D
De_Maria
Guest
Yes, it is. In Catholic Teaching, one is “justified” in the Sacrament of Baptism. Rom 2:13 is about who is justified. Baptism is only imparted upon those who keep the Commamdments.
Lol! How is it that the Sacraments could have developed in the middle ages, when they can be explicitly traced to the New Testament Scriptures? I know you won’t deny that Jesus Christ established Baptism? Will you?De_Maria:![]()
So I’ve been reading about the Sacraments. I doubt very seriously that Paul was describing anything other than a internal faith in Christ. Apparently, modern Sacramental theology was developed by Scholastic Theologians in the middle ages.He’s describing the Sacraments.
On the contrary, he’s the one we’ve discussing. He wrote Romans 2:13. He wrote Romans 6:4 and Titus 3:5.If you had asked Paul about the seven sacraments he wouldn’t have had any idea what you are talking about.
Hm? You mean when the word “Sacrament” was coined. But before the word Sacrament was coined, the Sacraments were already being practiced.Peter Lombard changed the definition of a Sacrament from Augustine’s “An outward sign of an inner grace” to mean not only a sign of grace but a cause of Grace in The Sentences. Lombard also set the number of Sacraments at seven. (Augustine identified over 300 Sacraments).
It still is. We still speak of the Church as the Sacrament of union. There are many Sacraments and sacramentals. But these seven Sacraments are the mysteries through which God works to pour grace out on our souls, directly.When sacraments first started being discussed as “Divine Mysteries” pretty much anything “Set apart as holy” was considered a sacrament. Even the earth itself was described as a sacrament as it showed the Glory and majesty of God’s creation.
That is what is called the “development” of Doctrine. It is addressed by Jesus when He says:It took a thousand years for the sacraments, as defined by the Catholic church, to be defined as we know them today.
Neh. The Church came to a deeper understanding of Christ’s truth.And the church actually changed the definition of a Sacrament when the scholastic Theologians all got on board with Peter Lombard’s opinions.
St. Paul would agree with the Catholic Church. Because St. Paul would submit to the Catholic Church. He would know that the Catholic Church is the vehicle which Jesus Christ established to bring His Truth to the world. And, he would also know that the Teaching of the Catholic Church today, is a deeper understanding of what he said in Apostolic times.So unless Paul could see 1000 years into the future and agreed with Peter Lombard then there is no way he was referring the sacraments when he is talking about faith.
Not today. Because there are no apostles alive with the special apostolic gift.Amen! But before we go further, do you agree that the Holy Spirit is given by the laying on of hands? Yes or no.
Well, in the early Church, a person isn’t going to get all the Papal encyclicals, the condemnations of heresies, the catechisms, or things like a completely worked-out doctrine of Christology, Trinity matters, or how the Sacraments work. In fact, we see throughout the History of the Church that a doctrine was not formally defined by the bishops in union with the Pope, in many regards, unless it had come under many and severe attacks by various heretical sects and leaders. Take Arianism, Nestorianism, Montanism, or Docetism for example. However, we believe that each and every one of the seven Sacraments was instituted by Our Lord. You cannot have a Sacrament unless it was instituted by Christ.Apparently, modern Sacramental theology was developed by Scholastic Theologians in the middle ages. If you had asked Paul about the seven sacraments he wouldn’t have had any idea what you are talking about.
I see. So, you don’t belive that this gift was passed down through the Church. Ok. We do. We believe that Jesus Christ passed down all His gifts through the Church.De_Maria:![]()
Not today. Because there are no apostles alive with the special apostolic gift.Amen! But before we go further, do you agree that the Holy Spirit is given by the laying on of hands? Yes or no.
Yes.I thought, that according to Catholic doctrine that someone is “born again”/indwelled by the Holy Spirit at Baptism???
I don’t know. But compare to the situation with St. Cornelius. He and his crew received the Holy Spirit BEFORE he was baptized.If that is the case then whey did the Holy Spirit wait until Paul laid hands on them for the Holy Spirit to come upon them?
The Indwelling? Yes. But what you are observing is a gift of the Holy Spirit. Speaking in tongues.Wouldn’t that have already happened in Baptism according to Catholic doctrine?
After reading a little about confirmation I’ve found that these are the effects of confirmation:
- An increased portion of the gifts of the Holy Spirit: wisdom, knowledge, right judgment, understanding, courage, piety, and fear of the Lord
- A deepening and strengthening of the grace received at Baptism, which is considered the presence of God in the soul
- A more intimate relationship with Jesus Christ
- A closer bond with the Catholic Church
- The ability to take a greater, more mature role in the Church’s mission of living the Christian faith daily and witnessing to Christ everywhere
- A special mark, or character, on the soul that can never be erased
I like that term. A power up of the Holy Spirit. I think you’re right.Basically, if I were using Video Game terms, Confirmation is a “power up” of the Holy Spirit and not the actual imparting of the Holy Spirit.
