Reconciling Genesis with God’s World

[TMC]

I get to decide and trust Catholic Answers.

I guess that’s your decision to make. I will stick with the Church’s official documents.

 

[Dovekin]

the Church does not teach that the universe is merely thousands of years old.

The Church has not decided.

Why are the two of you acting as if you disagree?

If the Church has not decided what the age of the universe is, then the Church does not teach what the age of the universe is.

 

[EndTimes]

He self identifies as agnostic. I think he gave himself 7 out of 8 on a scale in reference to God’s existence

Actually, he speaks different stories… and never corrects any of his fawning followers who see him and his writings as - in their minds - being the pop-epitome of Atheism - AntiChristian…

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

He self identifies as agnostic. I think he gave himself 7 out of 8 on a scale in reference to God’s existence

Actually, he speaks different stories… and never corrects any of his fawning followers who see him and his writings as - in their minds - being the pop-epitome of Atheism - AntiChristian…

Anti fundamentalist would be more accurate. Those who deny evolution for example. So you’d be included.

 

[EndTimes]

Anti fundamentalist would be more accurate. Those who deny evolution for example. So you’d be included.

No…

Evolution has many definitions . the most basic = change…

Some who promote false theories of “evolution” are antiChristian, pro-scientism, Darwinists

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

Anti fundamentalist would be more accurate. Those who deny evolution for example. So you’d be included.

No…

Evolution has many definitions . the most basic = change…

Some who promote false theories of “evolution” are antiChristian, pro-scientism, Darwinists

I’m sure they are.

 

[EndTimes]

I’m sure they are.

Yes… And if they remain unrepentant - they’ll miss out on Salvation

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

I’m sure they are.

Yes… And if they remain unrepentant - they’ll miss out on Salvation

I’m sure they will.

 

[EndTimes]

I’m sure they will.

And those who do shan’t be happy - to say the least

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

I’m sure they will.

And those who do shan’t be happy - to say the least

I’m sure they won’t.

 

[EndTimes]

I’m sure they won’t.

You know why, therefore?

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

I’m sure they won’t.

You know why, therefore?

I’m sure I do.

 

[EndTimes]

I’m sure I do.

Ah… a side-step … which avoids .?

not unanticipated for reason of what a forthright answer to my question would reveal…?

)

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

I’m sure I do.

Ah… a side-step … which avoids .?

not unanticipated for reason of what a forthright answer to my question would reveal…?

)

You already told me. Post 87 I think.

 

[EndTimes]

You already told me. Post 87 I think.

You think? Still, another side-step IMHO…

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

You already told me. Post 87 I think.

You think? Still, another side-step IMHO…

…they’ll miss out on Salvation

…

 

[EndTimes]

…

Another side-step…

 

[Freddy]

Freddy:

…

Another side-step…

Isn’t ‘missing out on salvation’ (which I quoted you saying) the correct answer?

How can I be wrong when I quote you directly…?

 

[IWantGod]

I’d love to hear People’s views

The only advise i can give you is that you should stop taking everything literally.

If the intention of the author was to give a literal cosmological history, then you have no choice but to consider it wrong. But did you have any justification for taking it literally in the first place?

The answer is no.