Republican convention

  • Thread starter Thread starter bellasbane
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Simple, forthright, no Greek columns or rock-concert lighting tricks.

I loved it. Especially that last line.

The best thing any President can do to help our families is GET THE GOVERNMENT DOWNSIZED OUT OF OUR LIVES!!!
 
Isn’t that hilarious…Romney the extremist! We wish he were a little MORE extreme sometimes. I think it’s clear that his speech was not aimed at the base but to counter these very arguments before the Democrats really make the push about Romney the Right Wingnut which is laughable to those who know him and will be unpersuasive to those who are just getting acquainted. He did look pretty scary holding the grandchild…

I totally agree with you and Scott regarding Clint Eastwood. He was engaging and got people listening. Clearly his point was that words can inspire but action is what matters.
The howling from the Left indicates he made his point.

Lisa
The only people who promote the “Romeny is not pro-life” line are Catholic democrats desperately trying to rationalize their votes for evil. On CAF we see all these posts telling us we have been duped and Romeny is pro-abortion, On TV we see ad after ad from Obama and pro-abortion groups telling us he is a pro-life extremist.
 
I am not voting for Father/Husband of the Year. His business experience impresses me, but he didn’t talk about it much.
Did you read the quote? I asked if any of it resonated with you…none of it was about his fatherhood or marriage. I’m guessing you just tuned it out as he said it too? :confused:
 
I am not voting for Father/Husband of the Year. His business experience impresses me, but he didn’t talk about it much.
He didn’t have to. His RESULTS speak for themselves. What do you prefer Scott, someone who talks about all the things he is GOING to do or someone who has actually DONE them, who has a proven track record of success in every endeavor?

As Ann Romney stated, this man will not fail. Who knows him better?

Further the rest of the Convention line up spoke to Mitt Romney’s experience and more important his success, his integrity, his determination to actually, point by point, fulfill each campaign promise.

It sounds as if you prefer the Braggart in Chief with his many utopian dreams to someone with an actual track record.

Lisa
 
I totally agree with you and Scott regarding Clint Eastwood. He was engaging and got people listening. Clearly his point was that words can inspire but action is what matters.
The howling from the Left indicates he made his point.

Lisa
He didn’t seem confused at times to you- like he forgot what he was going to say.

Some of his points didn’t sound “tangled” to you.

I haved worked with the impaired elderly for a long time and this is pretty common.

He basically sucked the energy out of the room. Just be honest.
 
He didn’t seem confused at times to you- like he forgot what he was going to say.

Some of his points didn’t sound “tangled” to you.

I haved worked with the impaired elderly for a long time and this is pretty common.

He basically sucked the energy out of the room. Just be honest.
Honest? He had people laughing at his jokes and cheering. How do you honestly describe that as “sucking energy out of the room?” 🤷
 
As Ann Romney stated, this man will not fail. Who knows him better?
You believe that Romney’s wife, knowing him personally, can accurately gauge that he would be an effective president?

My wife loves me deeply and things the world of my competence. She tends to believe I will be successful at what ever I attempt- still, despite her assurance, I can be unsuccessful in my attempts to piece together a more complicated household bric-o-brac.
 
Honest? He had people laughing at his jokes and cheering. How do you honestly describe that as “sucking energy out of the room?” 🤷
If you can’t be honest here. It was a strained speech. Ann Romney addtted as much.

Everyone who is honest would admit this. I would admit certainly admit it if a similar speech were given at the DNC.

Lisa- I know won’t admit such things, but I do believe you can Rig.

Is Eastwoods speech really that big of a deal- no, not really.
 
If you can’t be honest here. It was a strained speech. Ann Romney addtted as much.

Everyone who is honest would admit this. I would admit certainly admit it if a similar speech were given at the DNC.

Lisa- I know won’t admit such things, but I do believe you can Rig.

Is Eastwoods speech really that big of a deal- no, not really.
I agree that it wasn’t a big deal, and yet the Dems are making it a big deal. It was comic relief mixed with jabs at the president. Some of his hesitation was intentional, because he was pretending to ask the empty chair what he was saying. Some of the hesitation/strain was due to his age, which Dems don’t seem to want to give him a break about.

My boss, the one who will be paying me $1,000 when Romney wins, agrees. He is what I would call an honest Democrat.
 
Did you read the quote? I asked if any of it resonated with you…none of it was about his fatherhood or marriage. I’m guessing you just tuned it out as he said it too? :confused:
I watched the whole thing with my wife. I am not saying anything negative about Romney, per se, just that nothing glaring stood out. I thought Ryan hit it out of the park, and Rubio was fantastic…even though he gaffed in the last couple of sentences. Now, I get that he is painting the picture that he is a good guy to vote FOR, rather than just a vote against Obama. GOod strategy, and I like his “all of the above” energy message.
 
I agree that it wasn’t a big deal, and yet the Dems are making it a big deal. It was comic relief mixed with jabs at the president. Some of his hesitation was intentional, because he was pretending to ask the empty chair what he was saying. Some of the hesitation/strain was due to his age, which Dems don’t seem to want to give him a break about.

