. Hence, as soon as anyone of the faithful begins to be in danger of death from sickness or old age, the fitting time for him to receive this sacrament has certainly already arrived.”

scborromeo.org/ccc/p2s2c2a5.htm#1514
 
Priests at my Diocese invite anyone seeking healing for physical, emotional, spiritual , mental issues to experience Laying on of the Hands and Anointing.

You are good to go as they say. 😇
 
(posted this in AAA a few days ago, I know they can’t reply to every question)
Here is an older answer from them there:
Catholic Answers Apologist:

Anointing of the sick is only for those who are in some danger of death due to illness, old age, or undergoing surgery. Simply being a bit “under the weather” is not enough.

Catechism of the Catholic Church:
Quote:
1514 The Anointing of the Sick “is not a sacrament for those only who are at the point of death. Hence, as soon as anyone of the faithful begins to be in danger of death from sickness or old age, the fitting time for him to receive this sacrament has certainly already arrived.”

1515 If a sick person who received this anointing recovers his health, he can in the case of another grave illness receive this sacrament again. If during the same illness the person’s condition becomes more serious, the sacrament may be repeated. It is fitting to receive the Anointing of the Sick just prior to a serious operation. the same holds for the elderly whose frailty becomes more pronounced.

Fr. Charles Grondin
Catholic Answers Staff Apologist

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=13799322&highlight=anointing+of+the+sick#post13799322
 
(posted this in AAA a few days ago, I know they can’t reply to every question)
Here is an older answer from them there:

Catholic Answers Apologist:

"Anointing of the sick is only for those who are in some danger of death due to illness, old age, or undergoing surgery. Simply being a bit “under the weather” is not enough.

Catechism of the Catholic Church:
Quote:
1514 The Anointing of the Sick “is not a sacrament for those only who are at the point of death. Hence, as soon as anyone of the faithful begins to be in danger of death from sickness or old age, the fitting time for him to receive this sacrament has certainly already arrived.”

1515 If a sick person who received this anointing recovers his health, he can in the case of another grave illness receive this sacrament again. If during the same illness the person’s condition becomes more serious, the sacrament may be repeated. It is fitting to receive the Anointing of the Sick just prior to a serious operation. the same holds for the elderly whose frailty becomes more pronounced."

Fr. Charles Grondin
Catholic Answers Staff Apologist.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?p=13799322&highlight=anointing+of+the+sick#post13799322
 
Well, I know you know the rules backwards and frontwards…but this is not what we encounter in the parishes. Many pastors are regularly having healing Masses, and anointing dozens upon dozens of people. All with the expressed permission and encouragement of the Archbishop.
If an AB says it’s fine, I’m not going to tell her she did something wrong. 🤷
But I do understand your comment is coming from an informed place. :tiphat:
I myself have a severe flu and last year had pneumonia. I am in sore need of anointing. 😦
 
The thing is

an addiction to cigarette smoking , physical and emotional, puts a person in danger of death. A mental illness, as defined by the medical profession , can put a person in danger of death, esp from self harm, or harming others and the kick back consequences.
To be battling spiritual issues can put a person in danger of being separated from God - the worst death in my book!

In words of those much more knowledgable then mine, ’ you just can’t know by looking at a person, what is going on. That person may not even know to a recogniseable degree, at the time.

God bless, and keep us, us on our journey home.
 
The thing is

an addiction to cigarette smoking , physical and emotional, puts a person in danger of death. A mental illness, as defined by the medical profession , can put a person in danger of death, esp from self harm, or harming others and the kick back consequences.
To be battling spiritual issues can put a person in danger of being separated from God - the worst death in my book!

In words of those much more knowledgable then mine, ’ you just can’t know by looking at a person, what is going on. That person may not even know to a recogniseable degree, at the time.

God bless, and keep us, us on our journey home.
Good points.
 
Can. 1004 §1. The anointing of the sick can be administered to a member of the faithful who, having reached the use of reason, begins to be in danger due to sickness or old age.
I’d like to say that I do believe that it is the canon law that regulates the sacrament of the anointing of the sick as opposed to other writings such as the catechism. What I learned in my recent canon law class is that even writings about canon law are not binding unless they are offered by the Holy See and have the authority to supersede canon law.

Unlike many other places in the canon law text, the words “of death” are missing from this particular canon. I haven’t counted specifically, but I think that “of death” more commonly follows “in danger” than otherwise. That is my perception, anyway.

The text of this canon law does not specify the type of sickness (physical or mental).

Also, as I understand it, another aspect to canon law is freedom. It is assumed that we have freedom where there is uncertainty.

It is pretty clear that the intention of this writing of the canon law post Vatican II was to open up the sacrament of the anointing of the sick as compared to its use in the 1970s and earlier. It could be that the Church will want to close it up some from the way it is utilized today - but that has not happened yet.

If there is a sickness of some sort, I would make use of the sacrament assuming that the priest is willing. I’m not sure it makes sense to worry about it beyond that.
 
We too had this anointing at mass recently. Our pastor encouraged people to come up. He did not say anything to the effect that it was for people that are old, or terminally ill, etc. Who are we to go against what **our pastor ** tells us to do?

Everyone that felt the need to participate did so. Who are we to judge who **really **needs to be anointed or not?
 
Well, I know you know the rules backwards and frontwards…but this is not what we encounter in the parishes. Many pastors are regularly having healing Masses, and anointing dozens upon dozens of people. All with the expressed permission and encouragement of the Archbishop.
If an AB says it’s fine, I’m not going to tell her she did something wrong. 🤷
But I do understand your comment is coming from an informed place. :tiphat:
I myself have a severe flu and last year had pneumonia. I am in sore need of anointing. 😦
Unfortunately we live in an antinomian age in the Church. There are all kinds of strange things (even “wrong things”) being pushed for by bishops. Take a glance at the Canadians sacramentalizing suicide… deals with this sacrament as well, oddly enough.

Yes, “the parish” can be messy. But we should try to keep ourselves clean and others too as far as possible (without causing more harm than we might be preventing).
The thing is

an addiction to cigarette smoking , physical and emotional, puts a person in danger of death. A mental illness, as defined by the medical profession , can put a person in danger of death, esp from self harm, or harming others and the kick back consequences.
To be battling spiritual issues can put a person in danger of being separated from God - the worst death in my book!

In words of those much more knowledgable then mine, ’ you just can’t know by looking at a person, what is going on. That person may not even know to a recogniseable degree, at the time.

God bless, and keep us, us on our journey home.
The right person to see about those things are: a general practitioner, a psychologist, and finally a priest (but not to be anointed). This sacrament is meant to prepare a person SPIRITUALLY for imminent death which is already being caused by something occurring in that person’s body (not for execution, before a surgery unless the person is already this sick, and especially not before suicide), and only secondarily for physical healing. By your definition, we could all be anointed every day… We are all a little unhealthy, physically, mentally, and spiritually.
We too had this anointing at mass recently. Our pastor encouraged people to come up. He did not say anything to the effect that it was for people that are old, or terminally ill, etc. Who are we to go against what **our pastor ** tells us to do?

Everyone that felt the need to participate did so. Who are we to judge who **really **needs to be anointed or not?
We can at least judge for ourselves about ourselves. If we aren’t in danger of death from illness, we should not approach the sacrament.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top