S
Sr_Judith_Ann
Guest
Thank you, JR. I found the distinction of solemn and simple vows very helpful. Although I have lived the vows all these years, I never understood the difference before. You made it very clear.With all due respect, whether religious in simple vows can retain ownership of money and other property depends on the statutes of the religious institute. However, the use is not allowed by canon law. The religious can give it to his favorite niece or charity without interference from the community, unless there is something to the contrary in the statutes of the community.
Religious institutes in solemn vows cannot authorize private ownership. There is the difference between simple and solemn vows of poverty. The religious make a legal commitment to give up all ownership, prior to making solemn vows.
There is also a difference between a simple and solemn vow of chastity. Religious in simple vows who attempt sacramental marriage are validly married, but the marriage is illicit. A religious in solemn vows who attempts marriage cannot effect a valid marriage. The solemn vow overrides the marriage vows. Both incur ecclesial penalties.
Finally, there is a difference between a simple vow of obedience and a solemn vow of obedience. A solemn vow of obedience is usually made to a rule. In other words, communities in solemn vows follow one of the five “ancient” rules of the Church. Communities in simple vows do not need a rule. They may have statutes that they refer to as their rule or by any other name. The difference is that these statutes can be changed by a general chapter of the congregation. The rule of an order cannot be changed except by the Holy See. This applies even to Secular Orders. There are many congregations that follow the rule of an order, such as active Dominicans, Franciscans, Carmelites, Benedictines and Augustinians.
Hope this helps.
Fraternally,
Br. JR, OSF