S
Sir_Knight
Guest
Maybe you should have recognized that earlier when you called took my words to literally.“Lesser of two evils” is just an expression.
Are you implying that most priest don’t put in a full day?Yeah. The priests should get off their arses and do it themselves.
I don’t know what kind of priests you have experience with but during the past 15 years I’ve been exposed to priests from three different parishes in three different states and I’ve observed them on the go from the time that they say early morning mass until late into the evening. This leads me to believe that that is the norm rather than the exception.
When you put in a 14-18 hour day 6-7 days a week, then you can begin finding fault with our priests – many, of whom, are greatly overworked but continue in the service of our Lord without complaint despite the being unjustly critized [sp] by those whom they are trying to serve.
That is your OPINION. In almost all cases EMHCs are ASKED to serve by their priests. If they are asked to function in this role, then the priest clearly does not think that they are being “abused”, as you put it.If it becomes absolutely necessary (as in, the only option), then fine. That’swhy they’re called extraordinary ministers. However, they’re almost universally abused.
Or are you implying that your OPINION in this matter is more qualified than that of a priest who has actual experience and training in these matters?
So you are saying that you are willing to address something that you see as a problem when it affects YOU but are not willing to address it when it doesn’t affect you? Please forgive me if I understand your comments incorrectly but that doesn’t sound very charitable of you (to only care about a “problem” when it affects only you) and seems to demonstarate the opposite behavior of what followers of Christ are called to.When I’m old and dying, I’ll be a priest, so I don’t really have to worry about EMHCs haunting me.