Rep. JIm Bridenstine denied access to immgrant children

  • Thread starter Thread starter OrdinaryMelkite
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

OrdinaryMelkite

Guest
washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/2/rep-jim-bridenstine-denied-access-child-immigrant-/
"Any Member of Congress should have the legal authority to visit a federal youth detention facility without waiting three weeks,” Mr. Bridenstine said in the release. “What are they trying to hide? Do they not want the children to speak with Members of Congress? As a Navy pilot, I have been involved in operations countering illicit human trafficking. I would like to know to whom these children are being released.”
This is so weird.

What could possibly be the matter?

Discuss.
 
I am not surprised, especially if he is a Republican. I believe the entire recent migration influx was orchestrated by the current administration.
 
The Cloward-Pivens strategy comes to mind in regard to this immigration thing.
 
I am not surprised, especially if he is a Republican. I believe the entire recent migration influx was orchestrated by the current administration.
How else can one explain the sudden influx of not hundreds, not thousands, but 10’s of thousands of ‘unaccompanied’ children?
It seems almost as if the American public is being mocked by this administration, and I have noticed such in articles that seem at first glance to be revealing something, but the tone is tongue in cheek. Kind of like a, “ha ha, take that” tone.

God bless.
 
I just got an e-mail from Allen West suggesting that the government is making sure doctors and nurses at those camps (nice little deal, huh?) are keeping quiet because a lot of these poor kids are sick.

What is also is sick is how the “caring and compassionate” left-wing government of the United States is handling this.

What a joke!
 
How else can one explain the sudden influx of not hundreds, not thousands, but 10’s of thousands of ‘unaccompanied’ children?
It seems almost as if the American public is being mocked by this administration, and I have noticed such in articles that seem at first glance to be revealing something, but the tone is tongue in cheek. Kind of like a, “ha ha, take that” tone.

God bless.
On some level, the American public deserves such ridcule and criticism, just not at the expense of these kids.

What about:

War on women?

Legitimate rape?

Obama = First-second Black, first Asian, first gay President?

Immigration Reform?

GLBTQ family member “marrying” someone of the same sex?

Farm subsidies?

“Puttin y’all back in CHAINS!!!”

“We CARE!”

“Help the POOR!”

“Hi, I’m Catholic. May I vote Democrat because (insert selfish reason here)?”

“Auntie M! Auntie M! It’s a twister! It’s a twister!”​

My, my how EASILY we forget!
 
On some level, the American public deserves such ridcule and criticism, just not at the expense of these kids.

What about:

War on women? Mantra of the left.

Legitimate rape? One republican said that, and what he meant (allegedly) is actual rape rather than a woman claiming she was raped after making a bad decision, committing adultery, etc. (I actually have known a few to have done such). Still, his wording was extremely poor and detrimental to rape victims.

Obama = First-second Black, first Asian, first gay President? Muslim, communist, ad nauseum. Personally, I think he just may be a puppet.🤷

Immigration Reform? Something needs to be done. If I lived in one of those places, I perhaps would risk life and limb to save life and limb. Maybe.

GLBTQ family member “marrying” someone of the same sex? ???

Farm subsidies? Don’t know much about that subject. Is it like the taxation of rainwater that falls on a property owner’s land?:confused:

“Puttin y’all back in CHAINS!!!” I barely recall the whole incident, but I think the person was saying in effect, creating a dependent social class that won’t be able to make it should the government pull the rug out from under them. In that aspect, many of us, regardless of race will be put in chains.

“We CARE!” I do care. Give a man a fish…

“Help the POOR!” Within reason. Also, it is hard to watch a child suffer for the poor choices of the parent.

“Hi, I’m Catholic. May I vote Democrat because (insert selfish reason here)?” People have said I became Catholic because I like the teachings and they fit my ideals. I love the teachings, but no, they are not easy and comfortable. Who wants to go to Reconciliation and admit the wrong they’ve done? Who wants to give up their favorite sin? I can’t vote Democrat on most issues, but have seen many who do on ‘false’ compassion.

“Auntie M! Auntie M! It’s a twister! It’s a twister!” We’re not in Kansas anymore

My, my how EASILY we forget!
All the above bolded is my response to the topics.

God bless.
👍
 
How else can one explain the sudden influx of not hundreds, not thousands, but 10’s of thousands of ‘unaccompanied’ children?
It seems almost as if the American public is being mocked by this administration, and I have noticed such in articles that seem at first glance to be revealing something, but the tone is tongue in cheek. Kind of like a, “ha ha, take that” tone.

God bless.
Common sense tells us that Obama is behind this onslaught of children illegally crossing the border. But we have evidence. On January 29th, the Feds placed an ad in FedBizOpps for escorts for 65,000 children who, at that time, had not yet arrived in America. It is clear to me that Obama is practicing the Cloward and Piven strategy of overwhelming and breaking the system. Rob :sad_yes:

OF COURSE the Feds don’t want a man of honor such as Jim Bridenstine to access the base and report on all the horrors. They can’t put a gag order on a congressman.
 
How else can one explain the sudden influx of not hundreds, not thousands, but 10’s of thousands of ‘unaccompanied’ children?
It seems almost as if the American public is being mocked by this administration, and I have noticed such in articles that seem at first glance to be revealing something, but the tone is tongue in cheek. Kind of like a, “ha ha, take that” tone.

God bless.
This has been a long time coming, and its the fault of politicans on both sides for failing te follow and enforce immigration laws, as well as talking up ‘immigration reform’ as a code word for amnesty.

Administrations from both parties have tolerated the undermining of immigration laws by various states, taking no action in the face of sanctuary policies, refusal to identify illegal immigrants etc. etc. etc.

This is not the result of a single administration, but simply the logical progression of lawlessness.
 
This has been a long time coming, and its the fault of politicans on both sides for failing te follow and enforce immigration laws, as well as talking up ‘immigration reform’ as a code word for amnesty.

Administrations from both parties have tolerated the undermining of immigration laws by various states, taking no action in the face of sanctuary policies, refusal to identify illegal immigrants etc. etc. etc.

This is not the result of a single administration, but simply the logical progression of lawlessness.
I agree with most of what you say, except for the fact that the blame for this sudden rush of underage kids lies squarely at the feet of Barack Obama.
 
I agree with most of what you say, except for the fact that the blame for this sudden rush of underage kids lies squarely at the feet of Barack Obama.
And it does seem organized and well orchestrated.

How many of these children have illnesses that our children are immunized against?
In case studies, those immunizations have progressively grown weaker over the course of the vaccinated person’s life (why they are recommending that people be re-vaccinated for some of the illnesses), and with exposure, people will be at great risk.

Though I think I would risk life and limb to get to a safer place for my family (speaking of the reason many say they flee to America), I feel more strongly that I would want my homeland to be a safe haven.

God bless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top