I am skeptical. Not saying he can’t be guilty, and not saying this is definitive proof of anything, but I do recall reading an article by I think George Weigel when Pell was accused and he fiercely defended Cardinal Pell as a man of honor and integrity. Again, anyone can be duped into blindness in regards to the criminal activity/deviancy of a friend, but George Weigel’s opinion, the original dubiousness of the accusations before the gag order, and the lack of any contemporary accusations make me a bit skeptical. I would just like to actually see the full story/evidence.