My boss, the one who will be paying me $1,000 when Romney wins, agrees. He is what I would call an honest Democrat.
People who want to be mean are jerks. Yes, it’s small beans. You will see me be the first one to admit weirdness if I see it in the DNC.

I’m just being honest here. It was an odd speech. A fumble for the planners of the event.
 
Honest? He had people laughing at his jokes and cheering. How do you honestly describe that as “sucking energy out of the room?” 🤷
Eastwood was great. Yes, his age is showing. GIve the guy a break, he’s 82. But, his comments on Biden being the intellectual powerhouse of the DNC and that he is “kind of a grin with a body behind it” were funny. And telling “empty chair Obama” to “no, you shut up, its my turn”. The best line of the night from any speaker was “When someone isn’t getting the job done, you gotta let him go.”
 
If you can’t be honest here. It was a strained speech. Ann Romney addtted as much.

Everyone who is honest would admit this. I would admit certainly admit it if a similar speech were given at the DNC.

Lisa- I know won’t admit such things, but I do believe you can Rig.

Is Eastwoods speech really that big of a deal- no, not really.
Clint Eastwood wasn’t there to give a speech. He was there to be Clint Eastwood. The man is an entertainer. He entertained. Like many entertainers who use politics as their subject, the truth of his statements was the genesis of the humor.

Yes the man is elderly, but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t entertaining nor was his presentation ineffective. You wouldn’t have found it funny since his statements spoke against your candidate and your philosophy. I don’t find Bill Maher or Ed Schulz funny either. Does that mean you’re “right” and I’m wrong? No it means we have different perspectives.

Lisa
 
People who want to be mean are jerks. Yes, it’s small beans. You will see me be the first one to admit weirdness if I see it in the DNC.

I’m just being honest here. It was an odd speech. A fumble for the planners of the event.
It wasn’t a fumble at all. He was a big name draw to get the crowd woken up and ready for Rubio, who was fantastic, and ROmney, who made the case that he is just as nice of a guy and just as dependable a family man as Obama. Now, we can look at their records. A vote for Obama is a vote for the nanny state. A vote for Romney is a vote for personal liberty. THe distinction is clear.
 
Clint Eastwood wasn’t there to give a speech. He was there to be Clint Eastwood. The man is an entertainer. He entertained. Like many entertainers who use politics as their subject, the truth of his statements was the genesis of the humor.

Yes the man is elderly, but that doesn’t mean he wasn’t entertaining nor was his presentation ineffective. You wouldn’t have found it funny since his statements spoke against your candidate and your philosophy. I don’t find Bill Maher or Ed Schulz funny either. Does that mean you’re “right” and I’m wrong? No it means we have different perspectives.

Lisa
At least CLint Eastwood was funny without being profane or derogatory.
 
As the saying goes, I resemble that remark. It frankly fries my cheese to hear people playing modern day Jobs
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl: I do so look forward to your posts every morning. 🙂
curse God and die…complaining and whining and wailing that the perfect candidate with the perfect and consistent record of XY or Z does not exist. Therefore they will take their toys and go home.
I grew up with atheist, pro abortion, anti-religious parents. Although I never had an abortion there is absolutely no doubt that in my early life I would not have thought twice about having an abortion. It was no more meaningful to me than removing a boil.
The Holy Spirit is a powerful Force. I am now a Mass going and devoted Pro Life Catholic. I** RESENT the implication **that no one can change their heart and mind about this hideous and evil practice. I also believe Mitt Romney’s heart has changed. If he ever actually WERE pro-choice, then I also believe he is not of this mind anymore.
👍 Truly 👍
The people who are making these grand accusations (doesn’t our faith allow repentence and forgiveness or was I thinking about some other Catholic religion?) refer to rather vague statements ten years ago.
No matter how often people counter this with fact after fact after fact about Romney’s ACTIONS WHILE IN OFFICE, they revert back to a statement made a decade ago as if this were determinative.
Honestly Ishii I don’t know how you have the patience to explain over and over again. I wouldn’t bother since some are so invested in their anti-Romney crusade that the facts simply don’t matter.
Lisa once pro abortion rights now pro life and I am NOT changing
YOWZA! 🙂
 
Finally watched Romney’s speech…a home run IMNSHO. Well written, well delivered and I agree with every word of it.

Regarding Cardinal Dolan’s benediction. I hope he uses the same prayer, word-for-word, with the exception of the candidate’s names. He touched on everything important - our freedoms including religious freedom, the unborn to the elderly, marriage and family, immigrants past and present, our military, the poor and less fortunate, etc. It was an excellent, non-partisan benediction. Many Democrats will hate it, of course, but I don’t see a reason for him to tailor the speech any differently. He was praying for America.
I have thought about this too. I came to the conclusion that he shouldn’t change his prayer at the DNC at all. What he said was Truth.

I really admire Cardinal Dolan bringing his faith to the public square, not hiding in his mansion. Did you see his interview with Schieffer?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top