D
Dale_M
Guest
Just when it looked as if this tragic saga was coming to an end, it suddenly takes an errant turn.
As many may know, St. Stanislaus Kostka is a Catholic church in St. Louis. In 2003, the parishioners had a very public break with Archbishop Burke, who they feared wanted to close the parish. Because the church had an unusual incorporation, it was legally and financially independent of the archdiocese. Archbishop Burke wanted to change that, the parishioners refused.
Burke pulled the diocesan priests from the parish, and forbid any to say mass there. A few priests, secretly and episodically, did so anyways. Finally, a diocesan priest from the other side of the state abandoned his parish without approval of his bishop, and set up residence at St. Stanislaus, in defiance of Archbishop Burke.
Burke declared the parish and the priest to be in schism, and thus excommunicated. The Vatican eventually upheld the declaration of excommunication, and last year Pope Benedict formally laicized the priest.
But that hasn’t stopped him or his supporters.
Many of the original parishioners felt betrayed as the priest became increasingly heterodox. The church board had to be dissolved to prevent their opposition. Some parishioners began to leave, but those departures were replaced by other persons eager to embrace a Catholic church with non-orthodox views.
Its been a mess.
As many may know, St. Stanislaus Kostka is a Catholic church in St. Louis. In 2003, the parishioners had a very public break with Archbishop Burke, who they feared wanted to close the parish. Because the church had an unusual incorporation, it was legally and financially independent of the archdiocese. Archbishop Burke wanted to change that, the parishioners refused.
Burke pulled the diocesan priests from the parish, and forbid any to say mass there. A few priests, secretly and episodically, did so anyways. Finally, a diocesan priest from the other side of the state abandoned his parish without approval of his bishop, and set up residence at St. Stanislaus, in defiance of Archbishop Burke.
Burke declared the parish and the priest to be in schism, and thus excommunicated. The Vatican eventually upheld the declaration of excommunication, and last year Pope Benedict formally laicized the priest.
But that hasn’t stopped him or his supporters.
But one thing is clear: Last Sunday, parishioners rejected a proposed settlement that would have ended a lawsuit brought by the archdiocese and returned them to the archbishop’s good graces. Instead, they opted to yoke their church’s fate to the portly priest with thinning hair and a fashionable patch of whiskers just beneath his lower lip.
The vote nearly brought some parishioners to blows. Nevertheless, it is but the latest chapter in the extraordinary history of St. Stanislaus, a cause célèbre for those with progressive leanings in this deeply Catholic city by the river, and a source of scandal for traditionalists.
In the subsequent years, Mr. Bozek has become an increasingly vocal advocate for a more progressive Catholic church. In 2008 he presented parishioners with what he called his “vision,” which included the right of priests to marry, and that of women and homosexuals to become priests.
nytimes.com/2010/08/14/us/14church.html?_r=1&src=me&ref=general“He has opened our eyes,” said Melissa Kirkiewicz, 35. “His vision is what we perceive as the future of the church. He’s going in the direction I want to go as a Catholic.”
Many of the original parishioners felt betrayed as the priest became increasingly heterodox. The church board had to be dissolved to prevent their opposition. Some parishioners began to leave, but those departures were replaced by other persons eager to embrace a Catholic church with non-orthodox views.
Its been a mess.