It is clear that it is the moment in which they received a gift of the Holy Spirit as evidence that it had happened. Yes.The Acts 19 passage can’t be confirmation because it is clear that that the laying of hands was the moment the Holy Spirit came upon the 12 men who were disciple of John.
I believe so, since we become Soldiers of Christ in Confirmation. But 1 Tim describes the Sacrament of Holy Orders.As far as 1 Timothy 4:13-14 it is clear that gift that was given the they laying on of hands was the gift of exhortation and teaching. Does everyone who goes through confirmation get the gift of exhortation and teaching?
Yes, that’s why so many had visible effects like speaking in tongues. But miracles are still given today and many reject them. Catholic Saints have continued to grace this world since the time of Jesus Christ:I also understand the God gave the Apostles special Spiritual gifts for the purpose of displaying the power of God to the 1 Century Church.
We don’t believe they ceased. They are not imparted as often, but they continue to this day. All you have to do is read the lives of the Saints and you’ll see the evidence of them. And, there are also books documenting the miracles which God has done for us throughout the ages.Laying on of hands to give the Holy Spirit or impart Spiritual Gifts was one of those special gifts that ceased at the death of the last apostle and probably actually ceased over the course of life of the apostles as they were no longer needed to establish the authenticity of the gospel message.
So in the very instant that person sins after having been baptized, (s)he is no longer sinless?A sinless person is one who’s ledger has been washed clean by the grace of God. That is what happens at Baptism.
I don’t believe the gifts have ceased. I believe the office of apostle has ceased and the special gifts given to the apostles only, have cease. After the apostles gift ceased, either at death or some point in their life when it was no longer necessary, then all the gifts of the Spirit come from a direct relationship with God and are not transferred by men.We don’t believe they ceased. They are not imparted as often, but they continue to this day.
You’re right about the office of the Apostles, but you’re not right about the gifts. After all didn’t Ananias lay hands on Paul and didn’t he receive the Holy Spirit?I believe the office of apostle has ceased and the special gifts given to the apostles only, have cease.
Do you want to rephrase?De_Maria:![]()
So in the very instant that person sins after having been baptized, (s)he is no longer sinless?A sinless person is one who’s ledger has been washed clean by the grace of God. That is what happens at Baptism.
We don’t believe the Apostles received any exclusive gifts except the opportunity to be the individuals selected by Jesus Christ, personally, to lead His Church.De_Maria:![]()
I don’t believe the gifts have ceased. I believe the office of apostle has ceased and the special gifts given to the apostles only, have cease. After the apostles gift ceased, either at death or some point in their life when it was no longer necessary, then all the gifts of the Spirit come from a direct relationship with God and are not transferred by men.We don’t believe they ceased. They are not imparted as often, but they continue to this day.
Ananias was a disciple who the Lord had a direct conversation with concerning Saul/Paul. I would say that qualifies as someone chosen by God. He wasn’t one of the 12 but he was chosen by God to do a specific work.fter all didn’t Ananias lay hands on Paul and didn’t he receive the Holy Spirit?
Signs, wonders, and mighty works 2 Cor 12:12. God gave the early Apostles (those called to do a specific task) the ability to do signs, wonders, and mighty works that identified them as true apostles.Which gifts do you believe were exclusive to the Apostles?
Then, since you don’t know what they are, you can’t be sure that those signs, wonders and mighty works aren’t the same ones Jesus is talking about here:Signs, wonders, and mighty works 2 Cor 12:12. God gave the early Apostles (those called to do a specific task) the ability to do signs, wonders, and mighty works that identified them as true apostles.
I’m not sure what all of those signs, wonders, and might works are
Acts 9:17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.but we see a few in scripture. I would say that the Holy Spirit being given by the laying on the hands was one of those signs.
But they weren’t all Apostles. And, does the Scripture say that God no longer inspires people? Any people? To write or to speak?I would also say that the Holy Spirit gave several early church leaders the ability to create “God-Breathed” writings. And that ability has passed as well.
Agreed… Only Purity / Pure Spirits can be in God’s Kingdom.For one thing Catholics believe in a final state of purification, in line with the scriptural concept that no sinners enter heaven. Meanwhile they must show themselves to be moved well forward on the righteousness, aka love, scheme of things, not engaging in the kinds of sin that leads to death and which constitute a turning away from God and love. The Protestant doctrines, on the other hand, of Sola Fide and imputed righteousness, create a fuzzy line between whether or not one is obligated to actual righteousness at all or not, whereas Catholicism maintains that we absolutely are even if “venial” sins are to be expected in this life.
No, why? Because this brings us back to the more substantial issue: if baptism does not make us sinless, at least any further than until the first sin committed after baptism, it follows that Christians can not make a claim to be without sin. Yet, we believe that we are justified through faith by the blood of Christ. Hence, simul justus et peccator is an adequate and factual description of our state of being. We are being covered by the righteousness of Christ, rather than being inherently righteous.Do you want to rephrase?
Indeed, there is no one on earth who is righteous, no one who does what is right and never sins. (Eccl. 7:20)