P
puer.dei
Guest
“We believe that Rep. Ted Yoho’s recent actions and words as reported in the media are not reflective of the ethical standards expected of members of our Board of Directors,” the organization wrote in a statement.
The corroborating observer of the situation does not help his claim.He denies the conversation went the way AOC claims so it’s a matter of who is more believable, who has more credibility.
There was a witness.Ready to destroy a man’s life for something that did not happen.
The corroborating observer of the situation does not help his claim.
There was a witness.
It sounds as though the reporter didn’t really hear everything.who overheard the initial remarks
It is totally believable. It is also believable that a person would lie for political purpose. In my opinion, it is most believable that something said was heard wrong. This is the majority of my misunderstandings.It’s totally believable.
AOC never said she heard what was said, as far as I know. She is just repeating what the reporter said.No, there is no audio. Just a he said/she said. AOC isn’t known for being the brightest bulb in that chamber. She also is known as being fairly dramatic when it suits her purpose. Seriously, one day she is owning the title she claims Rep Yoho gave her all over Instagram, the next she is all offended.
Isn’t is “he said / they said?” What about that witness?No, there is no audio. Just a he said/she said…
What happened to this accusation then? If AOC is so credible why isn’t this all over the news also? It’s notable that Rep Williams didn’t call out Rep Yoho for his language if he did use the language AOC claims.“I never spoke to Rep. Yoho before he decided to accost me on the steps of the nation’s Capitol yesterday,” she said. “Believe it or not, I usually get along fine w/ my GOP colleagues. We know how to check our legislative sparring at the committee door. But hey, “b-----s” get stuff done.”
Ocasio-Cortez also accused Texas Republican Rep. Roger Williams of “yelling at me too, about ‘throwing urine.’” Williams’ communications director Heather Douglass disputed that claim.
“The Congressman did not participate in the exchange between Congressman Yoho and Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez, nor did he hear what was said in their conversation,” she said. "Any comments overheard or attributed to Congressman Williams were part of a separate conversation that he and Congressman Yoho were having. Congressman Williams would have immediately condemned that type of language towards any colleague."
That’s why he resigned?There they go again. Ready to destroy a man’s life for something that did not happen.
He denies the conversation went the way AOC claims so it’s a matter of who is more believable, who has more credibility.
Assuming motive is always dicey. That is why the catechism tells us we have to avoid rash judgement by always assuming the best motives in others. The truth in a matter of political mud-slinging is not as important as perception, and splatter can hit unintended targets.That’s why he resigned?
Was she there? I may have missed that part.Williams’ communications director Heather Douglass disputed that claim.
He was asked to resign and acquiesced.That’s why he resigned?
Is this a new standard? Is it a standard for all spokespeople or just for Republican spokespeople? Rep Williams apparently told his communications director and she released a statement.Was she there? I may have missed that part
I’ve heard of folks refusing to resign and opting for addressing the allegations. That did not happen in this instance.He was asked to resign and acquiesced.